Submitted:
13 June 2023
Posted:
14 June 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patient selection criteria
2.2. Endovascular technique and antithrombosis strategy
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Walcott, B.P.; Pisapia, J.M.; Nahed, B.V.; Kahle, K.T.; Ogilvy, C.S. Early experience with flow diverting endoluminal stents for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 2011, 18, 891–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fischer, S.; Vajda, Z.; Aguilar Perez, M.; Schmid, E.; Hopf, N.; Bazner, H.; Henkes, H. Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012, 54, 369–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Simgen, A.; Ley, D.; Roth, C.; Yilmaz, U.; Korner, H.; Muhl-Benninghaus, R.; Kim, Y.J.; Scheller, B.; Reith, W. Evaluation of a newly designed flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in an elastase-induced aneurysm model, in New Zealand white rabbits. Neuroradiology 2014, 56, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sadasivan, C.; Cesar, L.; Seong, J.; Rakian, A.; Hao, Q.; Tio, F.O.; Wakhloo, A.K.; Lieber, B.B. An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 2009, 40, 952–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nelson, P.K.; Lylyk, P.; Szikora, I.; Wetzel, S.G.; Wanke, I.; Fiorella, D. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011, 32, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gross, B.A.; Frerichs, K.U. Stent usage in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: past, present and future. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013, 84, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ebrahimi, N.; Claus, B.; Lee, C.Y.; Biondi, A.; Benndorf, G. Stent conformity in curved vascular models with simulated aneurysm necks using flat-panel CT: an in vitro study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007, 28, 823–829. [Google Scholar]
- Aurboonyawat, T.; Blanc, R.; Schmidt, P.; Piotin, M.; Spelle, L.; Nakib, A.; Moret, J. An in vitro study of silk stent morphology. Neuroradiology 2011, 53, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higashida, R.T.; Furlan, A.J.; Roberts, H.; Tomsick, T.; Connors, B.; Barr, J.; Dillon, W.; Warach, S.; Broderick, J.; Tilley, B.; Sacks, D.; Technology Assessment Committee of the American Society of, I.; Therapeutic, N.; Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional, R. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003, 34, e109–e137.
- Cohen, J.E.; Gomori, J.M.; Rajz, G.; Itshayek, E.; Eichel, R.; Leker, R.R. Urgent off-label use of the pipeline flow diverter stent in selected ischemic cerebrovascular conditions: thrombotic segments and tortuous arteries. J Neurointerv Surg 2015, 7, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fischer, S.; Perez, M.A.; Kurre, W.; Albes, G.; Bazner, H.; Henkes, H. Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of intra- and extracranial fusiform and dissecting aneurysms: initial experience and long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery 2014, 75, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brzezicki, G.; Rivet, D.J.; Reavey-Cantwell, J. Pipeline embolization device for treatment of high cervical and skull base carotid artery dissections: clinical case series. J Neurointerv Surg 2016, 8, 722–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurre, W.; Bansemir, K.; Aguilar Perez, M.; Martinez Moreno, R.; Schmid, E.; Bazner, H.; Henkes, H. Endovascular treatment of acute internal carotid artery dissections: technical considerations, clinical and angiographic outcome. Neuroradiology 2016, 58, 1167–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van de Graaf, R.A.; Chalos, V.; Del Zoppo, G.J.; van der Lugt, A.; Dippel, D.W.J.; Roozenbeek, B. Periprocedural antithrombotic treatment during acute mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Front Neurol 2018, 9, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, B.; Kim, B.M.; Bang, O.Y.; Baek, J.H.; Heo, J.H.; Nam, H.S.; Kim, Y.D.; Yoo, J.; Kim, D.J.; Jeon, P.; Baik, S.K.; Suh, S.H.; Lee, K.Y.; Kwak, H.S.; Roh, H.G.; Lee, Y.J.; Kim, S.H.; Ryu, C.W.; Ihn, Y.K.; Jeon, H.J.; Kim, J.W.; Byun, J.S.; Suh, S.; Park, J.J.; Lee, W.J.; Roh, J.; Shin, B.S. Carotid artery stenting and intracranial thrombectomy for tandem cervical and intracranial artery occlusions. Neurosurgery 2020, 86, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Steglich-Arnholm, H.; Holtmannspotter, M.; Kondziella, D.; Wagner, A.; Stavngaard, T.; Cronqvist, M.E.; Hansen, K.; Hojgaard, J.; Taudorf, S.; Krieger, D.W. Thrombectomy assisted by carotid stenting in acute ischemic stroke management: benefits and harms. J Neurol 2015, 262, 2668–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rangel-Castilla, L.; Rajah, G.B.; Shakir, H.J.; Shallwani, H.; Gandhi, S.; Davies, J.M.; Snyder, K.V.; Levy, E.I.; Siddiqui, A.H. Management of acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusion: should endovascular recanalization of the extracranial or intracranial occlusive lesion be done first? Neurosurg Focus 2017, 42, E16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jeong, H.G.; Kim, B.J.; Yang, M.H.; Han, M.K.; Bae, H.J.; Lee, S.H. Stroke outcomes with use of antithrombotics within 24 hours after recanalization treatment. Neurology 2016, 87, 996–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, J.E.; Gomori, J.M.; Rajz, G.; Itshayek, E.; Eichel, R.; Leker, R.R. Extracranial carotid artery stenting followed by intracranial stent-based thrombectomy for acute tandem occlusive disease. J Neurointerv Surg 2015, 7, 412–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heck, D.V.; Brown, M.D. Carotid stenting and intracranial thrombectomy for treatment of acute stroke due to tandem occlusions with aggressive antiplatelet therapy may be associated with a high incidence of intracranial hemorrhage. J Neurointerv Surg 2015, 7, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, F.; Bracard, S.; Anxionnat, R.; Derelle, A.L.; Tonnelet, R.; Liao, L.; Mione, G.; Humbertjean, L.; Lacour, J.C.; Hossu, G.; Anadani, M.; Richard, S.; Gory, B. Impact of emergent cervical carotid stenting in tandem occlusion strokes treated by thrombectomy: a review of the TITAN collaboration. Front Neurol 2019, 10, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haussen, D.C.; Jadhav, A.; Jovin, T.; Grossberg, J.A.; Grigoryan, M.; Nahab, F.; Obideen, M.; Lima, A.; Aghaebrahim, A.; Gulati, D.; Nogueira, R.G. Endovascular management vs intravenous thrombolysis for acute stroke secondary to carotid artery dissection: local experience and systematic review. Neurosurgery 2016, 78, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ohta, H.; Natarajan, S.K.; Hauck, E.F.; Khalessi, A.A.; Siddiqui, A.H.; Hopkins, L.N.; Levy, E.I. Endovascular stent therapy for extracranial and intracranial carotid artery dissection: single-center experience. J Neurosurg 2011, 115, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| N | Age, Sex | NIHSS | ASPECTS | IVT | Occlusion site | Approach | Revascularization technique | TICI | Time to true lumen gain (min) | Hemorrhagic Transforma-tion |
3 mo mRS |
6 mo DSA/CTA |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDS | Stent retriever | ||||||||||||
| 1 | 41 F |
12 | 8 | + | RICAO/M1 | Antegrade | PED | Solitaire 4×20 | 3 | 17 | − | 1 | Patent |
| 2 | 19 M | 26 | 6 | − | LICAO/M2 | Antegrade | PED | Solitaire 4×20 | 2b | 11 | − | 2 | Patent |
| 3 | 29 F |
16 | 9 | + | RICAO/M1 | Antegrade | PED | Solitaire 4×20 | 3 | 21 | − | 1 | Patent, stenosis |
| 4 | 32 F |
10 | 9 | − | RICAO/M1 | Antegrade | PED + Wallstent | pRESET 4×20 | 3 | 16 | − | 0 | Patent |
| 5 | 56 M |
18 | 8 | − | LICAO/M2 | Antegrade | PED + Wallstent | pRESET 4×20 | 3 | 18 | − | 0 | Patent Wallstent, proximal pseudo-aneurysm |
| 6 | 39 F |
8 | 10 | + | LICANO/”T” | Antegrade | PED Shield | pRESET 4×20/6×30 | 2b | 2 | − | 0 | Patent |
| 7 | 51 F |
6 | 10 | + | LICAO/M2 | Antegrade | PED Shield | pRESET 4×20 | 3 | 22 | − | 1 | Patent |
| 8 | 41 F |
12 | 8 | − | RICAO/- | Antegrade | PED Shield + Wallstent | 3 | 11 | − | 1 | Patent, stenosis | |
| 9 | 64 M |
6 | 10 | − | RICANO/M2 | Retrograde | PED Shield | pRESET 4×20 | 3 | 27 | PH1 | 0 | Occluded |
| 10 | 37 M |
12 | 8 | − | LICAO/M1 | Antegrade | PED Shield + Wallstent | pRESET 4×20/6×30 | 3 | 11 | − | 1 | Patent, stenosis |
| 11 | 39 F |
18 | 6 | − | RICANO/”T” | Antegrade | PED Shield | pRESET 5×40/6×30 | 3 | 8 | − | 2 | Patent |
| 12 | 59 M |
12 | 9 | - | RICAO/M1 | Antegrade | PED Shield | pRESET 5×40 | 3 | 6 | − | 0 | Patent |
| 13 | 54 F |
16 | 7 | - | RICAO/M1 | Antegrade | PED Shield | pRESET 5×40 | 3 | 14 | − | 0 | Patent |
| 14 | 37 F |
6 | 10 | − | LICAO/M2 | Antegrade | PED Shield | pRESET 4×20 + Envi 4×25 |
3 | 21 | − | 1 | Patent |
| 15 | 32 M |
14 | 8 | − | LICAO/M2 | Antegrade | Surpass Evolve 5×40 + Pipeline Vantage 5.5×40 | pRESET 4×20 + Envi 4×25 |
3 | 11 | − | 0 | Patent |
| 16 | 40 F |
16 | 8 | − | LICAO/M1 | Antegrade | PED Shield 4.5×30/5×35+ Wallstent 7×40 | pRESET 5×40 + NEVA 5.5×37 |
2b | 22 | − | 1 | Patent, stenosis |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).