Phase Stabilization of a Terahertz Wave using Mach-Zehnder Interference Detection

1. Introduction

In recent times, the exponential surge in mobile data traffic has necessitated the need for communication systems capable of handling higher frequency signal carriers, such as terahertz (THz) waves [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Positioned between radio waves and infrared waves, THz waves occupy a frequency range spanning from 0.1 to 10 THz. This unique range falls within the spectrum of capabilities that lie between traditional radio frequency (RF) and optical systems. Significantly surpassing the frequencies of radio waves, THz waves empower the transmission of communication signals with ultra-wide bandwidth [8,9,10,11]. Consequently, there has been an increasing interest among researchers and industry experts to explore the potential of terahertz frequencies as a practical solution for meeting the bandwidth demands of high-speed wireless communications [9,10,11,12,13,14].

There has been a race to boost data rates in response to rising demand and the need to improve service capabilities. Increasing data rates is critical to meet the ever-increasing service demands. This behavior is consistent with Edholm’s Law, according to which bandwidth and data rates double every 18 months. This equation has been shown to be astonishingly accurate in forecasting the continued improvement of data transmission speeds. Wireless transmission rates were roughly 5 to 10 kbit/s in 1995 but had greatly increased to 100 kbit/s by 2004 [15]. During the shift from 3G to 4G LTE technologies between 2000 and 2010, data rates ranged from several Mbit/s, with 4G LTE enabling download speeds of up to 100 Mbit/s between 2010 and 2020. Today, the implementation of 5G networks is predicted to reach speeds of up to 10 Gbit/s, as shown in Figure 1, in accordance with Edholm’s law. Furthermore, the industry hopes to reach a peak data throughput of 1,000 Gbit/s (1 Tbit/s) in 6G by 2035.

2. THz Waves: Meeting High-Speed Communication Needs

The introduction of terahertz frequencies into wireless communications opens up new

possibilities for achieving high data rates and ultra-wide bandwidths. Regarding generating THz waves, two main approaches have been utilized: the all-electronics and optoelectronics approaches. The all-electronics approach involves employing electronic devices, such as high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) and complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology, for both the THz emitter and receiver components [16,17]. This approach takes advantage of the capabilities of electronic devices to generate and detect THz waves. On the other hand, the opto-electronics approach which based on photonic generation on a high data rate THz signal. There are some approaches, such as Photonic Integrated Circuits (PICs) [18], Quantum Cascade Lasers (QCLs) [19], and photomixers or photodiodes [20].

We summarize up-to-date research efforts on the progress of high-speed THz wireless communication systems [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49], as shown in Figure 2. In the footprint map, carrier frequencies have been increased up to 500 GHz in order to explore more available bandwidth in higher frequency bands for carrying high-speed information. We can see that opto-electronic techniques have considerably contributed to higher data rates, particularly those over 80 Gbit/s. According to the graph, frequencies above 300 GHz are mostly handled utilizing opto-electronic techniques. The greatest transmission bit rate of 110 Gbit/s has been reached among all-electronics approaches at 220 GHz [30], while the opto-electronics approach has hit 140 Gbit/s at 500 GHz [49].

The all-electronics approach relies solely on electronic devices. This approach offers notable advantages, such as excellent resolution and adaptability for THz applications. However, as electronic components operate at higher frequencies, they face challenges such as limited bandwidth, increased noise levels, and power consumption issues [50]. These limitations hinder their ability to keep pace with the exponentially growing demand for high-speed data transmission [51]. To overcome these challenges, photonics-based methods can provide a solution with wider bandwidths [52]. Unlike the all-electronics approach, the photonics approach utilizes a fiber optic configuration, enabling seamless connectivity between fiber optic and wireless communication networks. By utilizing fiber optics, the photonics approach holds the potential for generating THz waves with wider bandwidths for higher-speed data transmission compared to purely electronic methods.

Among the various photonics approaches for generating THz waves, photomixing has emerged as a promising technique [53,54,55,56,57]. Photomixing involves introducing two lightwaves with different frequencies onto a photoelectronic conversion device, such as a uni-traveling-carrier photodiode

(UTC-PD) [58]. This technique exploits the square-law detection of the photoelectronic conversion device to generate high-frequency electrical signals in the THz range. The combination of the two input lightwaves generates a new signal in the THz frequency range.

3. Photomixing: A photonic-based approach

Photomixing has gained attention due to its ability to achieve high-frequency THz wave generation with excellent spectral purity and wide tunability. The UTC-PD, as a photomixer, being a key component in this technique, where it converts the optical power of the input lightwaves into a current. By introducing two continuous lightwaves with different frequencies of $f_1$ and $f_2$ into the photomixer, resulted in the generation of THz waves. Let’s say the initial lightwave is given below,

$$E_1=A_1 e^{i\left(2\pi f_{1}t+{\phi }_1\right)}$$

(1)

$$E_2=A_2 e^{i\left(2\pi f_{2}t+{\phi }_2\right)}$$

(2)

the frequency and phase of the generated THz wave depend on the frequency difference of $f_1-f_2$ and the phase difference of ${\phi }_1-{\phi }_2$ between the original two lightwaves, as shown in the equation below.

$$E_{THz}\propto {\left|E_1+E_2\right|}^2\propto A_1{}^2+A_2{}^2+2A_1{A}_2\cos \left(2\pi \left(f_1-f_2\right)t+\left({\phi }_1-{\phi }_2\right)\right)$$

(3)

One advantage of photomixing is offering a flexible and tunable approach to THz wave generation. By adjusting the frequencies of the input lightwaves, the generated THz frequency can be controlled, allowing for versatile applications in different communication scenarios. However, despite its promise, photomixing faces challenges that need to be addressed for practical implementation. One significant challenge is the phase stability of the lightwave, particularly for implementing multilevel phase modulation. Figure 3 shows an optical frequency comb (OFC)-based photomixing technique for THz wave generation [59,60]. In this technique, two lightwaves, whose optical frequencies are denoted as $f_1$ and $f_2$, are extracted from the OFC using an optical filter. The extracted lightwaves are then combined using an optical coupler (OC). Although the initial phase locking of $f_1$ and $f_2$ is achieved, the generated THz wave may experience phase fluctuations, ${\phi }_{noise}$_, due to path length variations in the optical fibers between the optical filter and the OC. This situation is due to the total phase difference of the generated THz wave will always change based on the ${\phi }_{noise}$ as shown in the equation below.

$$E_{THz}\propto A_1{}^2+A_2{}^2+2A_1{A}_2\cos \left(2\pi \left(f_1-f_1\right)t+\left({\phi }_1-{\phi }_2+{\phi }_{noise}\right)\right).$$

(4)

Therefore, phase stabilization techniques for the lightwaves are necessary to ensure the stability and reliability of the THz wave generated through photomixing.

4. Phase Stabilization Method

In previous research, we developed a phase stabilization system using the Mach-Zehnder Interferometric (MZI) phase stabilization method [61,62,63]. This method involved introducing a pilot lightwave, $f_0$, into the THz-wave intensity-modulation (IM)/coherent detection (CD) system, which can be considered an MZI as shown in Figure 4. As the pilot lightwaves from the upper and lower path interfere after OC, the interference signal is detected. This interference signal represented the ${\phi }_{noise}$ is then converted into an electrical signal and introduced into the feedback controller. By controlling the intensity of the interfered pilot lightwave at a constant, the stabilization of the THz-wave IM system was achieved.

This approach successfully demonstrated the transmission of THz-wave data using IM/CD. However, it is important to note that this method is not suitable for THz-wave phase modulation (PM), which is necessary for implementing multilevel PM schemes such as quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) or 16-state quadrature amplitude modulation (16QAM) for higher data rates. The pilot lightwave used in the MZI-based stabilization system would also undergo phase modulation, making it unable to accurately detect and compensate for phase fluctuations.

To address this limitation, the pilot lightwave is introduced along a backward direction. Figure 5 illustrates the use of a 100-mm-long lithium niobate (LN) phase modulator to modulate the phase of lightwaves [64]. The modulation is achieved by applying an electrical signal to the traveling-wave electrode of the LN modulator, causing a shift in the phase of the lightwave passing through it. Here, if the bit length is shorter than the length of the phase modulator, the optical lightwave traveling in the backward direction will not undergo modulation. This situation occurs because the lightwave encounters a constantly switching electrical signal voltage, resulting in the phase shift being effectively averaged out and remaining unaffected. However, it should be noted that the longer electrical bit would modulate the pilot lightwave.

Consequently, no significant modulation is observed on the backward pilot lightwave. In the case where the bit length (L_b) of the electrical signal is shorter than the length of the phase modulator (L), denoted as L_b < L, the backward pilot lightwave encounters a constantly fluctuating electrical signal voltage. This fluctuation can be represented by a time-varying function V(t) which represents the voltage applied to the phase modulator at time t with constant k. Considering the phase modulation equation Δφ = kVL, we can express the phase shift experienced by the backward pilot lightwave as:

Δφ_backward(t) = kV(t)L_b.

(5)

Since V(t) constantly switches within the short bit length, the integral of V(t) over that duration is expected to be averaged. Therefore, the phase shift Δφ_backward, which the backward lightwave experienced, can be effectively averaged out as well, resulting in no significant phase modulation:

$${\mathsf{\Delta }\mathsf{\phi }}_{\mathrm{backward}}=\int \left\{kV\left(t\right)L\right\}dt\approx 0.$$

(6)

In the following two sections, phase detection and stabilization in the optical domain using forward-direction and backward-direction pilot lightwaves are presented as well as the stability of phase-modulated THz-wave data transmission is discussed.

5. Phase Detection and Stabilization System of the Optical Domain

We have constructed an experimental setup to further explore the phase detection and stabilization techniques in a THz-wave phase PM system. Building upon the earlier discussed issues, our current focus is to compare the phase stabilization system based on the MZI technique by using the performance of forward and backward-direction pilot lightwaves. By introducing a pilot lightwave into two optical paths, the combined lightwaves at the output coupler will experience interference. By carefully controlling the intensity of the interfered lightwave, we can maintain a constant phase difference between the lightwaves of the two optical paths. This comparative study aims to evaluate the stability and reliability of phase stabilization system methods in stabilizing the THz wave generation system, which depends on the direction of the pilot lightwave being introduced into the system. In the forward-direction phase stabilization system, the pilot lightwave passes from the input of the THz wave generation system. In contrast, in the backward-direction phase stabilization system, the pilot lightwave travels from the output of the THz wave generation system. This setup allows us to study the impact of the pilot lightwave direction on the stability of the system.

5.1. Experimental Setup

5.1.1. Forward-Direction Pilot Lightwave System

Figure 6a illustrates the block diagram of a reference experiment conducted to generate phase-modulated THz waves using a forward pilot lightwave in the phase stabilization system. In this THz-wave PM generation system (solid line), a single lightwave with a frequency f_gen of 193.4125 THz (orange arrow) is introduced from the left side instead of utilizing two lightwaves with different optical frequencies. The introduced lightwave undergoes amplification by an Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifier (EDFA). After the EDFA, the lightwave passes through an isolator to ensure unidirectional transmission and suppress any unwanted reflections or backscattering effects. The lightwave is split into two optical paths at the optical splitter (OS). This point is marked as the input of the MZI. The upper path involves the lightwave traveling through a traveling-wave optical phase modulator (OPM) and being phase modulated by the pulse pattern generator (PPG) at rates of 1, 3, and 10 Gbit/s using a constant pseudorandom binary sequence (PRBS) of length 2⁷-1. The lower path comprises the lightwave passing through the phase shifter (PS). The lightwaves from these two paths are combined at the OC, here are marked as the output of the MZI. Figure 6c shows the optical spectra of the input and output lightwaves into the MZI. The input power of the f_gen into the MZI is -7.99 dBm and the output is -32.4 dBm. The coupled signal is introduced to an optical-electrical (O/E) converter, resulting in the modulated signal. The phase stability of modulated signal in the THz-wave generation system is observed by comparing it with the initial signal injected into the OPM using an OSC and a bit error rate tester (BERT) simultaneously.

In contrast, the phase stabilization system (dotted line) operates as follows: the pilot lightwave (pink arrow) originates from a laser with an optical frequency of 195.4125 THz. The frequency of the pilot lightwave is purposely chosen to be different from the frequency used in the THz wave generation system to avoid interference between the two signals. The pilot lightwave is then input into the MZI configuration at the OC. The lightwave is split and directed through the upper path involving the OPM and the lower path involving the PS. As shown in Figure 6c, the input pilot lightwave into the THz wave generation has a power of -7.77 dBm. However, no detection of the pilot lightwave is observed at the THz wave generation system due to its filtration. Instead, after coupling at the OC, the pilot lightwaves interfere and pass through the other arm of the coupler to the O/E converter. The interference of the pilot lightwave enables the detection of phase fluctuations occurring by phase changes in the optical paths, particularly the optical fiber. The intensity of the interference is then measured using the O/E converter. The converted voltage is subsequently read by a feedback controller, which adjusts the PS to maintain a constant voltage detected at the O/E converter. By precisely controlling and maintaining the intensity of the interfered pilot lightwave, the phase fluctuations in the THz wave generation system can be effectively eliminated, enabling the application of a high-sensitivity coherent detection at the output of the THz wave generation system.

5.1.2. Backward-Direction Pilot Lightwave System

Figure 6b shows the experimental setup featuring a phase stabilization system utilizing a backward-direction pilot lightwave. Similar to the forward-direction pilot lightwave system, a single lightwave is employed in the THz-wave PM generation system (solid line). The input power of a lightwave with a frequency f_gen of 193.4125 THz into the THz wave generation system is 14.5 dBm, and the output is -3.28 dBm, as shown in Figure 6d. The configuration of the phase stabilization system (dotted line) is positioned on the right side. In this setup, the pilot lightwave (light blue arrow) is Introduced to the THz wave generation system from the output of the setup. It is observed that the power of the pilot lightwave at the output of the THz wave generation system is -41.9 dBm, which is primarily due to the effects of total internal reflection at the OC (output). However, this power value is negligible and can be disregarded as it does not significantly impact the THz wave generation system. The pilot lightwave travels through the lower arm of the OC and splits into two paths. In the upper path, it passes through the OPM along the opposite direction, while in the lower path, it passes through the PS. Then, the pilot lightwave is recoupled after the OC (input). The coupled pilot lightwave is detected by the O/E converter. As the OPM modulates the phase of the lightwave only when the lightwave and the electrical data signal travel in the same direction, the phase of the backward-direction pilot lightwave remains unmodulated. Hence, efficient interference is expected in this configuration.

5.2. Detected Interference Intensity

Next, we observed the stabilization of the interfered intensity of the pilot lightwave, as depicted in Figure 7a,b. These figures present the voltage readings obtained from the O/E converter, which indicate the interfered intensity of both the forward-direction and backward-direction pilot lightwaves in the presence and absence of the phase stabilization system. The measurements were performed at various bit rates applied to the OPM; 1, 3 and 10 Gbit/s. Figure 7a shows the interference voltage value over time for the forward-direction pilot lightwave in the case of the system OFF and ON. The interference voltage displayed instability and fluctuations without the activation of the phase stabilization system. And, even with the activation of the phase stabilization system, the interfered intensity failed to maintain a constant voltage across all modulation bit rates. The condition happened in all modulation rates, 1, 3 and 10 Gbit/s. This behavior can be attributed to the blurring effect induced by the modulation of the pilot lightwave within the phase modulation system itself.

In contrast, when employing the phase stabilization system with a backward-direction pilot lightwave, the interfered intensity achieved stability when the phase stabilization is ON, as shown in Figure 7b. Furthermore, the vertical width of the interfered intensity, denoted as V_T, varied depending on the bit rate of the phase modulation. V_T decreased as the bit rate increased, indicating a reduced impact of phase modulation on the pilot lightwave at higher bit rates. At modulation bit rates of 3 Gbit/s and higher, the voltage fluctuation achieved a stable state with minimal fluctuations, measuring less than 0.02 V. In comparison, at 1 Gbit/s, the voltage fluctuation was 0.025 V. These results suggest that the phase modulation has minimal impact on the pilot lightwave at bit rates exceeding 3 Gbit/s. These experimental findings aligned with our simulation results displayed in Figure 7c and validated the effectiveness of the backward-direction phase stabilization system. The simulation result did show the probability of the phase fluctuation of the pilot lightwave that passes through the phase modulator in the backward direction. It shows that the phase fluctuation has become smaller as the modulation bit rate increases. Notably, at 3 Gbit/s, the phase fluctuation is significantly small. The behavior is also the same as the experimental voltage fluctuation.

These results are significant as they demonstrate the effectiveness of the phase stabilization system using a backward-direction pilot lightwave in maintaining stable interfered intensity. By toning down the fluctuations and achieving stability, this approach enables improved performance in generating phase-modulated THz waves. Furthermore, the observed variations in V_T provide insights into the influence of bit rates on the impact of phase modulation on the pilot lightwave. This analysis can guide the optimization of generation system configurations for enhanced THz-wave communication systems.

5.3. Stability of the Optical Domain

Then, the phase stability of the optical domain was assessed by observing the eye pattern at different bit rates of 1, 3, and 10 Gbit/s. A comparison of the performance between the forward-direction and backward-direction phase stabilization systems is presented in Figure 8a,b, respectively. In both figures, the blue dots represent the original modulation data from the PPG as a reference, while the orange dots represent the detected signal. It is clear that the forward-direction phase stabilization system fails to achieve a stable eye-opening at each bit rate. In the case of the backward-direction phase stabilization system, at lower bit rates, the pilot lightwave still undergoes modulation and cannot be interfered with, thus preventing feedback control for phase stabilization.

Consequently, the resulting eye pattern exhibits an unclear eye-opening. On the other hand, a clear eye-opening is achieved at bit rates exceeding 3 Gbit/s. These findings provide experimental evidence supporting the effectiveness of phase stabilization using a backward-direction pilot lightwave, particularly at higher bit rates, thereby agreeing with our earlier theoretical predictions.

Afterward, the bit-error-rate (BER) characteristics during data transmission were investigated by varying the bit rates of the modulation in the THz wave generation system. Figure 9 displays the BER as a function of THz wave generation. With the forward-direction phase stabilization system, the BER remains largely unchanged and consistently stays close to 10⁰. In contrast, the BER shows a significant decrease with the backward-direction phase stabilization system. These experimental results clearly demonstrate the adaptability and efficacy of the phase stabilization system employing the backward-direction pilot lightwave for the THz-wave generation system.

The observed improvements in eye pattern stability and reduced bit-error rates underscore the importance of employing the appropriate pilot lightwave direction in achieving robust and reliable phase stabilization, especially at higher bit rates. Such improvements are crucial for realizing multilevel phase modulation for a higher data-rate transmission in THz-wave applications.

6. THz-Wave Generation System

In this section, we explore the implementation of phase stabilization techniques in a phase-modulated THz-wave generation and transmission setup. Our experiment involves comparing both a forward-direction phase stabilization system and a backward-direction phase stabilization system. The configuration is divided into two parts: the transmitter part, T_X, where we generate the THz wave through photomixing using two different lightwaves, and the receiver part, R_X, where the detected THz wave is down-converted and observed.

The purpose of this setup is to demonstrate the practical application of the phase stabilization system in an actual THz generation system. We begin by presenting the configuration of the experimental THz generation setup, applying a phase stabilization system. Then, we investigate the detected signal of the phase-modulated THz wave. Here, we present the experimental details that validate the effectiveness of the phase stabilization technique in the context of phase-modulated THz-wave generation. Through this analysis, we aim to contribute to the understanding and optimization of phase stabilization methods for THz wave PM applications.

6.1. Experimental Setup

6.1.1. THz-Wave Generation System with Forward-Direction Phase Stabilization System

Figure 9a illustrates the THz wave PM system equipped with a forward-direction phase stabilization system. The T_X initiates the process by introducing a single lightwave at a frequency of 193.4 THz from a laser diode (LD) on the left side of the configuration. An optical frequency comb generator (OFCG) generates a frequency comb with equally spaced spectral lines of 25-GHz spacing, allowing us to output specific optical frequencies with a 300 GHz difference at the wavelength selective filter (WSF). In the upper path, the lightwave (red arrow) undergoes phase modulation using the OPM, employing a return-to-zero (RZ) continuous signal from the PPG. In the lower path (green arrow), the lightwave passes through the PS. The lightwaves from these two paths are combined at the OC, amplified, and directed to the UTC-PD, acting as a photomixer. The input and output power of the THz wave generation system can be observed in Figure 9c. It shows that the output power of $f_1$ is -36.6 dBm, while the $f_2$ is -34.1 dBm. Achieving power balance is crucial to ensure that both signals contribute equally to the mixing process. Despite the power differences between these two frequencies, as depicted in the optical spectra, it is important to note that both frequencies have almost the same output power. This is because $f_1$ has undergone modulation, resulting in the total output power being equivalent to that of $f_2$. Consequently, the UTC-PD generates the phase-modulated THz wave, which is transmitted through the WR3.4 waveguide. As the carrier frequency of the THz signal Is determined by the frequency difference between the lightwave, the output of the UTC-PD radiates a 300 GHz wave with 1, 5 and 10 Gbit/s OOK modulation.

At the R_X, a sub-harmonic mixer (SHM) is utilized to downconvert the received THz wave by a local oscillator (LO). The LO, with a frequency of 12.5 GHz from the signal generator (SG), is first multiplied by 12 using an electrical multiplier and then further multiplied by 2 inside the SHM, resulting in a total LO frequency of 300 GHz. This LO signal is also synchronized with the signal generator of the OFCG at the transmitter, enabling the implementation of homodyne detection. The resulting waveform is observed on an OSC.

In the phase stabilization system (dotted line), a pilot lightwave from a laser (pink arrow) with an optical frequency of 195.4125 THz is being introduced to the THz-wave generation system. The pilot lightwave power at the input of the THz wave generation system is -8.44 dBm, as shown in Figure 9c. This pilot lightwave is then split and directed through the upper path involving the OPM and the lower path involving a PS. These lightwaves interfere after coupling at the OC, and the interference intensity is detected by an O/E converter. The resulting converted voltage is then read by a feedback controller, which maintains a constant interference intensity by controlling the PS.

6.1.2. THz-Wave Generation System with Backward-Direction Phase Stabilization System

Figure 9b depicts the THz wave PM system with the backward-direction phase stabilization system. This configuration utilizes the lightwave in a manner similar to the forward-direction pilot lightwave system. This time, the output power of $f_1$ is -9.24 dBm, while the $f_2$ is -10.24 dBm, as shown in Figure 9d. Moving on to the phase stabilization system, a pilot lightwave that originates from an LD is introduced from the right side of the THz wave PM system. The internal reflection at the OC is causing the detection of the pilot lightwave at the output of the THz generation setup, but the power level is significantly low, measuring at -45.83 dBm. The pilot lightwave (light blue arrow) is split and then directed through the upper path involving the OPM and the lower path involving the PS in a backward direction. These lightwaves interfere after passing through the WSF in reverse. Due to the absence of phase modulation in the backward-direction pilot lightwave at bit rates of 3 Gbit/s and higher, efficient interference is anticipated. The interference intensity is detected using an O/E converter, and the resulting voltage is read by a feedback controller responsible for maintaining a constant interference intensity by controlling the PS.

6.2. Observation of Phase Modulated THz Wave

We proceeded with the transmission of the phase-modulated 300-GHz wave and detected it using a sub-harmonic mixer equipped with a 300-GHz LO signal, employing coherent detection. Figure 10a,b present the detected waveforms (orange) alongside the initial modulation patterns generated by the PPG (blue) for forward-direction and backward-direction phase stabilization systems, respectively. The results demonstrate that the forward-direction phase stabilization system does not yield a distinct and continuous data pattern. In contrast, the backward-direction phase stabilization system exhibits a noticeable and continuous data pattern at bit rates of 5 and 10 Gbit/s and does not exhibit the same level of continuity at a lower bit rate of 1 Gbit/s. These experimental findings corroborate our previously established theoretical results. These observations provide valuable insights into the performance and limitations of the forward-direction and backward-direction phase stabilization systems in the context of phase-modulated THz wave transmission. The promising results obtained with the backward-direction system indicate its potential for supporting high-speed data transmission. These findings contribute to the efforts in optimizing and enhancing the stability and reliability of phase-modulated THz wave communication systems.

7. Conclusions

Our research has successfully developed and compared a phase stabilization system for THz wave phase modulation using photomixing, employing both forward-direction and backward-direction approaches. The findings of our study highlight the effectiveness of the backward-direction phase stabilization method in achieving stable phase fluctuations between the two lightwaves while eliminating the impact of environmental disturbances. As a result, we generated and transmitted a stable phase-modulated 300-GHz wave at a bit rate of 3 Gbit/s and beyond using the constructed system. This significant outcome provides evidence supporting the effectiveness of the backward-direction phase stabilization system.