Elementary Particles and Space-Time Curvature

1. Preliminaries

Throughout this article, when referring to Matter, Energy also applies.

For clarity and conciseness, I will employ the term "particles" to denote housing for charges.

I will not distinguish between left-handed and right-handed particles; when I must choose a process, I will choose the one that happens.

The Universe often follows an unwritten rule: "Occam Razor Rule," which shows a preference for the simpler route. The "Occam Razor Rule" solution must conform to actual observations. (It does not always work – in which case I use a more elaborate solution.)

2. Limits

Space-time has built-in limits.

To understand the source of the limits, I examined the following two physical laws (stated as principles):

Uniformity of Physical Laws in the Universe Principle:

Each physical law is the same throughout the Cosmos.

The “Uniformity of Physical Laws in the Universe Principle” is a fundamental tenet in physics and forms the foundation of our understanding of the Cosmos.

All experiments and observations conducted on Earth thus far have consistently upheld this principle. Moreover, additional evidence gathered from distant galaxies further supports the validity of this principle across the vast reaches of the Universe, leading us to accept its validity throughout the Cosmos [1].

Based on many observations, we conclude that Energy is conserved in closed systems.

Energy Conservation Principle:

Energy is conserved in a closed system.

No known physical phenomenon or process has ever contradicted the "Energy Conservation Principle."

Applying the "Uniformity of Physical Laws in the Universe Principle" to the "Energy Conservation Principle" leads us to deduce that Energy conservation is a universal characteristic of closed systems, including the Universe as a whole.

Consequently, we can infer that the total amount of Energy in the Cosmos is constant.

Since our Universe has a fixed amount of Energy, it cannot contain infinite Energy in any given region. This conclusion is a very fundamental quality of our Cosmos and leads to limits in our Universe.

Remark: The only way to guarantee that no region in the Cosmos has infinite Energy under any circumstances is to ensure that even a point in space-time cannot have infinite Energy density.

If there is no infinite Energy anywhere in the Universe, then no Universe part can travel at infinite speeds because infinite speeds require infinite Energy.

Thus, all Universe parts must have a speed limit of influence propagation, movement, or change.

We never observed any Universe part that moves at speeds higher than the speed of light. Therefore, we deduce that the highest possible influence propagation speed, a Universe part’s speed, or a Universe part’s speed of change, is the speed of light, marked as "c" [m].

Maximal Speed Principle:

Nothing in our Cosmos propagates, changes, or moves faster than the speed of light.

If there were an infinite speed of influence propagation or movement in our Universe, we would get instant reactions to all processes all over the Universe. We would get a completely Uniform Universe. Our Universe is not completely uniform, corroborating the "Maximal Speed Principle."

This result leads to another important principle:

A Universe part cannot influence "almost instantly" any part of the Universe that is not its immediate neighbor. Otherwise, there was a possibility of influencing a very far Universe part in a way that violates the "Maximal Speed Principle."

Therefore, a Universe part can only "almost instantly" influence the Universe parts in its immediate neighborhood.

Note: combining physics and mathematics converts "almost instantly" into infinitesimally close.

The Locality Principle:

Universe parts can only influence Universe parts that are immediately in their neighborhood.

There is a third consequence - a new and fundamental limit:

The Universe cannot compress Energy indefinitely because I have shown that there is no infinite Energy anywhere in the Universe (not even the possibility of infinite Energy density at a point). This restriction leads us to conclude that a state of Matter with a maximum density MUST exist.

I name this state of maximum Matter density "Dachus" (derived from the Hebrew word for compressed.) I use the term "Dachus density" to denote this maximal density.

Maximal Density Principle:

Nothing in our Cosmos has a density greater than Dachus’ density.

I denote Dachus density by ${\rho }_D \left[Kg{m}^{-3}\right]$. (I will calculate its value later.)

Question: Where can we find Dachus density in the Universe?

We should look at extreme places where attraction forces are mighty.

In this context, I investigated what happens Inside a black hole.

Continual compression of Matter within a black hole ultimately compresses its Matter until it reaches Dachus density within a non-zero volume in the center of the black hole. As the Matter inside the black hole compresses to its maximum degree, any further compression only contributes to the expansion of the black hole’s core size, which maintains its Dachus state.

Remark: The concept of a black hole without a singularity challenges some calculations by esteemed physicists who predict singularities at the core of black holes. However, it is important to note that these calculations, which suggest the existence of singularities within black holes as a mathematical necessity, did not consider the presence of an upper limit for Matter density. Consequently, the conclusion that geodesics inside a black hole converge in a singularity is invalid.

3. Quantum Black Holes

Dachus state occurs in the core of any black hole composed of one body.

The Kerr-Newman solution describes a rotating, electrically charged black hole [2].

I will continue by examining the smallest black holes that have a profound physical meaning:

Quantum Black Hole Definition:

A "Quantum black hole" is a relativistically fast rotating, charged, miniature black hole whose core composes the entire black hole.

Going forward, I will use " QBH " as an abbreviation for a Quantum black hole.

By miniature, I refer to sizes in the order of $1·{10}^{-56}\left[\mathrm{m}\right]$ and less.

QBH (quantum black hole) is slightly oblated as it rotates relativistically fast, but this minor deformity does not affect my calculations in this article.

I will use "Naked core" to refer to a black hole composed of a single core (without two horizons.) QBH is a naked core, as I will prove through calculations.

Question: Is there a single value to Dachus density?

Like the maximal speed has one value, there is one value for the maximal density. In the Dachus state, there is absolutely no room for additional contraction. In this state, all Energy squeezes to the same limit of Dachus density.

Energy represents both the substance of the Cosmos and embodies the ability to cause changes in the Cosmos.

Energy composes everything in our Universe.

The Completeness Principle:

Energy and nothing but Energy composes the Cosmos.

Therefore, in Dachus state, QBHs compress charges (composed of Energy according to the “Completeness Principe”) to the highest possible degree.

Even though there is a single Dachus density, different QBHs have charges with different quantities and, therefore, different radii.

Following the Kerr-Newman metric, I present an adaptation to include all charges:

Equation 1Quadratic QBH radius

$${\left(r_{QBH}\right)}^2-\frac{2·M_{QBH}·G}{c^2}{r}_{QBH}+a^2+\sum \frac{C_i·e^2·G·{\left(\#units of charge q_i\right)}^2}{c^4}$$

Where $r_{QBH}$ is the $QBH$ radius, $C_i$ is the force coefficient of the non-gravitational charge $q_i$, “i” = E – electric, W – weak, Q -quarkic (also known as color or strong.)

For a solid sphere rotating relativistically $J=\frac{3}{4}Mc{r}_{QBH}$ [3] under the limit $\omega r<c$. $a=\frac{J}{MC}$ .

Equation 2 QBH Dachus core radius (first version)

$$r_{QBH\pm }=\frac{\frac{2·M_{QBH}·G}{c^2}\pm \sqrt{{\left(\frac{2·M_{QBH}·G}{c^2}\right)}^2-4·\frac{25}{16}·\left(\frac{e^2·G}{c^4}\right)·\sum C_i·{\left(\#units of charge q_i\right)}^2}}{\frac{50}{16}}$$

When using the “real charges” numbers, the root for QBHs is always imaginary (as I will show through calculations later,) and we get a naked core as in the definition of a QBH:

$$r_{QBH}= \frac{16·M_{QBH}·G}{25c^2}$$

Equation 3 QBH Mass, density, and radius

$$M_{QBH}=\frac{4\pi {\rho }_D·{\left(r_{QBH}\right)}^3}{3}, {\rho }_D=\mathrm{}\frac{3M_{QBH}}{4\pi {·\left(r_{QBH}\right)}^3}, {r_{QBH}=\mathrm{}\left(\frac{3M_{QBH}}{4\pi {\rho }_D}\right)}^{\frac{1}{3}}$$

Interestingly, since there is only one Dachus density, when comparing the radius in these two different equations, we get a restriction on the QBH Mass: ${M_{QBH}}^2= \frac{\mathrm{46,875}{c}^6}{\mathrm{16,384}\pi {\rho }_D{G}^3}$, which is the quantization of the gravitational charge! (Note: this calculation does not show the influences of the different charges within the QBH, as I will discuss in the paragraph: “Charges and their influence on space-time curvature.”)

4. Elementary Particles Must Be QBHs

We know that elementary particles have quantized charges, and very small dimensions [4].

Therefore, we must look for physical structures that keep the quantization of charges and are small enough to house elementary particles.

Let us look at what happens to Energy added to a QBH:

Suppose an uncertainty-related Energy emerges within the QBH, including its border - which are always at Dachus state.

We must remember that the Universal physical limits we listed, the speed of light, and the maximal Matter density cannot be circumnavigated – they hold at every possible physical phenomenon.

Therefore, no amount of Energy will make Matter move at the speed of light or higher, and no amount of Energy will squeeze Matter and Energy further than the Dachus state.

Thus, when uncertainty-related Energy emerges within a QBH up to and including its border, the Matter density there cannot increase. Therefore, the uncertainty-related Energy exits the QBH swiftly.

Outside the QBH, when Energy contacts the QBH, the QBH’s strong and very relativistic centrifugal force deflects any such Energy.

If no additional (to existing) Energy can become a permanent part of the QBH and being a black hole, it cannot lose charges. I found what I sought: a tiny structure that always keeps its existing quantized angular momentum and charges.

As there are no other candidates besides QBHs for elementary particles, I conclude that QBHs are the only structures in space-time that are elementary particles.

5. Quarks and Leptons as QBH?

It is common practice that quarks and leptons are elementary particles.

Therefore, as elementary particles, quarks and leptons should be QBHs.

Using the QBH radius equation, I calculated the radii of all quarks and leptons: [5]

Table 1. Calculated radii of quarks and leptons as QBHs.

*Neutrinos masses values are not certain (I used $\sum m_{\nu }=0.12 \left[eV\right]$ and results I discovered later in the chapter “RishonisL,” which yields the appropriate NH.) [7].

Table 1. Calculated radii of quarks and leptons as QBHs.

*Neutrinos masses values are not certain (I used $\sum m_{\nu }=0.12 \left[eV\right]$ and results I discovered later in the chapter “RishonisL,” which yields the appropriate NH.) [7].

We know that the maximal radius of an “Up” quark is $4.3·{10}^{-19} \left[m\right]$. [8]

We also know the upper limit for the electron radius is ${10}^{-22}\left[m\right]$ [9]

Discussion: Empirical observations of quarks and leptons’ radii vastly exceed the magnitude observed if they were indeed elementary particles.

The apparent discrepancy in size is too significant to ignore.

Therefore, because the only miniature structure that keeps quantization of Energy and charges for elementary particles is a QBH, I MUST conclude that quarks and leptons are NOT elementary particles.

Note: Quarks and leptons still exist and compose particles like protons and neutrons. The SM is very successful but imperfect: It has infinities corrected by mathematical procedures; it does not include gravity. It cannot explain dark Matter, Mass of elementary particles, quantization of elementary particles, size of elementary particles, neutrino oscillations, and more. This article explains and solves many of these problems:

6. Rishonis

I name the real (new) elementary particles (QBHs) that compose quarks and leptons: “Rishonis.” The singular is “Rishoni” (from the Hebrew word “Rishoni,” which means first one.)

Naming:

Rishonis who build quarks: “RishonisQ.”

RishoniQ with a negative electric charge “NegativiumQ.” Plural form: “NegativiumsQ.”

RishoniQ with a positive electric charge: “PositiviumQ.” Plural form: “PositiviumsQ.”

Rishonis who build leptons: “RishonisL.”

RishoniL with a negative electric charge: “NegativiumL.” Plural form: “NegativiumsL.”

RishoniL with a positive electric charge: “PositiviumL.” Plural form: “PositiviumsL.”

All RishonisQ and RishonisL share the same Dachus density but have different compositions of charges.

Protons, neutrons, electrons, and their composing quarks and leptons - all have the same spin: $\frac{\hslash }{2}$. Rishonis spin may well be of the same value as quarks and leptons. Whatever it is, the QBH will keep it quantized.

To determine Rishonis’ charges, I must explore Energy types, charges, and forces.

7. Luminous and Hidden Energy

From observations: everything we directly observe has a QBH source.

Therefore, the only structures we can observe in space-time are the QBHs and their products, like photons and the particles they build.

Luminous Energy Definition:

Luminous Energy aggregates all the QBHs and QBHs’ products Energy.

Our current observational devices cannot directly observe Energy that does not emanate from a QBH source.

Hidden Energy Definition:

Hidden Energy aggregates all charges and their Energies that are not part of Luminous Energy.

Hidden Energy is also known as “Dark Matter” (but as Energy composes everything in our Universe, and the term “Dark Energy’ is taken, I prefer the term hidden Energy.)

We can deduce hidden Energy existence by its influence on substantial structures in our Universe. (For example, the rotation speed of galaxies.) [10]

We estimate the volume of the known Universe $U_V=3.559·{10}^{80} \left[m^3\right]$. [11]

We estimate the Mass of the hidden Energy in the Universe $M\left(E_H\right)$ as $7.4165·{10}^{53}\left[Kg\right]$. (Energy in space-time (without Dark Energy) comprises close to 16.8% of Luminous Energy and 83.2% of Hidden Energy.) [12]

Therefore, the average density of hidden Energy in the observable Universe: ${\rho }_{HE}=\frac{M\left(E_H\right)}{U_V}=2.0839·{10}^{-27}\left[Kg{m}^{-3}\right]$

Remark: the data above assume an inflationary Universe expansion, which may be wrong. Without an inflationary era ${\rho }_{HE}=\frac{M\left(E_H\right)}{U_V}=7.98541·{10}^{-26}\left[Kg{m}^{-3}\right]$.

Hidden Energy contains an extremely thin soup-like aggregate of gravitational, electric, and weak charges. In many cases, it also contains quarkic (color) charges.

The low density of hidden Energy charges (many orders of magnitude less than QBHs’ Dachus density) emits very faint Energy and is, therefore, too faint to observe with current instruments.

Luminous Energy aggregates through quarks and leptons, atoms, molecules, gas clouds, stars, galaxies, and galaxy groups, clusters, and superclusters.

Hidden Energy surrounds Luminous Energy; in the case of attraction, it is denser near concentrations of corresponding Luminous Energy (for example, the center of the Milky Way galaxy). As gravitational charges have the most extensive range, they influence hidden Energy throughout space-time at varying degrees of density, creating the “Cosmic web.” Scientists still need more observation to detect the exact distribution of hidden Energy. [13]

Remark: Dark Energy is probably pure kinetic Energy. It has no charges. (It is not part of this article.)

8. Charges and Their Influence on Space-Time Curvature

Charge Definition:

A charge is a Universe part that constantly emits Energy that changes the space-time curvature it encounters in a specific way attributed to the charge type.

Note: Charges continuously affect their neighborhoods by changing space-time curvature. Charges do that by their Energy and its momentum. (For brevity, from now on, whenever I refer to charge Energy that changes space-time curvature, it will always also include the momentum associated with this space-time curvature change.)

Every charge changes space-time curvature in an amount specific to the charge type.

Charges invest Energy in any change they affect.

The influence of charges propagates from the charge outward.

Therefore, charge Energy continues to propagate away from the charge, modifying the space-time curvature it encounters, as long as some charge’s Energy (and momentum) remains.

In legacy terms, we use forces:

Force Definition:

A force is the influence of a Universe part’s charge on its surroundings with the same charge type. A force always causes a change in the influenced Universe part.

I name the point where the charge’s Energy is completely spent: "Charge diminishing point." (Equivalently, where a force stops its effect: "Force diminishing point.")

Gravitational charges:

The gravitational charge diminishing point is the largest, maybe even up to the size of the Universe. Its value: ~ substantial part of the Universe’s size?

Electric charges: Magnetars can affect space-time up to several astronomical units away. (Other sources provide a much shorter range.) Therefore, the electric charge diminishing point is ~ ${1·10}^{12} \left[m\right]$. (We require additional data.)

Quarkic charges: The charge diminishing point of the quarkic charge is about the radius of the last stable nucleus – the 208 lead nucleus. Its value: ~${7.61·10}^{-15} \left[m\right]$ [14]

Weak charges: The weak charge diminishing point is much shorter than the quarkic charge diminishing point. Its value: ${~1·10}^{-17}$. [15]

According to the "Locality Principle" and "Charge Definition," a charge Energy continuously propagates from the charge outward, changing the space-time curvature it encounters. Now imagine a particle that moves to a new neighborhood and has to change the new neighborhood and exert new Energy to do it. This perpetual state seems to contradict the "Energy Conservation Principle" since it implies a ceaseless Energy production at the charge location, which then ceaselessly expands from the charge outwards.

Surprisingly, from observations, this continuous influence does occur up to the charges’ diminishing points.

Recalling the explanation of how the QBH guards’ quantization, we know of just such a renewable Energy source: "Thus, when uncertainty-related Energy emerges within a QBH up to and including its border, the Matter density there cannot increase. Therefore, the uncertainty-related Energy exits the QBH swiftly."

This conclusion reveals exciting knowledge of space-time curvature behavior.

Every QBH repeatedly emits Energy, altering space-time curvature around it. A state of equilibrium forms: the ongoing charge’s Energy from the QBH continuously tries to change space-time curvature. Space-time curvature resists and counters by trying to return to its initial flat state. Thus, this space-time curvature remains "constant" - fluctuating around an equilibrium value.

Remark: Inside and at the border of the QBH, some uncertainty-related Energy keeps the substantial space-time curvature in check, and some propagates outside the QBH.

When a new QBH comes into play, it modifies the existing space-time curvature, creating a new, altered space-time curvature by simultaneously superpositioning its charges’ Energy influences.

All charges have the same form of behavior. They emit Energy that propagates and changes space-time curvature. They emit radiation when accelerated. [2,16]

This behavior embodies the "Uniformity of Physical Laws in the Universe Principle" applied to charges’ Energy.

Constructing the equations for QBH influence on space-time curvature:

“Uniformity of Physical Laws in the Universe Principle” requires a tensorial form.

Premise: Space-time curvature exists at every point of space-time. According to the “Completeness Principle,” Energy also exists at every point in space-time. Whenever space-time curvature encounters charges’ Energy (and momentum) or kinetic Energy, it changes. This same changed space-time curvature strives to be zero (“flat space-time curvature”): when Energy changes it, it will respond in an opposing manner, trying to return to its zeroth value - a state of equilibrium forms.

So, I can write an equation at a point in space-time that never encountered charge’s Energy or kinetic Energy (a hypothetical case): $R_{\mu \nu }- \frac{1}{2}R{g}_{\mu \nu }=0$.

The equations that describe changes in space-time curvature need tensors of the curvature from one side and tensors of the Energy and its momentum on the other side. These equations cover the entire space-time because charges’ Energy and momentum (and in some cases kinetic Energy) and space-time curvature exist throughout all of space-time.

Specifically, the resulting equations describe the equilibrium point between the space-time curvature resisting change and the Energy enforcing change on the space-time curvature.

We can form an Energy-momentum tensor $\left(T_{\mu \nu -i}\right)$ in space-time as a (0,2) tensor. We know that the Energy-momentum tensor must follow the “Energy conservation Principle”; consequently, the Curvature tensors on the opposite side of the equation must do the same and be (0,2) tensors.

Therefore, ${\nabla }^{\mu }{k_{i}T}_{\mu \nu -i}=0$, and correspondingly ${\nabla }^{\mu }\left({\left(Ri\right)}_{\mu \nu }- \frac{1}{2}\left(Ri\right)g_{\mu \nu }\right)=0$, where $k_i$ is a conversion factor between the Energy and the curvature (I will discuss later), and “i” associates with charge $q_i$.

The result is four sets of equations, one for each charge (The first is EFE.)

Equation 4 Rishonis charges influence on space-time curvature

$$\begin{gathered} {\left(RG\right)}_{\mu \nu }-\frac{1}{2}\left(RG\right)g_{\mu \nu }={k_{G}T}_{\mu \nu -G}, \forall r| r_{QBH<r<{ r}_G} \\ {\left(RE\right)}_{\mu \nu }-\frac{1}{2}\left(RE\right)g_{\mu \nu }={k_{E}T}_{\mu \nu -E}, \forall r| r_{QBH<r<{ r}_E} \\ {\left(RW\right)}_{\mu \nu }-\frac{1}{2}\left(RW\right)g_{\mu \nu }={k_{W}T}_{\mu \nu -W}, \forall r| r_{QBH<r<{ r}_W} \\ {\left(RQ\right)}_{\mu \nu }-\frac{1}{2}\left(RQ\right)g_{\mu \nu }={k_{Q}T}_{\mu \nu -Q}, \forall r| r_{QBH<r<{ r}_Q} \end{gathered}$$

${\left(Ri\right)}_{\mu \nu }$ is the Ricci curvature tensor of the charge $q_i$.

$\left(Ri\right)$ is Ricci scalar of the charge $q_i$.

$g_{\mu \nu }$ is the metric.

$T_{\mu \nu -i}$ is the Energy-momentum (stress-Energy) tensor of the charge $q_i$.

$k_i$ is a conversion constant corresponding to the Energy expenditure of the charge $q_i$ while changing space-time curvature. [Einstein calculated $k_G=\frac{8\pi G}{c^4}$] [17] [I calculated $k_E=-\frac{2q{\rho }_E}{m{{c^2ϵ}_0}^2{E}^2}$] [18]

$r_i$ is the charge $q_i$ diminishing point.

These equations describe Luminous Energy sources. Each Rishoni type will have specific stress-Energy tensors according to its specific charges’ quantities.

What about hidden Energy?

Outside the QBH, other charges exist in small densities as hidden Energy. There, the uncertainty-related Energy that acts on them induces changes in space-time curvature:

Equation 5 Hidden Energy charges influence on space-time curvature

$${\left(Ri\right)}_{\mu \nu }-\frac{1}{2}\left(Ri\right)g_{\mu \nu }={{\mathrm{k}}_i\mathsf{\Lambda }}_i, \forall r| r_{QBH<r<{ r}_i}$$

${\mathsf{\Lambda }}_i$ is a tensor similar to $T_{\mu \nu -i}$ for the charge $q_i$ of hidden Energy and the uncertainty-related Energy acting on it. Only the hidden Energy of gravitational charges influences space-time curvature on cosmic scales. The electric charges spread evenly so their influence cancels on large scales. The other charges have tiny diminishing points, and their influence does not carry far.

Remark: I separated hidden Energy from Luminous Energy for clarity, as they are charges’ Energy sources in separate locations. I did not write equations for Dark Energy; they will appear in an article about the Cosmos expansion.

Note: When solving the equations of Rishonis’ influence on space-time curvature, it is best to do so simultaneously, considering the sequence, the influences of charges’ Energy and momentum reach the space-time curvature under consideration (taking into account the maximal speed of influence propagation.) This way, we will incorporate the non-linear terms that may appear in some equations in the correct sequence and ultimately produce the correct space-time curvature change value.

Note: A known path to produce equations of motion: Form an action as an integral of Lagrange density up to the charge diminishing point. Then, perform an extremization procedure on the action. [19]

Examining photons and space-time curvature produces very important results.

"Photons" are particles without rest Energy (known as rest Mass.) They only have kinetic Energy. They are chargeless.

I can express photons as stress-Energy tensors containing pure kinetic Energy and momentum (without rest Energy.)

From current observations, although chargeless, photons respond to gravitation and electric charges!

Using the “Uniformity of Physical Laws in the Universe Principle,” I deduced that the only way space-time curvature influences a chargeless particle can happen is if and only if all charges’ Energy or chargeless kinetic Energy change the same space-time curvature and all particles (with or without charges) follow space-time curvature. Thus, when a photon moves along space-time curvature, it follows it even though it is chargeless. The photon does not add its charge’s Energy influence to the space-time curvature because it has no charges. However, it has kinetic Energy and momentum, and with them, it can influence the space-time curvature – usually in a negligible amount.

Discussion: All charges change the same space-time curvature. However, electric and weak charges have two types of charges, marked “+” and “-“. The effect of the signs is mirrored in the space-time curvature. The same sign-charged particles always change space-time curvature in the same manner. So, a particle with a “+” sign electric charge will change the curvature of space-time around it in a way that when another particle with a “-“ electric charge that follows the space-time curvature appears, it will move towards the “+” electrically charged particle.

The gravitational and quarkic charges have only a single sign charge. They always change space-time curvature similarly – always causing attraction.

When we do the calculations of Rishonis charges, we notice that in very close range, all charges, especially the electric, weak, and quarkic charges, have significant non-linear components in their stress-Energy tensors. These components change the space-time curvature most when they act on corresponding non-linear components of existing space-time curvature caused by another Rishoni charge of the same type (like “compound interest”).

The weak and quarkic charges have short charge diminishing points and stop affecting the space-time curvature beyond these distances.

The electric charge has a significant diminishing point, but beyond atom nuclei sizes, it has an even electric charge distribution (in hidden Energy), and therefore, its space-time curvature effects over large distances cancel out.

Ony the gravitational charges affect space-time curvature on large scales.

Example: What happens to RishonisL, which has no quarkic charges, when it encounters a quarkic-charged particle?

A quarkic charge has significant non-linear terms in its stress-Energy tensor. In turn, it changes the curvature tensor with significant non-linear terms. As with all particles, the RishoniL will follow the space-time curvature that, in this case, already has the influence of quarkic charges. This state differs from what we think we know about leptons and quarks.

Now contemplate that a new RishoniQ appears in the same neighborhood and influences the same space-time curvature that influenced the RishoniL. The new RishoniQ causes changes by its significant non-linear terms in its quarkic-related tensors operating on the existing significant non-linear terms in the curvature tensor - compounding the accumulated influence of the quarkic charges, thereby creating a much stronger influence on the space-time curvature (than the one in the case of a RishoniL and a RishoniQ interaction) which justifies our notion of a “strong” charge influencing a “strong” charge (a known result for coupling constants sizes at similar Energies.)

9. RishonisQ

Discussion:

There are equal amounts of opposing electric charges in the Universe.

Both electric charges have the same intensity.

Only QBHs possesses net quantized electric charges (as Rishonis.)

Electric charges of hidden Energy (outside the QBHs) have an equal amount of opposing charges, even on a very small scale. Therefore, the net electric charge of hidden Energy is zero. So, when determining the quarks and leptons’ electric charge, I do not need to consider the “space” between the Rishonis that construct the quarks and leptons.

Therefore, the electric charge of any Rishoni will directly correspond to the charge of the quarks and leptons they construct. In the case of RishonisQ:

Table 2. Electric charge for RishonisQ.

Elementary particles	$\mathbf{Electric} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{E}}$
PositiviumQ	+2e/3
NegativiumQ	-1e/3

Table 2. Electric charge for RishonisQ.

Elementary particles	$\mathbf{Electric} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{E}}$
PositiviumQ	+2e/3
NegativiumQ	-1e/3

Before continuing, I want to check the possible influence of hidden Energy on the structure of quarks and leptons :

If we take an Up quark, for example, its volume is $3.3304·{10}^{-55} \left[m^3\right]$, and the hidden Energy (presented as Matter) within this volume is $6.940·{10}^{-82} \left[Kg\right]$, which is $1.80·{10}^{-52}$ of the total Mass of the Up quark – quite insignificant.

To identify the other charges of Rishonis, I plan to propose a structure that consists of Rishonis forming quarks and leptons. At the end of the article, in a "Sensitivity analysis," I will investigate the influence of other options for Rishonis’ composition on the conclusions.

Gravitational, electric, and weak charges influence all Rishonis in space-time.

The quarkic charge influences RishonisQ but not RishonisL.

Using the "Occam Razor Rule," I will look for the least number of RishonisQ constituting the different quarks and the least number of RishonisL composing the different leptons.

Composite QBH definition:

Composite QBH is a compound particle composed of several QBHs.

To avoid a state of a quark composed of one elementary particle (that would return us to the original state of a quark as an elementary particle,) I need an electric neutral Composite QBH in addition to the charged RishoniQ. The simplest additional particle would be a composite particle with 2 NegativiumsQ and 1 PositiviumQ – which do not change the electric charge of the entire ensemble.

I will call this neutral compound particle: "ImpartialQ."

When discussing QBHs, I have shown that all Rishonis have a single quantized Mass. (Note: In observations, we will see the value of this Mass + the influences of the other charges on the space-time curvature.)

To get the values of PositiviumQ and NegativiumQ charges, I use the data known for quarks:

$Forup,charmandtopquarks:q_E=+\frac{2e}{3},q_W=+\frac{1e}{3}.q_Q=+1$

$Fordown,strangeandbottomquarks:q_E=-\frac{1e}{3},q_W=-\frac{2e}{3}.q_Q=+1$

Therefore:

An Up quark has 1 PositiviumQ and 1 ImpartialQ = 2 PositiviumQ + 2 NegativiumQ.

A Down quark has 1 NegativiumQ + 1 ImpartialQ = 1 PositiviumQ + 3 NegativiumQ.

Equation for $q_E$: $\left(2q_{E-NegativiumQ}+2q_{E-PositiviumQ}=\frac{2}{3}\right)\wedge \left(3q_{E-NegativiumQ}+1q_{E-PositiviumQ}=-\frac{1}{3}\right)$, yields: $q_{E-NegativiumQ}=-\frac{1}{3},q_{E-PositiviumQ}=\frac{2}{3}$

Similarly, for all RishonisQ charges:

Table 3. RishonisQ charges.

	$\mathbf{Gravitational} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{G}}$*	$\mathbf{Electric} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{E}}$	$\mathbf{Weak} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{W}}$	$\mathbf{Quarkic} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{Q}}$
PositiviumQ	$1e$	+2e/3	7e/12	1e/4
NegativiumQ	$1e$	-1e/3	-5e/12	1e/4
ImpartialQ: 1 PositiviumQ + 2 NegativiumsQ	3e	0e	-1e/4	3e/4
Up: 1 PositiviumQ + 1 ImpartialQ = 2 PositiviumQ + 2 NegativiumsQ	4e	+2e/3	1e/3	1e
Down: 1 NegativiumQ + 1 ImpartialQ = 1 PositiviumQ + 3 NegativiumsQ	4e	-1e/3	-2e/3	1e
Charm: 1 PositiviumQ + 2 ImpartialsQ + 1 antiImpartialQ = 3 PositiviumsQ + 4 NegativiumsQ + 1 anti PositiviumsQ + 2 antiNegativiumsQ	10e	+2e/3	1e/3	1e
Strange: 1 NegativiumQ + 2 ImpartialsQ + 1 antiImpartialQ = 2 PositiviumsQ + 5 NegativiumsQ + 1 anti PositiviumsQ + 2 antiNegativiumsQ	10e	-1e/3	-2e/3	1e
Top: 1 PositiviumQ + 3 ImpartialsQ + 2 antiImpartialsQ = 4 PositiviumsQ + 6 NegativiumsQ + 2 anti PositiviumsQ + 4 antiNegativiumsQ	16e	+2e/3	1e/3	1e
Bottom: 1 NegativiumQ + 3 ImpartialsQ + 2 antiImpartialsQ = 3 PositiviumsQ + 7 NegativiumsQ + 2 anti PositiviumsQ + 4 antiNegativiumsQ	16e	-1e/3	-2e/3	1e

*$q_G$ In this case, I used the conversion of the gravitational charge to comply with all other charges in the same form, using $q_i=e·( size of charge \mathrm{i} without e)$ .

Table 3. RishonisQ charges.

	$\mathbf{Gravitational} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{G}}$*	$\mathbf{Electric} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{E}}$	$\mathbf{Weak} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{W}}$	$\mathbf{Quarkic} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{Q}}$
PositiviumQ	$1e$	+2e/3	7e/12	1e/4
NegativiumQ	$1e$	-1e/3	-5e/12	1e/4
ImpartialQ: 1 PositiviumQ + 2 NegativiumsQ	3e	0e	-1e/4	3e/4
Up: 1 PositiviumQ + 1 ImpartialQ = 2 PositiviumQ + 2 NegativiumsQ	4e	+2e/3	1e/3	1e
Down: 1 NegativiumQ + 1 ImpartialQ = 1 PositiviumQ + 3 NegativiumsQ	4e	-1e/3	-2e/3	1e
Charm: 1 PositiviumQ + 2 ImpartialsQ + 1 antiImpartialQ = 3 PositiviumsQ + 4 NegativiumsQ + 1 anti PositiviumsQ + 2 antiNegativiumsQ	10e	+2e/3	1e/3	1e
Strange: 1 NegativiumQ + 2 ImpartialsQ + 1 antiImpartialQ = 2 PositiviumsQ + 5 NegativiumsQ + 1 anti PositiviumsQ + 2 antiNegativiumsQ	10e	-1e/3	-2e/3	1e
Top: 1 PositiviumQ + 3 ImpartialsQ + 2 antiImpartialsQ = 4 PositiviumsQ + 6 NegativiumsQ + 2 anti PositiviumsQ + 4 antiNegativiumsQ	16e	+2e/3	1e/3	1e
Bottom: 1 NegativiumQ + 3 ImpartialsQ + 2 antiImpartialsQ = 3 PositiviumsQ + 7 NegativiumsQ + 2 anti PositiviumsQ + 4 antiNegativiumsQ	16e	-1e/3	-2e/3	1e

*$q_G$ In this case, I used the conversion of the gravitational charge to comply with all other charges in the same form, using $q_i=e·( size of charge \mathrm{i} without e)$ .

Then, I must convert the gravitational constant with $\left[{Kg}^{-1}{m}^3{s}^{-2}\right]$ into a constant with $\left[Kg{m}^3{A}^{-2}{s}^{-4}\right]\to$ $C_{G-QBH}=\frac{G·{M_{QBH}}^2}{e^2}$. In reality, each Rishoni type has a slightly different Mass since different charges quantities influence the space-time curvature within the QBH differently.

Note: the full, accurate solution of Rishonis Mass, radii, and Dachus density must incorporate the Rishonis influence over space-time curvature, but we do not yet possess the entire data.

Instead, I used existing data about protons and quarks to calculate $M_{PositiviumQ}$ and $M_{NegativiumQ}$. The binding Energy inside a proton is ~99% of its Mass.

Two PositiviumsQ and two NegativiumsQ compose an Up quark. I will use an estimate that includes all charges. From the equation of the radius: I find that $r_{QBH}\propto q_{QBH}$, therefore, $M_{QBH}\propto {\left(q_{QBH}\right)}^3$ .

$q_{PositiviumQ}=\left(G,E,W,Q\right)=\left(1e,+2\mathrm{e}/\mathrm{3,7}\mathrm{e}/\mathrm{12,1}\mathrm{e}/4\right)$.

$q_{NegativiumQ}=\left(G,E,W,Q\right)=\left(1e,-1\mathrm{e}/3,-5\mathrm{e}/\mathrm{12,1}\mathrm{e}/4\right)$.

$M_{PositiviumQ}=\frac{M_{Quark-Up}·\left(1-\left(99\mathrm{\%}bindingEnergy\right)\right)}{\left(1+{\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{7}{12}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)}^3\right)\mathrm{*}2+\left(1+{\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{5}{12}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)}^3\right)\mathrm{*}2}·\left(1+{\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{7}{12}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)}^3\right)=1.1034184·{10}^{-32}\left[Kg\right]$, Now I will solve the equation of the radius:

$r_{PositiviumQ}=\frac{\frac{2·M_{PositiviumQ}·G}{c^2}+\sqrt{{\left(\frac{2·M_{PositiviumQ}·G}{c^2}\right)}^2-4·\frac{25}{16}·\left(\frac{e^2·G}{c^4}\right)·\left(C_E·{\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)}^2+C_{W·}{\left(\frac{7}{12}\right)}^2+C_Q·{\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)}^2\right)}}{\frac{50}{16}}=4.91521·{10}^{-60}\left[m\right]$.

The calculation result is only one “$r_{PositiviumQ}$” (the root is imaginary), as appropriate for a naked core.

${\rho }_D=\frac{3M_{PositiviumQ}}{4\pi {·\left(r_{PositiviumQ}\right)}^3}=2.2183262·{10}^{145}\left[Kg{m}^{-3}\right]$.

Same for NegativiumQ:

$M_{NegativiumQ}=\frac{M_{Quark-Up}·\left(1-\left(99\mathrm{\%} binding Energy\right)\right)}{\left(1+{\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{7}{12}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)}^3\right)\mathrm{*}2+\left(1+{\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{5}{12}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)}^3\right)\mathrm{*}2}·\left(1+{\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{5}{12}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)}^3\right)=8.218562174·{10}^{-33}$, using the Dachus density (shared by all) I can find the radius:

${r_{NegativiumQ}=\left(\frac{3M_{NegativiumQ}}{4\pi {\rho }_D}\right)}^{\frac{1}{3}}=4.45547·{10}^{-60}\left[m\right]$.

Only one “$r_{NegativiumQ}$” exists.

10. RishonisL

Following the “Occam Razoe Principle,” I chose an electric neutral composite QBH particle for RishonisL with 1 NegativiumL and 1 PositiviumL. I call this neutral compound particle: “ImpartialL.”

Table 4. RishonisL charges.

	$\mathbf{Gravitational} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{G}}$	$\mathbf{Electric} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{E}}$	$\mathbf{Weak} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{W}}$
PositiviumL	$1e$	1e	2e
NegativiumL	$1$e	-1e	-1e
Electron neutrino = 1 PositiviumL + 1 NegativiumL	$2\mathrm{e}$	0	1e
Electron lepton = 1 NegativiumL + 1 Electron neutrino	3e	-1e	0
Muon neutrino = 2 electron neutrinos + 1 electron antineutrino	$6\mathrm{e}$	0	1e
Muon lepton = 1 NegativiumL + 1 Muon neutrino	$7\mathrm{e}$	-1e	0
Tau neutrino = 3 electron neutrinos + 2 electron antineutrinos	$10\mathrm{e}$	0	1e
Tau lepton= 1 NegativiumL + 1 Tau neutrino	$11\mathrm{e}$	-1e	0

Note: Now, neutrino oscillations are easy to explain by adding or removing electron neutrinos and electron antineutrinos as required. (Figure 1).

Table 4. RishonisL charges.

	$\mathbf{Gravitational} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{G}}$	$\mathbf{Electric} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{E}}$	$\mathbf{Weak} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{W}}$
PositiviumL	$1e$	1e	2e
NegativiumL	$1$e	-1e	-1e
Electron neutrino = 1 PositiviumL + 1 NegativiumL	$2\mathrm{e}$	0	1e
Electron lepton = 1 NegativiumL + 1 Electron neutrino	3e	-1e	0
Muon neutrino = 2 electron neutrinos + 1 electron antineutrino	$6\mathrm{e}$	0	1e
Muon lepton = 1 NegativiumL + 1 Muon neutrino	$7\mathrm{e}$	-1e	0
Tau neutrino = 3 electron neutrinos + 2 electron antineutrinos	$10\mathrm{e}$	0	1e
Tau lepton= 1 NegativiumL + 1 Tau neutrino	$11\mathrm{e}$	-1e	0

Note: Now, neutrino oscillations are easy to explain by adding or removing electron neutrinos and electron antineutrinos as required. (Figure 1).

Remark: Notably, protons, neutrons, electrons, and electron neutrinos are composed exclusively of Rishonis, without their corresponding antiRishonis. This unique composition is a crucial factor contributing to their exceptionally long half-lives, leading to the widespread assumption that they are stable. In contrast, other particles, characterized by a composition that includes both Rishonis and antiRishonis, exhibit significantly shorter half-lives. This is primarily due to the potential for annihilation events between Rishonis and antiRishonis within these particles, resulting in their more transient nature.

As with RishonisQ, I chose a binding Energy of ~99% of the Electron lepton Mass.

1 PositiviumL and 2 NegativiumsL compose an Electron lepton.

$q_{PositiviumL}=\left(G,E,W\right)=\left(1e,+1\mathrm{e},2\mathrm{e}\right)$.

$q_{NegativiumL}=\left(G,E,W\right)=\left(1e,-1\mathrm{e},-1\mathrm{e}\right)$.

$M_{PositiviumL}=\frac{M_{Lepton-Electron}·\left(1-\left(99\mathrm{\%} binding Energy\right)\right)}{\left(1+1+{\left(2\right)}^3\right)+\left(1+1+1\right)\mathrm{*}2}·\left(1+1+{\left(2\right)}^3\right)=5.693375·{10}^{-33}\left[Kg\right]$, Now I will solve the equation of the radius:

${r_{PosetiviumL}=\left(\frac{3M_{PositiviumL}}{4\pi {\rho }_D}\right)}^{\frac{1}{3}}=3.94232·{10}^{-60}\left[m\right]$.

Only one “$r_{PosetiviumL}$” exists.

$M_{NegativiumL}=\frac{M_{Lepton-Electron}·\left(1-\left(99\mathrm{\%} binding Energy\right)\right)}{\left(1+1+{\left(2\right)}^3\right)+\left(1+1+1\right)\mathrm{*}2}·\left(1+1+1\right)=1.7080125·{10}^{-33}$.

${r_{NegativiumL}=\left(\frac{3M_{NegativiumL}}{4\pi {\rho }_D}\right)}^{\frac{1}{3}}=2.63912·{10}^{-60}\left[m\right]$.

Only one “$r_{NegativiumL}$” exists.

11. Validity Check

Direct observations of Rishonis are beyond the ability of current particle accelerators.

However, the resultant neutrino oscillations are not!

As opposed to the standard model, I have successfully explained the following:

• The nature of elementary particles.
• Quantization of gravitational charges.
• Neutrinos oscillations.
• The nature of Dark Matter.
• The nature of Luminous Matter.
• Sizes of quantization of all charges of all elementary particles.
• Sizes ([m]) of elementary particles.
• The Dachus density.
• The source of protons, neutrons, and electrons stability versus other particles.
• The influence of charges on space-time curvature.
• The equations that govern all Luminous and Dark Energy movements in space-time.

Therefore, as the only theory that (easily) explains the source of observed neutrinos’ oscillations and solves many deficiencies of the SM, we have proof of this article’s validity.

12. Sensitivity Analysis

Binding energies

The exact value of $M_{PositiviumQ}$ is not certain. What will happen if it changes?

In this article, I assumed 99% as the guide for the value of binding Energy, yielding $M_{PositiviumQ}= \frac{M_{Quark-Up}·\left(1-\left(99\% binding Energy\right)\right)}{\left(1+{\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{7}{12}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)}^3\right)*2+\left(1+{\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{5}{12}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)}^3\right)*2}·\left(1+{\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{7}{12}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)}^3\right)=1.103418·{10}^{-32} \left[Kg\right]$.

Let me test what occurs when the binding Energy is 1% instead of 99%. $M_{PositiviumQ}= \frac{M_{Quark-Up}·\left(1-\left(1\% binding Energy\right)\right)}{\left(1+{\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{7}{12}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)}^3\right)*2+\left(1+{\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{5}{12}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)}^3\right)*2}·\left(1+{\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{7}{12}\right)}^3+{\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)}^3\right)=1.09238·{10}^{-30} \left[Kg\right]$. The result is roughly two magnitude orders larger than the article’s value. Changing the value of the binding Energy percent, only affects the radius $\left(5.1918·{10}^{-58}\left[m\right]\right)$, Mass, and Dachus density $\left(1.8635·{10}^{+141}\left[Kg{m}^{-3}\right]\right)$ of Rishonis. The new binding Energy does not change the non-gravitational charges values of any Rishoni. All Rishonis are still QBHs that affect space-time curvature. Therefore, the characteristics and essential conclusions of the article will not change.

As I do not know all charges influence on space-time curvature, I used an estimate depending on the cubic of the charges within the QBH. If I used only the quantized gravitational charge, I would get: $M_{PositiviumQ}= \frac{M_{Quark-Up}·\left(1-\left(99\% binding Energy\right)\right)}{4}·1=9.6236375·{10}^{-31} \left[Kg\right]$ which is very close to the value I used, and hence it does not influence the conclusions in the article.

Number of constituents Rishonis

What will happen if the number of Rishonis composing quarks and leptons is much higher than the proposed model?

The Mass, radii, and charge values will change in this case. However, the conclusions will not change; elementary particles are still QBHS that change space-time curvature.

Additional options for Rishonis charges

There is another alternative to RishonisQ compositions, one that does not require quarks to possess antiRishonisQ at the cost of many more RishonisQ (12 types instead of 2):

Table 5. Alternative RishonisQ charges.

	$\mathbf{Gravitational} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{G}}$	$\mathbf{Electric} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{E}}$	$\mathbf{Weak} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{W}}$	$\mathbf{Quarkic} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{Q}}$
PositiviumQ-up	$1e$	+2e/3	1e/3	1e/4
NegativiumQ-up	$1e$	-1e/3	-1e/6	1e/4
Up quark = 1 PositiviumQ-up + 1 ImpartialQ-up	4e	+2e/3	+1e/3	1e
PositiviumQ-charm	$1e$	+2e/3	1e/3	1e/7
NegativiumQ-charm	$1e$	-1e/3	-1e/6	1e/7
Charm quark = 1 PositiviumQ- charm + 2 ImpartialsQ- charm	7e	+2e/3	+1e/3	1e
PositiviumQ-top	$1e$	+2e/3	1e/3	1e/10
NegativiumQ-top	$1e$	-1e/3	-1e/6	1e/10
Top quark = 1 PositiviumQ-top + 3 ImpartialsQ-top	10e	+2e/3	+1e/3	1e
PositiviumQ-down	1e	+2e/3	-2e/3	1e/4
NegativiumQ-down	1e	-1e/3	1e/3	1e/4
Down quark = 1 NegativiumQ-down + 1 ImpartialQ-down	4e	-1e/3	-2e/3	1e
PositiviumQ-strange	1e	+2e/3	-2e/3	1e/7
NegativiumQ-strange	1e	-1e/3	1e/3	1e/7
Strange quark = 1 NegativiumQ- strange + 2 ImpartialsQ- strange	7e	-1e/3	-2e/3	1e
PositiviumQ-bottom	1e	+2e/3	-2e/3	1e/10
NegativiumQ-bottom	1e	-1e/3	1e/3	1e/10
Bottom quark = 1 NegativiumQ- bottom + 3 ImpartialsQ- bottom	10e	-1e/3	-2e/3	1e

Table 5. Alternative RishonisQ charges.

	$\mathbf{Gravitational} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{G}}$	$\mathbf{Electric} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{E}}$	$\mathbf{Weak} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{W}}$	$\mathbf{Quarkic} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{Q}}$
PositiviumQ-up	$1e$	+2e/3	1e/3	1e/4
NegativiumQ-up	$1e$	-1e/3	-1e/6	1e/4
Up quark = 1 PositiviumQ-up + 1 ImpartialQ-up	4e	+2e/3	+1e/3	1e
PositiviumQ-charm	$1e$	+2e/3	1e/3	1e/7
NegativiumQ-charm	$1e$	-1e/3	-1e/6	1e/7
Charm quark = 1 PositiviumQ- charm + 2 ImpartialsQ- charm	7e	+2e/3	+1e/3	1e
PositiviumQ-top	$1e$	+2e/3	1e/3	1e/10
NegativiumQ-top	$1e$	-1e/3	-1e/6	1e/10
Top quark = 1 PositiviumQ-top + 3 ImpartialsQ-top	10e	+2e/3	+1e/3	1e
PositiviumQ-down	1e	+2e/3	-2e/3	1e/4
NegativiumQ-down	1e	-1e/3	1e/3	1e/4
Down quark = 1 NegativiumQ-down + 1 ImpartialQ-down	4e	-1e/3	-2e/3	1e
PositiviumQ-strange	1e	+2e/3	-2e/3	1e/7
NegativiumQ-strange	1e	-1e/3	1e/3	1e/7
Strange quark = 1 NegativiumQ- strange + 2 ImpartialsQ- strange	7e	-1e/3	-2e/3	1e
PositiviumQ-bottom	1e	+2e/3	-2e/3	1e/10
NegativiumQ-bottom	1e	-1e/3	1e/3	1e/10
Bottom quark = 1 NegativiumQ- bottom + 3 ImpartialsQ- bottom	10e	-1e/3	-2e/3	1e

The same for Leptons without antiRishonisL (at the cost of 6 types instead of 2):

Table 6. Alternative RishonisL charges.

	$\mathbf{Gravitational} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{G}}$	$\mathbf{Electric} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{E}}$	$\mathbf{Weak} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{W}}$
PositiviumL-electron	$1e$	1e/2	1e
NegativiumL-electron	$1$e	-1e	-1e
Electron neutrino = 1 NegativiumL-electron + 2 PosiviumsL-electron	$3\mathrm{e}$	0	1e
Electron lepton = 1 NegativiumL-electron + 1 electron neutrino	$4\mathrm{e}$	-1e	0
PositiviumL-muon	$1$e	1e/2	3e/4
NegativiumL-muon	$1$e	-1e	-1e
Muon neutrino	$6\mathrm{e}$	0	1e
Muon lepton	$7\mathrm{e}$	-1e	0
PositiviumL-tau	$1$e	1e/2	2e/3
NegativiumL-tau	$1$e	-1e	-1e
Tau neutrino	$9\mathrm{e}$	0	1e
Tau lepton	$10\mathrm{e}$	-1e	0

Table 6. Alternative RishonisL charges.

	$\mathbf{Gravitational} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{G}}$	$\mathbf{Electric} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{E}}$	$\mathbf{Weak} \mathbf{charge} {\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{W}}$
PositiviumL-electron	$1e$	1e/2	1e
NegativiumL-electron	$1$e	-1e	-1e
Electron neutrino = 1 NegativiumL-electron + 2 PosiviumsL-electron	$3\mathrm{e}$	0	1e
Electron lepton = 1 NegativiumL-electron + 1 electron neutrino	$4\mathrm{e}$	-1e	0
PositiviumL-muon	$1$e	1e/2	3e/4
NegativiumL-muon	$1$e	-1e	-1e
Muon neutrino	$6\mathrm{e}$	0	1e
Muon lepton	$7\mathrm{e}$	-1e	0
PositiviumL-tau	$1$e	1e/2	2e/3
NegativiumL-tau	$1$e	-1e	-1e
Tau neutrino	$9\mathrm{e}$	0	1e
Tau lepton	$10\mathrm{e}$	-1e	0

This alternate version is more complicated and does not explain neutrino oscillations or the shorter half-life of some particles. Only experimental data will decide which occurs.

Both choices of the Rishonis types provide a Cosmos where QBHs are the elementary particles that influence space-time curvature.

Gravitational charges as part of other charges

I checked whether a gravitational charge cannot exist without the other non-gravitational charges:

Calculating Up quark mass with 99% binding Energy yielded $M_{Quark-Up}~{10}^{-25}\left[Kg\right]$ – six orders of magnitude too high.

Calculating Up quark mass with 1% binding Energy yielded $M_{Quark-Up}~{10}^{-19}\left[Kg\right]$ – eleven orders of magnitude too high.

Therefore, I conclude that gravitational charges can exist irrespective of other non-gravitational charges.

13. Conclusions

Rishonis – the elementary particles in space-time are Quantum black holes: miniature, relativistically fast rotating spheres at Dachus state (slightly oblated) that are naked cores. They keep quantization of all charges (including the gravitational charge) and spin.

Rishonis, in different combinations, compose all quarks and leptons.

The Dachus density (according to available data) is ${\rho }_D\approx 2.2183262·{10}^{145}\left[Kg{m}^{-3}\right]$.

Rishonis Energy is replenished by the uncertainty-related Energy that appears in them.

All Rishonis release Energy that changes the space-time curvature it encounters.

The uncertainty-related Energy within Rishonis (including their border) maintains the highly curved space-time curvature inside the QBH. Some of this Energy exits the QBH, expands outward, and changes space-time curvature as far as the QBH’s charges diminishing points.

Space-time curvature strives to return to its flat state.

The space-time curvature value is an oscillation of values around an equilibrium value between the QBH charge’s Energy, which changes the space-time curvature at a point and the reaction of the space-time curvature trying to revert to its flat state.