1. Introduction
The convergence of digital administration and sustainability represents a pivotal juncture in modern governance. Through the integration of digital technologies and sustainable practices, governments and organizations can streamline operations, enhance transparency, and reduce their environmental footprint.
Digital administration involves the adoption of technology-driven solutions to manage various administrative tasks and processes. This includes digital document management, online service delivery, automation of routine procedures, and the use of data analytics for informed decision-making. By digitizing administrative workflows, inefficiencies can be minimized, leading to time and resource savings.
Sustainability, on the other hand, centers on responsible resource management to meet the needs of the present without compromising the needs of future generations. The incorporation of sustainable practices within digital administration involves strategies like energy-efficient data centers, paperless initiatives, remote work policies to reduce commuting, and the use of renewable energy sources.
The synergy between digital administration and sustainability is evident in several ways:
i) Paper Reduction: Digitalization eliminates or minimizes the need for paper-based documentation, ii) reducing deforestation and paper waste, iii) Energy Efficiency: Embracing digital processes can reduce the energy consumption associated with traditional administrative practices, iv) Remote Work: Digital tools enable remote work options, leading to decreased commuting, lower carbon emissions, and improved work-life balance, v) Data-Driven Insights: Digital platforms provide the means to collect and analyze data, facilitating informed decisions for sustainable policies and practices, vi) Transparency: Digital systems enhance transparency and accountability, contributing to better governance and sustainable development, vii) E-Government Services: Online service delivery reduces the need for physical infrastructure and travel, aligning with sustainable principles, viii) Waste Reduction: Minimized paper usage and optimized processes result in reduced waste generation, ix) Renewable Energy Integration: Digital infrastructure can be powered by renewable energy sources, aligning with sustainability goals and x) Innovation: The fusion of digital tools and sustainable practices encourages innovation in both realms, driving technological advancements and environmentally friendly solutions.
In this sense, the COVID-19 crisis has made a significant negative impact on global economic activity in 2020, and Europe is no exception. The European Union (EU) has launched the Next Generation EU program to mitigate the effects of the pandemic, boost economic growth and, ultimately, kick-start economic recovery in member states.
Over the next three years (2021-2023) Spain will receive transfers from the Next Generation EU program for a maximum amount of 71,604 million euros through two major investment instruments: the Recovery and Resilience Mechanism (RRM), which will gather up to 59,168 million euros, and the React-EU, which will represent an additional maximum amount of 12,436 million euros.
EC Member States are preparing national plans for the period 2021-2023, which must be consistent with country-specific recommendations and contribute to the green and digital transitions.
Specifically, the Spanish government has published the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan, which represents “the European manna” that will put a country devastated by the crisis back on the road to recovery. Indeed, references to the need to “increase the efficiency of public spending and modernize the administration”, or to the promotion of “the quality and efficiency of public administrations and public services” are consistent throughout this document.
The exceptional situation generated by the Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the urgency and opportunity to develop a digital administration that may respond to the needs of citizens in a more agile and effective manner. The challenge, therefore, lies in the capacity to develop quality digital public services for citizens, and businesses that are more inclusive, efficient, personalized, and proactive. Spanish public administrations have a heavy bureaucratic burden due to the intense control to which they are subject. The legislation applicable to each procedure is enormous given the procedural tradition of public bodies and the great risk of corruption in the management of public funds. It is important to highlight the work of (Klippel, 2019), which addresses several methodological issues focusing on why genuine methodological diversity is important and how it can be achieved, and (Rosenbloom and Gould, 2021) who present an overview of non-quantitative research in the field of law and public administration in the United States.
Such a challenge immediately encounters a hurdle that economists and institutional analysts in our country highlight day after day: the inadequacy of the Spanish public administration and its management system—especially its structures, processes and people—to face such a challenge. (Hidalgo, 2020) highlights the opportunity the funds represent for our economy. Yet he also alludes to an obvious management challenge, stating that the current architecture of the bureaucratic-administrative system clearly provides no capacity to efficiently manage such projects.
The following legislative initiatives have been launched in Spain:
Royal Decree for the modernization of the Public Administration and for the implementation of the Recovery Plan:
All applications will be centralized in a one-stop shop. This will not be used to tender European funds; each Ministry, Community or City Council will continue to be “entities” tenderers.
A mixed figure is created between State and companies: PERTES, whose financing details will be published in June 2021.
On 21 July 2020, the European Council agreed on a far-reaching package of measures that bring together the future reinforced Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2021-2027 and the launch of a European Recovery Instrument (“Next Generation EU”) worth EUR 750 billion in constant 2018 prices.
This European Recovery Instrument, which will involve approximately 140 billion euros in transfers and loans for Spain over the period 2021-26, is based on three pillars:
The adoption of instruments to support Member States’ efforts to recover, repair damage, and emerge stronger from the crisis.
The adoption of measures to boost private investment and support companies in difficulty.
The strengthening of key EU programs to learn the lessons of the crisis, make the single market stronger and more resilient, and accelerate the double green and digital transition.
The Spanish government has planned the Digital Spain 2025 agenda in an aim to boost connectivity and cybersecurity as well as the digital skills of society as a whole and disruptive innovation in the field of artificial intelligence while also digitizing the Administration and the productive fabric of Spain. Public administrations are undergoing a continuous process of modernization to adapt to current ongoing social and political changes.
The management and implementation of the projects linked to the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan will increase the workload of Spanish public administrations, which will have to face this challenge with limited resources. This requires a strategic reflection on organization, processes, personnel management and digitalization.
In this regard, the Spanish government has approved Royal Decree-Law 36/2020 of 30 December, which approves urgent measures for the modernization of the Public Administration and the implementation of the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan, articles 3 and 4 of which state:
Article 3. Management principles.
For a better management of the services and the execution of the actions entrusted to them and, in particular, for the effective implementation and achievement of objectives linked to the projects assigned within the framework of the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan, the Public Administrations shall respect the principles of good management:
Agility, speed, simplicity and clarity in procedures, processes and execution of tasks.
e) Effective public expenditure control, management responsibility and accountability.
Article 4. Management guidelines.
For the effective management of the projects linked to the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan, the responsible bodies will adopt the following guidelines within the framework of their competencies:
f) Analyze the management objectives for which they are responsible and the resources available for their fulfilment.
g) Innovate in the search for solutions for sustainable management.
h) Promote digital transformation.
Once modernization in public management has been confirmed as a clear objective of European and national policies, it will be of vital importance within the Higher Education sector, as pointed out by (Mehaffy, 2012). On the other hand, (Figaredo, 2016) pointed out that while universities take years to introduce new technologies and management procedures, they have yet to respond adequately to the structural change demanded by the digital model characterized by high connectivity and hybridization of the physical and the technological.
The university is no stranger to this digital transformation, but it is necessary to point out and perhaps insist—given the resistance to change—that the adoption of a digital strategy is much more than the incorporation and regular use of the Internet and digital media. (Lorens and Fernández, 2018) point out as a fundamental characteristic of this the capacity to change or create new strategic processes based on technological advances. Nowadays, new ICTs are a fundamental tool in the daily performance of university activity. No doubt the use of ICT has represented a change in the performance of academic life, in the processes and development of tasks, training, learning and teaching as well as the way to research and transfer results to society. Overall, these changes have come to be called digital innovation. Yet important as this step may be, it is still insufficient. (Cuervo, 2013) concludes that innovation cannot be understood solely on the basis of the use of information and communication technologies; it involves the integration of different disciplinary knowledge to manage knowledge based on the information to which one has access. (Ramírez-Montoya, 2020) indicates that the solidarity commitment of various sectors must support the challenges for the digital transformation and educational innovation of institutions. On the other hand, (Owen et al., 2006) points out that interaction between participants has been enriched thanks to the introduction of social software expanding the possibilities of communication, interaction and information between participants, and facilitating collaborative work generated within a virtual space. (Del Moral and Villalustre, 2008) focus on the fact that the real digital transformation, which can be implemented on the basis of prior digitization (the most basic technological needs already covered), requires focusing on the potential of technology to transform existing university processes or even create new, more efficient processes: to digitize is to use information technologies to offer more efficient solutions to existing needs. (Ramirez, 2011) argues that incorporating electronic media in administrative procedures highlights how these tools streamline administrative procedures by enhancing the principles underpinning them. (Vera Carretero, 2019) summarizes that the digitization of processes with the planning of any activity is executed more rapidly and is more accurate in all the hypotheses set out, thereby increasing the operability of the Unit.
In this respect, following the pandemic crisis with the digitization of the public administration as a whole, this crisis has also served to make all Spanish public universities realize that they lacked a digitization system in line with the new times. The rapid adaptation of these institutions has put the spotlight on the immediate need to improve these systems. (Arístegui, J.L., 2019) confirms this need in terms of public procurement.
In this sense, in the Spanish Higher Education System, the research staff of public universities manage a large amount of funds dedicated to R&D, namely 15,572 million euros in 2019, which represents an increase of 4.2% over the previous year and 1.25% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). These funds come from different calls for research grants financed by regional, national and European bodies.
One of the aspects that cause a high bureaucratic burden in the management of files is the requirement established in Law 38/2003, of 17 November, General Law on Subsidies, which specifies the form and documentation required by the funding body to justify the use of funds.
Furthermore, the Spanish government, through Royal Decree 641/2021 issued on July 27th, has taken steps to facilitate the modernization and digitalization of Spanish public universities as part of the broader Recovery, Transformation, and Resilience Plan. An impressive sum of €76,850,000 has been earmarked to support these universities in their efforts to streamline processes through digitalization projects.
In a noteworthy development, after more than two decades without adjustments, the significance of this initiative becomes even more apparent. This is due to the recent approval of Order HFP/792/2023 on July 12th, which revises the allowances and allocations for travel expenses within the framework of the Personal Income Tax. This revision underscores the research’s relevance, as it reflects the growing interest in the field, exemplified by the increased funding for travel-related costs.
All these regulations applicable to public administrations, together with the guaranteeing profile of the procedures defined to comply with these regulations, result in an excess of bureaucracy, where the guaranteeing procedure takes precedence over the final objective, thus leaving economic concepts such as efficiency and proportionality to one side in management decisions.
(Cosenz, 2014) demonstrates that the purely guarantee-based model is only one of several models; the objective should be the provision of public services and the procedure should serve to achieve this in the best possible way.
(Thompson, 1965) asserts that conditions within the bureaucracy are determined by a drive for productivity and control, but they are inappropriate for creativity. Suggestions are made to modify the bureaucratic structure in order to increase innovation. These include greater professionalization, a looser and more uncluttered structure, decentralization, freer communications, organization of projects wherever possible, rotation of assignments, greater reliance on group processes, attempts at continuous restructuring, modification of the incentive system, and changes in many management practices.
Regarding sustainability, one kilogram of office paper results in the emission of 3.3 kilograms of CO2 into the atmosphere (Source: Docusign, September 23, 2021). This implies that each package of 500 sheets, weighing 2.5 kilograms, would contribute to an emission of 8.25 kilograms of CO2 into the atmosphere. This scientific article also aims to analyze the advantages of digitizing administrative procedures in terms of sustainability and its direct impact on CO2 emissions into the atmosphere. All public administrations, including universities, consume a significant amount of office paper due to their administrative processes and the bureaucracy inherent in the Spanish public system.
This justification is the focus of this research because it burdens research personnel with administrative and bureaucratic to such an extent that it often leads to inefficiency in knowledge management.
Based on these conclusions, we propose an analysis and demonstrate with our results that it is possible to minimize administrative bureaucracy. This will lead to a series of direct benefits, such as economic savings, time savings, lower personnel costs, and in turn an increase in productivity and the efficient achievement of the final objective: increased research and knowledge. In terms of sustainability, the conclusions of this analysis indicate that remarkable results are achieved, with emissions reductions of 95%.
We deal with the practical case of the Compensation for service commissions, commonly known as “per diems”. This field has been chosen because it applies equally to all Spanish public administrations. In public universities this presents particularities that make management all the more complicated. The disparity of trips derived from the lack of definition of the concept of research itself makes the procedure even more complex and clearly distorts the final objective—which is to increase knowledge through research—by increasing the obstacles in managing allowances for service commissions through excessive bureaucracy.
This article examines the situation regarding regulations and administrative procedures in Spanish universities. In our opinion, the emphasis on digitization for the elimination of administrative bureaucracy is very relevant. From what we seen in the current diverse bibliography, many authors relate the benefits of digitalization, but no practical analysis seems to clearly detail a real example of procedure simplification common to all universities, as well as the cost and time savings that can be achieved through clear decisions concerning the digitalization and standardization of procedures. Furthermore, the experience under analysis can be extrapolated to any Spanish public administration, which highlights the great qualitative and quantitative leap forward represented by this research that could be put into practice in all national public administrations.