Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Is There a Risk for Semaglutide Misuse? Focus on the Food and Drug Administration-FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) Pharmacovigilance Dataset

Version 1 : Received: 18 September 2023 / Approved: 19 September 2023 / Online: 20 September 2023 (05:05:11 CEST)

How to cite: Chiappini, S.; Vickers-Smith, R.; Harris, D.; Petellier Papanti, D.G.; Corkery, J.M.; Guirguis, A.; Martinotti, G.; Sensi, S.L.; Schifano, F. Is There a Risk for Semaglutide Misuse? Focus on the Food and Drug Administration-FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) Pharmacovigilance Dataset. Preprints 2023, 2023091300. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202309.1300.v1 Chiappini, S.; Vickers-Smith, R.; Harris, D.; Petellier Papanti, D.G.; Corkery, J.M.; Guirguis, A.; Martinotti, G.; Sensi, S.L.; Schifano, F. Is There a Risk for Semaglutide Misuse? Focus on the Food and Drug Administration-FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) Pharmacovigilance Dataset. Preprints 2023, 2023091300. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202309.1300.v1

Abstract

Recent media reports commented about a possible antidiabetics’ misuse issue related to molecules promoted as a weight-loss treatment in non-obese people. We evaluated here available pharmacovigilance misuse/abuse signals related to semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue, in comparison to other GLP-1 receptor agonists (albiglutide; dulaglutide; exenatide; liraglutide; lixisenatide; tirzepatide) and the phentermine-topiramate combination. To that aim, we analysed the Food and Drug Administration-FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) dataset, performing a descriptive analysis of adverse event reports (AER) and calculating related pharmacovigilance measures, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the proportional reporting ratio (PRR). During January 2018-December 2022, a total of 31,542 AER involving the selected molecules were submitted to FAERS; most involved dulaglutide (n=11,858; 37.6%) and semaglutide (n=8,249; 26.1%). In comparing semaglutide vs the remaining nolecules, the AER ‘drug abuse’, ‘drug withdrawal syndrome’, ‘prescription drug used without a prescription’ and ‘intentional product use issue’ respective PRR values were 4.05, 4.05, 3.60 and 1.80 (all<0.01). The same comparisons of semaglutide vs the phentermine-topiramate combination were not associated with any significant differences. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study documenting the misusing/abusing potential of semaglutide in comparison with other GLP1 analogues and the phentermine-topiramate combination. Current findings will need to be confirmed by further empirical investigations to fully understand the safety profile of those molecules.

Keywords

semaglutide; drug misuse; drug abuse; pharmacovigilance; image- and performance-enhancing (IPED) drugs; glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Toxicology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.