Submitted:
24 November 2023
Posted:
30 November 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Probiotic isolation and identification
2.1.1. Probiotic isolation
2.1.2. Gram staining test, 16S gene sequencing, and phylogenetic tree
2.1.3. Cellular morphology analysis under Transmission Electron Microscope
2.2. Probiotic potentiality and safety test
2.2.1. Antibiotic sensitivity test by agar well diffusion method
2.2.2. Hemolysis test
2.2.3. Acid tolerance
2.2.4. Bile salt tolerance
2.2.5. Antimicrobial activity test by agar well diffusion method
2.2.6. Antimicrobial activity test by time-kill assay against unknown contamination
2.3.1. Analysis of milk for preparation of dahi
2.3.2. Preparation of probiotic dahi
2.4. Shelf-life study at storage condition
2.5. Consumer acceptance of dahi
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Probiotic isolation and identification
3.1.1. Probiotic isolation
3.1.2. Gram staining test, 16S gene sequencing, and phylogenetic tree
2.1.3. Cellular morphology analysis under Transmission Electron Microscope
3.2. Probiotic potentiality and safety test
3.2.1. Antibiotic sensitivity test
3.2.2. Hemolysis test
3.2.3. Acid tolerance
3.2.4. Bile salt tolerance
3.2.5. Antagonistic test
3.2.6. Antimicrobial activity test by time-kill assay for unknown contamination
3.3.1. Analysis of milk for preparation of dahi
3.3.2. Preparation of probiotic dahi
3.4. Shelf-life study at storage condition
3.5. Consumer acceptance of dahi
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Alberts BM. Prokaryotic DNA Replication Mechanisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 1987, 317, 395–420.
- Anjam, KCM., 2014. The Dynamic Interactions between Salmonella and the Microbiota, within the Challenging Niche of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Int. Sch. Res. Notices. [CrossRef]
- Anjuman, AB., Jakaria, DM., Sharif et al., 2015. Market Assessment and Product Evaluation of Probiotic Containing Dietary Supplements Available in Bangladesh Market. Int. J. Pharm. [CrossRef]
- AOAC (2012) Official methods of analysis. 13th Edition, 2012. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc; Washington, D.C 2012(25–78).
- Arepally D, Reddy RS, Goswami TK. Studies on survivability, storage stability of encapsulated spray dried probiotic powder. Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. 2020, 3, 235–242.
- Britton, RA, and Versalovic, J., 2009. Probiotics and gastrointestinal infections. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2008. [CrossRef]
- Caballero, B.; Finglas, P.; Toldra, F., 2015. Encyclopedia of Food and Health. Elsevier sci. 345–351. ISBN 978-0-12-384953-3.
- Chetan, S., Sachin, G., Nishchal, T et al., 2017. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of indigenous lactobacilli isolated from curd and human milk samples. Biotech. 7, 53. [CrossRef]
- Chidre, P., and Revanasiddappa, K.C., 2017. Probiotic potential of Lactobacilli with antagonistic activity against pathogenic strains: An in vitro validation for the production of inhibitory substances. Biomed. J. 40, 270-283. [CrossRef]
- Chidre, P., and Revanasiddappa, K.C., 2017. Probiotic potential of Lactobacilli with antagonistic activity against pathogenic strains: An in vitro validation for the production of inhibitory substances. Biomed. J. 40, 270-283. [CrossRef]
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2015. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 25th informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S22. Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute, Wayne, PA.
- Coico, R., 2005. Gram Staining. Curr Protoc Microbiol. [CrossRef]
- Ding, W. K.; & Shah, N. P., 2007. Acid, Bile, and Heat Tolerance of Free and Microencapsulated Probiotic Bacteria. J. Food Sci. 72:M446–M450. [CrossRef]
- Felsenstein, J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985, 39, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fijan, S., 2016. Antimicrobial effect of probiotics against common pathogens. In: Rao, V., & Rao, L. G. (Eds.), Probiotics and prebiotics in human nutrition and health. Intech Open 10.5772/63141.
- Fijan, S., 2016. Antimicrobial effect of probiotics against common pathogens. In: Rao, V., & Rao, L. G. (Eds.), Probiotics and prebiotics in human nutrition and health. Intech Open 10.5772/63141.
- Guesh, M., Diriba, M., Anteneh, T., and Tesfaye, S., 2020. Protective Effect of Potential Probiotic Strains from Fermented Ethiopian Food against Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 in Mice. Int. J. Microbiol. [CrossRef]
- Hashim, I.B., Khalil, A.H., and Afifi, H.S. Quality characteristics and consumer acceptance of yogurt fortified with date fiber. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 5403–5407. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hassanzadazar H, Ehsani A, Mardani K, Hesari J. Investigation of antibacterial, acid and bile tolerance properties of lactobacilli isolated from Koozeh cheese. Vet Res Forum. 2012, 3, 181–5.
- Halder D, Mandal M, Chatterjee SS, Pal NK, Mandal S., 2017. Indigenous Probiotic Lactobacillus Isolates Presenting Antibiotic like Activity against Human Pathogenic Bacteria. Biomedicines. 5:31. [CrossRef]
- Helmenstine, A.M., 2020. What Is the pH of the Stomach? ThoughtCo. thoughtco.com/ph-of-the-stomach-608195.
- Kailasapathy, and Chin, J., 2000. Survival and therapeutic potential of probiotic organisms with reference to Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. Immunol Cell Biol. 78(1), 80-8. [CrossRef]
- Kavitha, P., Sindhuja, D., and Banumathi, M., 2016. Isolation and Biochemical Characterization of Lactobacillus species Isolated from Dahi. Int. J. Curr Microbiol App Sci. 5, 1042-1049. [CrossRef]
- Maryam, T., Mohammad, B., and Habibi, N. Mohebbat M., 2019. Effect of the milk fat content and starter culture selection on proteolysis and antioxidant activity of probiotic yogurt. Heliyon 5(2), e01204. [CrossRef]
- Matthew B., Sue P., Julian M., Eshwar M., 2013. The life history of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a probiotic: a tale of revisionary taxonomy, misidentification and commercial success, FEMS Microbiology Letters. 349(2), 77–87. [CrossRef]
- Meng L, Li S, Liu G, Fan X, Qiao Y, Zhang A, et al., 2021. "The nutrient requirements of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and their application to fermented milk". Journal of Dairy Science. 104 (1), 138–150. [CrossRef]
- Molecular detection by analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of fecal coliform bacteria from the two Korean Apodemus species (Apodemusagrarius and A. peninsulae). Genet Mol Res. 16(1).
- Ortakci, F., Broadbent, J.R., McManus, W.R., and McMahon, D.J., 2012. Survival of microencapsulated probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei LBC-1e during manufacture of Mozzarella cheese and simulated gastric digestion. J. Dairy Sci. 95, 6274-6281. [CrossRef]
- Prabhurajeshwar, and Kelmani, C., 2019. Evaluation of antimicrobial properties and their substances against pathogenic bacteria in-vitro by probiotic Lactobacilli strains isolated from commercial yoghurt. Clin. Nutr. Exp. 23, 97-115.
- Radhakrishna Tirumalai, Ph.D., 2006. <2021>Microbiological enumeration tests-nutritional and dietary supplements. Pharmacopeial Forum, 29, 268.
- Radhakrishna Tirumalai, Ph.D., 2006. <2022>Microbiological procedure for absence of specified microorganism- nutritional and dietary supplements. Pharmacopeial Forum, 29, 287.
- Radhakrishna, T., 2006. <2023>Microbiological attributes of non-sterile nutritional and dietary supplements. Pharmacopeial Forum. 30, 1818.
- Rahman, M.M., Yoon, K.B., Lim, S.J., Jeon, M.G., Kim, H.J., Kim, H.Y., Cho, J.Y., Chae H.M., and Park, Y.C., 2017.
- Rolhion, N, and Chassaing, B., 2016. When pathogenic bacteria meet the intestinal microbiota. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 371, 20150504. [CrossRef]
- Saitou N. and Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425.
- Sarker, A.R., Sultana, M., and Mahumud, R.A., 2018. Economic costs of hospitalized diarrheal disease in Bangladesh: a societal perspective. Glob Health Res Policy. 3. [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, K., Stupar, J., Shirley, J., Adapa, S., and Sukup. Factors affecting titratable acidity in raw milk. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. Dairy Day 1996, 2, 60–62.
- Tamura K., Stecher G., and Kumar S., 2021. MEGA 11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. [CrossRef]
- Yagmur, E.K., Ibrahim, A., and Senol, K. Determination of Texture Profile Analysis of Yogurt Produced By Industrial and Traditional Method. Int J Sci Technol Res. 2018, 4, 66–70.
- Yang, E., Fan, L., and Yan, J., 2018. Influence of culture media, pH and temperature on growth and bacteriocin production of bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria. AMB Expr. 8. [CrossRef]



| Antibiotic | Dose | ZOI |
|---|---|---|
| Cefuroxim | 30μg / 100μL | 33.0±4.24 |
| Gentamycin | 10μg / 100μL | 22.0±2.0 |
| Chloramphenicol | 30μg / 100μL | 48.67±2.31 |
| Erythromycin | 15 µg / 100 µL | 31.0±1.0 |
| Clindamycin | 10 µg / 100 µL | 30.0±6.0 |
| Tylosin | 30 µg / 100 µL | 67.33±6.43 |
| Amphicilin | 10 µg / 100 µL | 69.33±11.06 |
| Vancomycin | 30 µg / 100 µL | 48.67±4.16 |
| Kanamycin | 30 µg / 100 µL | 21.33±2.31 |
| Streptomycin | 10 µg / 100 µL | 20.67±1.15 |
| Tetracycine | 30 µg / 100 µL | 42.0±2.0 |
| Bacteria | Diameter of ZOI (mm) |
|---|---|
| Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028 | 13.5±0.5 |
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC6538 | 12.0±0.0 |
| Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 | 15.75±0.35 |
| Bacillus subtitlis ATCC 6633 | 12.25±0.35 |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 1427 | 12.0±1.41 |
| Candida albicans ATCC 10231 | 0.0 |
| pH | Temperature | CFU/mL in TSA | Types of morphology in TSA | CFU/mL in SCA | Types of morphology in SCA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.74 | Ambient room temperature | TNTC | 3 | TNTC | 1 |
| 3.95 | 35°C | TNTC | 2 | <100 | 0 |
| 3.75 | 44°C | TNTC | 2 | <100 | 0 |
| Microorganism | Media | pH | Temperature | Identical Colony |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escherichia coli | MacConkey Broth, MacConkey Agar |
4.74 | Ambient | No Growth |
| 3.95 | 35°C | No Growth | ||
| 3.75 | 44°C | No Growth | ||
| Staphylococcus aureus | Mannitol Salt Agar | 4.74 | Ambient | No Growth |
| 3.95 | 35°C | No Growth | ||
| 3.75 | 44°C | No Growth | ||
| Salmonella sp. | Rappaport Vassiliadis Salmonella Enrichment Broth, XLD Agar | 4.74 | Ambient | No Growth |
| 3.95 | 35°C | No Growth | ||
| 3.75 | 44°C | No Growth | ||
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Pseudomonas Cetrimide agar | 4.74 | Ambient | No Growth |
| 3.95 | 35°C | No Growth | ||
| 3.75 | 44°C | No Growth |
| Serial No. | Ingredients | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fat | 2.67 % |
| 2 | SNF (Solids-not-Fat) | 8.6 % |
| 3 | Protein | 3.10% |
| 4 | Lactose | 4.1% |
| 5 | Specific gravity | 1.027 |
| 6 | pH | 6.81 |
| 7 | Conductivity | 4.1 |
| 8 | Added Water | 2% |
| 9 | Temperature | 24.5 |
| 10 | Freezing Point | -0.693 |
| 11 | Salts | 0.85% |
| Temperature | pH of probiotic dahi | Probiotic dahi formation time (hour) |
|---|---|---|
| 25 | 5.55±0 | Not completed |
| Ambient Room Temperature | 4.75±0.01 | 20.5±0.71 |
| 35 | 4.85±0.16 | 4.75±0.35 |
| 44 | 4.65±0.14 | 4.60±0.35 |
| Day and pH | Probiotic count (CFU/30mL) | Contamination on TSA (CFU/mL) | Contamination on SCA (CFU/mL) |
C. albicans (CFU/mL) | E. coli (CFU/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container-1 | Container-2 | Container-2 | Container-3 | Container-4 | |
| 1 & 3.65±0 | 60±4.24 ×109 | TNTC | 4.5±0.71 | 94.5±0.71 | 00 |
| 3 & 3.65±0 | 72.0±0 ×109 | TNTC | 5.0±0 | 106.0±0 | 00 |
| 14 & 3.59±0 | 170.0±0 ×109 | TNTC | 121.0±0 | 114.0±0 | 00 |
| Group | Favor | Color | Sweet | Sour | Texture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.25±1.50 | 6.75±.95 | 6.0±.81 | 6.0±.81 | 4.5±.58 |
| 2 | 7.0±.81 | 7.0±.81 | 7.0±.81 | 7.0±.81 | 5.0±0 |
| 3 | 7.5±1.29 | 7.5±1.29 | 7.5±1.29 | 7.5±1.29 | 5.0±0 |
| 4 | 7.0±.81 | 6.0±.81 | 6.0±.81 | 6.0±.81 | 5.0±0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).