Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

C-undecylcalix[4]resorcinarene Langmuir-Blodgett/Porous Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite Film as a Electrochemical Sensor for Determination of Tryptophan

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

11 October 2023

Posted:

13 October 2023

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
In this study, a composite film was developed for electrochemical sensing of tryptophan (Trp). Porous reduced graphene oxide (PrGO) was utilized as the electron transfer layer, and a C-undecylcalix[4] resorcinarene Langmuir-Blodgett (CUCR-LB) film served as the molecular recognition layer. Atomic force microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and electrochemical experiments were employed to analyze the characteristics of the CUCR-LB/PrGO composite film. The electrochemical behavior of Trp on the CUCR-LB/PrGO composite film was investigated, revealing a linear response range of Trp was 1.0×10-7 to 3.0×10-5 mol L-1 and a detection limit of 3.0×10-8 mol L-1. Furthermore, the developed electroanalytical method successfully determined Trp content in an amino acid injection samples. This study not only introduces a rapid and reliable electrochemical method for determination of Trp but also presents a new strategy for constructing high-performance electrochemical sensing platforms.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Tryptophan (Trp), as a pivotal constituent among the eight essential amino acids, plays a key role in regulating body growth and metabolic processes [1]. Research has indicated that abnormal levels of Trp can potentially contribute to the development of some serious diseases, such as delusional disorders and Alzheimer’s disease [2,3]. Furthermore, the determination of Trp serves as a critical means for early diagnosis of diseases. For example, the concentration of Trp in gastric fluid can yield valuable information about early-stage gastric cancer [4]. Therefore, it is crucial to develop a dependable and effective method for the determining of Trp in real samples.
Several methods, including fluorescence spectroscopy [5], capillary electrophoresis [6], and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [7,8], have been proposed to determinate trace amounts of Trp. Despite their widespread usage, these techniques entail certain limitations, such as long detective times, costly instrumentation, intricate analytical processes and the use of toxic solvents [9]. Over the years, electrochemical sensing methods have emerged as a promising approach for the determination of bioactive molecules [10]. This is primarily attributed to their inherent advantages, including rapid response, easy miniaturization, high sensitivity, and low cost. On bare electrodes, however, the sensitivity for determination of Trp is limited due to the sluggish electrode kinetics resulting from high overpotentials [11]. To address this challenge, modified electrodes with enhanced sensitivity has emerged as an effective solution. Various materials, including noble metals [12,13], carbon-based materials [14,15,16], functional polymers [17,18,19], and semiconductors [20,21], have been employed to modify electrodes and have successfully demonstrated determination of Trp in diverse real-world samples. Nonetheless, these electrochemical sensors still suffer from limitations, such as narrow linear ranges, insufficient detection limits (LOD), and high costs associated with the use of noble metals [22]. Therefore, there is necessary to explore and develop more efficient electrochemical sensing for determination of Trp.
Porous reduced graphene oxide (PrGO) has emerged as a superior material for electrochemical sensing [23]. It has all the advantages of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) for electrochemical sensing, such as facilitated electron transfer and increased active surface area. Furthermore, its unique structure can mitigate aggregation and stacking, thereby promoting mass and ion transmission [24,25,26]. Wang H.Y. demonstrated the notable advantages of PrGO in electrochemical sensing of rifampicin [27]. Similarly, Rabah B and coworkers presented a simple and efficient strategy for immobilizing anti-gliadin polyclonal antibodies on PrGO-modified glassy carbon electrodes (GCE) [28]. The resulting immunosensor exhibits high sensitivity to gliadin due to the excellent electron transfer channels facilitated by the support of PrGO.
Calixarenes are cyclic molecules with a rigid structure that can selectively bind to specific analytes [29]. This binding interaction between the analyte and calixarene can be conveniently translated into an electrochemical signal, allowing for highly selective and sensitive analysis of the samples. Siriboon M et al. reported the composite film of calix[6]arene/bismuth ferrite/multi-walled carbon nanotube for electrochemical sensing of methyl parathion [30]. The result demonstrated that calix[6]arene can form a host-guest interaction with methyl parathion. Its introduction promotes the selective enrichment of methyl parathion on the surface of electrode, which improves the sensitivity and selectivity of the sensor. On the other hand, the Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) technique enables the fabrication of uniform and ultra-thin films at the molecular level. By increasing the transferred surface pressure and the number of layers, it is possible to construct films modified with calixarene that are well-arranged, tightly packed, and have a higher density of active centers. Hao Q L et al. proposed the modification of a pre-oxidized gold electrode with a mixed LB film of 4-tert-butylcalix [6]arene and cellulose acetate, which demonstrated excellent recognition and sensing capabilities towards dopamine (DA) [31]. Recently, our research group introduced a pre-treated GCE modified with C-undecylcalix[4]resorcinarene LB (CUCR-LB) film [32]. It was utilized as an electrochemical sensing platform for the simultaneous detection of dopamine (DA) and uric acid (UA). The synergistic effect of the CUCR-LB film and the pre-treated GCE resulted in high sensitivity and selectivity.
Herein, a novel electrochemical sensing platform was presented to determinate Trp based on a composite film of CUCR-LB film and PrGO modified GCE (CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE). Scheme 1 shows the fabrication process of PrGO and CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE. PrGO serves as an electron transfer layer, which helps to enhance the electron transfer between Trp molecules and the surface of electrode. On the other hand, CUCR-LB acts as a molecular recognition layer, which increases the adsorption capacity of Trp molecules on the surface of the electrode. Through the combination of the advantages of PrGO and CUCR-LB film, the composite film exhibits enhanced electrochemical response towards Trp, surpassing that of the pure PrGO film. This novel sensing platform holds great potential for various applications in the determination of Trp.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

C-undecylcalix[4]resorcinarene (CUCR), tryptophan (Trp), tert-Butanol hydrogen peroxide (TBHP), graphite powder,potassium, permanganate (KMnO4), and other chemical reagents were obtained from Shanghai Aladdin Chemical Reagent Co., LTD (Shanghai, China). All reagents were used without any additional purification.

2.2. Preparation of porous reduced graphene oxide

Graphene oxide (GO) was prepared using a previously established method [33]. Subsequently, rGO was obtained by reducing GO with hydrazine [34]. To obtain PrGO, 100 mg of rGO was dispersed in a 100 ml TBHP solution (100 mL) and sonicated for 0.5 hour. The resulting mixture was then refluxed at 60°C for 12 hours. After filtration, the collected PrGO powder was subjected to dialysis to remove any residual TBHP. Finally, the PrGO powder was obtained through freeze-drying.

2.3. Fabrication of the composite film modified electrode

A GCE (d = 3 mm) was polished by a conventional method. 0.5 mg mL-1 PrGO was dispersed in N-methylpyrrolidone and then sonicated in an ice bath for 1 hour to ensure thorough mixing and dispersion. An 8-μL solution of the PrGO dispersion was then carefully deposited onto the tip of the electrode. The modified electrode was then dried at a temperature of 60°C for 1 hour. It was named PrGO/GCE. Similarly, an rGO-modified electrode was prepared (rGO/GCE). Subsequently, a CUCR-LB film was fabricated and transferred onto the PrGO/GCE under a surface pressure of 30.0 mN m-1. This modified electrode was designated as CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE. Multilayer films were assembled by sequentially transferring monolayers.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characteristics of CUCR-LB film

According to our previous results, CUCR is able to form a stable monolayer at the gas-liquid interface.[32]. Figure 1A displays the isotherms of surface pressure (π) ~ molecular area (A) for CUCR on pure water and aqueous subphase with varying concentrations of Trp. In the case of CUCR monolayers formed on pure water, the surface pressure remains low at relatively high molecular areas. As the compression increases, the isotherms exhibit a sharp rise in surface pressure. The collapse of the CUCR monolayer occurs when the surface pressure surpasses 48 mN m-1. When the linear portion of the isotherm was extrapolated to π = 0, the mean area of CUCR in the condensed state is determined to be 1.85 nm2. This result is comparable to the reported mean area of calix[4]arene [35]. As the concentration of Trp in the subphase aqueous solution increases, the isotherm shifts the rightward and the mean area of CUCR increases. This indicates a binding interaction between CUCR and Trp molecules. To further validate this result, UV-visible spectral curves were measured. Figure 1B shows the UV-visible spectral curve of a 20-layer CUCR-LB modified film deposited on a quartz sheet before and after soaking in a solution containing 1.0×10-4 mol L-1 Trp for 30 minutes. It is evident that the CUCR-LB film displays a distinctive absorption peak at 282.0 nm, resulting from the presence of the phenyl group [36]. Upon immersion of the modified quartz in the Trp solution, the absorption peak undergoes significant enhancement and shifts to 286.0 nm. These spectral changes once again confirm the interaction between the CUCR-LB film and Trp molecules, indicating its ability to effectively enrich Trp molecules.
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) was used to study the morphology of CUCR-LB films. Figure 1C presents the AFM image of the CUCR-LB film on the mica surface. It is evident that a dense, ordered, and ultrathin film with regularly distributed small pores can be observed. The film surface appears relatively flat and there is no significant molecular aggregation, indicating good stability and reproducibility of the film. To further characterize the CUCR-LB films, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was utilized. Figure 1D displays the Nyquist plots of the bare GCE and the CUCR-LB modified electrodes with varying layers in a 0.1 mol L-1 KCl solution containing 5.0 × 10-3 mol L-1 K3[Fe(CN)6]/K4[Fe(CN)6] (1:1) solution. It can be observed that the Nyquist plot of the bare GCE shows a small semicircle diameter, indicating easy accessibility of [Fe(CN)6]4-/3- to the electrode surface and effective electron transfer [37]. For the CUCR-LB modified electrodes, the diameter of the semicircle in the Nyquist plots increases gradually with each additional layer. This can be explained attributed to the increasing density of the non-conductive CUCR-LB films with more layers. Using the equivalent circuit shown in the inset of Figure 1D, the relevant parameters were calculated and are listed in Table 1. There exists a relationship between the double-layer capacitance (Cdl), the thickness of films (d), and the number of layers (N): Cdl=(εcalixεS/Nd) [38]. Here, ε represents the vacuum permittivity with a magnitude of 8.85 × 10-14 F cm-1, and εcalix corresponds to the relative dielectric constant of calixarene with a magnitude of 2.80 [38]. Through calculation, the thickness of 1 layer, 2 layers, and 3 layers of CUCR-LB films are determined to be 4.4 nm, 9.0 nm, and 13.3 nm, respectively. A linear relationship between the number of layers and the film thickness of CUCR-LB films was found, which further emphasizes the flatness and uniformity of CUCR-LB films.

3.2. Characteristics of CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE

The transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of the prepared rGO and PrGO are shown in Figure 2A. In the image of rGO, a transparent and continuous nanosheet structure is observed. After treatment with H2O2, uniformly distributed nanoscale pores can be clearly observed, with diameters ranging from approximately 5 to 10 nanometers. Further, Raman spectroscopic technique was used to characterize rGO and PrGO. According to Figure 2B, GO, rGO, and PrGO all exhibit two prominent characteristic peaks: a D peak at ~1345 cm-1 and a G peak at ~1590 cm-1 [39]. The integrity and ordering of the carbon lattice structure is reflected by the intensity ratio of the D peak to the G peak (ID/IG). Based on Raman testing, the ID/IG ratio for GO, rGO, and PrGO is determined to be 0.86, 1.06, and 1.46, respectively. PrGO has a larger ID/IG ratio, indicating a higher density of exposed edges and defects [40]. This situation is advantageous for enhancing the electron transfer.
To compare the characteristics of the different electrodes, cyclic voltammetry (CV) responses of various electrodes to K3[Fe(CN)6] solution were examined (Figure 2C). Compared with the bare GCE electrode, the K3[Fe(CN)6] redox peaks of rGO/GCE, PrGO/GCE, and CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE electrodes show a significant increase in the redox peaks and a decrease in the peak-to-peak distance (ΔEp), indicating that these modified films have excellent electron transfer. Notably, the PrGO/GCE electrode showed the highest response peaks and the smallest ΔEp, suggesting that PrGO has better potential for electrochemical sensing applications compared to rGO. Compared with PrGO/GCE, the redox peaks of K3[Fe(CN)6] on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE did not decrease significantly, indicating that the introduced CUCR-LB had no significant effect on the conductivity of the composite films. The electrochemical active surface area was calculated to be 0.052 cm2 for the bare GCE, 0.077 cm2 for rGO/GCE, 0.115 cm2 for PrGO/GCE, and 0.104 cm2 for CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE according to the literature [41]. A higher electrochemical active surface area is expected to benefit the electrochemical sensing performance of Trp. Meanwhile, the morphology of the different modified electrodes was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as depicted in Figure 2D. On the rGO film, clusters of dense and wrinkled thin flakes were observed, exhibiting a pronounced aggregation phenomenon. On the PrGO film, a highly porous and interconnected network-like layered structure was observed, uniformly distributed on the surface of electrode. It is pleasing to note that the aggregation phenomenon was significantly reduced. On the CUCR-LB/PrGO composite film, a similar network-like layered structure was observed, but the edges of the layers appeared slightly blurred, attributed to the non-conductive nature of CUCR-LB.

3.3. Electrochemical behavior of Trp on CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE

The electrochemical response of various electrodes (including bare GCE, rGO/GCE, PrGO/GCE, and CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE) to Trp was characterized by the CV method. The corresponding voltammograms are presented in Figure 3A, and the electrochemical data are listed in Table 2. A weak oxidation peak was observed on the bare GCE, which was due to the slow kinetics of the electrode caused by the high overpotential. However, after modification with rGO and PrGO, the oxidation peak current (ipa) of Trp increased significantly due to the improved conductivity and electrochemically active surface area of rGO and PrGO. Notably, the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE exhibited the highest ipa for Trp, being 50.9 times, 3.0 times, and 1.7 times higher than the bare GCE, rGO/GCE, and PrGO/GCE, respectively. This enhancement can be attributed to the synergistic effect between the PrGO and the CUCR-LB film. The PrGO film acts as the electron transfer layer, promoting the electron transfer rate of Trp, while the CUCR-LB film serves as the recognition layer, enhancing the accumulation of Trp on the electrode surface. This enhancement is due to the synergistic effect of PrGO as an electron transfer layer, which enhances the electron transfer between Trp molecules and the electrode surface, and CUCR-LB film as a molecular recognition layer, which improves the adsorption of Trp molecules on the electrode surface. The combined effect of the PrGO and the CUCR-LB film results in a composite film that exhibits high sensitivity towards Trp.
The effect of scan rate (v) on ipa was investigated to study the electrochemical kinetics of Trp on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE (Figure 3B). As the value of v increased, ipa gradually increased and the oxidation peak potential (Epa) shifted to a more positive potential. Furthermore, a linear relationship was observed between logipa and logv with a linear regression equation of logipa = - (3.139±0.017) logv + (0.63±0.02) and an R-value of 0.999. This suggests that the electrochemical oxidation of Trp on CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE is under the control of both adsorption and diffusion [42].
Chronocoulometry (CC) and chronoamperometry (CA) were used to determine the saturated adsorption amount (Γ*) and catalytic rate constant (kcat) of Trp on various electrodes. The chronocoulometric curves of CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE in blank and 5.0 × 10-4 mol L-1 Trp solutions and the corresponding Q vs t1/2 linear plots are showed in Figure 3C. The Γ* of Trp on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE was determined to be 1.17 × 10-8 mol cm-2 by calculating the difference in the intercept between the curves a and b [43]. Similarly, the calculated values of Γ* for Trp on other electrodes are listed in Table 2. Trp exhibited higher Γ* on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE, indicating that the introduction of the CUCR-LB film indeed enhanced the loading of Trp on the surface of electrode. Furthermore, the chronoamperometric curves of the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE in blank and 5.0 × 10-4 mol L-1 Trp solutions and the corresponding icat/iL vs t1/2 linear plots are presented in Figure 3D. The kcat of Trp on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE was calculated to be 2.07 × 104 mol L-1 s-1 using the slope of icat/iL vs t1/2 [44]. Similarly, the calculated values of kcat for Trp on other electrodes can be found in Table 2. These results indicate that Trp exhibits higher kcat on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE, suggesting that the synergistic effect of the PrGO film and the CUCR-LB film provides a more efficient interface for the electrochemical reaction of Trp.

3.4. Analytical method validations

3.4.1. Optimization of Analysis and Detection Conditions

To enhance sensitivity and minimize background current, Linear Sweep Voltammetry (LSV) was employed as the detection method in our analysis. Figure 4A demonstrates the influence of varying amounts of PrGO modification on the ipa of Trp at concentrations of 1.0×10-6 mol L-1 and 1.0×10-5 mol L-1 within the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE electrochemical sensing system. The results indicate that the ipa of Trp increases with escalating PrGO modification amount. However, increasing the PrGO modification amount from 8μL to 10μL did not result in a significant rise in current. Consequently, we selected an 8μL PrGO modification for subsequent experiments to ensure an appropriate current response while minimizing excessive PrGO usage. Notably, the number of layers in the CUCR-LB film exhibited a contrary effect on the ipa of Trp, where an increase led to a decrease. This phenomenon is attributed to the dense and non-conductive nature of CUCR-LB films, impeding electron transfer rates.

3.4.2. Analytical performances

An electroanalytical method for the determination of Trp using the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE was established under optimized conditions. Figure 4B illustrates the linear sweep voltammograms of Trp at various concentrations. As the concentration of Trp increases, the ipa gradually increases.
There is a strong linear relationship between the peak current values and the concentration in the range of 1.0 × 10-7 to 3.0 × 10-5 mol L-1 (the inset of Figure 4B), with a regression equation of ipa (μA) = (0.171 ± 0.088) + (1.589 ± 0.026) c (μmol L-1) (R = 0.9995). The limit of detection (LOD) for Trp was determined to be 3.0 × 10-8 mol L-1. We compared the response performance of the CUCR-LB/PrGO composite film to other graphene-based composite films in terms of electrochemical sensing properties (Table 3). Except for SnS/TiO2@GO, nano-CeO2/rGO, CSOH/rGO, and CuO-CeO2-rGO-MWCNTs, the CUCR-LB/PrGO composite films have a wider linear range and higher sensitivity compared with other graphene-based composites. This indicates that using PrGO as the electron transfer layer and the CUCR-LB film as the recognition layer is a highly effective strategy for constructing an electrochemical sensing platform.
To evaluate the reproducibility of the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE for detection of Trp, we conducted five parallel experiments. The relative standard deviation (RSD) was approximately 3.7%, demonstrating good reproducibility of the composite film for Trp detection. Furthermore, after storing the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE at 4°C for 14 days, it still retained 92.2% of the response current for the concentration of 1.0 × 10-5 mol L-1 Trp, indicating excellent stability of the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE.

3.4.3. Interference studies

The effect of potential interferents on the determination of Trp on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE was investigated. The results showed that even with 10-fold doses of interfering substances such as glucose, uric acid, cysteine, alanine, tyrosine, arginine, leucine, valine, histidine, and lysine, there were no significant effects on the peak current response and peak potential of Trp on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE. Figure 4C presents a comparison of the LSV response curves of 1.0×10-5 mol L-1 Trp on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE before and after the addition of 10-fold uric acid concentration. The results indicate that the CUCR-LB/PrGO composite film exhibits excellent selectivity in the electrochemical sensing of Trp.

3.4.4. Electrode renewal

The modified electrode was immersed in a 0.2 mol L-1 pH=7.0 phosphate buffer (PB) solution and subjected to 5 minutes of stirring cleaning. Subsequently, CV was performed in the potential range of 0.0 ~0.8 V (vs SCE) until the oxidation peak of Trp disappeared, achieving the renewal of modified electrode. After 5 renewal/sensing cycles, the electrochemical response current for Trp at concentrations of 1.0×10-6 mol L-1 and 1.0×10-5 mol L-1 only decreased by 5.8% and 6.7%, respectively (Figure 4D). The performance of the renewed electrode was nearly identical to its initial state, indicating that the CUCR-LB/PrGO composite film was undamaged.

3.5. Determination of Trp in amino acid injection samples

The prospect of applying the established analytical method to analyze available amino acid injection samples is discussed. The amino acid injection samples were directly diluted 100 times directly with ultrapure water. An appropriate amount of the sample solution was determination using the standard addition method. The results showed no significant difference compared with the HPLC method (Table 4). The recoveries ranged from 98.7% to 104.0%, indicating that the CUCR-LB/PrGO composite films are highly reliable and practical.

4. Conclusions

In this work, a composite film for electrochemical sensing of Trp was prepared using PrGO as the electron transfer layer and CUCR-LB as the molecular recognition layer. PrGO exhibits high electrochemical activity and accelerated electron transfer, while CUCR-LB film demonstrates strong recognition and enrichment capabilities for Trp molecules. Through the combination of the advantages of PrGO and CUCR-LB film, the composite film exhibits enhanced selectivity and sensitivity towards Trp. It not only provides a rapid and promising electrochemical method for determination of Trp but also presents a new strategy for constructing high-performance electrochemical sensing platforms.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Yanju Wu, Keyu Chen, and Song Li; Methodology: Yanju Wu, Song Li, and Junlong Ma; Investigation: Yanju Wu, Keyun Chen, Baoshan Wang; Formal analysis: Yanju Wu and Fei Wang; Writing-original draft: Fei Wang; Writing review & editing: Yanju Wu and Fei Wang; Supervision: Fei Wang; Funding acquisition: Yanju Wu and Fei Wang. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial supported by the Scientific and Technological Project of Henan Province (No. 232102321116, 212102310258).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Friedman, M. Analysis, nutrition, and health benefits of tryptophan. Int. J. Tryptophan. Res. 2018, 11, 117-128. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1178646918802282]. [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, L.; Yang, R.; Li, J. J.; Qu, L. B.; Harrington, P. D. A highly selective and sensitive electrochemical sensor for tryptophan based on the excellent surface adsorption and electrochemical properties of PSS functionalized graphene. Talanta 2019, 196, 309-316. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.12.058]. [CrossRef]
  3. Li, J. H.; Jiang, J. B.; Xu, Z. F.; Liu, M. Q.; Tang, S. P.; Yang, C. M.; Qian, D. Facile synthesis of Pd-Cu@Cu2O/N-RGO hybrid and its application for electrochemical detection of tryptophan. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 260, 526-535. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.12.125]. [CrossRef]
  4. Lian, W.; Ma, D. J.; Xu, X.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Y. L. Rapid high-performance liquid chromatography method for determination of tryptophan in gastric juice. J. Digest. Dis. 2012, 13, 100-106. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2980.2011.00559.x]. [CrossRef]
  5. Reynolds, D. M. Rapid and direct determination of tryptophan in water using synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Res. 2003, 37, 3055-3060. [https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1354(03)00153-2]. [CrossRef]
  6. Altria, K. D.; Harkin, P.; Hindson, M. G. Quantitative determination of tryptophan enantiomers by capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. B. 1996, 686, 103-110. [https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4347(96)00037-0]. [CrossRef]
  7. Marklova, E.; Fojtaskova, A.; Makovickova, H. HPLC methods for determination of tryptophan and its metabolites. Chem. Listy 1996, 90, 732-733.
  8. Widner, B.; Werner, E. R.; Schennach, H.; Wachter, H.; Fuchs, D. Simultaneous measurement of serum tryptophan and kynurenine by HPLC. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43, 2424-2426.
  9. Ozcan, A.; Sahin, Y. A novel approach for the selective determination of tryptophan in blood serum in the presence of tyrosine based on the electrochemical reduction of oxidation product of tryptophan formed in situ on graphite electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 31, 26-31. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2011.09.048]. [CrossRef]
  10. Karimian, N.; Hashemi, P.; Khanmohammadi, A.; Afkhami, A.; Bagheri, H. The principles and recent applications of bioelectrocatalysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. Re 2020, 7, 281-301.
  11. Xu, C.; Huang, K.; Fan, Y.; Wu, Z.; Li, J.; Can, T. Simultaneous electrochemical determination of dopamine and tryptophan using a TiO2-graphene/poly(4-aminobenzenesulfonic acid) composite film based platform. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. 2012, 32, 969-974. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.02.022]. [CrossRef]
  12. Arroquia, A.; Acosta, I.; Garcia Armada, M. P. Self-assembled gold decorated polydopamine nanospheres as electrochemical sensor for simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine, uric acid and tryptophan. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. 2020, 109. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110602]. [CrossRef]
  13. Hashkavayi, A. B.; Raoof, J. B.; Ojani, R. Construction of a highly sensitive signal-on aptasensor based on gold nanoparticles/functionalized silica nanoparticles for selective detection of tryptophan. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2017, 409, 6429-6438. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0588-z]. [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Waterhouse, G. I. N.; Xiang, Z. P.; Che, J.; Chen, C.; Sun, W. Z. A highly sensitive electrochemical sensor containing nitrogen-doped ordered mesoporous carbon (NOMC) for voltammetric determination of L-tryptophan. Food Chem. 2020, 326. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126976]. [CrossRef]
  15. Gautam, J.; Raj, M.; Goyal, R. N. Determination of tryptophan at carbon nanomaterials modified glassy carbon sensors: A comparison. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167. [https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab7e88]. [CrossRef]
  16. Niu, X. H.; Yang, X.; Mo, Z. L.; Guo, R. B.; Liu, N. J.; Zhao, P.; Liu, Z. Y.; Ouyang, M. X. Voltammetric enantiomeric differentiation of tryptophan by using multiwalled carbon nanotubes functionalized with ferrocene and beta-cyclodextrin. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 297, 650-659. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.041]. [CrossRef]
  17. Ratautaite, V.; Brazys, E.; Ramanaviciene, A.; Ramanavicius, A. Electrochemical sensors based on L-tryptophan molecularly imprinted polypyrrole and polyaniline. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2022, 917. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116389]. [CrossRef]
  18. Prinith, N. S.; Manjunatha, J. G. Electrochemical analysis of L-Tryptophan at highly sensitive poly(Glycine) modified carbon nanotube paste sensor. Mater. Res. Innovations 2022, 26, 134-143. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14328917.2021.1906560]. [CrossRef]
  19. Karabozhikova, V.; Tsakova, V.; Lete, C.; Marin, M.; Lupu, S. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-modified electrodes for tryptophan voltammetric sensing. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 848, 113309-113316. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113309]. [CrossRef]
  20. Rajendran, K.; Nallal, M.; Ganesan, M.; Shanmugasundaram, M.; Hira, S. A.; Gopalakrishnan, G.; Murugan, S.; Aharon, G.; Park, K. H. Fabrication of dual functional 3D-CeVO4/MWNT hybrid nanocomposite as a high-performance electrode material for supercapacitor and L-Tryptophan detection. Electrochim. Acta 2023, 445, 142020-142031. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142020]. [CrossRef]
  21. Fazl, F.; Gholivand, M. B. High performance electrochemical method for simultaneous determination dopamine, serotonin, and tryptophan by ZrO2-CuO co-doped CeO2 modified carbon paste electrode. Talanta 2022, 239, 122982-122992. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122982]. [CrossRef]
  22. Nasimi, H.; Madsen, J. S.; Zedan, A. H.; Malmendal, A.; Osther, P. J. S.; Alatraktchi, F. A. a. Electrochemical sensors for screening of tyrosine and tryptophan as biomarkers for diseases: A narrative review. Microchem. J. 2023, 190. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2023.108737]. [CrossRef]
  23. Walcarius, A. Electrocatalysis, sensors and biosensors in analytical chemistry based on ordered mesoporous and macroporous carbon-modified electrodes. Trac-Trend. Anal. Chem. 2012, 38, 79-97. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2012.05.003]. [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, D.; Feng, H. B.; Li, J. H. Graphene oxide: Preparation, functionalization, and electrochemical applications. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 6027-6053. [https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300115g]. [CrossRef]
  25. Demon, S. Z. N.; Kamisan, A. I.; Abdullah, N.; Noor, S. A. M.; Khim, O. K.; Kasim, N. A. M.; Yahya, M. Z. A.; Manaf, N. A. A.; Azmi, A. F. M.; Halim, N. A. Graphene-based materials in gas sensor applications: A review. Sensor. Mater. 2020, 32, 759-777. [https://doi.org/10.18494/sam.2020.2492]. [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, S. X.; He, Q. Y.; Tan, C. L.; Wang, Y. D.; Zhang, H. Graphene-based electrochemical sensors. Small 2013, 9, 1160-1172. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201202896]. [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, K.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, N. Three-dimensional porous reduced graphene oxide modified electrode for highly sensitive detection of trace rifampicin in milk. Anal. Methods 2022, 14, 2304-2310. [https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ay00517d]. [CrossRef]
  28. Chekin, F.; Singh, S. K.; Vasilescu, A.; Dhavale, V. M.; Kurungot, S.; Boukherroub, R.; Szunerits, S. Reduced graphene oxide modified electrodes for sensitive sensing of gliadin in food samples. ACS Sens. 2016, 1, 1462-1470. [https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.6b00608]. [CrossRef]
  29. Ikeda, A.; Shinkai, S. Novel cavity design using calix[n]arene skeletons:  Toward molecular recognition and metal binding. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1713-1734. [https://doi.org/10.1021/cr960385x]. [CrossRef]
  30. Gissawong, N.; Srijaranai, S.; Nanan, S.; Mukdasai, K.; Uppachai, P.; Teshima, N.; Mukdasai, S. Electrochemical detection of methyl parathion using calix[6]arene/bismuth ferrite/multiwall carbon nanotube-modified fluorine-doped tin oxide electrode. Microchim. Acta 2022, 189, 461-472. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-022-05562-5]. [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, Y. J.; Hao, Q. L.; Mandler, D. Electrochemical detection of dopamine by a calixarene-cellulose acetate mixed Langmuir-Blodgett monolayer. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1042, 29-36. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.08.019]. [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, F.; Chi, C. L.; Yu, B.; Ye, B. X. Simultaneous voltammetric determination of dopamine and uric acid based on Langmuir-Blodgett film of calixarene modified glassy carbon electrode. Sensor. Actuat. B-Chem. 2015, 221, 1586-1593. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.06.155]. [CrossRef]
  33. Xin, C. Z.; Gao, S. S.; Din, Y. X.; Wu, Y. J.; Wang, F. Direct electrodeposition to fabricate 3D graphene network modified glassy carbon electrode for sensitive determination of tadalafil. Nano 2019, 14, 93-102. [https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793292019500097]. [CrossRef]
  34. Park, S.; An, J.; Potts, J. R.; Velamakanni, A.; Murali, S.; Ruoff, R. S. Hydrazine-reduction of graphite- and graphene oxide. Carbon 2011, 49, 3019-3023. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.071]. [CrossRef]
  35. Van der Heyden, A.; Regnouf-de-Vains, J. B.; Warszyński, P.; Dalbavie, J. O.; Żywociński, A.; Rogalska, E. Probing inter- and intramolecular interactions of six new p-tert-butylcalix[4]arene-based bipyridyl podands with langmuir monolayers. Langmuir 2002, 18, 8854-8861. [https://doi.org/10.1021/la025575j]. [CrossRef]
  36. Kämmerer, H.; Happel, G.; Mathiasch, B. Schrittweise synthesen und eigenschaften einiger cyclopentamerer aus methylenverbrückten (5-alkyl-2-hydroxy-1,3-phenylen)-bausteinen. Makromol. Chem. 1981, 182, 1685-1694. [https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.1981.021820609]. [CrossRef]
  37. Pei, R. J.; Cheng, Z. L.; Wang, E. K.; Yang, X. R. Amplification of antigen-antibody interactions based on biotin labeled protein-streptavidin network complex using impedance spectroscopy. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2001, 16, 355-361. [https://doi.org/10.1016/s0956-5663(01)00150-6]. [CrossRef]
  38. Yim, J. H.; Kim, J.; Gidley, D. W.; Vallery, R. S.; Peng, H. G.; An, D. K.; Choi, B. K.; Park, Y. K.; Jeon, J. K. Calixarene derivatives as novel nanopore generators for templates of nanoporous thin films. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2006, 291, 369-376. [https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.200500370]. [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, H.; Robinson, J. T.; Li, X. L.; Dai, H. J. Solvothermal reduction of chemically exfoliated graphene sheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9910-+. [https://doi.org/10.1021/ja904251p]. [CrossRef]
  40. Ghosh, S.; Ganesan, K.; Polaki, S. R.; Ravindran, T. R.; Krishna, N. G.; Kamruddin, M.; Tyagi, A. K. Evolution and defect analysis of vertical graphene nanosheets. J. Raman. Spectrosc. 2014, 45, 642-649. [https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.4530]. [CrossRef]
  41. Bard, A. J.; Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical methods, fundamentals and applications. 2nd ed ed.; Wiley: New York, 2001.
  42. Gosser, D. K. Cyclic voltammetry: simulation and analysis of reaction mechanisms. VCH: New York, 1993; p 154.
  43. Anson, F. C. Application of potentiostatic current integration to the study of the adsorption of cobalt(iii)-(ethylenedinitrilo(tetraacetate) on mercury electrodes. Anal. Chem. 1964, 36, 932-934. [https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60210a068]. [CrossRef]
  44. Pournaghi-Azar, M. H.; Sabzi, R. Electrochemical characteristics of a cobalt pentacyanonitrosylferrate film on a modified glassy carbon electrode and its catalytic effect on the electrooxidation of hydrazine. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2003, 543, 115-125. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(02)01480-8]. [CrossRef]
  45. Deng, K.; Zhou, J.; Li, X. Direct electrochemical reduction of graphene oxide and its application to determination of L-tryptophan and L-tyrosine. Colloid. Surface. B 2013, 101, 183-188. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.06.007]. [CrossRef]
  46. Tig, G. A. Development of electrochemical sensor for detection of ascorbic acid, dopamine, uric acid and L-tryptophan based on Ag nanoparticles and poly(L-arginine)-graphene oxide composite. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017, 807, 19-28. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.11.008]. [CrossRef]
  47. Beitollahi, H.; Safaei, M.; Shishehbore, M. R.; Tajik, S. Application of Fe3O4@SiO2/GO nanocomposite for sensitive and selective electrochemical sensing of tryptophan. J. Electrochem. Sci. En. 2019, 9, 45-53. [https://doi.org/10.5599/jese.576]. [CrossRef]
  48. Zhou, S.; Deng, Z.; Wu, Z.; Xie, M.; Tian, Y.; Wu, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, G.; He, Q. Ta2O5/rGO nanocomposite modified electrodes for detection of tryptophan through electrochemical route. Nanomaterials 2019, 9. [https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9060811]. [CrossRef]
  49. Murugan, E.; Kumar, K. Fabrication of SnS/TiO2@GO composite coated glassy carbon electrode for concomitant determination of paracetamol, tryptophan, and caffeine in pharmaceutical formulations. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 5667-5676. [https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05531]. [CrossRef]
  50. Abdelwahab, A. A.; Elseman, A. M.; Alotaibi, N. F.; Nassar, A. M. Simultaneous voltammetric determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine, acetaminophen and tryptophan based on hybrid trimetallic nanoparticles-capped electropretreated graphene. Microchem. J. 2020, 156. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.104927]. [CrossRef]
  51. Nazarpour, S.; Hajian, R.; Sabzvari, M. H. A novel nanocomposite electrochemical sensor based on green synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/gold nanoparticles modified screen printed electrode for determination of tryptophan using response surface methodology approach. Microchem. J. 2020, 154. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.104634]. [CrossRef]
  52. Nie, X.; Zhang, R.; Tang, Z.; Wang, H.; Deng, P.; Tang, Y. Sensitive and selective determination of tryptophan using a glassy carbon electrode modified with nano-CeO2/reduced graphene oxide composite. Microchem. J. 2020, 159. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.105367]. [CrossRef]
  53. Sangili, A.; Vinothkumar, V.; Chen, S.-M.; Veerakumar, P.; Chang, C.-W.; Muthuselvam, I. P.; Lin, K.-C. Highly selective voltammetric sensor for l-tryptophan using composite-modified electrode composed of CuSn(OH)6 microsphere decorated on reduced graphene oxide. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 25821-25834. [https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07197]. [CrossRef]
  54. Gao, J.; Li, H.; Li, M.; Wang, G.; Long, Y.; Li, P.; Li, C.; Yang, B. Polydopamine/graphene/MnO2 composite-based electrochemical sensor for in situ determination of free tryptophan in plants. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1145, 103-113. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2020.11.008]. [CrossRef]
  55. Faridan, A.; Bahmaei, M.; Sharif, A. M. Simultaneous determination of trace amounts ascorbic acid, melatonin and tryptophan using modified glassy carbon electrode based on Cuo-CeO2-rGO-MWCNTS nanocomposites. Anal. Bioanal. Electro. 2022, 14, 201-215.
  56. Zhang, S.; Ling, P.; Chen, Y.; Liu, J.; Yang, C. 2D/2D porous Co3O4/rGO nanosheets act as an electrochemical sensor for voltammetric tryptophan detection. Diamond Relat. Mater. 2023, 135. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2023.109811]. [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic procedure for the fabrication of PrGO (A) and CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE (B).
Scheme 1. Schematic procedure for the fabrication of PrGO (A) and CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE (B).
Preprints 87511 sch001
Figure 1. (A) π ~ A isotherms of CUCR monolayer on pure water and aqueous subphase with different Trp concentrations; (B) UV-vis spectral curves of 20 layers of CUCR-LB film on quartz substrate before and after soaking in a 1.0×10-4 mol L-1 Trp solution for 30 minutes; (C) AFM 2D morphology images of mica-covered CUCR-LB film under 30 mN m-1 transfer surface pressures (scan area: 10μm × 10μm); (D) Nyquist plots of bare GCE and different layers of CUCR-LB film modified GCE in a 5 × 10-3 mol L-1 [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- + 0.2 mol L-1 KCl solution, with an insert showing the equivalent circuit.
Figure 1. (A) π ~ A isotherms of CUCR monolayer on pure water and aqueous subphase with different Trp concentrations; (B) UV-vis spectral curves of 20 layers of CUCR-LB film on quartz substrate before and after soaking in a 1.0×10-4 mol L-1 Trp solution for 30 minutes; (C) AFM 2D morphology images of mica-covered CUCR-LB film under 30 mN m-1 transfer surface pressures (scan area: 10μm × 10μm); (D) Nyquist plots of bare GCE and different layers of CUCR-LB film modified GCE in a 5 × 10-3 mol L-1 [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- + 0.2 mol L-1 KCl solution, with an insert showing the equivalent circuit.
Preprints 87511 g001
Figure 2. (A) TEM images of rGO and PrGO; (B) Raman spectra of GO, rGO, and PrGO; (C) CV curves of bare GCE, rGO/GCE, PrGO/GCE and CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE in 1.0 × 10-3 mol L-1 K3[Fe(CN)6] + 0.1 mol L-1 KCl solution at a scan rate of 50 mV s-1; (D) SEM images of rGO, PrGO and CUCR-LB/PrGO.
Figure 2. (A) TEM images of rGO and PrGO; (B) Raman spectra of GO, rGO, and PrGO; (C) CV curves of bare GCE, rGO/GCE, PrGO/GCE and CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE in 1.0 × 10-3 mol L-1 K3[Fe(CN)6] + 0.1 mol L-1 KCl solution at a scan rate of 50 mV s-1; (D) SEM images of rGO, PrGO and CUCR-LB/PrGO.
Preprints 87511 g002
Figure 3. (A) CV curves of 2.0 × 10-5 mol L-1 Trp on a bare GCE, rGO/GCE, PrGO/GCE and CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE in a 0.2 mol L-1 phosphate buffer solution (pH=7.0) at a scan rate of 50 mV s-1; (B) CV curves of 2.0 × 10-5 mol L-1 Trp on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE at different scan rates; (C) Chronocoulometric curves of absence (curve a) and presence (curve b) of 5.0 × 10-4 mol L-1 Trp on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE, with the inset showing the corresponding relationship of Q versus t1/2; (D) Chronoamperometric curves of absence (curve a) and presence (curve b) of 5.0 × 10-4 mol L-1 Trp on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE, with the inset showing the corresponding relationship of icat/iL versus t1/2.
Figure 3. (A) CV curves of 2.0 × 10-5 mol L-1 Trp on a bare GCE, rGO/GCE, PrGO/GCE and CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE in a 0.2 mol L-1 phosphate buffer solution (pH=7.0) at a scan rate of 50 mV s-1; (B) CV curves of 2.0 × 10-5 mol L-1 Trp on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE at different scan rates; (C) Chronocoulometric curves of absence (curve a) and presence (curve b) of 5.0 × 10-4 mol L-1 Trp on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE, with the inset showing the corresponding relationship of Q versus t1/2; (D) Chronoamperometric curves of absence (curve a) and presence (curve b) of 5.0 × 10-4 mol L-1 Trp on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE, with the inset showing the corresponding relationship of icat/iL versus t1/2.
Preprints 87511 g003
Figure 4. (A) Influence of varying amounts of PrGO on the oxidation currents of different concentrations of Trp detected at the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE; (B) LSV curves and corresponding calibration plot (the inset) for increasing concentrations of Trp on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE (from a to o: 0.0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.8, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 20.0, 30.0 and 50.0 (× 10-6 mol L-1)); scan rate, 50 mV s-1; (C) LSV curves of CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE in 1.0 × 10-5 mol L-1 Trp and in 1.0 × 10-5 mol L-1 Trp + 1.0 × 10-4 mol L-1 UA; (D) influence of renewal times on the oxidation currents of different concentrations of Trp detected on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE.
Figure 4. (A) Influence of varying amounts of PrGO on the oxidation currents of different concentrations of Trp detected at the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE; (B) LSV curves and corresponding calibration plot (the inset) for increasing concentrations of Trp on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE (from a to o: 0.0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.8, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 20.0, 30.0 and 50.0 (× 10-6 mol L-1)); scan rate, 50 mV s-1; (C) LSV curves of CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE in 1.0 × 10-5 mol L-1 Trp and in 1.0 × 10-5 mol L-1 Trp + 1.0 × 10-4 mol L-1 UA; (D) influence of renewal times on the oxidation currents of different concentrations of Trp detected on the CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE.
Preprints 87511 g004aPreprints 87511 g004b
Table 1. Relevant parameters of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for CUCR-LB film modified electrode.
Table 1. Relevant parameters of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for CUCR-LB film modified electrode.
N Cdl (F) W (Ω cm-2) RΩ(Ω) Rct (Ω) d (nm)
1 3.967 × 10-8 0.003273 22.99 336.5 4.4
2 9.726 × 10-9 0.002009 32.32 540.6 9.0
3 4.388 × 10-9 0.001972 40.23 778.4 13.3
Cdl: double-layer capacitance; W: warburg impedance; RΩ: solution resistance; Rct: electron transfer resistance; d: thickness of films.
Table 2. Electrochemical reaction and kinetic characteristics of Trp on various electrodes.
Table 2. Electrochemical reaction and kinetic characteristics of Trp on various electrodes.
Electrode CV CC and CA
Epa (V) ipa (μA) Γ*×109
(mol cm-2)
kcat×10-3
(mol L-1 s-1)
bare GCE 0.755 0.58 0.23 0.39
rGO/GCE 0.635 9.97 3.78 6.09
PrGO/GCE 0.621 17.89 9.17 10.9
CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE 0.619 29.54 11.7 20.7
Table 3. Comparison of CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE sensor for Trp detection with other graphene-based published modified electrodes.
Table 3. Comparison of CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE sensor for Trp detection with other graphene-based published modified electrodes.
Electrode Methods Linear range
(mol L-1)
Detection limit (mol L-1) Reference
TiO2-GR/4-ABSA/GCE DPV 1.0×10-6 ~ 3.0×10-5 3.0 × 10-7 [11]
ErGO/GCE DPV 2.0×10-7 ~ 4.0×10-5 1.0×10-7 [45]
AgNPs/P(Arg)-GO/GCE DPV 1.0×10-6 ~ 1.5×10-4 1.22×10-7 [46]
Fe3O4@SiO2/GO/SPE DPV 1.0×10-6 ~ 4.0×10-4 2.0×10-7 [47]
Ta2O5-rGO/GCE LSV 1.0×10-6 ~ 8.0×10-6
8.0×10-6 ~ 8.0×10-5
8.0×10-5 ~ 8.0×10-4
8.4×10-7 [48]
SnS/TiO2@GO/GCE DPV 1.33×10-8 ~ 1.57×10-4 7.8×10-9 [49]
(Au/Ag/Pd)NPs/EPGrO/GCE DPV 1.0×10-6 ~ 6.0×10-4 3.0 × 10-8 [50]
rGO/AuNPs/SPE DPV 5.0×10-7 ~ 5.0×10-4 3.9 × 10-7 [51]
nano-CeO2/RGO/GCE LSV 1.0×10-8 ~ 1.0×10-5 6.0×10-9 [52]
CSOH/rGO/GCE DPV 5.0×10-8 ~ 1.758×10-5 2.0×10-9 [53]
PDA/rGO-MnO2/GCE DPV 1.0×10-6 ~ 3.0×10-4 2.2×10-7 [54]
CuO-CeO2-rGO-MWCNTs/GCE DPV 1.0×10-8 ~ 1.35×10-5 7.3×10-9 [55]
Co3O4/rGO/GCE LSV 1.0×10-6 ~ 8.0×10-4 2.6×10-7 [56]
CUCR-LB/PrGO/GCE LSV 1.0×10-7 ~ 3.0×10-5 3.0×10-8 This work
DPV: differential pulse voltammetry; LSV: linear sweep voltammetry; SPE: screen-printed electrode.
Table 4. Determination results of Trp in the amino acid injection samples by LSV and HPLC (n=3).
Table 4. Determination results of Trp in the amino acid injection samples by LSV and HPLC (n=3).
Sample LSV HPLC
Labeled
(μmol L-1)
Detected
(μmol L-1)
Added
(μmol L-1)
Total Detected
(μmol L-1)
RSD
(%)
Recovery
(%)
Detected
(μmol L-1)
1a 5.00 5.10(±0.14) 2.0 7.18(±0.21) 2.9 104.0 5.08(±0.05)
20.0 24.83(±0.30) 3.8 98.7
2b 2.50 2.56(±0.09) 2.0 4.61(±0.13) 3.1 102.5 2.54(±0.08)
20.0 22.47(±0.24) 3.9 99.6
a. obtained from Guangzhou Green Cross Pharmaceutical Co., LTD. b. obtained from Xuzhou Fifth Pharmaceutical Co., LTD.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated