Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Association of High Red Meat Consumption with Risk of Cancer and Adverse Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review and Meta-Analysis.

Version 1 : Received: 29 June 2023 / Approved: 29 June 2023 / Online: 29 June 2023 (09:50:12 CEST)

How to cite: Nian, T.; Xue, S.; Zhou, J.W.; E, F.F.; Yan, L.Y.; Hu, Y.P.; Xin, J.T.; Chen, Y.K.; Cai, S.Z.; Lu, C.C.; Yang, H.K.; Li, X.X. Association of High Red Meat Consumption with Risk of Cancer and Adverse Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review and Meta-Analysis.. Preprints 2023, 2023062082. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202306.2082.v1 Nian, T.; Xue, S.; Zhou, J.W.; E, F.F.; Yan, L.Y.; Hu, Y.P.; Xin, J.T.; Chen, Y.K.; Cai, S.Z.; Lu, C.C.; Yang, H.K.; Li, X.X. Association of High Red Meat Consumption with Risk of Cancer and Adverse Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review and Meta-Analysis.. Preprints 2023, 2023062082. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202306.2082.v1

Abstract

Background Dietary guidelines typically recommend limiting the intake of fresh red meat, yet evidence linking red meat consumption with adverse health outcomes is inconsistent. Objective To assess the level of evidence from existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses and analyze the association between high consumption of red meat and cancer risk and adverse health outcomes. Methods Eight databases were searched to collect systematic reviews and meta-analyses from database inception to December 2022. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data and used the AMSTAR 2 tool to evaluate methodological quality of the included studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 17.0. Results A total of 18 studies were included, of which 5 were rated as high quality, 4 as medium quality, 6 as low quality, and 3 as extremely low quality. Of the 9 SRs/MAs included, primary studies with overlap were identified, and 14 studies were eventually included. The meta-analysis results showed that compared with the lowest intake of red meat, the highest intake of red meat was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.07-1.37), gastric cancer (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.18-1.59), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (OR 1.10.95% CI 1.02-1.19), stroke (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.20), type 2 diabetes (RR 1.19 95% CI 1.04-1.37), and ischemic heart disease (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.12), as well as a negative effect on total cholesterol (WMD 0.264, 95% CI 0.144-0.383), triglycerides (WMD -0.181, 95% CI -0.349 to -0.013), low-density lipoprotein (WMD 0.198, 95% CI 0.065-0.330), and high-density lipoprotein (WMD -0.065, 95% CI -0.109 to -0.020). However, the associations with breast cancer (RR 1.05 95% CI 1.00-1.11), glycemic control (WMD 0.040, 95% CI 0.049-0.129), and changes in body weight status [overweight (β 0.89, 95% CI 0.48-1.64); obesity (β 1.06, 95% CI 0.30-3.71)] were not significant. Conclusions This comprehensive umbrella review suggests that high consumption of red meat may increase the risk of colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, and that reducing red meat intake is a key modifiable dietary factor for reducing risk. However, there was no significant correlation with breast cancer, kidney stones, age-related eye disease or changes in body weight.

Keywords

red meat; health outcomes; cancer; risk factors; umbrella review; meta-analysis.

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Other

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.