Submitted:
09 August 2023
Posted:
10 August 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data
2.3. Methods
2.3.1. Comparison between Station and CHIRPS Rainfall Data
2.3.2. Description of Selected Rainfall and River Discharge Extreme Indices
2.3.3. Trend and Change Point Detection
- Tests for Trend Analysis
-
The selection of MMK could be justified by its consideration of the autocorrelation effect present in the data. The principle is based on an adaptation of the statistic (S) used in the MK test. The modified MK was proposed by [19] with the aim of considering autocorrelation in the series: the statistics allow for adjusting the variance accordingly.
The parameter ns* is utilized to correct the effective number of observations, considering the autocorrelation in the data.
is a correction factor due to the autocorrelation present in the data
- 2.
- Change Point Detection Tests
- Pettit’s Test
- The test's sensitivity lies in its ability to detect breaks at both the start and end of the series. Moreover, it demonstrates insensitivity to potential missing values, making it relatively straight-forward yet highly effective compared to other tests. The SNHT test's application is based on the utilization of the following equation:
3. Results
3.1. Spatial Variation of Extreme Rainfall Indices over the Senegal River Basin
3.2. Trend and Significance of Extreme Indices
3.3. Inter-Annual Variation and Trends in Rainfall Extremes Indices
3.4. Breakpoint Detection on the Trends of Extremes Precipitations
3.5. Characterization of Extreme Flows of the Basin
3.5.1. Inter-Annual Variation of Discharge
3.5.2. Trends and Inter-Annual Variability of Flow Extremes
3.5.3. Breakpoint Detection on the Trends of Extremes Flow
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- OCHA, “Afrique de l ’ Ouest • Inondations 2009,” 2009.
- M. Ben Abdelmalek and I. Nouiri, “Study of trends and mapping of drought events in Tunisia and their impacts on agricultural production,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 734, p. 139311, 2020. [CrossRef]
- D. Konate et al., “Observed Changes in Rainfall and Characteristics of Extreme Events in C ô te d ’ Ivoire ( West Africa ),” 2023.
- Larbi, F. C. C. Hountondji, T. Annor, W. A. Agyare, J. M. Gathenya, and J. Amuzu, “Spatio-temporal trend analysis of rainfall and temperature extremes in the Vea catchment, Ghana,” Climate, vol. 6, no. 4, 2018. [CrossRef]
- Badji, J. Mignot, E. Mohino, M. Diakhaté, and A. T. Gaye, “Decadal variability of rainfall extreme events in Senegal over the 20th century : observations and modelling,” no. May, p. 8335, 2023.
- M. T. Cisse, S. Sambou, Y. Dieme, C. Diatta, and M. Bop, “Analysis of flow in the Senegal River basin from 1960 to 2008,” Rev. des Sci. l’Eau, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 167–187, 2014. [CrossRef]
- C. Faye, “Impact Du Changement Climatique Et Du Barrage De Manantali Sur La Dynamique Du Régime Hydrologique Du Fleuve Sénégal À Bakel (1950-2014),” BSGLg., vol. 64, pp. 69–82, 2015.
- Bodian et al., “Recent trend in hydroclimatic conditions in the Senegal River basin,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2020. [CrossRef]
- Faty, A. Kane, and A. L. Ndiaye, “Influence de la manifestation climatique sur les régimes pluviométriques saisonniers dans le haut bassin versant du Sénégal,” Rev. des Sci. l’Eau, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 79–87, 2017. [CrossRef]
- Faye, “Méthode d’analyse statistique de données morphométriques : corrélation de paramètres morphométriques et influence sur l’écoulement des sous-bassins du fleuve Sénégal,” Cinq Cont., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 80–108, 2014.
- J. E. Nash and J. V Sutcliffe, “River Flow Forecasting Through Conceptual Models - Part I - A Discussion of Principles,” J. Hydrol., vol. 10, no. 1970, pp. 282–290, 1970.
- J. Sillmann, V. V. Kharin, X. Zhang, F. W. Zwiers, and D. Bronaugh, “Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate,” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., vol. 118, no. 4, pp. 1716–1733, 2013. [CrossRef]
- J. Sillmann, V. V. Kharin, F. W. Zwiers, X. Zhang, and D. Bronaugh, “Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 2. Future climate projections,” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 2473–2493, 2013. [CrossRef]
- Avila-Diaz, G. Abrahão, F. Justino, R. Torres, and A. Wilson, “Extreme climate indices in Brazil: evaluation of downscaled earth system models at high horizontal resolution,” Clim. Dyn., vol. 54, no. 11–12, pp. 5065–5088, 2020. [CrossRef]
- Avila-Diaz, V. Benezoli, F. Justino, R. Torres, and A. Wilson, “Assessing current and future trends of climate extremes across Brazil based on reanalyses and earth system model projections,” Clim. Dyn., vol. 55, no. 5–6, pp. 1403–1426, 2020. [CrossRef]
- B. Wilson, A. Avila-Diaz, L. F. Oliveira, C. F. Zuluaga, and B. Mark, “Climate extremes and their impacts on agriculture across the Eastern Corn Belt Region of the U.S.,” Weather Clim. Extrem., vol. 37, no. February, p. 100467, 2022. [CrossRef]
- M. Hu, T. Sayama, W. Duan, K. Takara, B. He, and P. Luo, “Assessment of hydrological extremes in the Kamo River Basin, Japan,” Hydrol. Sci. J., vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 1255–1265, 2017. [CrossRef]
- F. Garcia, “Amélioration d ’ une modélisation hydrologique régionalisée pour estimer les statistiques d ’ étiage Florine Garcia To cite this version : HAL Id : tel-01624530 Université Pierre et Marie Curie Amélioration d ’ une modélisation hydrologique régionalisée p,” 2017.
- Ahmad et al., “Spatiotemporal analysis of precipitation variability in annual, seasonal and extreme values over upper Indus River basin,” Atmos. Res., vol. 213, pp. 346–360, 2018. [CrossRef]
- R. Sneyers, “On the statistical analysis of series of observations,” World Meteorol. Organ., vol. 415, p. 1990, 1990. [CrossRef]
- Tarhule and M. Woo, “Changes in rainfall characteristics in northern Nigeria,” Int. J. Climatol., vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1261–1271, 1998.
- G. Verstraeten, J. Poesen, G. Demarée, and C. Salles, “Long-term (105 years) variability in rain erosivity as derived from 10-min rainfall depth data for Ukkel (Brussels, Belgium): Implications for assessing soil erosion rates,” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., vol. 111, no. 22, 2006. [CrossRef]
- X. Mu, L. Zhang, T. R. McVicar, B. Chille, and P. Gau, “Analysis of the impact of conservation measures on stream flow regime in catchments of the Loess Plateau, China,” Hydrol. Process., vol. 21, no. 16, pp. 2124–2134, 2007. [CrossRef]
- S. Zhang and X. X. Lu, “Hydrological responses to precipitation variation and diverse human activities in a mountainous tributary of the lower Xijiang, China,” Catena, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 130–142, 2009. [CrossRef]
- P. Gao, X. M. Mu, F. Wang, and R. Li, “Changes in streamflow and sediment discharge and the response to human activities in the middle reaches of the Yellow River,” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2011. [CrossRef]
- V. F. Decembre, “S d a g e d u f l e u v e s e n e g a l,” 2009.
- R. Hounguè, A. E. Lawin, S. Moumouni, and A. A. Afouda, “Change in climate extremes and pan evaporation influencing factors over Ouémé Delta in Bénin,” Climate, vol. 7, no. 1, 2019. [CrossRef]
- V. N. Dike, Z. H. Lin, and C. C. Ibe, “Intensification of summer rainfall extremes over nigeria during recent decades,” Atmosphere (Basel)., vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 10–12, 2020. [CrossRef]
- S. Diatta, C. W. Diedhiou, D. M. Dione, and S. Sambou, “Spatial variation and trend of extreme precipitation in west africa and teleconnections with remote indices,” Atmosphere (Basel)., vol. 11, no. 9, 2020. [CrossRef]
- OE, L. BL, L. AE, and S. IS, “Spatio-Temporal Precipitation Trend and Homogeneity Analysis in Komadugu-Yobe Basin, Lake Chad Region,” J. Climatol. Weather Forecast., vol. 05, no. 03, 2017. [CrossRef]
- S. E. Nicholson, B. Some, and B. Kone, “An analysis of recent rainfall conditions in West Africa, including the rainy seasons of the 1997 El Nino and the 1998 La Nina years,” J. Clim., vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 2628–2640, 2000.
- P. Ozer, M. Erpicum, G. Demarée, and M. Vandiepenbeeck, “The Sahelian drought may have ended during the 1990s,” Hydrol. Sci. J., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 489–492, 2003. [CrossRef]
- B. Sarr and M. Camara, “Evolution Des Indices Pluviométriques Extrêmes Par L’analyse De Modèles Climatiques Régionaux Du Programme CORDEX: Les Projections Climatiques Sur Le Sénégal,” Eur. Sci. Journal, ESJ, vol. 13, no. 17, p. 206, Jun. 2017. [CrossRef]
- Attogouinon, A. E. Lawin, Y. N. T. M’Po, and R. Houngue, “Extreme precipitation indices trend assessment over the Upper Oueme river valley-(Benin),” Hydrology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–24, 2017. [CrossRef]
- M. Fofana et al., “Urban flash flood and extreme rainfall events trend analysis in Bamako, Mali,” Environ. Challenges, vol. 6, no. January, pp. 0–8, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Z. Nouaceur, “La reprise des pluies et la recrudescence des inondations en Afrique de l’Ouest sahélienne,” Physio-Géo, vol. 15, no. Volume 15, pp. 89–109, 2020. [CrossRef]
- S. Sene and P. Ozer, “Évolution Pluviométrique Et Relation Inondations – Événements Pluvieux Au Sénégal,” Bull. la Société géographique Liège, vol. 42, no. January 2002, pp. 27–33, 2002. 20 January.
- J. Niang, A. Ozer, and P. Ozer, “Fifty years of landscape evolution in Southwestern Mauritania by means of aerial photos,” J. Arid Environ., vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 97–107, 2008. [CrossRef]
- P. Ozer, Y. C. Hountondji, and O. Laminou Manzo, “Evolution des caractéristiques pluviométriques dans l’est du niger de 1940 a 2007,” Geo. Eco. Trop., vol. 33, pp. 11–30, 2009.
- G. Panthou, T. Vischel, and T. Lebel, “Recent trends in the regime of extreme rainfall in the Central Sahel,” Int. J. Climatol., vol. 34, no. 15, pp. 3998–4006, 2014. [CrossRef]
- S. Sambou, A. M. Badji, and E. N. Malanda-nimy, “Une Approche Statistique,” vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 104–111, 2009.







| Rainfall Station Name | Longitude | Latitude | Country located |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saint Louis | -16.45 | 16.05 | Senegal |
| Dagana | -15.5 | 16.52 | Senegal |
| Podor | -14.97 | 16.65 | Senegal |
| Matam | -13.25 | 15.65 | Senegal |
| Bakel | -12.47 | 14.90 | Senegal |
| Saraya | -11.78 | 12.78 | Senegal |
| Siguiri | -9.17 | 11.43 | Guinea |
| Labe | -12.30 | 11.32 | Guinea |
| Tougue | -11.66 | 11.43 | Guinea |
| Mamou | -12.08 | 10.37 | Guinea |
| Toukoto | -9.90 | 13.45 | Mali |
| Bafing-makana | -10.25 | 12.55 | Mali |
| Daka saidiou | -10.61 | 11.95 | Mali |
| Kita | -9.47 | 13.07 | Mali |
| Falea | -11.82 | 12.26 | Mali |
| Discharge station Name | Longitude | Latitude |
|---|---|---|
| Bakel | -12.45 | 14.9 |
| Kidira | -12.21 | 14.45 |
| Oualia | -10.38 | 13.6 |
| Bafing-makana | -10.28 | 12.55 |
| Statistical Indicators | ||
|---|---|---|
| Stations | NSE | Correlation Coefficient |
| Saint-Louis | 0.98 | 0.99 |
| Dagana | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| Podor | 0.96 | 0.99 |
| Matam | 0.98 | 0.99 |
| Bakel | 0.96 | 0.98 |
| Saraya | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Kita | 0.96 | 0.99 |
| Falea | 0.97 | 0.98 |
| Tokoto | 0.97 | 0.95 |
| Daka saidou | 0.89 | 0.97 |
| Bafing-Makana | 0.95 | 0.99 |
| Mamou | 0.90 | 0.99 |
| Tougue | 0.85 | 0.96 |
| Labe | 0.96 | 0.99 |
| Siguiri | 0.89 | 0.96 |
| Index | Index Name | Index Definitions | Units |
|---|---|---|---|
| SDII | Simple daily rainfall index | The ratio of annual total rainfall to the number of wet days | mm/day |
| RX5day | Max 5-day rainfall | Annual maximum consecutive 5- day rainfall | mm |
| R95p | Very wet days | Total annual rainfall accumulated above the 95th percentile of 1982–2021 |
mm |
| R99p | extremely wet day | Total annual rainfall accumulated above the 95th percentile of 1982–2021 |
mm |
| Qmax | Peak discharge | Annual maximum discharge in 1982 - 2021 | m3/s |
| Q95p | High flow days | Annual total stream flow from days > 95th percentile of 1982-2021 | m3/s |
| Q99p | Very high flow days | Annual total stream flow from days > 99th percentile of 1982-2021 | m3/s |
| Indices | P-value | Zc | Sen’s slope | Tau | Var |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R95P | 47E-25 | 10.33 | 0.079 | 0.34 | 667.00 |
| R99P | 99E-9 | 5.73 | 0.098 | 0.23 | 997.35 |
| SDII | 11E-9 | 6.08 | 0.024 | 0.22 | 826.80 |
| RX5DAY | 22E-3 | 3.05 | 0.067 | 0.096 | 587.97 |
| Index | P-value | Break point |
|---|---|---|
| R95p | 0.020 | 2007 |
| R99p | 0.2625 | 2006 |
| SDII | 0.078 | 2007 |
| RX5DAY | 1 | 2006 |
| Indices | P-Value | Zc | Sen’s slope | Tau | Var(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q95P | 22 E-17 | 8.48 | 29.23 | 0.33 | 946.912 |
| Q99P | 33 E-14 | 7.58 | 37.49 | 0.31 | 1060 |
| Qmax | 13E-12 | 7.08 | 38.35 | 0.30 | 1137.5 |
| Indices | Pettit’s test | SNHT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-value | Break point | P-value | Break point | |
| Q95p | 0.0239 | 1993 | 0.0153 | 1993 |
| Q99p | 0.04125 | 1993 | 0.01795 | 1993 |
| QMAX | 0.02804 | 1993 | 0.01735 | 1993 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).