Sort by
Antimicrobial Resistance and Transferability in Oral-Care Probiotic Strains and Products: A Narrative Review
Panagoula Dimitrelou
,Efstathios Alonaris
,Athanasia Sergounioti
Posted: 04 August 2026
Impact of Personal Health Record Use on HbA1c Improvement in People with Type 2 Diabetes
Isaki Hanamura
,Norio Abiru
,Toshifumi Sakamoto
,Akie Moriuchi
,Nobuko Sera
Posted: 04 August 2026
Advancing Early Biorisk Assessment, Emerging Infectious Disease Forecasting, and Rapid Decision-Making Through a Novel AI-Based One Health Platform
Zinaida Klestova
,Roman Dubik
,Ievgen Makarenko
,Alexander Makarenko
Posted: 03 August 2026
LLM-Based Chatbots and the Suicidal Crisis: Relational Hallucination as a Bi-Logical Process
Ruggero Andrisano Ruggieri
,Alberto Ragosta
,Luke Balcombe
Posted: 03 August 2026
Reduction in Parenting Stress Following an Early Parent-Mediated Intervention for Autism
Valeria Costanzo
,Natasha Chericoni
,Fabrizia Festante
,Alice Martinelli
,Eugenia Conti
,Ilaria Colombino
,Giulia Guainai
,Benedetta Riva
,Viviana Marchi
,Andrea Guzzetta
+2 authors
Posted: 31 July 2026
Factors Associated with Transport Instability and Outcome Deterioration During Interhospital Intensive Care Transfers of Patients with COVID-19 in Germany
Leonie Hannappel
,Jan Wnent
,Rolf Lefering
,Janina Bathe
,Jan-Thorsten Gräsner
Posted: 31 July 2026
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches in Periodontology: From Traditional Concepts to Modern Innovations
Tatiana Chacón
,Óscar Zuluaga-López
,Gloria María Sandoval-Llanos
,Maria Camila Piedrahita Posada
,Brenda Yuliana Herrera-Serna
Posted: 30 July 2026
Enhancing Lactation Counseling Skills in Dietetics Education Through Active Learning Strategies
Crystal Clark Douglas
,Simone P. Camel
,Madelyn S. Kraft
Posted: 29 July 2026
Low Rates of Co-Administration of Respiratory Vaccines Across the United States: Experiences from a Large Vaccination Ecosystem
Ruth Carrico
,Chris Kemp
,Salwa Rashid
Posted: 29 July 2026
Associations Between Reproductive Coercion and Abuse by a Partner and Physical, Mental, Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes
Laura Tarzia
,Nicholas Egan
,Deborah Loxton
Posted: 28 July 2026
Hiss App Evaluation: AI Food Classification for Nutritional Literacy
Jessica L. Campbell
,Grant Schofield
,Jackson Schofield
,Caryn Zinn
Posted: 27 July 2026
Assumptions, Borderline Cases, and Misapplications of the GRIM Test in Forensic Metascience
Moaz Abouelmagd
Posted: 27 July 2026
Family Planning Data and Measurement in the Era of Changing Global Development Architecture
Shiza Farid
,Althea Wolfe
,Kerry MacQuarrie
,Elizabeth Sully
,Mahesh Karra
,Emily Sonneveldt
,Mohamad Brooks
,Nirali Chakraborty
,Aurelie Brunie
,Rajib Acharya
+4 authors
Posted: 27 July 2026
Blood Cell Imaging Analysis for Multiple Sclerosis Classification Using Leave-One-Subject-Out Study with Deep Neural Networks
Dylan Tijburg
,Noor Christoph
,Tahir Nawaz
,Jan De Zoeten
,Ian Galea
,Carmen Jacob
,Marya Butt
Posted: 24 July 2026
Sex-Specific and Academic Program-Stratified Interplay of Anthropometric and Psychosocial Predictors of BMI Among University Students: A Multiple Linear Regression and ROC Curve Analysis
Ioana Mihaela Tomulescu
,Mihai Ion Marian
,Ciprian Brisc
Background: Evaluating obesity among young adults requires precise anthropometric screening methods alongside a clear understanding of the psychosocial impact of this pathology. This study evaluated the predictive capacity of several biometric indicators—Body Fat Percentage (BFP), Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR), Body Adiposity Index (BAI), and Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR)—and psychosocial scales—Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)—in identifying obesity established by Body Mass Index (BMI), stratified by sex and academic programs. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 445 university students. Statistical analyses included multiple comparisons (ANOVA) based on sex and academic program, multilinear regression equations to predict BMI, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine the Area Under the Curve (AUC). Optimal cut-off points were identified using the Youden index. Results: Multilinear regression revealed that WHtR was the strongest positive predictor for BMI across all academic programs: Biomedical Sciences (BS) (β = 1.725, t = 7.822, p < .001), Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) (β = 1.986, t = 11.172, p < .001), and Social Sciences and Physiotherapy (SSP) (β = 1.695, t = 11.259, p < .001). Conversely, WHR and BAI exhibited strong inverse relationships with BMI across BS, CSE, and SSP programs (p < .001). BFP was a significant but weaker positive predictor for BS (β = .142, p < .02) and CSE (β = .136, p < .02), but not for SSP (p = .24). Social support had a small effect on BMI in BS (p < .04) and CSE (p < .01), while SWLS was irrelevant across all programs. In sex-stratified ROC analysis, biometric parameters demonstrated excellent discrimination. BFP was the strongest predictor with an AUC of 1.000 for both sexes (cut-off: 24.38% for men, 35.43% for women). WHtR proved robust, outperforming WHR (AUCMen = 0,980; AUCWomen = 0,969), with optimal cut-offs of 0.56 (men) and 0.53 (women). Conversely, MSPSS and SWLS showed no predictive capacity or statistical significance relative to obesity (p > .05, AUC ≈ 0.50). Conclusions: While modern anthropometric markers (BFP and WHtR) represent infallible and rapid clinical screening tools, the psychosocial dimension evolves independently of weight status. This demonstrates psychological resilience among the sampled youth and refutes the stereotype of automatic quality-of-life degradation in the context of obesity.
Background: Evaluating obesity among young adults requires precise anthropometric screening methods alongside a clear understanding of the psychosocial impact of this pathology. This study evaluated the predictive capacity of several biometric indicators—Body Fat Percentage (BFP), Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR), Body Adiposity Index (BAI), and Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR)—and psychosocial scales—Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)—in identifying obesity established by Body Mass Index (BMI), stratified by sex and academic programs. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 445 university students. Statistical analyses included multiple comparisons (ANOVA) based on sex and academic program, multilinear regression equations to predict BMI, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine the Area Under the Curve (AUC). Optimal cut-off points were identified using the Youden index. Results: Multilinear regression revealed that WHtR was the strongest positive predictor for BMI across all academic programs: Biomedical Sciences (BS) (β = 1.725, t = 7.822, p < .001), Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) (β = 1.986, t = 11.172, p < .001), and Social Sciences and Physiotherapy (SSP) (β = 1.695, t = 11.259, p < .001). Conversely, WHR and BAI exhibited strong inverse relationships with BMI across BS, CSE, and SSP programs (p < .001). BFP was a significant but weaker positive predictor for BS (β = .142, p < .02) and CSE (β = .136, p < .02), but not for SSP (p = .24). Social support had a small effect on BMI in BS (p < .04) and CSE (p < .01), while SWLS was irrelevant across all programs. In sex-stratified ROC analysis, biometric parameters demonstrated excellent discrimination. BFP was the strongest predictor with an AUC of 1.000 for both sexes (cut-off: 24.38% for men, 35.43% for women). WHtR proved robust, outperforming WHR (AUCMen = 0,980; AUCWomen = 0,969), with optimal cut-offs of 0.56 (men) and 0.53 (women). Conversely, MSPSS and SWLS showed no predictive capacity or statistical significance relative to obesity (p > .05, AUC ≈ 0.50). Conclusions: While modern anthropometric markers (BFP and WHtR) represent infallible and rapid clinical screening tools, the psychosocial dimension evolves independently of weight status. This demonstrates psychological resilience among the sampled youth and refutes the stereotype of automatic quality-of-life degradation in the context of obesity.
Posted: 16 July 2026
‘How Well Do We Mix?’ A Scoping Review of Mixed Methods Review Methodologies
Katherine Harper
,Sarah Schoerwerth
,Christel McMullan
,Andrew Soundy
Posted: 15 July 2026
Beyond the Rulebook: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Management-Based Anti-Doping Education for Young Elite Athletes in a Developing-Nation Context
Zemikael Getu Yemiru
,Sisay Mengestu
,Tefera Tadesse
Posted: 10 July 2026
A Small Change to the Standard NHS Handwashing Procedure and Soap Position Can Reduce Sink Area Contamination
Claire Bailey
,Catherine Makison Booth
,Gillian Nicholls
Posted: 10 July 2026
Nomophobia, Insomnia, and Coping Strategies in Relation to Academic Achievement and Psychological Well-Being Among Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
Lucia Terze
,Anni Klapez
,Ivana Petricevic
,Ivana Pavlinac Dodig
,Renata Pecotic
,Zoran Dogas
Posted: 10 July 2026
How Safe Is Safe Enough? International Frameworks for Constructing Alcohol Drinking Guidelines
Creina S. Stockley
,Marjana Martinic
Posted: 08 July 2026
of 40