Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Food Production Scheduling: A Thorough Comparative Study Between Optimization and Rule-Based Approaches

Version 1 : Received: 22 May 2023 / Approved: 23 May 2023 / Online: 23 May 2023 (07:33:31 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Samouilidou, M.E.; Georgiadis, G.P.; Georgiadis, M.C. Food Production Scheduling: A Thorough Comparative Study between Optimization and Rule-Based Approaches. Processes 2023, 11, 1950. Samouilidou, M.E.; Georgiadis, G.P.; Georgiadis, M.C. Food Production Scheduling: A Thorough Comparative Study between Optimization and Rule-Based Approaches. Processes 2023, 11, 1950.

Abstract

This work addresses the lot-sizing and production scheduling problem of multi-stage multi-product food industrial facilities. More specifically, the production scheduling problem of the semi-continuous yogurt production process, for two large-scale Greek dairy industries, is considered. Production scheduling decisions are taken using two approaches: i) an optimization and ii) a rule-based approach, followed by a comparative study. A MILP model is applied for the optimization of short-term production scheduling of the two industries. Then, the same problems are solved using the commercial scheduling tool ScheduleProTM, which derives scheduling decisions, using simulation-based techniques and empirical rules. It is concluded that both methods, despite having their advantages and disadvantages, are suitable for addressing complex food industrial scheduling problems. The optimization-based approach leads to better results in terms of operating cost reduction. On the other hand, the complexity of the problem and the experience of production engineers and plant operators can significantly impact the quality of the obtained solutions for the rule-based approach.

Keywords

Food process industry; Production scheduling; MILP; Optimization; Heuristics

Subject

Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.