Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Culture, Mindset and Functionality in Regional Organisations – A Study on ASEAN and the European Union.

Version 1 : Received: 29 May 2023 / Approved: 30 May 2023 / Online: 30 May 2023 (08:53:14 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 2 June 2023 / Approved: 5 June 2023 / Online: 5 June 2023 (09:00:10 CEST)

How to cite: Rautakivi, T.; Yolles, M. Culture, Mindset and Functionality in Regional Organisations – A Study on ASEAN and the European Union.. Preprints 2023, 2023052091. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.2091.v1 Rautakivi, T.; Yolles, M. Culture, Mindset and Functionality in Regional Organisations – A Study on ASEAN and the European Union.. Preprints 2023, 2023052091. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.2091.v1

Abstract

Regional organisations (ROs) are important in that they can enable states in their regions to pros-per and develop for improvement. Interest here lies in the European Union (EU) and the Associa-tion of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). Their political development involves complex process-es for collective actions involving ingroup member RO states. To explore development, we firstly examine the rise of both the EU and ASEAN. The literature gives some attention to the behaviour-alist political approach to explain developmental differences using social organisation theory, often in terms of the Gemeinschaft-Gesellschaft paradigm of Tönnies. However, here we adopt a social psychology approach that distinguishes between operative structure (which directly determines behaviour), and substructure (housing normative personality deemed to be responsible for behav-ioural imperatives). This enables a relationship to be made between the Tönnies paradigm and the Collectivism-Individualism paradigm of Triandis. The theoretical approach adopted involves a complex adaptive systems model deriving from metacybernetics, and this also delivers Mindset Agency Theory as a qualitative methodology. Consistent with the general view, it is shown that the EU is more or less a coherent rational organisation, while ASEAN is more idealistic delivering pragmatic paradox. In particular, ASEAN is frequently descried as an organisation with contra-dictions, and for this reason its pathologies are explored in some detail

Keywords

Regional organisations; Gemeinschaft-Gesellschaft; Collectivism-Individualism; Cultural Agency Theory; metacybernetics, political development, social psychology, Mindset Agency Theory, normative personality, EU, ASEAN

Subject

Social Sciences, Political Science

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.