Submitted:
18 August 2023
Posted:
18 August 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant materials
2.2. Morphological traits
2.3. Biochemical parameters
2.4. Data analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Sensory analysis
3.2. Morphological traits
4. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ercisli, S.; Esitken, A.; Turkkal, C.; Orhan, E. The allelopathic effects of juglone and walnut leaf extracts on yield, growth, chemical and PNE composition of strawberry cv. Fern. Plant Soil Environ. 2005, 51(6), 283-387. [CrossRef]
- Erturk, Y.; Ercisli, S.; Cakmakci R. Yield and growth response of strawberry to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation. J. Plant Nutr. 2012, 35(6), 817-826. [CrossRef]
- Abanoz, Y.Y.; Okcu, Z. Biochemical content of cherry laurel (Prunus laurocerasus L.) fruits with edible coatings based on caseinat, Semperfresh and lecithin. Turk J Agric For, 2022, 46 (6), 908-918. http://doi.org/10.55730/1300-011X.3052. [CrossRef]
- Daler, S.; Cangi, R. Characterization of grapevine (V. vinifera L.) varieties grown in Yozgat province (Turkey) by simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Turk J Agric For. 2022, 46 (1), 38-48. [CrossRef]
- Delialioglu, R.A.; Dumanoglu, H.; Erdogan, V.; Dost, S.E.; Kesik, A.; Kocabas, Z. Multidimensional scaling analysis of sensory characteristics and quantitative traits in wild apricots. Tur. J. Agric. For. 2022, 46 (2), 160-172. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-011X.2968. [CrossRef]
- Ozer, G.; Makineci, E. Fruit characteristics, defoliation, forest floor and soil properties of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) forests in Istanbul-Turkey. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2022, 46 (5), 703-716. [CrossRef]
- Sikora, E.; Bieniek, M.I.; Borczak, B. Composition and antioxidant properties of fresh and frozen stored blackthorn fruits (Prunus spinosa L.). Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2013, 12 (4), 365-372.
- Rampáčková, E.; Göttingerová, M.; Kiss, T.; Ondrášek, I.; Venuta, R.; Wolf, J.; Nečas, T.; Ercisli, S. CIELAB analysis and quantitative correlation of total anthocyanin content in European and Asian plums. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci, 2021, 86, 453–460. [CrossRef]
- Trendafilova, A.; Ivanova, V.; Trusheva, B.; Kamenova-Nacheva, M.; Tabakov, S.; Simova, S. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Capacity of the Fruits of European Plum Cultivar “Čačanska Lepotica” Influenced by Different Rootstocks. Foods. 2022, 11(18), 2844. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182844. [CrossRef]
- Popović, B.; Mitrović, O.; Nikićević, N.; Tešević, V.; Urošević, I.; Miletić, N.; Milojević, S. Influence of Different Pre-Distillation Steps on Aromatic Profile of Plum Spirits Produced by Traditional and Modified Methods. Processes. 2023, 11(3), 863. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030863. [CrossRef]
- Bolat, I.; Ak, B.E.; Acar, I.; Ikinci, A. Plum culture in Turkey. Acta Hortic. 2017, 1175, 15-18. https://doi.10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1175.4. [CrossRef]
- Ercisli, S. A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2004, 51(4), 419-435. [CrossRef]
- Erturk, Y.; Ercisli, S.; Tosun, M. Physicochemical characteristics of wild plum fruits (Prunus spinosa L.), Int. J. Plant Prod. 2009, 3, 89-92. [CrossRef]
- Gunduz, K.; Saracoglu, O. Variation in total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Prunus cerasifera Ehrh. selections from Mediterranean region of Turkey. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 134, 88–92. [CrossRef]
- Cakir, G.; Tascioglu, T.; Cavdar, A.; Doganlar, S.; Frary, A.; Frary, A. Molecular Genetic Characterization of the Turkish National Green Plum (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.) Collection. Anadolu, 2021, 31 (1), 61-73. https://doi.10.18615/anadolu.950008. [CrossRef]
- Ozkan, G. Phenolic compounds, organic acids, vitamin c and antioxidant capacity in Prunus spinosa. C.R. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 2019, 72 (2), 267–273. [CrossRef]
- Baytop T. Türkiye’de bitkiler ile tedavi 2. Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, İstanbul, 1999; 204-5.
- Ayla, S.; Gunal, M.Y.; Sayin Sakul, A.A.; Biceroglu, O.; Ozdemir, E.M.; Okur, M.E.; Polat, D.C.; Okur, N.U.; Bilgic, BiE. Effects of Prunus spinosa L. fruits on experimental wound healing. Medeniyet Med J. 2017, 32, 152-158. [CrossRef]
- Karakas, N.; Okur, M.E.; Ozturk, I.; Ayla, S.; Karadag, A.E.; Polat, D.C. Antioxidant activity of blackthorn (Prunus spinosa L.) fruit extract and cytotoxic effects on various cancer cell lines. Medeniyet Med. J. 2019, 34(3), 297-304. https://doi.org/10.5222/MMJ.2019.87864. [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-Rodríguez, B.M.; de Ancos, B.; Sánchez-Moreno, C.; Fernandez-Ruiz, V.; Sanchez-Mata, M.C.; Camara, M.; Tardio, I. Wild blackthorn (Prunus spinosa L.) and hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna Jacq.) fruits as valuable sources of antioxidants. Fruits, 2014, 69, 61-73. [CrossRef]
- Marčetić, M.; Samardžić, S.; Ilić, T.; Božić, D.D.; Vidović, B. Phenolic Composition, Antioxidant, Anti-Enzymatic, Antimicrobial and Prebiotic Properties of Prunus spinosa L. Fruits. Foods. 2022, 11(20), 3289. https://doi.10.3390/foods11203289. [CrossRef]
- Negrean, O.R.; Farcas, A.C.; Pop, O.L.; Socaci, S.A. Blackthorn-A Valuable Source of Phenolic Antioxidants with Potential Health Benefits. Molecules. 2023, 28 (8), 3456. https://doi.10.3390/molecules28083456. [CrossRef]
- Bozan, B.; Baser, K.H.C.; Kara, S. Quantitative determination of naphthaquinones of Arnebia densiflora (Nordm.) Ledeb. by an improved high-performance liquid chromatographic method. J. Chromatogr. A, 1997, 782(1), 133-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(97)00460-3. [CrossRef]
- Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1965, 16, 144-158. [CrossRef]
- Krawczyk, U.; Petri, G. Application of RP-HPLC and spectrophotometry in standardization of bilberry anthocyanin extract. Archiv D. Pharm, 1992, 325, 147-149. [CrossRef]
- Benzie, I.F.F.; Strain, J.J. Ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of antioxidant power: The FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70-76. [CrossRef]
- Baldina, S.; Picarella, M.E.; Troise, A.D.; Pucci, A.; Ruggieri, V.; Ferracane, R.; Barone, A.; Fogliano, V.; Mazzucato, A. Metabolite profiling of Italian tomato landraces with different fruit types. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 664. [CrossRef]
- Karatas, N. Evaluation of nutritional content in wild apricot fruits for sustainable apricot production. Sustainability, 2022, 14 (3), 1063. [CrossRef]
- Sheng, L.; Ni, Y.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Gao, H. Characteristic-aroma-component-based evaluation and classification of strawberry varieties by aroma type. Molecules, 2021, 14, 6219. [CrossRef]
- Mukherjee, S.; Pal, A.; Mitra, A. An insight into fruit aroma volatilome during postharvest maturation in two popular Musa cultivars of tropics. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 4276-4286. [CrossRef]
- Ozzengin, B.; Zannou, O.; Koca, I. Quality attributes and antioxidant activity of three wild plums from Prunus spinosa and Prunus domestica species. Measurement: Food, 2023, 10, 100079. [CrossRef]
- Cinquanta, L.; Di, M.; Esti, M. Physical pre-treatment of plums (Prunus domestica). Part 2. Effect on the quality characteristics of different prune cultivars, Food Chem. 2022, 79, 233-238. [CrossRef]
- Egea, I.; Barsan, C.; Bian, W.; Purgatto, E.; Latche, A.; Chervin, C.; Bouzayen, M.; Pech, J-C. Chromoplast differentiation: Current status and perspectives, Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51 (10), 1601-1611, https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcq136. [CrossRef]
- Ozcan, T. Some vitamin and organic acid contents in the fruits of Prunus spinosa L. subsp. dasyphylla (Schur) Domin from Europe-in- Turkey. IUFS J. Biol. 2008, 67 (2), 105-114.
- Celik, F.; Gundogdu, M.; Alp, S.; Muradoglu, F.; Ercisli, S.; Gecer, M.K.; Canan, I. Determination of phenolic compounds, antioxidant capacity and organic acids contents of Prunus domestica L., Prunus cerasifera Ehrh. and Prunus spinosa L. fruits by HPLC. Acta Chromatographica, 2017, 29 (4), 507-510. [CrossRef]
- Gundogdu, M.; Guler, E.; Aglar, E.; Arslan, T.; Kan, T.; Celik, K. Use of spermidine to preserve organic acids, polyphenols, and quality of cold stored plum fruits. J Food Compos. Anal. 2023, 121,105411. [CrossRef]
- Bozhkova, V. Chemical composition and sensory evaluation of plum fruits. Trakya Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 2014,15 (1), 31-35.
- Nergiz, C.; Yildiz, H. Research on chemical composition of some varieties of European plums (Prunus domestica) adapted to the Aegean district of Turkey. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 2820–2823. [CrossRef]
- Johnson, J.B.; Collins, T.; Mani, J.S.; Naiker, M. Nutritional quality and bioactive con- stituents of six Australian plum varieties. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 2020, 21, 115-132. [CrossRef]
- Katanić Stanković, J.S.; Mićanović, N.; Grozdanić, N.; Kostić, A.Ž.; Gašić, U.; Stanojković, T.; Popović-Djordjević, J.B. Polyphenolic Profile, Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Potential of Medlar (Mespilus germanica L.), Blackthorn (Prunus spinosa L.) and Common Hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna Jacq.) Fruit Extracts from Serbia. Horticulturae. 2022; 8(11), 1053. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8111053. [CrossRef]
- Kim, I.; Lee, J. Variations in Anthocyanin Profiles and Antioxidant Activity of 12 Genotypes of Mulberry (Morus spp.) Fruits and Their Changes during Processing. Antioxidants. 2020, 9(3), 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9030242. [CrossRef]
- Memete, A.R.; Sărac, I.; Teusdea, A.C.; Budău, R.; Bei, M.; Vicas, S.I. Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity of Several Blackberry (Rubus spp.) Fruits Cultivars Grown in Romania. Horticulturae. 2023, 9 (5), 556. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9050556. [CrossRef]
- Urbstaite, R.; Raudone, L.; Janulis, V. Phytogenotypic Anthocyanin Profiles and Antioxidant Activity Variation in Fruit Samples of the American Cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton). Antioxidants. 2022, 11 (2), 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11020250. [CrossRef]

| Genotypes | Aroma | Taste | Juiciness |
|---|---|---|---|
| PS-1 | High | Sweet | Moderate |
| PS-2 | High | Sweet | Moderate |
| PS-3 | High | Sweet-Sour | High |
| PS-4 | Moderate | Sweet | Moderate |
| PS-5 | High | Sweet-Sour | High |
| PS-6 | Moderate | Sweet | Moderate |
| PS-7 | Moderate | Sweet-Sour | High |
| PS-8 | High | Sweet | Moderate |
| Genotypes | Fruit weight (g) |
Skin | Flesh | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | L* | a* | b* | ||
| PS-1 | 3.14e | 14.56cd | 3.12bc | 3.16a | 19.22ab | 4.88b | 4.43ab |
| PS-2 | 3.55c | 15.67b | 3.45b | 2.85ab | 17.68bc | 6.34ab | 5.18ab |
| PS-3 | 3.71b | 13.88e | 2.56d | 3.44ab | 17.45c | 6.73a | 5.66a |
| PS-4 | 2.95f | 13.11f | 2.83cd | 3.28ab | 19.04ab | 5.12ab | 4.33ab |
| PS-5 | 3.85a | 16.03ab | 3.85a | 2.38ab | 18.33b | 5.56ab | 4.98ab |
| PS-6 | 3.27d | 14.44d | 2.95c | 2.56ab | 18.56bc | 5.80ab | 4.49b |
| PS-7 | 2.67bc | 16.12a | 3.26bc | 2.01b | 20.37a | 4.96b | 4.12c |
| PS-8 | 2.88fg | 14.86c | 3.34bc | 2.63ab | 19.55ab | 5.44ab | 4.33ab |
| Genotypes | Citric acid (mg/100 g) | Malic acid (g/100 g) |
Succinic acid (mg/100 g) |
Fumaric acid (mg/100 g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PS-1 | 17.12ab | 1.32ab | 3.12ab | 1.56NS |
| PS-2 | 17.80ab | 1.52a | 3.37ab | 1.35 |
| PS-3 | 15.38bc | 1.41ab | 3.44a | 1.12 |
| PS-4 | 14.07c | 1.25ab | 2.88ab | 1.20 |
| PS-5 | 15.03bc | 1.12b | 2.50ab | 0.92 |
| PS-6 | 14.68bc | 1.44ab | 3.20ab | 1.44 |
| PS-7 | 18.64a | 1.29ab | 1.95b | 0.97 |
| PS-8 | 16.50b | 1.04ab | 2.65ab | 1.25 |
| Genotypes | SSC (%) |
Vitamin C mg/100 g | Total phenolic (mg GAE/100 g FW) |
Total anthocyanin (mg cy-3-g eq./ 100 g) |
FRAP (mmol Fe (II) eq./g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PS-1 | 19.15bc | 16.50b | 498ab | 60c | 116c |
| PS-2 | 19.80b | 18.90ab | 450c | 68b | 125b |
| PS-3 | 18.66c | 17.90ab | 390f | 72a | 112cd |
| PS-4 | 20.70ab | 20.44ab | 504a | 63bc | 134a |
| PS-5 | 18.90bc | 18.60ab | 424d | 68b | 121bc |
| PS-6 | 21.07a | 21.30a | 482b | 66bc | 128ab |
| PS-7 | 18.40bc | 19.50ab | 404e | 53d | 116c |
| PS-8 | 21.00a | 20.70ab | 372g | 56cd | 107d |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).