Submitted:
19 October 2023
Posted:
19 October 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction

2. Peach Post-Harvest Physiology
2.1. Recognizing the Physiological Changes that Occur during Peach Ripening

2.2. Factors Affecting the Post-Harvest Quality and Shelf Life of Peach Fruit
2.2.1. Humidity and Temperature
2.2.2. Ethylene, Along with Other Ripening Regulators:
2.2.3. Susceptibility to Disease and Mechanical Injury
| Factor | Effects on the quality and shelf life of peach fruit |
|---|---|
| Temperature | (1) Accelerated ripening and softening may result from high temperatures. (2) Chilling damage from low temperatures can have an impact on the texture and flavor of food. (3) By slowing ripening processes, controlled temperatures can extend shelf life. |
| Humidity | (1) High humidity can keep fruit from losing moisture and keep it turgid. (2) High humidity can encourage the growth of mold and decay. |
| Exposure to Ethylene | (1) Exposure to ethylene can cause ripening, which affects the development of firmness and flavor. (2) Scavengers for ethylene or storage in a controlled environment can lessen these effects. |
| Mechanical Damage | (1) Physical damage and bruises can hasten deterioration and quality loss. (2) Mechanical damage can be reduced by careful handling and packaging. |
| Pathogens | (1) Pathogens such as fungi and bacteria can cause decay, reducing shelf life. (2) Post-harvest treatments and sanitary practices may minimize pathogen growth. |
2.3. Important Biochemical Procedures in Peach Ripening
3. Developments in Post-Harvest Technologies
3.1. Novel Approaches to Manage Peaches after Harvest
3.1.1. Innovative Storage Methods to Increase Shelf Life
3.2. Utilizing Nanotechnology in Food Preservation
3.3. Post-Harvest Processes Mechanization and Automation
4. Peach Ripening Techniques to Improve Quality
4.1. Ripening Techniques Based on Ethylene
4.1.1. Application Techniques and Dosages of Ethylene
4.1.2. Controlled Ripening with Ethylene Inhibitors
4.2. Ripening Agents that are not Ethylene-based
4.2.1. Acetylene- and Calcium-Carbide-based Ripening
4.2.2. Ethephon and Other Compounds that Release Ethylene
4.3. New Methods for Coordinating and Managing Ripening
4.3.1. Genetic Modification and Gene Editing for Delayed Ripening
5. Effect on Peach Fruit Quality and Shelf Life
5.1. Nutritional Composition Changes during Post-Harvest Handling and Ripening

5.2. The Impact of Advanced Technologies on the Texture, Flavor, and Aroma of Peaches
5.3. Post-Harvest Treatment Microbiological and Sensory Aspects
5.4. Consumer Preferences and Market Response to Improved Peach Quality
6. Future Prospects and Sustainability
6.1. Advanced Post-Harvest Technologies' Effects on the Environment
6.2. Optimizing Resources and Reducing Waste
6.3. Possibilities for Including Sustainable Practices in the Peach Sector
6.3.1. Packaging:
6.3.2. Energy-Efficient Technologies:
6.3.3. Social Accountability:
6.4. Recent Developments and Future Directions of Peach Post-Harvest Research
6.4.1. Applications of Nanotechnology:
6.4.2. Gene Editing and Biotechnology:
6.4.3. IoT and Smart Sensors:
6.4.4. Waste Optimization:
| Post-Harvest Technology | Peach Quality Effect | Extension of Shelf Life | Impact of the environment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packaging for Modified Atmospheres (MAP) | (1) Reduces decay and preserves firmness. (2) Maintains flavor and aroma. (3) Decreases microbial growth. |
(1) Decreases oxygen levels to prolong shelf life. (2) Inhibits the ripening processes. (3) Reduces moisture loss. |
(1) When compared to traditional packaging, it reduces packaging waste. (2) Controlled atmospheric conditions are required. |
| Controlled Atmosphere Storage (CAS ) | (1) Preserves fruit texture and firmness. (2) Postpones ripening and senescence. (3) Maintains nutrient content. |
(1) Significantly increases shelf life by changing the composition of the gas. (2) Reduces losses after harvest. (3) Prevents chilling damage. |
(1) Need specific monitoring tools and storage facilities. (2) Process that uses a lot of energy since the temperature and gas are controlled. |
| Applications of Nanotechnology | (1) Increases the delivery of bioactive compounds and nutritional absorption. (2) Maintains the appearance and texture. (3) Lessens post-harvest damage. |
(1) Slows down enzymatic activity to prolong shelf life. (2) Decreases microbial growth and decay. (3) Increases the pathogen resistance of fruit. |
(1) Potential environmental risks associated to nanoparticles release. (2) To completely comprehend the effects of nanomaterials, research is required. |
| Gene Editing | (1) Gives fine control over the traits and processes of ripening. (2) Can improve nutritional value (3) May lessen vulnerability to diseases and pests. |
(1) Prolongs the shelf life through delaying off ripening. (2) Keeps fruit quality intact. (3) Prevents overripening, thus decreasing waste. |
(1) Impact on the environment relies on particular changes and legal procedures. (2) Social and moral problems concerning genetic modifications. |
5. Conclusions
References
- Ansari, M.; W, N.J.P.č; Tuteja. Post-harvest quality risks by stress/ethylene: management to mitigate. Protoplasma 2015, 252, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thompson, A.K.; Prange, R.K.; Bancroft, Roger, P.; Tongchai, Controlled atmosphere storage of fruit and vegetables. CABI, 2018: p. 1-48.
- Usall, J.; Casals, C.; Sisquella, M.; Palou, L. ; De Cal, Alternative technologies to control postharvest diseases of stone fruits. Stewart Postharvest Review. 2015, 11, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Florkowski, W.J.; Banks, Nigel. H.; Shewfeltet, Robert.L.; Prussia, E.; Stanley, Postharvest handling: a systems approach. 2021: Academic press.
- Salyari, R.; Seifi, E.; Varasteh, F. ; Alizadeh, Mahdi, Effects of pre-harvest salicylic acid treatment on the post-harvest quality of peach cultivar Robin. Journal of Chemical Health Risks 2022, 12, 355–362. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, Z.; Zhou, D.; Ge, X.; Luo, Y. ; Su, Jingyi, The role of essential oils in maintaining the postharvest quality and preservation of peach and other fruits. Journal of Food Biochemistry 2022, 46, e14513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Benichou, M.; Ayour, J.; Sagar, M.; Alahyane, A. ; Elateri, I.; Aitoubahou, Ahmed, Postharvest technologies for shelf life enhancement of temperate fruits. Postharvest biology technology of temperate fruits 2018, 77–100. [Google Scholar]
- Pokhrel, H.J.I.J.O. ;Binod, Review on post-harvest handling to reduce loss of fruits and vegetables. International Journal of Horticulture Food Science 2021, 2, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahajan, P. V.; Caleb, O. J.; Gil, Maria. I.; Izumi, H.; Colelli, G.; Watkins, C. B.; Zude, Manuela, Quality and safety of fresh horticultural commodities: Recent advances and future perspectives. Food Packaging Shelf Life 2017, 14, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Zhao, L.; Fan, C.; Wang, P.; Cui, M.; Liu, L.; Yang, H.; W. ; Junjie, Impact of methyl salicylate on storage quality, ethylene action, and protein profiling of ‘Zaosu’pear (Pyrus bretschneideri). Scientia Horticulturae. 2020, 264, 109196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramaswamy, Hosahalli.; S, Post-harvest technologies of fruits & vegetables. DEStech Publications, Inc. 2014, .
- Alegbeleye, O.; Odeyemi, O.A.; Strateva, M. ; Stratev, Deyan, Microbial spoilage of vegetables, fruits and cereals. Applied Food Research 2022, 2, 100122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Oliveira, K.R.; Fernandes, K.D.d.S.; Guedes, J.P.d.; Souza, E.L.; Magnani, Marciane, Chitosan-based coatings and plant extracts, in Chitosan: Novel Applications in Food Systems. Elsevier. 2023, p. 31-68. 31.
- Sudheer, K.; Indira, V.; Indira, Post harvest technology of horticultural crops. New India Publishing. 2007: Vol. 7.
- Goulao, L.; F, C.M.J.T.i.f.s. ; Oliveira, Cristina, Cell wall modifications during fruit ripening: when a fruit is not the fruit. Trends in food science technology. 2008, 19, 4–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, N.; Huang, W.; Wu, D.; Chen, K. ; He, Yong, Quantitative visualization of pectin distribution maps of peach fruits. Scientific Reports. 2017, 7, 9275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, B.J.; Lecourt, G.J.P. ; Bishop, Advances in non-destructive early assessment of fruit ripeness towards defining optimal time of harvest and yield prediction—A review. Plants. 2018, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hussein, Z.O.A.; Fawole, U.L.J.H.P.; J. Opara, Harvest and postharvest factors affecting bruise damage of fresh fruits. Horticultural Plant Journal. 2020, 6, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Matetić, M.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, X. ; Jemrić, Tomislav, Postharvest quality monitoring and variance analysis of peach and nectarine cold chain with multi-sensors technology. Applied Sciences. 2017, 7, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kou, X.; Feng, Y.; Yuan, S.; Zhao, X.; Wu, C.; Wang, C. ; Xue, Zhaohui, Different regulatory mechanisms of plant hormones in the ripening of climacteric and non-climacteric fruits: a review. Plant Molecular Biology. 2021, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Pan, L.; Wang, Y.; Meng, J.; Deng, L.; Niu, Liang. ; Liu, H.; Ding, Y.; Yao, J.L.; Nieuwenhuizen, Nicolaas Jacobus, PpIAA1 and PpERF4 form a positive feedback loop to regulate peach fruit ripening by integrating auxin and ethylene signals. Plant Science. 2021, 313, 111084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmad, M.S.; Siddiqui, M.Wasim.; Ahmad, M.S.; Siddiqui, M.; Wasim, Factors affecting postharvest quality of fresh fruits. Postharvest quality assurance of fruits: practical approaches for developing countries. 2015: p. 7-32.
- Chen, H.; Cao, S.; Fang, X.; Mu, H.; Yang, H.; Wang, X.; Xu, Q. ; Gao, Haiyan, Changes in fruit firmness, cell wall composition and cell wall degrading enzymes in postharvest blueberries during storage. Scientia Horticulturae. 2015, 188, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Jiang, L.; Yu, M.; An, X.; Ma, R. ; Yu, Zhifang, Proteomic analysis of changes in mitochondrial protein expression during peach fruit ripening and senescence. Journal of Proteomics. 2016, 147, 197–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toivonen, P.; MA, New approaches to production and quality assessment of fruits. XXX International Horticultural Congress IHC2018: International Symposium on Fruit and Vegetables for Processing, International 1292, 2018.
- Lutz, É.; Coradi, P. ; Carteri, Applications of new technologies for monitoring and predicting grains quality stored: Sensors, internet of things, and artificial intelligence. Measurement. 2022, 188, 110609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, C.; Gaspar, P.D.; Simões, M.P.; Silva, P.D. ; Andrade, Luís, Review on techniques and treatments toward the mitigation of the chilling injury of peaches. Journal of Food Processing Preservation. 2022, 46, e14358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kondle, R.; Sharma, K.; Singh, G. ; Kotiyal, A Using Nanotechnology for Enhancing the Shelf Life of Fruits. Food Processing and Packaging Technologies. 2022. [CrossRef]
- El Khetabi, A.; Lahlali, R.; Ezrari, S.; Radouane, N.; Lyousfi, N.; Banani, H.; Askarne, L.; Tahiri, A.E.; Ghadraoui, L. ; Belmalha, Saadia, Role of plant extracts and essential oils in fighting against postharvest fruit pathogens and extending fruit shelf life: A review. Trends in Food Science Technology. 2022, 120, 402–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, D.; Cao, S.; Sheng, T.; Shao, J.; Song, C.; Wo, F.; Chen, W. ; Yang, Zhenfeng, Effect of blue light on ethylene biosynthesis, signalling and fruit ripening in postharvest peaches. Scientia Horticulturae. 2015, 197, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Lichter, A.; Chalupowicz, D.; Gamrasni, D.; Goldberg, T.; Nerya, O.; Ben-Arie, R. ; Porat, Ron, Effects of the ethylene-action inhibitor 1-methylcyclopropene on postharvest quality of non-climacteric fruit crops. Postharvest Biology Technology. 2016, 111, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmood, T.; Saeed, I.; Anwer, H.; Mahmood, I. ; Zubair, Arif, Comparative study to evaluate the effect of calcium carbide (cac 2) as an artificial ripening agent on shelf life, physio-chemical properties, iron containment and quality of prunus persica l. Batsch Eur J Res. 2013, 1, 685–700. [Google Scholar]
- Ali,T.J.; A, C.; Subramanian, J.; Peter K, Pauls, Ethephon-induced abscission of “Redhaven” peach. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2012, 7 pages. [CrossRef]
- Maduwanthi, S.D.T. Maduwanthi, S.D.T.; Marapana, Rauj, Induced ripening agents and their effect on fruit quality of banana. International journal of food science. 2019, 8 pages. [CrossRef]
- Martín-Pizarro, C. ; Posé, David, Genome editing as a tool for fruit ripening manipulation. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018, 9, 1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- García-Gómez, B.E.; Salazar, J.A.; Nicolás-Almansa, M.; Razi, M.; Rubio, M.; Ruiz, D. ; Martínez-Gómez, Pedro, Molecular bases of fruit quality in Prunus species: An integrated genomic, transcriptomic, and metabolic review with a breeding perspective. International journal of molecular sciences. 2020, 22, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brandi, F.; Bar, E.; Mourgues, F.; Horváth, G.; Turcsi, E.; Giuliano, G.; Liverani, A.; Tartarini, S.; Lewinsohn, E. ; Rosati, Carlo, Study of'Redhaven'peach and its white-fleshed mutant suggests a key role of CCD4 carotenoid dioxygenase in carotenoid and norisoprenoid volatile metabolism. BMC plant biology. 2011, 11, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fenn, M.A. ; Giovannoni, James, Phytohormones in fruit development and maturation. The Plant Journal. 2021, 105, 446–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minas, I.S.; Tanou, G. ; Molassiotis, Athanassios, Environmental and orchard bases of peach fruit quality. Scientia Horticulturae. 2018, 235, 307–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belisle, C.; Adhikari, K.; Chavez, D.; Phan, U. T. ; Xuan, Development of a lexicon for flavor and texture of fresh peach cultivars. Journal of Sensory Studies. 2017, 32, e12276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, J.S.; Park, H.S.; Lee, K.W.; Song, J.S.; Han, H.Y.; Kim, H.W.; Cho, T. ; Jin, Advances in the Strategic Approaches of Pre-and Post-Harvest Treatment Technologies for Peach Fruits (Prunus persica). Horticulturae. 2023, 9, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serra, S.; Anthony, B.; Masia, A.; Giovannini, D. Musacchi, Stefano, Determination of biochemical composition in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) accessions characterized by different flesh color and textural typologies. Foods. 2020, 9, 1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taiti, C.; Costa, C.; Petrucci, W.A.; Luzzietti, L.; Giordani, E.; Mancuso, S. ; Nencetti, Valter, Are peach cultivars used in conventional long food supply chains suitable for the high-quality short markets? Foods 2021, 10, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moreno, S.R.; Curtis, S.J.; Sarkhosh, A.; Sarnoski, P.J.; Sims, C.A.; Dreyer, E.; Rudolph, A.B.; Thompson-Witrick, K.A. ; MacIntosh, Andrew, Considerations when brewing with fruit juices: A review and Case study using peaches. Fermentation. 2022, 8, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alonso-Salinas, R.; Acosta-Motos, J.R.; Núñez-Delicado, E.; Gabaldón, J.A. ; López-Miranda, Santiago, Combined effect of potassium permanganate and ultraviolet light as ethylene scavengers on post-harvest quality of peach at optimal and stressful temperatures. Agronomy. 2022, 12, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu,F.; Wen, Development and application of citrus storage technologies with concurrent consideration of fruit quality preservation, energy use, and costs. in Technology on Reducing Post-harvest Losses and Maintaining Quality of Fruits and Vegetables Proceedings of 2010 AARDO Workshop. 農業試驗所. 2010.
- Fernandez, C.M.; Alves, J.; Gaspar, P.D.; Lima, M. ; Tânia, Fostering awareness on environmentally sustainable technological solutions for the post-harvest food supply chain. Processes. 2021, 9, 1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gradziel, T.; McCaa, J. Gradziel, T.; McCaa, J.; P, Processing peach cultivar development, in The peach: botany, production and uses. 2008, CABI Wallingford UK. p. 175-192.
- Lamidi, R.O.; Jiang, L.; Pathare, P.B.; Wang, Y.D. ; Roskilly, AP, Recent advances in sustainable drying of agricultural produce: A review. Applied energy. 2019, 233, 367–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allison, A.L.; Lorencatto, F.; Michie, S. ; Miodownik, Mark, Barriers and enablers to buying biodegradable and compostable plastic packaging. Sustainability. 2021, 13, 1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu Nguyen, M.B.; Nguyen, T.K.; Dang, K.; Luu, T.H.; Thach, P.L.; Phuong Nguyen, K.Q.; Nguyen, Hong, Current and potential uses of agricultural by-products and waste in main food sectors in Vietnam—A circular economy perspective, in Circular Economy and Waste Valorisation: Theory and Practice from an International Perspective. Springer. 2022, p. 131-151.
- Pohlmann, C.; Rosa, Scavarda, A. J.; Alves, M.B.; Korzenowski, A.; Luis, The role of the focal company in sustainable development goals: A Brazilian food poultry supply chain case study. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020, 245, 118798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).