Submitted:
23 October 2023
Posted:
24 October 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. The crucial steps of drug discovery by using bioinformatics
2.1. Target identification
2.2. Target validation
2.3. Lead identification
2.4. Lead optimization
2.5. Preclinical testing
2.6. Clinical trials
3. Bioinformatics tools and techniques
3.1. Genomics, Proteomics and Metabolomics
3.2. Molecular Docking
4. Case studies on successful integration of bioinformatics in drug discovery
5. Challenges and future directions
5. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgements
Conflicts of interest
References
- David, E.; Tramontin, T.; Zemmel, R. Pharmaceutical R&D: the road to positive returns. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 609–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drews, J.; Ryser, S. The role of innovation in drug development. Nat. Biotechnol. 1997, 15, 1318–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilbert, D. Bioinformatics software resources. Brief. Bioinform. 2004, 5, 300–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: Paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paananen, J.; Fortino, V. An omics perspective on drug target discovery platforms. Briefings in bioinformatics 2020, 21, 1937–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reichel, A.; Lienau, P. Pharmacokinetics in drug discovery: an exposure-centred approach to optimising and predicting drug efficacy and safety. In New approaches to drug discovery; 2016; pp. 235–260. [Google Scholar]
- Malathi, K.; Ramaiah, S. Bioinformatics approaches for new drug discovery: a review. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews 2018, 34, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gill, S.K.; Christopher, A.F.; Gupta, V.; Bansal, P. Emerging role of bioinformatics tools and software in evolution of clinical research. Perspectives in clinical research 2016, 7, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xue, Y.; Lameijer, E.W.; Ye, K.; Zhang, K.; Chang, S.; Wang, X.; Wu, J.; Gao, G.; Zhao, F.; Li, J.; Han, C. Precision medicine: what challenges are we facing? Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 2016, 14, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernald, G.H.; Capriotti, E.; Daneshjou, R.; Karczewski, K.J.; Altman, R.B. Bioinformatics challenges for personalized medicine. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 1741–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schadt, E.E.; Linderman, M.D.; Sorenson, J.; Lee, L.; Nolan, G.P. Computational solutions to large-scale data management and analysis. Nature reviews genetics 2010, 11, 647–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinha, S.; Vohora, D. Drug discovery and development: An overview. Pharmaceutical medicine and translational clinical research 2018, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopec, K.K.; Bozyczko-Coyne, D.; Williams, M. Target identification and validation in drug discovery: the role of proteomics. Biochemical Pharmacology 2005, 69, 1133–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xia, X. Bioinformatics and drug discovery. Current topics in medicinal chemistry 2017, 17, 1709–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mamas, M.; Dunn, W.B.; Neyses, L.; Goodacre, R. The role of metabolites and metabolomics in clinically applicable biomarkers of disease. Archives of toxicology 2011, 85, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramazi, S.; Zahiri, J. Post-translational modifications in proteins: resources, tools and prediction methods. Database 2021, 2021, baab012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Golestan Hashemi, F.S.; Razi Ismail, M.; Rafii Yusop, M.; Golestan Hashemi, M.S.; Nadimi Shahraki, M.H.; Rastegari, H.; Miah, G.; Aslani, F. Intelligent mining of large-scale bio-data: Bioinformatics applications. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 2018, 32, 10–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malathi, K.; Ramaiah, S. Bioinformatics approaches for new drug discovery: a review. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews 2018, 34, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Sim, T.B.; Kim, Y.S.; Chang, Y.T. Tools for target identification and validation. Current opinion in chemical biology 2004, 8, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, V.S.; Srinivas, K.; Sujini, G.N.; Kumar, G.N. Protein-protein interaction detection: methods and analysis. International journal of proteomics. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Adelstein, S.J.; Kassis, A.I. Target discovery from data mining approaches. Drug discovery today 2012, 17, S16–S23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, R.; Ursu, O.; Gaulton, A.; Bento, A.P.; Donadi, R.S.; Bologa, C.G.; Karlsson, A.; Al-Lazikani, B.; Hersey, A.; Oprea, T.I.; Overington, J.P. A comprehensive map of molecular drug targets. Nature reviews Drug discovery 2017, 16, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.S. Preclinical pharmacokinetics: an approach towards safer and efficacious drugs. Current drug metabolism 2006, 7, 165–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schenone, M.; Dančík, V.; Wagner, B.K.; Clemons, P.A. Target identification and mechanism of action in chemical biology and drug discovery. Nature chemical biology 2013, 9, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhasmana, A.; Raza, S.; Jahan, R.; Lohani, M.; Arif, J.M. High-throughput virtual screening (HTVS) of natural compounds and exploration of their biomolecular mechanisms: An in silico approach. In New look to phytomedicine; Academic Press, 2019; pp. 523–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badrinarayan, P.; Narahari Sastry, G. Virtual high throughput screening in new lead identification. Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening 2011, 14, 840–860. [Google Scholar]
- Kitchen, D.B.; Decornez, H.; Furr, J.R.; Bajorath, J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nature reviews Drug discovery 2004, 3, 935–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossi, T.; Braggio, S. Quality by Design in lead optimization: a new strategy to address productivity in drug discovery. Current Opinion in Pharmacology 2011, 11, 515–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghosh, A.; Chakraborty, M.; Chandra, A.; Alam, M.P. Structure-activity relationship (SAR) and molecular dynamics study of withaferin-A fragment derivatives as potential therapeutic lead against main protease (M pro) of SARS-CoV-2. Journal of molecular modeling 2021, 27, 1–7 DOI. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johnson, D.E.; Wolfgang, G.H. Predicting human safety: screening and computational approaches. Drug discovery today 2000, 5, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kraljevic, S.; Stambrook, P.J.; Pavelic, K. Accelerating drug discovery: Although the evolution of ‘-omics’ methodologies is still in its infancy, both the pharmaceutical industry and patients could benefit from their implementation in the drug development process. EMBO reports 2004, 5, 837–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hsiao, Y.; Su, B.H.; Tseng, Y.J. Current development of integrated web servers for preclinical safety and pharmacokinetics assessments in drug development. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2021, 22, bbaa160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Afshari, C.A.; Hamadeh, H.K.; Bushel, P.R. The evolution of bioinformatics in toxicology: advancing toxicogenomics. Toxicological Sciences 2011, 120 (suppl_1), S225–S237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varshney, S.; Bharti, M.; Sundram, S.; Malviya, R.; Fuloria, N.K. The Role of Bioinformatics Tools and Technologies in Clinical Trials. In Bioinformatics Tools and Big Data Analytics for Patient Care; Chapman and Hall/CRC, 31 Aug 2022; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Loging, W.T. (Ed.) Bioinformatics and computational biology in drug discovery and development; University Press, 17 Mar 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Peraman, R.; Sure, S.K.; Dusthackeer, V.A.; Chilamakuru, N.B.; Yiragamreddy, P.R.; Pokuri, C.; Kutagulla, V.K.; Chinni, S. Insights on recent approaches in drug discovery strategies and untapped drug targets against drug resistance. Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2021, 7, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lockhart, D.J.; Winzeler, E.A. Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays. Nature 2000, 405, 827–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, A.; Mann, M. Proteomics to study genes and genomes. Nature 2000, 405, 837–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Idle, J.R.; Gonzalez, F.J. Metabolomics. Cell metabolism 2007, 6, 348–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- 40. Ogata, H.; Goto, S.; Sato, K.; Fujibuchi, W.; Bono, H.; Kanehisa, M. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic acids research 1999, 27, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanehisa, M.; Furumichi, M.; Tanabe, M.; Sato, Y.; Morishima, K. KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic acids research 2017, 45, D353–D361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goodsell, D.S.; Zardecki, C.; Di Costanzo, L.; Duarte, J.M.; Hudson, B.P.; Persikova, I.; Segura, J.; Shao, C.; Voigt, M.; Westbrook, J.D.; Young, J.Y. RCSB Protein Data Bank: Enabling biomedical research and drug discovery. Protein Science 2020, 29, 52–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stanzione, F.; Giangreco, I.; Cole, J.C. Use of molecular docking computational tools in drug discovery. Progress in Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 60, 273–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saikia, S.; Bordoloi, M. Molecular docking: challenges, advances and its use in drug discovery perspective. Current drug targets 2019, 20, 501–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balmain, A.; Gray, J.; Ponder, B. The genetics and genomics of cancer. Nature genetics 2003, 33, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooper, L.A.; Demicco, E.G.; Saltz, J.H.; Powell, R.T.; Rao, A.; Lazar, A.J. PanCancer insights from The Cancer Genome Atlas: the pathologist's perspective. The Journal of pathology 2018, 244, 512–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cline, M.S.; Craft, B.; Swatloski, T.; Goldman, M.; Ma, S.; Haussler, D.; Zhu, J. Exploring TCGA pan-cancer data at the UCSC cancer genomics browser. Scientific reports 2013, 3, 2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mittica, G.; Ghisoni, E.; Giannone, G.; Genta, S.; Aglietta, M.; Sapino, A.; Valabrega, G. PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer. Recent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery 2018, 13, 392–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zheng, F.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, S.; Weng, X.; Rao, Y.; Fang, H. Mechanism and current progress of Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 2020, 123, 109661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imamichi, T. Action of anti-HIV drugs and resistance: reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. Current pharmaceutical design 2004, 10, 4039–4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghosh, A.K.; Chapsal, B.D.; Weber, I.T.; Mitsuya, H. Design of HIV protease inhibitors targeting protein backbone: an effective strategy for combating drug resistance. Accounts of chemical research 2008, 41, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhan, P.; Pannecouque, C.; De Clercq, E.; Liu, X. Anti-HIV drug discovery and development: current innovations and future trends: miniperspective. Journal of medicinal chemistry 2016, 59, 2849–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merelli, I.; Pérez-Sánchez, H.; Gesing, S.; D’Agostino, D. Managing, analysing, and integrating big data in medical bioinformatics: open problems and future perspectives. BioMed research international 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).