Submitted:
28 August 2023
Posted:
29 August 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
Measurement of bisphenols (BPA, BPF, BPS) in urine
Urinary creatinine and specific gravity
Estimated daily intake (EDI) of bisphenols
Statistical analysis
3. Results
3.1. Characteristics of the participants
3.2. Bisphenol exposure
3.3. Factors correlated with urinary bisphenol concentrations
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lind PM, Lind L: Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and risk of diabetes: an evidence-based review. Diabetologia 2018, 61(7):1495-1502. [CrossRef]
- Liu B, Lehmler HJ, Sun Y, Xu G, Sun Q, Snetselaar LG, Wallace RB, Bao W: Association of Bisphenol A and Its Substitutes, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S, with Obesity in United States Children and Adolescents. Diabetes Metab J 2019, 43(1):59-75.
- Moon S, Seo MY, Choi K, Chang YS, Kim SH, Park MJ: Urinary bisphenol A concentrations and the risk of obesity in Korean adults. Sci Rep 2021, 11(1):1603. [CrossRef]
- Rubin BS, Schaeberle CM, Soto AM: The Case for BPA as an Obesogen: Contributors to the Controversy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019, 10:30. [CrossRef]
- Siracusa JS, Yin L, Measel E, Liang S, Yu X: Effects of bisphenol A and its analogs on reproductive health: A mini review. Reprod Toxicol 2018, 79:96-123. [CrossRef]
- Zhou J, Chen XH, Pan SD, Wang JL, Zheng YB, Xu JJ, Zhao YG, Cai ZX, Jin MC: Contamination status of bisphenol A and its analogues (bisphenol S, F and B) in foodstuffs and the implications for dietary exposure on adult residents in Zhejiang Province. Food Chem 2019, 294:160-170. [CrossRef]
- Rochester JR, Bolden AL: Bisphenol S and F: A Systematic Review and Comparison of the Hormonal Activity of Bisphenol A Substitutes. Environ Health Perspect 2015, 123(7):643-650. [CrossRef]
- Hanioka N, Naito T, Narimatsu S: Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms involved in bisphenol A glucuronidation. Chemosphere 2008, 74(1):33-36. [CrossRef]
- Thayer KA, Doerge DR, Hunt D, Schurman SH, Twaddle NC, Churchwell MI, Garantziotis S, Kissling GE, Easterling MR, Bucher JR et al: Pharmacokinetics of bisphenol A in humans following a single oral administration. Environ Int 2015, 83:107-115. [CrossRef]
- Oh J, Choi JW, Ahn YA, Kim S: Pharmacokinetics of bisphenol S in humans after single oral administration. Environ Int 2018, 112:127-133. [CrossRef]
- Tait S, Carli F, Busani L, Ciociaro D, Della Latta V, Deodati A, Fabbrizi E, Pala AP, Maranghi F, Tassinari R et al: Italian Children Exposure to Bisphenol A: Biomonitoring Data from the LIFE PERSUADED Project. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021, 18(22). [CrossRef]
- Lehmler HJ, Liu B, Gadogbe M, Bao W: Exposure to Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F, and Bisphenol S in U.S. Adults and Children: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2014. ACS Omega 2018, 3(6):6523-6532. [CrossRef]
- Perera F, Vishnevetsky J, Herbstman JB, Calafat AM, Xiong W, Rauh V, Wang S: Prenatal bisphenol a exposure and child behavior in an inner-city cohort. Environ Health Perspect 2012, 120(8):1190-1194.
- Cui FP, Yang P, Liu C, Chen PP, Deng YL, Miao Y, Luo Q, Zhang M, Lu WQ, Zeng Q: Urinary bisphenol A and its alternatives among pregnant women: Predictors and risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 2021, 784:147184. [CrossRef]
- Remer T, Neubert A, Maser-Gluth C: Anthropometry-based reference values for 24-h urinary creatinine excretion during growth and their use in endocrine and nutritional research. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002, 75(3):561-569.
- Pornkunwilai S, Nosoongnoen W, Jantarat C, Wachrasindhu S, Supornsilchai V: Urinary bisphenol A detection is significantly associated with young and obese Thai children. Asian Biomedicine 3915, 9(3):363-372.
- Gys C, Bastiaensen M, Bruckers L, Colles A, Govarts E, Martin LR, Verheyen V, Koppen G, Morrens B, Den Hond E et al: Determinants of exposure levels of bisphenols in flemish adolescents. Environ Res 2021, 193:110567. [CrossRef]
- Chen Y, Fang J, Ren L, Fan R, Zhang J, Liu G, Zhou L, Chen D, Yu Y, Lu S: Urinary bisphenol analogues and triclosan in children from south China and implications for human exposure. Environ Pollut 2018, 238:299-305. [CrossRef]
- Gys C, Ait Bamai Y, Araki A, Bastiaensen M, Caballero-Casero N, Kishi R, Covaci A: Biomonitoring and temporal trends of bisphenols exposure in Japanese school children. Environ Res 2020, 191:110172. [CrossRef]
- Covaci A, Den Hond E, Geens T, Govarts E, Koppen G, Frederiksen H, Knudsen LE, Mørck TA, Gutleb AC, Guignard C et al: Urinary BPA measurements in children and mothers from six European member states: Overall results and determinants of exposure. Environ Res 2015, 141:77-85. [CrossRef]
- Rocha BA, Asimakopoulos AG, Honda M, da Costa NL, Barbosa RM, Barbosa F, Jr., Kannan K: Advanced data mining approaches in the assessment of urinary concentrations of bisphenols, chlorophenols, parabens and benzophenones in Brazilian children and their association to DNA damage. Environ Int 2018, 116:269-277. [CrossRef]
- Heffernan AL, Aylward LL, Toms LM, Eaglesham G, Hobson P, Sly PD, Mueller JF: Age-related trends in urinary excretion of bisphenol A in Australian children and adults: evidence from a pooled sample study using samples of convenience. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2013, 76(18):1039-1055. [CrossRef]
- Peivasteh-Roudsari L, Barzegar-Bafrouei R, Sharifi KA, Azimisalim S, Karami M, Abedinzadeh S, Asadinezhad S, Tajdar-Oranj B, Mahdavi V, Alizadeh AM et al: Origin, dietary exposure, and toxicity of endocrine-disrupting food chemical contaminants: A comprehensive review. Heliyon 2023, 9(7):e18140.
| Characteristics | Value |
|---|---|
| Age (years; mean ± SD) | 9.4 ±1.7 |
| Sex, N (%) Boy Girl |
186 (52) 172 (48) |
| Age group, N (%) < 10 years ≥ 10 years |
211 (58.9) 147 (41.1) |
| Anthropometry, median (IQR) Body weight (kg.) Height (cm.) Waist circumference (cm.) |
32.7 (25.1-41.4) 134.2 (126-144) 60.5 (55-70.5) |
| BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR) Underweight, N (%) Normal, N (%) Overweight, N (%) Obese, N (%) |
17.3 (15.4-20.9) 12 (3.3)209 (58.9) 56 (15.8) 78 (22) |
| Caregiver Education, N (%) < High school High school or equivalent ≥ Bachelor’s degree |
53 (18.3) 159 (54.8) 78 (26.9) |
| Family Income (THB/month), n (%) <30000 30000-50000 >50000 |
155 (54.2) 111 (38.8) 20 (7) |
| Residence, N (%) Apartment/condominium/townhouse/shop house/other Detached house |
296 (82.7) 62 (17.3) |
| Detection rate from first urine samples (N = 358) | Participant who provides both urine samples (N= 286) | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detection rate from first urine samples | Detection rate from second urine samples | |||
| BPA | 285 (79.6) | 235 (82.2) | 173 (60.5) | <0.001 |
| BPF | 111 (31.0) | 98 (34.3) | 60 (21.0) | <0.001 |
| BPS | 60 (16.8) | 49 (17.1) | 14 (4.9) | <0.001 |
| Analyte | 10th | 25th | 50th | 75th | 90th | GM | 95%CI of GM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted urine bisphenol concentration (ng/mL) | ||||||||
| BPA | ||||||||
| 1st sample | 0.5 | 0.607 | 1.384 | 2.766 | 4.924 | 1.487* | 1.348-1.641 | |
| 2nd sample | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.7005 | 1.425 | 2.61 | 0.934* | 0.847 - 1.03 | |
| Mean | 0.5085 | 0.754 | 1.296 | 2.124 | 3.7475 | 1.414 | 1.278 - 1.565 | |
| BPF | ||||||||
| 1st sample | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.012 | 0.022 | 0.013 | 0.012-0.013 | |
| 2nd sample | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.019 | 0.012 | 0.011 - 0.012 | |
| Mean | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.014 | 0.022 | 0.013 | 0.012 - 0.014 | |
| BPS | ||||||||
| 1st sample | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.067 | 0.015* | 0.013-0.017 | |
| 2nd sample | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.011* | 0.01 - 0.012 | |
| Mean | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.0485 | 0.014 | 0.013 - 0.016 | |
| Cr-adjusted urine bisphenol concentration (mcg/g Cr) | ||||||||
| BPA | ||||||||
| 1st sample | 0.560 | 0.927 | 1.446 | 2.446 | 4.920 | 1.586* | 1.442-1.744 | |
| 2nd sample | 0.426 | 0.634 | 0.950 | 1.662 | 2.886 | 1.094* | 0.985 - 1.215 | |
| Mean | 0.591 | 0.864 | 1.291 | 1.958 | 3.138 | 1.389 | 1.262 - 1.529 | |
| BPF | ||||||||
| 1st sample | 0.005 | 0.007 | 0.011 | 0.021 | 0.047 | 0.014 | 0.012-0.015 | |
| 2nd sample | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.012 | 0.019 | 0.042 | 0.014 | 0.013 - 0.015 | |
| Mean | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.012 | 0.017 | 0.030 | 0.013 | 0.012 - 0.014 | |
| BPS | ||||||||
| 1st sample | 0.005 | 0.007 | 0.010 | 0.023 | 0.104 | 0.016 | 0.014-0.018 | |
| 2nd sample | 0.005 | 0.007 | 0.010 | 0.018 | 0.044 | 0.013 | 0.012 - 0.015 | |
| Mean | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.011 | 0.018 | 0.048 | 0.014 | 0.013 - 0.016 | |
| SG-adjusted urine bisphenol concentration (ng/mL) | ||||||||
| BPA | ||||||||
| 1st sample | 0.5 | 0.607 | 1.384 | 2.766 | 4.924 | 1.487* | 1.348-1.641 | |
| 2nd sample | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.691 | 1.425 | 2.610 | 0.932* | 0.845 - 1.029 | |
| Mean | 0.601 | 0.829 | 1.348 | 2.176 | 3.729 | 1.471 | 1.331 - 1.625 | |
| BPF | ||||||||
| 1st sample | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.012 | 0.022 | 0.013 | 0.012-0.013 | |
| 2nd sample | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.019 | 0.012 | 0.011 - 0.013 | |
| Mean | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.012 | 0.016 | 0.026 | 0.014 | 0.013 - 0.015 | |
| BPS | ||||||||
| 1st sample | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.067 | 0.015* | 0.013-0.017 | |
| 2nd sample | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.011* | 0.01 - 0.012 | |
| Mean | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.011 | 0.016 | 0.044 | 0.015 | 0.013 - 0.017 | |
| Bisphenol concentration ratio | ||||||||
| BPF/BPA | ||||||||
| 1st sample | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.010 | 0.020 | 0.033 | 0.010 | 0.009-0.012 | |
| 2nd sample | 0.004 | 0.008 | 0.017 | 0.020 | 0.020 | 0.013 | 0.011 - 0.014 | |
| Mean | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.010 | 0.016 | 0.021 | 0.009 | 0.008 - 0.01 | |
| BPS/BPA | ||||||||
| 1st sample | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.009 | 0.020 | 0.020 | 0.009 | 0.008-0.010 | |
| 2nd sample | 0.004 | 0.007 | 0.015 | 0.020 | 0.020 | 0.012 | 0.011 - 0.014 | |
| Mean | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.010 | 0.019 | 0.040 | 0.01 | 0.009 - 0.012 | |
| Analyte | 25th | 50th | 75th | 95th | Regulation (TDI) | N (%) >TDI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPA | 0.0125 | 0.0213 | 0.0448 | 0.1136 | 4 | 0 (0%) |
| BPF | 0.0001 | 0.0002 | 0.0004 | 0.0011 | N/A | N/A |
| BPS | 0.0002 | 0.0003 | 0.0006 | 0.0034 | 4.4 | 0 (0%) |
| Parameter | Group | BPA | p | BPF | p | BPS | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obesity | Not Obese (N=226) | 1.341 (1.223-1.471) |
0.165 | 0.013 (0.012-0.015) |
0.107 | 0.046 (0.011-0.081) |
0.727 |
| Obese (N=60) | 1.584 (1.171-2.143) |
0.011 (0.01-0.013) |
0.059 (-0.013-0.13) |
||||
| Sex | Boy (N=153) | 1.41 (1.209-1.643) |
0.748 | 0.013 (0.011-0.014) |
0.391 | 0.052 (0.001-0.102) |
0.842 |
| Girl (N=133) | 1.366 (1.225-1.523) |
0.013 (0.012-0.015) |
0.045 (0.012-0.078) |
||||
| Age | Age < 10 years (N=182) | 1.533 (1.347-1.745) |
0.007 | 0.015 (0.013-0.017) |
<0.001 | 0.046 (0.021-0.071) |
<0.001 |
| Age ≥ 10 years (N=104) | 1.169 (1.026-1.332) |
0.01 (0.009-0.012) |
0.053 (-0.021-0.127) |
| Variable | Cr-adjusted BPA | Cr-adjusted BPF | Cr-adjusted BPS | BPF/BPA ratio | BPS/BPA ratio | |||||
| GMR (95%CI) | p* | GMR (95%CI) | p* | GMR (95%CI) | p* | GMR (95%CI) | p* | GMR (95%CI) | p* | |
| Age < 10 vs ≥ 10 years | 1.31 (1.07-1.6) |
0.007 | 1.46 (1.22-1.73) |
0.000 | 1.62 (1.26-2.08) |
0.000 | 1.12 (0.87-1.42) |
0.391 | 1.23 (0.91-1.67) |
0.167 |
| Obese/yes | 1.19 (0.93-1.49) |
0.165 | 0.84 (0.68-1.04) |
0.107 | 0.95 (0.7-1.28) |
0.727 | 0.71 (0.54-0.94) |
0.018 | 0.8 (0.57-1.14) |
0.223 |
| Food with plastic containera | 1.2 (0.99-1.45) |
0.061 | 1.44 (1.16-1.78) |
0.001 | 1.40 (1.05-1.87) |
0.024 | 1.2 (0.96-1.5) |
0.108 | 1.17 (0.87-1.58) |
0.31 |
| Water in plastic bottlea | 1.14 (0.92-1.42) |
0.229 | 1.06 (0.87-1.28) |
0.564 | 1.11 (0.84-1.46) |
0.456 | 0.93 (0.71-1.21) |
0.576 | 0.97 (0.7-1.35) |
0.867 |
| Toothpasteb | 1.09 (0.85-1.4) |
0.485 | 1.13 (0.9-1.4) |
0.306 | 1.09 (0.79-1.51) |
0.578 | 1.03 (0.76-1.39) |
0.850 | 1 (0.69-1.46) |
0.995 |
| Soapb | 1.11 (0.86-1.43) |
0.434 | 1.06 (0.84-1.34) |
0.641 | 1.03 (0.74-1.42) |
0.872 | 0.95 (0.7-1.3) |
0.767 | 0.92 (0.63-1.36) |
0.702 |
| Face / body lotionb | 1 (0.83-1.22) |
0.977 | 1.02 (0.85-1.21) |
0.866 | 0.9 (0.7-1.15) |
0.418 | 1.01 (0.8-1.28) |
0.919 | 0.9 (0.68-1.21) |
0.481 |
| Dishwashing liquidb | 1.03 (0.84-1.25) |
0.768 | 1.05 (0.89-1.26) |
0.551 | 0.84 (0.66-1.07) |
0.168 | 1.02 (0.81-1.3) |
0.840 | 0.82 (0.61-1.09) |
0.173 |
| Country | Year | N | Age (years) | Method | Detection rate (%) | Concentration (ng/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPA | BPF | BPS | BPA | BPF | BPS | |||||
| Current study | 2019-2020 | 358 | 6-13 | LC-MS/MS | 79.6 | 31 | 16.8 | 1.41 | 0.013 | 0.014 |
| belgium[17] | 2017-2018 | 423 | 14-15 | GC-MS/MS | 86 | 97 | 83 | 1.05 | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Japan[19] | 2012-2017 | 396 | 7 | GC-MS/MS | 89 | 83 | 78 | 0.89 | 0.07 | 0.11 |
| China[18] | 2015 | 283 | 3-11 | HPLC-MS/MS | 93 | 12 | 89 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.03 |
| US[12] | 2013-2014 | 868 | 6-19 | HPLC−MS/MS | 95.7 | 66.5 | 89.4 | 1.25 | 0.32 | 0.29 |
| Thailand [16] | 2013-2014 | 376 | 3-18 | LCMS | 75.3 | - | - | 0.68 | - | - |
| Brazil[21] | 2012-2013 | 300 | 6-14 | LC-MS/MS | 98 | 9 | 23 | 1.66 | <LOQ | <LOQ |
| EUa[20] | 2011-2012 | 653 | 5-12 | LC-MS/MS | 91.1 | - | - | 1.96 | - | - |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions, or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
