Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Isolated Femoral Bifurcation Endarterectomy or Combined with Bypass Surgery in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia

Version 1 : Received: 10 January 2024 / Approved: 10 January 2024 / Online: 11 January 2024 (09:04:37 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Ahmic, E.; Hitzl, W.; Seitelberger, R.; Linni, K. Using Isolated Femoral Bifurcation Endarterectomy or Combined with Bypass Surgery for Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. Medicina 2024, 60, 316. Ahmic, E.; Hitzl, W.; Seitelberger, R.; Linni, K. Using Isolated Femoral Bifurcation Endarterectomy or Combined with Bypass Surgery for Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. Medicina 2024, 60, 316.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients suffering from chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) and tissue loss treated with primary isolated femoral bifurcation endarterectomy (FBE) or with FBE combined with bypass surgery. Methods: This retrospective study was performed in a tertiary university based care center. Between January 2008 and December 2019 a prospectively collected database of patients suffering from CLTI and tissue loss and undergoing either primary FBE (group A) or FBE in combination with bypass surgery (group B) was analysed. Study endpoints were ulcer healing, primary and secondary patency rate, limb salvage and survival. Results: In total, FBE was performed in 73 and FBE with bypass in 60 patients. Between both groups there were no significant differences regarding demographic data or the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) grade III and IV of femoropopliteal lesions. After 3 years, ulcer healing could be achieved in 72% of FBE and in 75% of FBE with bypass patients. The primary patency rate was 95% and 91% for FBE and 83% and 80% for FBE with bypass after one and three years, respectively. The 3-year limb salvage rate was 78% for FBE and 84% for FBE with bypass. The secondary patency rate after one and three years was 99% and 97% for FBE and 93% and 88% for FBE with bypass. Conclusion: FBE and FBE with bypass are equally effective for ulcer healing in cases of combined CFA and superficial femoral artery lesions. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding primary and secondary patency

Keywords

endarterectomy; bypass surgery; femoral artery; lesion

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Surgery

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.