Submitted:
19 November 2023
Posted:
22 November 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- Young rice seedlings, only 7-15 days old instead of 20-30 days, are transplanted singly and carefully, rather than in clumps of 3-4 plants or more. This minimizes trauma to the plant roots and protects their capability to support root systems and tiller growth.
- Plant density is greatly reduced, by as much as 80-90% m-2, through wider spacing between these single plants. This minimizes inter-plant competition and gives all plants more access to sunlight, air, water, and nutrients.
- The soil is kept moist and, and not mostly aerobic. Ceasing the continuous flooding of rice paddies ensures a good supply of oxygen to the roots.
2. Morphological Development, Physiological Characteristics, Grain Yield, and Grain Quality of Traditional Rice Varieties under SRI Management
3. Traditional Rice Varieties under SRI Management
- A red-rice variety Adanbargi achieved 8.8 tonnes ha-1 in just 95 days, with up to 35 tillers plant-1, long panicles (27 cm), and more grains panicle-1 (225).
- Mansuri, a popular rice variety with bold grains, showed a yield of 8.4 tonnes ha-1 in 120 days, with 50-60 tillers plant-1, panicle length of 25 cm, and more grains panicle-1, up to 285.
- A black rice variety Kajri with a crop cycle of 135 days gave a yield of 8 tonnes ha-1 under SRI, with 45 tillers plant-1, long panicles (25 cm), and more grains panicle-1 (290).
- Njavara, a medicinal rice variety that is susceptible to lodging, has been found to be less susceptible to this when grown with SRI methods.
- Kavuni, used for medicinal purposes due to the antioxidant activity of its natural anthocyanin pigment ranging from red to black coloration, responded very positively to these methods.
- Several of the varieties evaluated -- Nootripathu, Norungan, Kuruvaikalanjiyam, Kuliyadichan, and Chandikar -- are known to be drought-tolerant. This will become ever more important as water limitations for growing rice become more severe.
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Appendix A
| Variety name | Habitat | Dura-tion (days) |
Tillers plant-1 | Panicle length (cm) | % Fertile panicles | Grains panicle-1 |
Grain yield (t ha-1) |
Stress tolerance |
Grain grade |
Special features; Farmer assessments |
| Lohondi | Lowland | 150 | 17 | 25 | 90 | 200 | 6.0 | 1 | 2 | 1, F2; No need to parboil |
| Rongochuri | Lowland | 120 | 40 | 18 | 38 | 120 | 6.2 | 1,3,4 | 2 | 1, F1; Good for making biryani; grains elongate during cooking |
| Kalinga | Medium upland | 90 | 25 | 20 | 90 | 200 | 6.2 | 1 | 2 | 1; Summer season paddy; price Rs 10 kg-1 |
| Jhumpuri | Lowland | 160 | 32 | 30 | 93 | 290 | 6.2 | 1 | 2 | 1; Straw is strong; this variety is alternated with Champaisiari for avoiding weeds |
| Asamchudi | Lowland | 135 | 25 | 27 | 100 | 385 | 6.2 | 1,3,4 | 2 | 1; High satiety; good for rice porridge and rice beer (landah) |
| Ramipareva | Medium upland | 130 | 15 | 25 | 100 | 346 | 6.2 | 3,4 | 2 | 1, 2, 3 |
| Puiri Lochai | Medium upland | 125 | 43 | 24 | 100 | 275 | 6.2 | 1,3,4 | 2 | 1; Low price in market, Rs 12.5 kg-1 |
| Jeeraphul | Lowland | 150 | 50 | 25 | 90 | 200 | 6.4 | 1 | 2 | 1, F2; No need to parboil |
| Tulsibas | Medium upland | 135 | 21 | 29 | 13 | 355 | 6.5 | 2 | F2; Good price in market, Rs. 50 kg-1; ratooning possible | |
| Bandiluchai | Lowland | 135 | 23 | NA | 100 | 390 | 6.7 | 1,3,4 | 2 | 1, 3, 4; Good for rice porridge; grains that elongate during cooking |
| Sopori | Lowland | 150 | 45 | 25 | 40 | 140 | 6.9 | 3,4 | 3 | F1; Good for Pitha making; tastes sweet |
| Champaisiari | Lowland | 160 | 35 | 32 | 95 | 320 | 7.0 | 2 (30 d) | 2 | 1; Tasty; preferred by the poor |
| Jauphul | Medium upland | 145 | 70 | 19 | 100 | 280 | 7.0 | 1,3,4 | 2 | 1, F2; Good price in market, Rs. 50 kg-1 |
| Sarogotora | Medium upland | 135 | 26 | 29 | 23 | 350 | 7.0 | 3 | 1; Fine non-scented rice; its short straw length makes it suitable as fodder | |
| Mourikhas | Lowland | 140 | 22 | 30 | 18 | 345 | 7.0 | 2 | F2; Good price in market, Rs 50-55 kg-1 | |
| Khajurcheri | Medium upland | 128 | 25 | 25 | NA | 245 | 7.0 | 3 | 1; Fine non-scented rice; good both raw and parboiled; cross-pollinating variety | |
| Dhaniaphul | Lowland | 140 | 45 | 25 | 90 | 330 | 7.2 | 1 | 1 | |
| Bhataphul | Medium upland | 95 | 25 | 28 | 100 | 300 | 7.2 | 1,3,4 | 1 | 1, F2 |
| Birholi | Medium upland | 95 | 25 | 28 | 100 | 300 | 7.2 | 1,3,4 | 1 | 1, F2 |
| Kumdhen | Lowland | 110 | 25 | 25 | 100 | 250 | 7.4 | 1 | 2 | 1, F1 |
| Lal Lochai | Medium upland | 125 | 33 | 23 | 100 | 250 | 7.4 | 1,3,4 | 2 | 1; Rice price in market is only Rs 12.5 kg-1 |
| Kalajeera | Lowland | 145 | 20 | 25 | 100 | NA | 7.4 | 1 | 1, F2 | |
| Lalmokro | Lowland | 135 | 15 | 27 | 100 | 271 | 7.5 | 1,3,4 | 2 | 1, 2, 3 |
| Latamohu | Lowland | 160 | 43 | 30 | 97 | 250 | 7.6 | 1,3,4 | 2 | 1, F1; Tasty |
| Kalachampa | Medium upland | 150 | 37 | 34 | 85 | 327 | 7.6 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Kajri | Lowland | 135 | 45 | 25 | 90 | 285 | 8.0 | 2 | 1 | |
| Kurlubuti | Lowland | 135 | 19 | 26 | 100 | 271 | 8.0 | 1,3,4 | 2 | 1; Good for rice porridge; less breaking of grains during milling |
| Radhatilak | Medium upland | 135 | 21 | 29 | 17 | 345 | 8.0 | 2 | 1, F2; Good price in market, Rs 50 kg-1 | |
| Mahsuri | Lowland | 125 | 55 | 25 | 90 | 285 | 8.4 | 2 | 1; Tasty, Rs 10 kg-1 | |
| Adanbargi | Lowland | 100 | 35 | 28 | 90 | 225 | 8.8 | 1,3,4 | 2 | 1 |
| Agnilal | Medium upland | 130 | 16 | 26 | 11 | 220 | 9.0 | 4* | 2 | 1, 5; Good for pregnant women |
| Red 1009 | Medium upland | 135 | 27 | 25 | 22 | 232 | 9.0 | 2 | 1, 2, 3; Strong straw, can be used for thatching and growing mush-rooms | |
| Laluchura | Medium upland | 130 | 25 | 29 | 18 | 245 | 9.0 | 2 | 1, 2, 4; Bold variety; preferred by economically-weaker sections; straw is good for thatching | |
| Kanchan Safri | Medium upland | 110 | 80 | 28 | 90 | 275 | 9.2 | 1,3,4 | 3 | 1 |
| Kumlichudi | Lowland | 120 | 45 | 28 | 90 | 275 | 9.2 | 1,3,4 | 2 | 1 |
| Sungibaram | Lowland | 130 | 21 | 29 | 18 | 285 | 10.0 | 4* | 2 | 1 |
| Bashabhog | Medium upland | 120 | 43 | 32 | 90 | 350 | 10.4 | 1 | 2 | 1, F2 |
| Talomuli | Medium upland | 130 | 31 | 30 | 18 | 280 | 11.0 | 1, 3 | 2 | 1, 4 |
Appendix B
| Yield (in tonnes ha-1) | Number of varieties | Traditional varieties evaluated with SRI management |
| ≥11 | 1 | Talamuli |
| ≥10 | 1 | Surangibaran |
| ≥9 | 1 | Agnilal |
| ≥8 | 11 | Laghu Pathara, Runja Manika, Dilip Mota, Sita Sal, Radha Tilak, Birai, Gopal Bhog, Sunapan,* Sana Bhata Dhan, Morikhas, Ketaki Champa |
| ≥7 | 15 (4 aromatic) |
Nandika, Khajur Cheri, Bhainspat, Banamal, Mayurkantha, Narayan Kamini, Lathisal, Karpurakeli, Govind Bhoga, Banspatri, Samalai Bhog, Saragtara, Debrani, Ajirbana, Ketakijoha |
| ≥6 | 36 (5 aromatic) |
Barhagali, Andharchaki, Dandabalunga, Nadiaphula, Mugudi, Hari Shankar, Kolajan, Barapanka, Kalabarni, Kajal Kanhei, Kukudamunda, Ghios, Bhaluki (no. 2), Badagandamala, Jagatsinghpur Basmati, Saru Chinamali, Sunasari, Meghamala, Kalakanhu, Katrangi, Gangabali, Baramasi, Tulsi Mukul, Chamormoni, Batakalama, Kanakchur, Kuja, Kuji Patali, Jalendri, Rahaspanjar, Matabhog, Panicheri, Kalajeera, Basbhog, Doddaberunelu, Banglapatnai |
| ≥5 | 34 (4 aromatic) |
Banapuri, Kankhri, Bhalu Dubraj, Ramsal, Kerandi, Ramigali, Laghu Bhutia, Lim Dhan, Gedi Kanhei, Alsikiba, Raghusal, Nadiajodi, Badanali, Kalonunia, Dhusura Bhutia, Silkote, Balabhadrabhog, Baikani, Nalipakhia, Mugajai, Dudh Kalama, Jawaphul, Kalakadam, Geleigeti, Chudi, Kadalia Champa, Bhelian, Ganagabali (no. 2), Tulsa, Raniakhanda, Kajalamali, Jhingesal, Dhaniaphual, Tulsibasa, Khaw Dam |
References
- Stoop, W.A.; Uphoff, N.; Kassam, A. A review of agriculture research issues raised by the system of rice intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: Opportunities for improving farming systems for resources-poor farmers. Agric. Syst. 2002, 71, 249–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vijayakumar, M.; Ramesh, S.; Chandrasekaran, B.; Thiyagarajan, T.M. Effects of system of rice intensification (SRI) practices on yield attributes, yield, and water productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Res. J. Agric. Biolog. Sci. 2006, 2, 236–242. [Google Scholar]
- Tsujimoto, Y.; Horie, T.; Randriamihary, H.; Shiraiwa, T.; Homma, K. 2009. Soil management: The key factors for higher productivity in the fields utilizing the system of rice intensification (SRI) in the central highland of Madagascar. Agric. Syst. 2009, 100, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manjunatha, B.N.; Basavarajappa, R.; Siddaram, Policepatil, A.S.; Yogeeshappa, H.; Kalyanamurthy, K.N. Effect of age of seedlings under different system of rice intensification (SRI). Int. J. Agric. Sci. 2010, 6, 2, 377–379.
- Laulanié, H. Intensive rice farming in Madagascar. Tropicultura 2011, 29, 183–187. (English translation of the original article published in French in Tropicultura, 1993).
- Uphoff, N.; Fasoula, V.; Iswandi, A.; Kassam, A.; Thakur, A.K. Improving the phenotypic expression of rice genotypes: Rethinking ‘intensification’ for production systems and the selection practices for rice breeding. Crop J. 2015, 46, 77–98. [CrossRef]
- Thakur, A.; Mandal, K.; Verma, O.; Mohanty, R. Do System of Rice Intensification practices produce rice plants phenotypically and physiologically superior to conventional practice? Agronomy 2023, 13, 1098. [CrossRef]
- Yuan, L-P. A scientist’s perspective on experience with SRI in China for raising the yields of super hybrid rice. In Assessments of the System of Rice Intensification, Proc. Int. Conf., Sanya, China, April 1-4, 2002, 23-25, Cornell Int. Inst. Food Agric. Dev., Ithaca, NY, 2002. http://sri.cals.cornell.edu/proc1/sri_06.pdf.
- Diwakar, M.C.; Kumar, A.; Verma, A.; Uphoff, N. Report on the world record yields in kharif season 2011 in Nalanda district, Bihar state, India. Agric. Today (New Delhi) 2012, 79, 261–281. Available online: https://independentsciencenews.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/India-Bihar-Paddy-Record-Yield-SRI.pdf (accessed 16 October 2023).
- Uphoff, N. The System of Rice Intensification: Responses to Frequently Asked Questions. SRI Int. Network and Resources Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 2016. http://sri.cals.cornell.edu/aboutsri/SRI_FAQs_Uphoff_2016.pdf (accessed 15 October 2023).
- Chaboussou, F. Healthy Crops: A New Agricultural Revolution, Jon Carpenter Publishing, Charlbury, UK, 2005.
- Nandini, B.; Gangappa, E.; Mahesha, B. et al. Assessment of flowering response in traditional rice varieties of Karnataka to photo period. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2020, 9, 2, 1224–1229. [CrossRef]
- Dwiningsih, Y.; Al-Kahtani, J. Rojolele: A premium aromatic rice variety in Indonesia. Int. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 2022, 2, 42–53. https://www.svedbergopen.com/files/1678426833_(5)_IJAGST 202229111427TX45R_(p_42-53).pdf. [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, S. Indigenous paddy varieties under SRI and conventional practices: A performance study. NewsReach, PRADAN, New Delhi 2013, 13. https://www.pradan.net/sampark/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Indigenous-Paddy-Varieties-under-SRI-and-Conventional-Practices.pdf.
- Thakur, A.K.; Uphoff, N. How the System of Rice Intensification can contribute to climate-smart agriculture, Agron. J. 2017, 109, 1163–1182. [CrossRef]
- Chintalapati, P. et al. Insect pest incidence with the System of Rice Intensification: A multi-location study with meta-analysis, Agronomy 2023, 13. [CrossRef]
- Jagannath, P.; Pullabhotla, H.; Uphoff, N. Meta-analysis evaluating water use, water saving, and water productivity in irrigated production of rice with SRI vs. standard management methods. Taiwan Water Conserv. 2013, 61, 14–49.
- Dahlgren, J.; Parr, A. The impact on greenhouse gas emissions of rice crop management under the System of Rice Intensification: A review. Agronomy 2023, 13. [CrossRef]
- Anas, I.; Rupela, O.P; Thiyagarajan, T.M.; Uphoff, N. A review of studies on SRI effects on beneficial organisms in rice soil rhizospheres, Paddy Water Envir. 2011, 9, 53–69. [CrossRef]
- Doni, F.; Khadka, R.B.; Uphoff, N. Soil biological contributions to the productivity of the System of Rice Intensification. In: Biological Approaches to Regenerative Soil Systems, eds. Uphoff, N.; Thies, J.E., 291-307, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2023.
- Thakur, A.K.; Chaudhari, S.K.; Singh, R.; Kumar, A. Performance of rice varieties at different spacing grown by the system of rice intensification in eastern India. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 79, 443–447.
- Banerjee, S.; Sundarpahari. Study of Performance of Indigenous Paddy Varieties under SRI and Conventional practices. Report for the National Consortium of SRI, New Delhi, India, 2013.
- Das, S. Rice in Odisha, IRRI Tech. Bull. No. 16, Int. Rice Res. Inst., Los Baños, Philippines, 2012.
- Deb, D. The struggle to save heirloom rice varieties. Scient. Amer. 2019, 321, 54–61. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-struggle-to-save-heirloom-rice-in-india/.
- Patnaik, A.; Jongerden, J.; Ruivenkamp, G. Repossession through sharing of and access to seeds: Different cases and practices. Int. Rev. Sociol. 2016, 27, 179–201. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03906701.2016.1235213. [CrossRef]
- Roopa, N. The magic of a fistful of seeds. Earth Island J., Aug. 12, 2022. https://www.earth island.org/journal/index.php/articles/entry/the-magic-of-a-fistful-seeds/.
- BIND. Growth and Yield Responses of Traditional Upland Rice on Different Distance of Planting Using Azucena Variety. Report for Broader Initiatives for Negros Development, Bacalod, Philippines, 2005. http://sri.cals.cornell.edu/countries/philippines/philsBIND_ UplandResults2002.pdf (accessed 7 June 2023).
- WWF. Conservation through Ba’kelalan Adan rice: Heirloom rice of the Lun Bawang. World Wide Fund for Nature, Gland, Switzerland, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhEc4XD0Y4U.
- Toyat, J. WWF-Malaysia, Antares Venture ink MOA to promote, market Ba Kelalan’s highland rice. Borneo Post, Nov. 17, 2023.
- Plabita, R.; Raj, R.K. Extent of adoption of practices under system of rice intensification in Odisha. Oryza 2014, 51, 81–85.
- Hameed, K.A.; Jaber, F.A.; Hadi, A.Y.; Elewi, J.; Uphoff, N. Application of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) methods on productivity of jasmine rice variety in Southern Iraq. Jordan J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 7, 3.
- Dwipa, I.; Rozen, N.; Kasim, M. Emergence of phyllochron of three rice varieties in different time of land flooding in System of Rice Intensification (SRI). Int. J. Envir. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 3, 6. [CrossRef]
- Isnawan, B.H.; Samanhudi; Supriyono; Supriyadi. Growth and yield of various local rice varieties with system of rice intensification irrigation system. 2nd Int. Conf. on Sustainable Agriculture, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environ. Sci. 2020, 458, 012021. [CrossRef]
- Styger, E. System of Rice Intensification (SRI): Community-Based Evaluation in Goundam and Dire Circles, Timbuktu, Mali, 2008/09. Report for Africare, Bamako, Mali, 2009. http://sri.cals.cornell.edu/countries/mali/MaliAfricare%2008and09.pdf.
- Panda, D.K.; Jyotirmayee, B.; Mahalik, G. Black rice: A review from its history to chemical makeup, health advantages, nutritional properties, and dietary uses. Plant Sci. Today 2022, 9, 1–15. https://horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/PST/article/view/1817. [CrossRef]
- Khadka, R.; Acharya, H.; Uphoff, N. Performance of landrace and improved rice varieties under the System of Rice Intensification management in Bajhang District of Nepal. J. Agric. Environ. 2014, 15. [CrossRef]
- Ashraf, A.; Lokanadan, S. Effect of seedling age on productivity and profitability in traditional rice landraces. Oryza 2022, 59, 113–125. [CrossRef]
- Tilda Ricelands. Promotion of SRI with Basmati Rice. Presentation to 3rd National SRI Symposium, Coimbatore, India, 2008. https://www.slideshare.net/SRI.CORNELL/0854-welcome-to-the-world-of-tilda-promotion-of-sri-with-basmati-rice-in-haryana (accessed 20 April 2023).
- Panigrahi, T.; Garnayak, L.M.; Ghosh, M.; Bastia, D.K.; Ghosh, D.C. Productivity and profitability of basmati rice varieties under SRI. Int. J. Bio-resource Stress Manage. 2014, 5, 333–339. [CrossRef]
- Flora, G.; Rajendran, K.; Kumar, K.; Sharmili, K.; Pramitha, J. Effect of System of Rice Intensification practices in increasing the yield of traditional varieties of rice. Int. J. Envir. Clim. Change 2023, 13, 1175–1180. [CrossRef]
- Economist. The idea of “holobionts” represents a paradigm shift in biology, The Economist, June 14, 2023.



| Rice varieties | (N) | Life cycle with conventional methods (days) |
Life cycle under SRI management (days) |
Difference (in days) |
| Sughanda (basmati) | 12 | 120 | 106 | 14 |
| Hardinath 1 (improved) | 39 | 120 | 107 | 13 |
| Barse 2014/2017 | 14 | 135 | 126 | 9 |
| Bansdhar/Kanchhi | 248 | 145 | 127 | 18 |
| Radha 12 | 12 | 155 | 138 | 17 |
| Swarna | 40 | 155 | 139 | 16 |
| Mansuli | 48 | 155 | 136 | 19 |
| Total/average | 413 | 140 | 125 | 15 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
