Submitted:
12 June 2023
Posted:
12 June 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
3.1. Factors Influencing Social Transformation
3.2. The Process of Social Transformation in Peri-Urban Communities during the Disruption Era
3.3. Collaboration in Hexahelix for Social Transformation in Peri-Urban Communities
3.4. The Impact of Social Transformation
Rice fields in Karawang
- (1)
- Economic Benefits
- (2)
- Social Benefits
- (3)
- Environmental Benefits
Backyard Gardens in Majalengka
- a.
- Economic Benefits
- c.
- Social Benefits
3.5. Program Achievements Towards SDGs
4. Conclusions and Implications
- Efforts in empowering agricultural communities in peri-urban areas have had an impact on six types of social transformations, including transformations related to: (1) the utilization of digital information technology, (2) a sharing economy that promotes partnership synergy through hexahelix collaboration, (3) Transformation of attitudes and socio-cultural values in response to the Covid-19 pandemic crisis towards the post-pandemic era, (4) community attitudes towards changes occurring in their strategic environment, (5) Behavioral changes in society based on an increased awareness of the importance of synergy and collaboration, and (6) The degree of community empowerment is strongly related to increased community participation.
- The social transformation process is influenced by several factors, including: (1) disruptions caused by the dynamics of changes in the peri-urban community’s strategic environment, triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic crisis and ICT developments, (2) an increased awareness of the importance of collaborative synergy in empowerment, (3) the accessibility of various collaborative parties to ICT, and (4) the development of the community’s empowerment level in managing the potential resources of their community.
- The community empowerment program not only has an impact on social transformations but also has positive effects on (1) the sustainability of organic food and (2) the achievement of the six SDGs indicators. Responsible consumption and production, no hunger, no poverty, decent work and economic growth, good health and well-being, and life on land are the six SDG indicators. In paddy fields, there is a more conducive environment for economic sustainability, while in dry land, the impact is more conducive to environmental sustainability. Both paddy fields and dry land are conducive to social sustainability.
- The positive impact of transformation is triggered by hexahelix collaboration in the process of participatory social intervention through community empowerment. In this regard, the role and integrity of academics are needed to act as integrators, prioritizing inclusive values among collaborators.
- Clarity among collaborative partners is essential in social interventions, particularly regarding the orientation of community empowerment goals. The desired orientation includes clear indicators of SDGs achievement that align with the needs and accessible resources.
- The development of inclusive and participatory approaches is crucial for the sustainability of the social, economic, and environmental impacts of community empowerment interventions. The inclusive orientation developed by collaborators becomes the key to achieving the desired social transformation in peri-urban communities through hexahelix-based empowerment interventions.
- These recommendations highlight the importance of collaboration, clarity, and inclusivity in community empowerment interventions. By implementing these recommendations, stakeholders can enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of their interventions, leading to positive impacts on social, economic, and environmental aspects in peri-urban communities.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- “BPS: Tingkat Pengangguran Terbuka sebesar 5,83 Persen pada Februari 2022 - Data Tempo.co.” https://data.tempo.co/data/1419/bps-tingkat-pengangguran-terbuka-sebesar-583-persen-pada-februari-2022 (accessed Sep. 03, 2022).
- H. Zulfinanda, N. N. Pratiwi, and A. Wulandari, “Analisis Tipologi Wilayah Peri Urban Berdasarkan Aspek Fisik di Kecamatan Sungai Raya Kabupaten Kubu Raya,” JeLAST : Jurnal PWK, Laut, Sipil, Tambang, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2020.
- K. D. R. Sari and E. B. Santoso, “Analisis Keterkaitan Wilayah Peri Urban di Kabupaten Gresik dengan Wilayah Desa-Kota di Sekitarnya,” Jurnal Teknik ITS, vol. 6, no. 2, Sep. 2017. [CrossRef]
- N. N. Pratiwi, “Korelasi Antar Aspek Pembentuk Tipologi Wilayah Peri Urban Kecamatan Sungai Raya,” TATALOKA, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 13–23, Feb. 2023. [CrossRef]
- Z. Rosyidi and B. U. Aulia, “Pola Keterkaitan Kota-Desa dari Segi Pergerakan Orang Antara Kota Mojokerto dengan Wilayah Peri Urban di Kabupaten Mojokerto,” Jurnal Teknik ITS, vol. 8, no. 2, Jan. 2020. [CrossRef]
- Sumardjo, A. Firmansyah, and L. Dharmawan, “The Role of Extension and Local Champions in Empowering Coastal Communities For Achieving SDGs,” The Seybold Report, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1639–1651, 2022.
- Sumardjo, A. Firmansyah, and L. Dharmawan, Pemberdayaan Urban Farming Pada Masyarakat Peri-Urban sebagai Upaya Pencapaian SDGs, 1st ed. Bogor: IPB Press, 2022.
- S. Sumardjo, A. Firmansyah, and L. Dharmawan, “Organic Farming for Sustainable Development in Peri-Urban Community,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Rural Socio-Economic Transformation: Agrarian, Ecology, Communication and Community Development Perspectives, RUSET 2021, 14-15 September 2021, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia, EAI, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Sumardjo, A. Firmansyah, and L. Dharmawan, “Sodality in Peri-Urban Community Empowerment: Perspective of Development Communication and Extension Science,” Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 29–41, Aug. 2021. [CrossRef]
- Sumardjo, A. Firmansyah, and Manikharda, “Organic Medical Plants Urban Farming Based on Family Empowerment on Bekasi , West Java,” Journal of Hunan University, vol. 47, no. 12, 2020.
- P. Bourdieu, “The forms of capital,” in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, J. Richardson, Ed., Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1986. [CrossRef]
- R. D. Putnam, “Social capital and public affairs,” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1994, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3824796.
- M. Woolcock and D. Narayan, “Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy,” World Bank Res Obs, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 225–249, Aug. 2000. [CrossRef]
- P. Bieler et al., “Distributing Reflexivity through Co-laborative Ethnography,” J Contemp Ethnogr, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 77–98, Feb. 2021. [CrossRef]
- S. A. K. Uthoff, A. Zinkevich, J. Boenisch, S. K. Sachse, T. Bernasconi, and L. Ansmann, “Collaboration between stakeholders involved in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) care of people without natural speech,” J Interprof Care, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 821–831, Nov. 2021. [CrossRef]
- R. White, “Conceptions of ecocide and challenges for social transformation,” Current Issues in Criminal Justice, pp. 1–12, May 2023. [CrossRef]
- IPCC, “Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)],” Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2022.
- T. E. Benjamin-Thomas, D. Laliberte Rudman, D. Cameron, and B. Batorowicz, “Participatory digital methodologies: Potential of three approaches for advancing transformative occupation-based research with children and youth,” J Occup Sci, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 559–574, Oct. 2019. [CrossRef]
- J. B. Spiegel, B. Ortiz Choukroun, A. Campaña, K. M. Boydell, J. Breilh, and A. Yassi, “Social transformation, collective health and community-based arts: ‘Buen Vivir’ and Ecuador’s social circus programme,” Glob Public Health, vol. 14, no. 6–7, pp. 899–922, Jul. 2019. [CrossRef]
- H. van Bruggen et al., Case Studies For Social Transformation Through Occupation. ENOTHE, 2020.
- D. Coy, “From little things, big things grow: Facilitating community empowerment in the energy transformation,” Energy Res Soc Sci, vol. 84, 2022. [CrossRef]
- D. Coy, “Rethinking community empowerment in the energy transformation: A critical review of the definitions, drivers and outcomes,” Energy Res Soc Sci, vol. 72, 2021. [CrossRef]
- P. Maring, “Conflict transformation and collaboration in developing social forestry in Flores, Indonesia,” Forest and Society, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 40–66, Apr. 2022. [CrossRef]
- S. Sumardjo, A. Firmansyah, and L. Dharmawan, “The Role of Creative Social Energy in Strengthening Ecological Adaptation Capacity Through Community Empowerment,” Jurnal Penyuluhan, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 323–332, Nov. 2020. [CrossRef]
- Rogers, “Demonstrating the value of community development: An inclusive evaluation capacity building approach in a non-profit Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander organisation,” Eval J Australas, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 234–255, 2018. [CrossRef]
- E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. New York: Free Press, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=9U1K5LjUOwEC&printsec=frontcover&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.
- E. M. Rogers and D. L. Kincaid, Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research. Free Press, 1981. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=r3tiAAAAMAAJ.
- P. Freire, Pendidikan Kaum Tertindas, 6th ed. Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES, 2008.
- Tjondronegoro Smp, “National development, transmigration models and demographic trends in Indonesia.,” Indones Q, vol. 11, no. 2, 1983.
- Q. van Ufford and S. M. P. Tjondronegoro, “Social Organization and Planned Development in Rural Java.,” Man, vol. 20, no. 4, 1985. [CrossRef]
- Sumardjo, A. Firmansyah, and L. Dharmawan, “Social Transformation Base on Creative Social Energy toward Community Autonomous and their Wel-Being,” Journal of Positive School Psychology, vol. 6, no. 10, 2022.
- Sumardjo, A. Firmansyah, and L. Dharmawan, “Ecological adaptation of coastal communities based on social energy : A case of natural disasters potential on the north coast of West Java Ecological adaptation of coastal communities based on social energy : A case of natural disasters potential on the,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, 2019. [CrossRef]
- Sumardjo, A. Firmansyah, and Manikharda, “Community adaptation on ecological changes through urban farming innovation for family food security,” in Proceedings of the International Confernece on Rural Socio-Economic Transformation: Agrarian, Ecology, Communication and Community Development Perspectives (RUSET 2018), November 14-15, 2018, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia, R. A. Kinseng, A. H. Dharmawan, D. Lubis, and A. U. Seminar, Eds., CRC Press, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.routledge.com/Rural-Socio-Economic-Transformation-Agrarian-Ecology-Communication-and/Kinseng-Dharmawan-Lubis-Seminar/p/book/9780367236038.
- R. Munford, “Transformative Social Work Practice: Providing Meaningful Support to People Living with Mental Health Challenges,” Practice, pp. 1–16, May 2023. [CrossRef]
- S. Lara, “Participatory rural appraisal as an educational tool to empower sustainable community processes,” J Clean Prod, vol. 172, pp. 4254–4262, 2018. [CrossRef]
- G. Maulani, “Educating farmers using participatory rural appraisal construct,” 2020 5th International Conference on Informatics and Computing, ICIC 2020. 2020. [CrossRef]
- M. E. Menconi, “European farmers and participatory rural appraisal: A systematic literature review on experiences to optimize rural development,” Land use policy, vol. 60, pp. 1–11, 2017. [CrossRef]
- L. A. Omondi, “Learning together: Participatory rural appraisal for coproduction of climate change knowledge,” Action Research, 2020. [CrossRef]
- L. Dharmawan, P. Muljono, D. Retno Hapsari, and B. Priyo Purwanto, “Digital Information Development in Agriculture Extension in Facing New Normal Era During Covid-19 Pandemics,” Jonuns.Com, vol. 47, no. 12, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://jonuns.com/index.php/journal/article/view/482.
- J. J. L. Osumba, J. W. Recha, and G. W. Oroma, “Transforming Agricultural Extension Service Delivery through Innovative Bottom–Up Climate-Resilient Agribusiness Farmer Field Schools,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 3938, Apr. 2021. [CrossRef]
- Palanisamy and N. Bharadwaj, “Utilization of Information Disseminated through Mobile Telephones by Farmers in Tamil Nadu,” JOURNAL OF EXTENSION EDUCATION, vol. 29, no. 3, p. 5902, Sep. 2018. [CrossRef]
- H. Ihsaniyati, S. Sarwoprasodjo, P. Muljono, and D. Gandasari, “The Use of Social Media for Development Communication and Social Change: A Review,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 2283, Jan. 2023. [CrossRef]
- W. Jiumpanyarach, “Organic Agriculture: Farmers Perception and Adaptation in Northern Thailand,” Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 245–254, Sep. 2021. [CrossRef]
- J. MacLeod, A. J. Brandt, K. Collins, H. Moller, and J. Manhire, “Behavioural insights for improved uptake of agricultural sustainability assessment tools,” People and Nature, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 428–444, Apr. 2022. [CrossRef]
- S. Santaweesuk, P. Boonyakawee, and W. Siriwong, “Knowledge, attitude and practice of pesticide use and serum cholinesterase levels among rice farmers in Nakhon Nayok Province, Thailand,” J Health Res, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 379–387, Jun. 2020. [CrossRef]
- L. E. Méndez-Barrientos, A. DeVincentis, J. Rudnick, R. Dahlquist-Willard, B. Lowry, and K. Gould, “Farmer Participation and Institutional Capture in Common-Pool Resource Governance Reforms. The Case of Groundwater Management in California,” Soc Nat Resour, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1486–1507, Dec. 2020. [CrossRef]
- L. Peng, J. Tan, W. Deng, and Y. Liu, “Farmers’ participation in community-based disaster management: The role of trust, place attachment and self-efficacy,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 51, p. 101895, Dec. 2020. [CrossRef]









Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
