Description of the Electron in the Electromagnetic Field: The Dirac Type Equation and the Equation for the Wave Function in Spinor Coordinate Space

1. Introduction

Nowadays, the interest to study applications of the Dirac equation to different situations and to find out the conditions of its generalization is not weakening. In particular, in [1] new versions of an extended Dirac equation and the associated Clifford algebra are presented. In [2] a study of the Schrödinger-Dirac covariant equation in the presence of gravity, where the non-commuting gamma matrices become space-time-dependent, is carried out. In [3] an idea is discussed that the visible properties of the electron, including rest mass and magnetic moment, are determined by a massless charge spinning at light speed within a Compton domain. In [4] some aspects of conformal rescaling in detail are explored and the role of the "quantum" potential is discussed as a natural consequence of non-inertial motion and is not exclusive to the quantum domain. Author establishes the fundamental importance of conformal symmetry, in which rescaling of the rest mass plays a vital role. Thus, the basis for a radically new theory of quantum phenomena based on the process of mass-energy flow is proposed. In [5] author have derived the covariant fourth-order/one-function equivalent of the Dirac equation for the general case of an arbitrary set of γ-matrices.

Supporting these search aspirations, in our work we propose a deeper understanding of the Dirac equation with an emphasis on the direct use of the principles of symmetry and invariance to Lorentz transformations. For the first time we present a formulation of the Dirac and Schrödinger equations in spinor coordinate space.

2. Generalized Dirac type equation

Let us introduce notations, which will be used further on. The speed of light and the rationalized Planck’s constant will be considered as unity.

Pauli matrices

Matrices constructed from Pauli matrices

A vector of matrices

A set of arbitrary complex numbers and a vector of its three components

Let us define a 2×2 matrix of Lorentz transformations given by the set of real rotation angles  and boosts

and a similar 4×4 transformation matrix

We also define a 4×4 matrix of Lorentz transformations , where μ and ν take values 0,1,2,3

which can also be written explicitly using the 4×4 matrices of turn generators  and boosts

Let’s define a 4×4 matrix

In fact, we consider a quaternion with complex coefficients, which we multiply by its conjugate quaternion (due to the complexity of the coefficients, these are biquaternions, but we still use quaternionic conjugation, without complex conjugation).

Let us subject the set of complex numbers to the Lorentz transformation

Let us write a relation whose validity for an arbitrary set of complex numbers can be checked directly

The matrix  in the simplest case is diagonal with equal complex elements on the diagonal equal to the square of the length of the vector  in the metric of Minkowski space, which we denote . Both  and  do not change under any rotations and boosts, in physical applications the invariance of  is usually used, in particular, for the four-component momentum vector this quantity is called the square of mass.

Since the matrices  anticommutate with each other, for a vector  whose components commute with each other, we have just the simplest case with a diagonal matrix with  on the diagonal. But if the components of vector  do not commute, the matrix  already has a more complex structure and carries additional physical information compared to . For example, the vector  may include the electron momentum vector and the electromagnetic potential vector. The four-component potential vector is a function of the four-dimensional coordinates of Minkowski space. The components of the four-component momentum do not commute with the components of the coordinate vector, respectively, and the coordinate function does not commute with the momentum components, and their commutator is expressed through the partial derivative of this function by the corresponding coordinate. If the components of the vector  do not commute, the matrix  will no longer be invariant with respect to Lorentz transformations.

Suppose that the complex numbers we consider commute with all matrices, and note that the squares of all matrices are equal to the unit 4×4 matrix I

Taking into account anticommutative properties of matrices and expressions for their pairwise products we obtain

Consider the case when  is the sum of the momentum vector and the electromagnetic potential vector, which is a function of coordinates

For now, we’ll stick with the Heisenberg approach, that is, we will consider the components of the momentum vector  as operators for which there are commutation relations with coordinates or coordinate functions such as . In this approach, the operators do not have to act on any wave function.

Taking into account the commutation relations of the components of the momentum vector and the coordinate vector, the commutator of the momentum component and the coordinate function is expressed through the derivative of this function by the corresponding coordinate, e.g.

As a result, we obtain

where

As a result, we have the expression

Similarly, it can be shown that

The matrix

does not change under Lorentz transformations involving any rotations and boosts.

Taking into account the electron charge we have

Let us summarize our consideration. There is a correlation

where

Let’s analyze the obtained equality

Note that the quantity  is invariant to the Lorentz transformations irrespective of whether the momentum and field components commute or not. To solve this equation, we have to make additional simplifications. For example, to arrive at an equation similar to the Dirac equation, we must equate  with the matrix , where is the square of the mass of a free electron. Then

With this substitution the generalized equation almost coincides with the equation [[6], formula (43.25)], the difference is that there is a plus sign before , and instead of  there is , in which the matrices  have the following form

A similar equation is given by Dirac in [[7], Para. 76, Equation 24]; he does not use the matrices , only the matrices , but the signs of the contributions of the magnetic and electric fields are the same.

Along with the original form

it is possible to consider the form with a different order of the factors. It can be shown that this leads to a change in the sign of the electric field contribution

Since , unlike , is invariant to Lorentz transformations, it would be logical to replace it by . At least both these matrices are diagonal, and in the case of a weak field their diagonal elements are close. Nevertheless, the approach based on the Dirac equation leads to solutions consistent with experiment.

The matrix  in the general case has complex elements and is not diagonal, and in the Dirac equations instead of it is substituted the product of the unit matrix by the square of mass , the physical meaning of such a substitution is not obvious. Apparently it is implied that it is the square of the mass of a free electron. But the square of the length of the sum of the lengths of the electron momentum vectors and the electromagnetic potential vector is not equal to the sum of the squares of the lengths of these vectors, that is, it is not equal to the square of the mass of the electron, even if the square of the length of the potential vector were zero. But, for example, in the case of an electrostatic central field, even the square of the length of one potential vector is not equal to zero. Therefore, it is difficult to find a logical justification for using the mass of a free electron in the Dirac equation in the presence of an electromagnetic field. After all, mass is simply the length of a momentum vector, but the concept of a momentum vector, and hence of mass, can be applied only for a free particle. Similarly, energy is the zero component of the momentum vector and the concept of energy can only be strictly defined for a free particle. Due to the noted differences, the solutions of the generalized equation can differ from the solutions arising from the Dirac equation.

In the case when there is a constant magnetic field directed along the z-axis, we can write down

Here . Only when the field is directed along the z-axis, the matrix  is diagonal and real because the third Pauli matrix is diagonal and real. And if the field is weak,  can be approximated by the  matrix. This is probably why it is customary to illustrate the interaction of electron spin with the magnetic field by choosing its direction along the z-axis. In any other direction  is not only non-diagonal, but also complex, so that it is difficult to justify the use of .

When the influence of the electromagnetic field was taken into account, no specific characteristics of the electron were used. When deriving a similar result using the Dirac equation, it is assumed that since the electron equation is used, the result is specific to the electron. In our case Pauli matrices and commutation relations are used, apparently these two assumptions or only one of them characterize the properties of the electron, distinguishing it from other particles with non-zero masses.

The proposed equation echoes the Dirac equation, at least from it one can obtain the same formulas for the interaction of spin and electromagnetic field as with the Dirac equation, and in the absence of a field the proposed equation is invariant to the Lorentz transformations. In contrast, to prove the invariance of the Dirac equation even in the absence of a field, the infinitesimal Lorentz transformations are used, but the invariance at finite angles of rotations and boosts is not demonstrated. The proof of invariance of the Dirac equation is based on the claim that a combination of rotations at finite angles can be represented as a combination of infinitesimal rotations. But this is true only for rotations around one axis, and if there are at least two axes, this statement is not true because of non-commutability of Pauli matrices, which are generators of rotations, so that the exponent of the sum is not equal to the product of exponents if the sum includes generators of rotations around different axes.

A test case for any theory is the model of the central electrostatic field used in the description of the hydrogen atom, in which the components of the vector potential are zero

If again we equate the left part with , we obtain

Introducing the notations  we obtain

If we substitute operators acting on the wave function instead of momentum components into the generalized equation, we obtain a generalized analog of the relativistic Schrödinger equation, in which the wave function has four components and changes as a spinor under Lorentz transformations. Using the substitutions

the equation for the four-component wave function  before all transformations has the form

and after transformations

Once again, note that the matrix  is not diagonal and real.

All the above deductions are also valid when replacing 4×4 matrices  by 2×2 matrices , since their commutative and anticommutative properties are the same. The corresponding generalized equation is of the form

where

and the equation for the now two-component wave function looks like

In deriving his equation, Dirac [[[7], paragraph 74] noted that as long as we are dealing with matrices with two rows and columns, we cannot obtain a representation of more than three anticommuting quantities; to represent four anticommuting quantities, he turned to matrices with four rows and columns. In our case, however, three anticommuting matrices are sufficient, so the wave function can also be two-component. Dirac also explains that the presence of four components results in twice as many solutions, half of which have negative energy. In the case of a two-component wave function, however, no negative energy solutions are obtained. Particles with negative energy in this case also exist, but they are described by the same equation in which the signs of all four matrices  or  are reversed.

One would seem to expect similar results from other representations of the momentum operator, e.g., [[6], formula (24.15)]

under the assumption that this representation can describe a particle with spin one. But this expectation is not justified, since the last three matrices do not anticommutate, and therefore the quadratic form constructed on their basis is not invariant under Lorentz transformations.

Let’s see what happens to  when we change the sign of the matrices. When changing the sign of  we have

swapping the places of the multipliers. The multipliers do not necessarily commute, so  is not invariant with respect to the change of sign of , which can be interpreted as a reflection in time. The same picture of invariance absence we have at the sign change of matrices , i.e. at spatial reflection

If we change the signs of all matrices at once, we have

i.e. invariance. The physical interpretation of this case can be given by taking into account the change of signs of the matrices in equation

which can be rewritten as

it can be interpreted as an equation for a particle with negative energy and positive charge, i.e. for the positron. Thus, the generalized equation with matrices describes a particle, and with matrices  an antiparticle. However, in the next section of the paper another approach is described in which we do not have to deal with negative energy, it is positive for all particles, and the difference between particles and antiparticles consist in a different sign of their mass. And the mass in the generally accepted sense is simply equal to its modulus.

If one consistently adheres to the Heisenberg approach and does not involve the notion of wave function, it is not very clear how to search for solutions of the presented equations. The Schrödinger approach with finding the eigenvalues of the matrix and their corresponding eigenfunctions can help here.

In the left-hand side are the operators acting on the wave function, and in the right-hand side is a constant matrix on which the wave function is simply multiplied. This equality must be satisfied for all values of the four-dimensional coordinates  at once. Then  is not fixed but can take a set of possible values, finding all these values is the goal of solving the equation.

Thus, we have arrived at an equation containing a matrix  which is non-diagonal, complex and in general depends on the coordinates . After the standard procedure of separating the time and space variables, we can go to a stationary equation in which there will be no time dependence, but the dependence the matrix  on the coordinates will remain. It is possible to ignore the dependence of  on the coordinates and its non-diagonality and simply replace this matrix by a unit matrix with a coefficient in the form of the square of the free electron mass. Then the equation will give solutions coinciding with those of the Dirac equation. But this solution can be considered only approximate and the question remains how far we depart from strict adherence to the principle of invariance with respect to Lorentz transformations and how far we deviate from the hypothetical true solution, which is fully consistent with this principle. To find this solution, we need to approach this equation without simplifying assumptions and look for a set of solutions, each of which represents an eigenvalue matrix  of arbitrary form and its corresponding four-component eigenfunction.

When searching for solutions, one can try to use two equations

successively applying the operators with first order derivatives included in them to the eigenfunctions already found, similarly as described in Schrödinger’s work [8].

3. Equation for the Spinor Coordinate Space

Let us return to the set of arbitrary complex numbers, for simplicity we will call it a vector

Let us consider in connection with it arbitrary four-component complex spinors

There is a representation of the components of the vector

and there is another way to calculate them

Further we will assume that both spinors are identical, then the vector constructed from them

has real components, and we will assume that this is the electron momentum vector constructed from the complex momentum spinor   

Consider the complex quantity

where we introduce one more complex spinor, which in the future we will give the meaning of the complex coordinate spinor

and

Coordinate vector of the four-dimensional Minkowski space

is obtained from the coordinate spinor by the same formulas

The quantity  is invariant under the Lorentz transformation simultaneously applied to the momentum and coordinate spinor, which automatically transforms both corresponding vectors as well

This quantity does not change for any combination of turns and boosts

Accordingly, the exponent

characterizes the propagation process of a plane wave in spinor space with phase invariant to Lorentz transformations.

Let us apply the differential operator to the spinor analog of a plane wave

Applying this operator at another definition of the phase gives the same eigenvalue

that is, two different eigenfunctions correspond to this eigenvalue, but in the second case the phase in the exponent is not invariant with respect to the Lorentz transformation, so we will use the first definition.

Since

are complex spinors, which, under the transformation

is affected by the same matrix , then the complex quantity

is invariant under the action on the momentum spinor  of the transformation .  is an eigenvalue of the differential operator, and the plane wave is the corresponding m eigenfunction, which is a solution of the equation

Here  denotes the complex function of complex spinor coordinates.

When substantiating the Schrödinger equation for a plane wave in four-dimensional vector space, an assumption is made (further confirmed in the experiment) about its applicability to an arbitrary wave function. Let us make a similar assumption about the applicability of the reduced spinor equation to an arbitrary function of spinor coordinates, that is, we will consider this equation as universal and valid for all physical processes.

Let us clarify that by the derivative on a complex variable from a complex function we here understand the derivative from an arbitrary stepped complex function using the formula that is valid at least for any integer degrees

In particular, this is true for the exponential function, which is an infinite power series.

It is not by chance that we denote the eigenvalue by the symbol m, because if we form the momentum vector from the momentum spinor  included in the expression for the plane wave

then for the square of its length the following equality will be satisfied

That is the square of the modulus m has the sense of the square of the mass of a free particle, which is described by a plane wave in spinor space as well as by a plane wave in vector space. For the momentum spinor of a fermionic type particle having in the rest frame the following form

quantity

is real and not equal to zero, and for the bosonic-type momentum spinor

it is zero

i.e., the boson satisfies the plane wave equation in spinor space with zero eigenvalue.

For the momentum spinor of a fermion-type particle we can consider another form in the rest system

then the mass will be real and negative

This particle with negative mass can be treated as an antiparticle, and in the rest frame its energy is equal to its mass modulo, but it is always positive

To describe the behavior of an electron in the presence of an external electromagnetic field, it is common practice to add the electromagnetic potential vector to its momentum vector. We use the same approach at the spinor level and to each component of the momentum spinor of the electron we add the corresponding component of the electromagnetic potential spinor. For simplicity, the electron charge is equal to unity.

Further we need an expression for the commutation relation between the components of the momentum spinor, to which is added the corresponding component of the electromagnetic potential spinor, which is a function of the spinor coordinates

Let us replace the momenta by differential operators

and find the commutation relation

Thus

Let us apply the proposed equation to analyze the wave function of the electron in a centrally symmetric electric field, this model is used to describe the hydrogen-like atom. For the components of the vector potential of a centrally symmetric electric field it is true that

As a result, it is possible to accept

We are looking for a solution of the spinor equation; we do not consider the electron’s spin yet

This equation can be interpreted in another way.

Let us take the invariant expression

And let’s do the substitution

We will consider this equation as an equation for determining the eigenvalues of  and the corresponding eigenfunctions

Let’s introduce the notations

this quantity does not change under rotations and boosts and is some analog of the interval defined for Minkowski space and

this quantity represents time in four-dimensional vector space. An interesting fact is that time is always a positive quantity.

As a result, we have an equation for determining the eigenvalues of m and their corresponding eigenfunctions

Instead of looking for solutions to this equation directly, we can first try substituting already known solutions to the Schrödinger equation for the hydrogen-like atom. If  is one of these solutions, we need to find its derivatives over all spinor components

For example

Let’s pay attention to the shift in priorities. In the Schrödinger equation one looks for energy eigenvalues, while here it is proposed to look for mass eigenvalues, it seem more natural to us. The mass of a free particle is an invariant of the Lorentz transformations, and in the bound state the mass of the particle has a discrete series of allowed values, each of which corresponds to an energy eigenvalue, and the eigenfunction of these eigenvalues is the same. But these energy eigenvalues are not the same as the energy eigenvalues of the Schrödinger equation, because the equations are different. When an electron absorbs a photon, their spinors sum up and the mass of the electron changes. If the new mass coincides with some allowed value, the electron enters a new state. The kay idea here is the assumption that the interaction of spinors occurs simply by summing them.

The advantages of considering physical processes in spinor coordinate space may not be limited to electrodynamics. It may turn out, for example, that the spinor space is not subject to curvature under the influence of matter, as it takes place in the general theory of relativity for the vector coordinate space. On the contrary, it can be assumed that it is when the components of vector coordinate space are computed from the coordinate spinor that the momentum spinor with a multiplier of the order of the gravitational constant is added to this spinor. This results in a warp that affects other massive bodies.

To account for the electron spin, we will further represent the electron wave function as a four-component spinor function of four-component spinor coordinates

where the coefficients are some complex constants.

We will search for the solution of the wave equation considered in the first part of this paper

Let’s express the left part through the components of the momentum spinor

Let’s distinguish the direct products of vectors in these matrices

Let’s introduce the notations

Let us substitute differential operators instead of spinor components

Then the quantities included in the wave equation

will have the form

Let us consider the case of a free particle and represent the electron field as a four-component spinor function of four-component spinor coordinates

For a free particle, the components of the momentum spinor commute with each other, so all components of the matrix  are zero.

Let us use the model of a plane wave in spinor space

Substituting the plane wave solution into the differential equation, we obtain the algebraic equation

Let us take into account the commutativity of the momentum components, besides, let us introduce the notations

for the quantities which are invariant under any rotations and boosts, then we obtain

Additionally, introducing notation for Lorentz invariant quantities

we obtain

We see that in the case of a plane wave in spinor space, the matrix in the left part of the equation is diagonal and remains so at any rotations and boosts, the diagonal element also does not change.

In this case we can consider the matrix  in the right part to be diagonal with the same elements on the diagonal , then the equation can be rewritten as an equation for the problem of finding eigenvalues and eigenfunctions

Let us compare our equation with the Dirac equation [[6], formula (43.16)]

In the rest frame of reference, the three components of momentum are zero and the equation is simplified

That is, in the rest frame the Dirac equation and the spinor equation analyzed by us look identically and contain a diagonal matrix. The corresponding problem on eigenvalues and eigenvectors of these matrices has degenerate eigenvalues, which correspond to the linear space of eigenfunctions. In this space, one can choose an orthogonal basis of linearly independent functions, and this choice is quite arbitrary. For example, in [[9], formula (2.127)], solutions in the form of plane waves in the vector space have been proposed for the Dirac equation in the rest frame

and the following spinors are chosen as basis vectors

For transformation to a moving coordinate system in [[9], formula (2.133)] the following formula is used

where

The basis spinors form a complete system, that is, any four-component complex spinor can be represented as their linear combination and this arbitrary spinor will be a solution to the problem on eigenvalues and eigenfunctions in a resting coordinate system. The choice of the given particular basis has disadvantages, because if to find a four-dimensional current vector from any of these basis functions

then this current in the rest frame of reference

has non-zero components, and the square of the length of the current vector is zero. It turns out that a resting electron creates a current, which contradicts physical common sense. Since we have freedom of choice of the basis, it is reasonable to choose the spinor of the wave function in the rest frame of reference proportional to the momentum spinor, for example

The proportionality factor is chosen so that in the rest frame the zero component of the current is equal to the charge of, for example, an electron or a positron. If the momentum spinor in the rest frame has the form

then the momentum vector in this rest frame of reference will be

and the current vector

The same momentum vector in the rest frame of reference can be obtained from different spinors, e.g,

after a 30-degree boost along the z-axis we get

After scaling the spinors by the factor similar relations are true for the current vector. Thus, electrons can have the same momentum and current vector but different spinors, i.e., they are characterized by different spins. As it is supposed, the electron here has two physical degrees of freedom, since in a rest frame of reference one can choose the components  and  to be real.

Thus defined spinor wave function for a free particle is invariant to Lorentz transformations, since in this case the mass of electron , its charge and the phase of the plane spinor wave

do not change at rotations and boosts. The matrix on the left side of the equation does not change either, remaining diagonal with  on the diagonal.

It is logical to use the same considerations when choosing the basis for the wave function of the photon, whose mass, i.e., the eigenvalues of the wave function equation, are also degenerate and thus equal to zero. In this case, the choice of the proportionality factor between the spinor of the wave function and the momentum spinor is not so obvious, one can, for example, consider the option of

For a fermion, which can be an electron or a positron takes place , so the quantity

which, unlike the mass M in the Dirac equation, is complex in the general case, is also real for the fermion and can be positive for the electron or negative for the positron. The charge is proportional to the mass with a minus sign, since the electron charge is considered negative and the positron positive. For simplicity it is possible to consider the mass of the electron as negative and that of the positron as positive, then the charge will be proportional to the mass without changing the sign.

For the momentum spinor of a boson, such as a photon, it is true that , so its mass is zero

The given constructions are not abstract, but describe the physical reality, since the results of the processes occurring in the spinor space are displayed in the Minkowski vector space. In particular, the momentum vector corresponding to the momentum spinor has the following parameters

the square of the length is equal to the square of the mass of the electron or positron

And to the spinor wave function  at some point in spinor space corresponds the vector wave function

(which for a plane wave coincides with the current vector), taking its value in the corresponding point of physical space with coordinates

The vector wave function  can be compared in meaning to the square of the modulus of the conventional scalar wave function, in particular  is equal to this square and has the meaning of probability. The conventional scalar wave function itself is closer in meaning to the spinor wave function considered here, they both have complex values, and the four-component wave functions of the electron have in both cases the same meaning.

The arbitrary choice of the basis of the linear space of the eigenvectors of the matrix takes place only for a free particle. In the general case the matrix K is not zero, the wave equation has no solution in the form of plane waves in spinor space and ceases to be invariant with respect to Lorentz transformations, and the eigenvalues become nondegenerate.

We propose to extend the scope of applicability of the presented equation consisting of differential operators in the form of partial derivatives on the components of coordinate spinors with a nonzero matrix K

not only to the case of a plane wave, but to any situation in general. This transition is analogous to the transition from the application of the Schrödinger equation to a plane wave in vector space to its application in a general situation. The legitimacy of such transitions should be confirmed by the results of experiments.

This equation will be called the equation for the spinor wave function defined on the spinor coordinate space. Here the matrix  is, generally speaking, neither diagonal nor real, but it does not depend on the coordinates and is determined solely by the parameters of the electromagnetic field. Only in the case of a plane wave it is diagonal and has on the diagonal the square of the mass of the free particle. We can try to simplify the problem and require that the matrix is diagonal with the same elements on the diagonal , then the equation can be rewritten in the form of the equation for the problem of search of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions for any quantum states

This approach is pleasant in the Dirac equation, where the mass is fixed and equated to the mass of a free particle, and at the same time results giving good agreement with experiment are obtained.

We are of the opinion that the spinor equation is more fundamental than the relativistic Schrödinger and Dirac equations, it is not a generalization of them, it is a refinement of them, because it describes nature at the spinor level, and hence is more precise and detailed than the equations for the wave function defined on the vector space.

Let us consider the proposed equation for the special case when the particle is in an external electromagnetic field, which we will also represent by a four-component spinor function at a point of the spinor coordinate space

We will apply to the wave function of the electron the operators corresponding to the components of the momentum spinor, putting for simplicity the electron charge equal to unity

Note that the electromagnetic potential vector can be calculated from the electromagnetic potential spinor by the standard formula

The advantage of the spinor description over the vector description is that instead of summing up the components of the momentum and electromagnetic potential vectors as is usually done

now we sum the spinor components and then the resulting vector is

in addition to the usual momentum and field vectors, contains an additional term

taking real values and describing the mutual influence of the fields of the electron and photon.

After the addition of the electromagnetic field the components of the momentum spinor do not commute, the corresponding commutators are found above

Let’s find commutators for other operators

Further we will use these and analogous relations

Let’s solve the equation

Since the second factor  in the left-hand side of the equation has a simpler structure than the first factor, perhaps as a first step we should find the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the equation

and use them when solving the equation as a whole.

Let’s calculate the expressions included in the equation

Let us consider the situation when the electromagnetic potential can be described by a plane wave in spinor space

When the electromagnetic potential is represented by a plane wave, the field created by a charged particle is not taken into account, so this model adequately describes only the situation when the electromagnetic field is strong enough and the influence of the particle charge can be neglected.

It would be interesting in this context to consider for the presented spinor model the case of a centrally symmetric electric field and to find solutions of the spinor wave equation for the hydrogen-like atom, taking into account the presence of spin at the electron. For such a model we can take

As mentioned above, we can substitute into the equation the already known exact solutions of the Dirac equation for the hydrogen-like atom by expressing the components of the coordinate vector and derivatives on them through the components of the coordinate spinor and derivatives on them. It is likely that the solution of the Dirac equation would not make the spinor equation an identity; it would be evidence that more arbitrary assumptions are made in the Dirac equation than in the spinor equation, and that the latter claims to be a better description of nature.

We can also consider the case of a constant magnetic field directed along the z-axis

Let’s say

We see that the scalar potential  grows with time, but does not depend on spatial coordinates, and the vector potential does not depend on time, so that there is no electric field. In this case

In general case electric and magnetic fields are expressed through partial derivatives of components of the vector potential by components of the space vector. We also can find the expression through these fields for the derivatives of the spinor components of the electromagnetic potential by the components of the coordinate spinor. To do this, we first find all derivatives

then express the components of the vector potential through the components of the spinor potential, substitute the components of the electric and magnetic fields instead of the derivatives of the components of the vector potential by the components of the coordinate vector, and then find the required derivatives from the resulting system of linear equations.

From general considerations taking into account the substitutions

it is possible to write the commutation relations for the components of the impulse spinor and functions from the components of the coordinate spinor

All other combinations commute with each other. The constant coefficients c and d possibly include a minus sign, an imaginary unit and some degree of the rationalized Planck’s constant. Their values can be determined using known commutation relations for vector components, e.g.

and using expressions of vector components through spinor components

Let’s return to the relations

In this form they are equivalent, but if an external field is added, a difference arises, since in one case the field is added at the vector level and in the other at the spinor level

These relations correspond to differential equations including the relativistic Schrödinger equation

For a free particle the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues solving these equations should coincide, but in the presence of an external field the eigenvalues and the corresponding eigenfunctions will differ because of the above mentioned difference in summation in one case of vector components and in the other case of spinor components.

Let us describe in more detail the square of the length of the momentum vector

To obtain this result, we did not have to make assumptions about commutability of the spinor components among themselves. Accordingly, a similar expression takes place for the phase of a plane wave in vector space

Further we assume that the components of the momentum spinor commute, which takes place for a free particle, then we obtain

On the other hand, we can write

Thus, the results of calculations coincide.

Let us compare the phases of plane waves in vector and spinor spaces. Let us hypothesize that the plane wave in spinor space has a more complicated form than it was supposed earlier in the paper, namely, it contains an additional conjugate multiplier

On the one hand, this assumption does not cancel the reasoning given in the paper concerning the equations and derivatives, since the derivatives on the components of the spatial spinor from the first conjugate factor are equal to zero, and on the other hand, the phase of the wave in this form is closer to the generally accepted phase of a plane wave in vector space.

For the boson the momentum spinor has a special form

Thus phases calculated by two methods do not coincide with each other, though both of them are invariant under Lorentz transformations

However, if to impose restrictions also on the form of the coordinate spinor

then

That is, there is an equality

The form of the coordinate spinor defined in this way leads to the zero length of the coordinate vector, but the boson is characterized by this property. That is, it turns out that the requirement of coincidence of two definitions of the phase allows revealing the form of the coordinate spinor of the particle.

If a fermion is at rest in some coordinate system, then all components of its momentum vector, except the zero component, i.e., energy, are zero. Therefore, the phase of the corresponding plane wave in vector space depends on time but does not depend on spatial coordinates. It turns out that oscillations in time occur synchronously throughout space, and there is no wave propagation in the usual sense. On the contrary, the phase of the wave in spinor space depends on the spatial coordinates in such a situation. In addition, two fermions with different spins correspond to the same momentum vector, so the phases of the corresponding waves do not differ. But the phases of the wave in spinor space for fermions with different spins are different even when they are stationary.

If we accept the proposed hypothesis, then we need to change the equation for which the plane wave is an eigenfunction

where

As a result, we have the equation

Although the complex multiplier in front of the exponent in the right-hand side does not change with rotations and boosts, it now depends on the coordinates.

Let’s consider the equation

then the function corresponding to the free particle

is its solution with

This equation can be ascribed a universal character and its solutions can be sought at different possible values of  for real physical conditions, for example, in the presence of an electromagnetic field. Note that the function with imaginary unit under the exponent

tends to zero at removal from the origin, i.e. the wave function of the free fermion is localized in space.

If one consistently adheres to the idea of the fundamentality of the spinor space, it is necessary to reformulate the procedure of second quantization of the electron field. According to the known concept, the wave function of the electron field is represented in the form of expansion by plane waves describing a free electron. But we can use plane waves not in vector space, but plane waves in spinor space

In this case, let us assume

Alternatively, we can use decomposition by the following functions

We can start the analysis in a rest frame of reference, for transition to the general case it is necessary to apply the Lorentz transformation to the impulse and coordinate spinors, in this case neither the phase in the exponent nor the mass of the electron  changes. In the rest frame, one momentum vector corresponds to four momentum spinors

Signs of the respective masses

say that it’s two particles with positive mass and two with negative mass. The energy of all four types of particles – electrons and positrons with different spin, represented by the zero component of the momentum vector, is positive, which once again emphasizes that there are no particles with negative energy.

The orthogonality relations take place in any reference frame

Let us accept the agreement that spinors p2 and p4 describe the field with zero number of particles in the state with momentum P and masses with different sign. Spinors p1 and p3 describe the field with presence of a particle in a state with momentum P and negative or positive mass, respectively. The transition from one state to another is provided by the annihilation and birth operators

The relations can be directly verified

The action of the operators does not change the sign of the mass of the particle. Here the particle number operator  demonstrates that two states are indeed filled and two are empty, since this operator has an eigenvalue in one case of one and in the other case of zero.

The wave function of the electron field at a fixed value of the momentum vector P will be a combination of plane spinor waves with four momentum spinors corresponding to this momentum vector.

A system of particles with different momenta can be described by the direct product of momentum spinors, which includes spinors , as well as their versions subjected to an arbitrary Lorentz transformation , as co-multipliers

This system can be acted upon by an operator in the form of a direct product of an arbitrary set of annihilation and birth operator matrices or unit matrices for a particle whose state does not change

In this case

The annihilation and birth operators have disadvantage, they do not commute with Lorentz transformations matrix

Let’s introduce operators

The product of them commute with the Lorentz transformations matrix and they anticommutate with each other

The product of those operators with the proper order choice transform the state with zero number of particles to the state with presence of a particle and vice versa, and this relation is Lorentz invariant

Double applying this product changes the momentum spinor sign

Let us note one more interesting point. Let in a rest frame of reference electron and positron meet, then the annihilation process can be described by the summation of spinors in two ways with the same result

We see that at interaction the total mass of particles, their total energy and total momentum are conserved, and photons fly away in opposite directions. The same takes place in any other frame of reference.

If we take as an axiom the conservation of mass of a system of particles during interaction, then we can explain the difference between bosons and fermions.

Fermions with masses of different signs, for example, electron and positron, when summing  of their spinors give zero mass, i.e. the law of conservation of mass is fulfilled. The electron can be summed with an electron with the same sign of mass, but a different spin , their mass is equal to two masses of the electron, that is, the law of conservation is also fulfilled. But the summation of spinors of two identical electrons  gives a mass four times greater than the mass of the electron, that is, this combination is forbidden by the law of conservation of mass and two electrons cannot be in the same quantum state. Identical bosons at summation of spinors give zero mass, the law of conservation is fulfilled. In particular, identical photons can be summed in an unlimited number, while the mass will remain zero and all photons will be in the same quantum state. However also among four types of bosons

there are forbidden pairs, in particular  and , at summation of spinors of which the mass is different from zero. The reasoning applies to a rest frame of reference, but since the masses of all the particles do not change during the transition to an arbitrary system, the above results have universal significance.

The law of conservation of mass allows k photons to sum their spinors, so it would seem that energy of the system then will be proportional to , that contradicts to experience. But the possibility of summation does not mean its realization, photons can form several groups containing some number of indistinguishable particles, for which it is necessary to take into account combinatorial regularities at their exchange within groups and between groups. In general, a dynamical equilibrium should be established, leading, for example, to Bose statistics.