Submitted:
06 July 2023
Posted:
07 July 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
Objectives
- An in-depth analysis of AI and sensor technology applications in mitigating prev- alent challenges, such as 'shy feeders' identification, weight tracking automation, and accurate cattle counting.
- Discussion of the implications of these technologies on animal welfare improve- ment, supply chain efficiency enhancement, and market accessibility and compet- itiveness augmentation.
- Exploration of potential challenges and future scope of these technologies in the dairy livestock export industry.
2. Application of AI and Sensor Technology in Livestock Management

3. Leveraging AI and Sensor Technology for Supply Chain Enhancement
4. The Role of AI and Sensor Technology in Market Access and Development
5. Future Perspectives: AI and Sensor Technology in Livestock Management
6. Conclusions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Koutouzidou, G.; Ragkos, A.; Melfou, K. Evolution of the Structure and Economic Management of the Dairy Cow Sector. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neethirajan, S.; Kemp, B. Digital Livestock Farming. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Re- search 2021, 32, 100408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoque, M.; Mondal, S.; Adusumilli, S. Sustainable Livestock Production and Food Security. In Emerging Issues in Climate Smart Livestock Production; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 71–90. [Google Scholar]
- Hashem, N.M.; González-Bulnes, A.; Rodriguez-Morales, A.J. Animal Welfare and Livestock Supply Chain Sustainability under the COVID-19 Outbreak: An Overview. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 582528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neethirajan, S. Harnessing the Metaverse for Livestock Welfare: Unleashing Sensor Data and Navigating Ethical Frontiers. Preprints 2023. [CrossRef]
- Hing, S.; Foster, S.; Evans, D. Animal Welfare Risks in Live Cattle Export from Aus- tralia to China by Sea. Animals 2021, 11, 2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collins, T.; Hampton, J.; Barnes, A. Literature Review of Scientific Research Relating to Animal Health and Welfare in Livestock Exports. Murdoch University: Perth, Aus- tralia, 2018.
- Martins, B.M.; Mendes, A.L.C.; Silva, L.F.; Moreira, T.R.; Costa, J.H.C.; Rotta, P.P.; Chizzotti, M.L.; Marcondes, M.I. Estimating Body Weight, Body Condition Score, and Type Traits in Dairy Cows Using Three Dimensional Cameras and Manual Body Measurements. Livest. Sci. 2020, 236, 104054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stygar, A.H.; Gómez, Y.; Berteselli, G.V.; Dalla Costa, E.; Canali, E.; Niemi, J.K.; Llonch, P.; Pastell, M. A Systematic Review on Commercially Available and Vali- dated Sensor Technologies for Welfare Assessment of Dairy Cattle. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 634338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tassinari, P.; Bovo, M.; Benni, S.; Franzoni, S.; Poggi, M.; Mammi, L.M.E.; Mattoc- cia, S.; Di Stefano, L.; Bonora, F.; Barbaresi, A.; et al. A Computer Vision Approach Based on Deep Learning for the Detection of Dairy Cows in Free Stall Barn. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 182, 106030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, M.F.; Smith, M.L.; Smith, L.N.; Jabbar, K.A.; Forbes, D. Automated Moni- toring of Dairy Cow Body Condition, Mobility and Weight Using a Single 3D Video Capture Device. Comput. Ind. 2018, 98, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDonagh, J.; Tzimiropoulos, G.; Slinger, K.R.; Huggett, Z.J.; Down, P.M.; Bell, M.J. Detecting Dairy Cow Behavior Using Vision Technology. Agriculture 2021, 11, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caja, G.; Castro-Costa, A.; Knight, C.H. Engineering to Support Wellbeing of Dairy Animals. J. Dairy Res. 2016, 83, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Neethirajan, S. Recent Advances in Wearable Sensors for Animal Health Management. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research 2017, 12, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katainen, A.; Norring, M.; Manninen, E.; Laine, J.; Orava, T.; Kuoppala, K.; Sa- loniemi, H. Competitive Behaviour of Dairy Cows at a Concentrate Self-Feeder. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A-Anim. Sci. 2005, 55, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weigele, H.C.; Gygax, L.; Steiner, A.; Wechsler, B.; Burla, J.B. Moderate Lameness Leads to Marked Behavioral Changes in Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 2370–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matore, Z. Drivers and Indicators of Dairy Animal Welfare in Large-Scale Dairies. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2023, 55, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grant, R.J.; Ferraretto, L.F. Silage Review: Silage Feeding Management: Silage Char- acteristics and Dairy Cow Feeding Behavior. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 4111–4121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Llonch, P.; Mainau, E.; Ipharraguerre, I.R.; Bargo, F.; Tedó, G.; Blanch, M.; Manteca, X. Chicken or the Egg: The Reciprocal Association between Feeding Behavior and Animal Welfare and Their Impact on Productivity in Dairy Cows. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018, 5, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neethirajan, S. Transforming the Adaptation Physiology of Farm Animals through Sensors. Animals 2020, 10, 1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tzanidakis, C.; Tzamaloukas, O.; Simitzis, P.; Panagakis, P. Precision Livestock Farming Applications (PLF) for Grazing Animals. Agriculture 2023, 13, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alshehri, M. Blockchain-Assisted Internet of Things Framework in Smart Livestock Farming. Internet Things 2023, 22, 100739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Džermeikaitė, K.; Bačėninaitė, D.; Antanaitis, R. Innovations in Cattle Farming: Ap- plication of Innovative Technologies and Sensors in the Diagnosis of Diseases. Animals 2023, 13, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brault, S.A.; Hannon, S.J.; Gow, S.P.; Otto, S.J.; Booker, C.W.; Morley, P.S. Calcula- tion of Antimicrobial Use Indicators in Beef Feedlots—Effects of Choice of Metric and Standardized Values. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tasdemir, S.; Urkmez, A.; Inal, S. Determination of Body Measurements on the Hol- stein Cows Using Digital Image Analysis and Estimation of Live Weight with Regres- sion Analysis. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2011, 76, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, Y.; Kong, H.; Clark, C.; Lomax, S.; Su, D.; Eiffert, S.; Sukkarieh, S. Intelligent Perception for Cattle Monitoring: A Review for Cattle Identification, Body Condition Score Evaluation, and Weight Estimation. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 185, 106143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morrone, S.; Dimauro, C.; Gambella, F.; Cappai, M.G. Industry 4.0 and Precision Livestock Farming (PLF): An up to Date Overview across Animal Productions. Sen-sors 2022, 22, 4319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haldar, A.; Mandal, S.N.; Deb, S.; Roy, R.; Laishram, M. Application of Information and Electronic Technology for Best Practice Management in Livestock Production System. In Agriculture, Livestock Production and Aquaculture: Advances for Small- holder Farming Systems Volume 2; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzer- land, 2022; pp. 173–218. [Google Scholar]
- Darvazeh, S.S.; Vanani, I.R.; Musolu, F.M. Big Data Analytics and Its Applications in Supply Chain Management. In New Trends in the Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Industry 4.0; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; p. 175. [Google Scholar]
- Saleem, T.J.; Chishti, M.A. Deep Learning for the Internet of Things: Potential Bene- fits and Use-Cases. Digit. Commun. Netw. 2021, 7, 526–542. [Google Scholar]
- Woschank, M.; Rauch, E.; Zsifkovits, H. A Review of Further Directions for Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in Smart Logistics. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menendez III, H.M.; Brennan, J.R.; Gaillard, C.; Ehlert, K.; Quintana, J.; Neethirajan, S.; Remus, A.; Jacobs, M.; Teixeira, I.A.; Turner, B.L.; Tedeschi, L.O. ASAS–NANP Symposium: Mathematical Modeling in Animal Nutrition: Opportunities and Chal- lenges of Confined and Extensive Precision Livestock Production. J. Anim. Sci. 2022, 100, skac160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhat, S.A.; Huang, N.F.; Sofi, I.B.; Sultan, M. Agriculture-Food Supply Chain Man- agement Based on Blockchain and IoT: A Narrative on Enterprise Blockchain Interop- erability. Agriculture 2021, 12, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattarai, B.P.; Paudyal, S.; Luo, Y.; Mohanpurkar, M.; Cheung, K.; Tonkoski, R.; Hovsapian, R.; Myers, K.S.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, P.; Manic, M. Big Data Analytics in Smart Grids: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions. IET Smart Grid 2019, 2, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klerkx, L.; Jakku, E.; Labarthe, P. A Review of Social Science on Digital Agriculture, Smart Farming and Agriculture 4.0: New Contributions and a Future Research Agenda. NJAS-Wageningen J. Life Sci. 2019, 90, 100315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Ma, X.; Shu, L.; Hancke, G.P.; Abu-Mahfouz, A.M. From Industry 4.0 to Agriculture 4.0: Current Status, Enabling Technologies, and Research Challenges. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2022, 18, 5544–5557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Applica- tion | AI and Sensor Technology Role | Specific Technol- ogy Used | Benefits | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identifica- tion of 'Shy Feed- ers' | Uses AI and video analytics to spot 'shy feeder' behavior through RFID tag data analysis. | RFID Tags, Com- puter Vision, Ma- chine Learning algo- rithms | Aids early identification and intervention, improv- ing herd health and productivity. Enables personalized nutrition plans. | Needs sensor setup and careful AI cali- bration to minimize false results. |
| Monitor- ing of Feeding Behaviors | Sensors track feed- ing metrics with AI identifying abnormal patterns in real-time, offering actionableinsights. | Feed intake sensors, IoT (Internet of Things) connectiv- ity, Cloud Compu- ting, MachineLearning algorithms | Gives real-time insights into animal health and nutrition status, enabling timely interventions. Helps prevent over/un- derfeeding. |
Requires robust connectivity and sensor maintenance for real-time moni- toring. |
| Automa- | Sensor-based walk- | Walk-over-weighing | Provides accurate, has- | |
| tion of | over-weighing sys- | systems, IoT con- | sle-free weight tracking. | Requires animal |
| Weight | tems with AI inter- | nectivity, Cloud | Allows continuous moni- | training to use the |
| Collection | pretation for auto- | Computing, Ma- | toring of animal perfor- | system, sensor cali- |
| matic weight collec- | chine Learning algo- | mance. Assists in adjust- | bration and mainte- | |
| tion. | rithms | ing feeding strategies. | nance for accurate | |
| readings. |
| Aspect | AI and Sensor Technology Role | Specifics | Benefits | Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auto- mated Cattle Counting | Facilitates accurate, effi- cient cattle counting using AI-powered image pro- cessing. | Machine Vi- sion systems, Image Recog- nition algo- rithms | Minimizes human er- rors, accelerates counting, allows real- time livestock track- ing. | Setup needs for cam- eras and processing systems, varying ac- curacy due to light- ing and cattle move- ment. |
| Supply Chain Tracea- bility | Uses sensors for location and condition tracking throughout the supply chain, coupled with AI for real- time tracking and issue pre- diction. | GPS trackers, RFID tags, IoT connectivity, Big Data Ana- lytics | Boosts traceability, promotes animal wel- fare through timely interventions, assists in regulatory compli- ance. | Demands robust sen- sor network and data management, poten- tial privacy concerns with location track- ing. |
| Market Develop- ment | Leverages AI for market trend analysis, demand-sup- ply dynamics, and price fluctuations, offering pre- dictive insights for produc- tion and exports. |
Machine Learning algo- rithms, Big Data Analytics | Promotes proactive decision-making, op- timizes market de- mand fulfilment, po- tentially increases profits. |
Relies on compre- hensive market data, requires advanced AI models for accurate predictions. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).