Submitted:
15 May 2023
Posted:
16 May 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- Design of LSTM-GA mathematical modeling for STATCOM microgrid analysis.
- Modelling of the proposed system using MATLAB Simulink model and its validation under dynamic non-linear loading conditions and PV output variation with respect to environmental parameters.
- A detailed comparative analysis with the other established benchmarking model.
2. Problem Formulation and Solution Methodology

3. Result Analysis
4. Conclusion
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ping He, Qiyuan Fang, Haoran Jin, Yuqi Ji, Zhijie Gong, Jie Dong, Coordinated design of PSS and STATCOM-POD based on the GA-PSO algorithm to improve the stability of wind-PV-thermal-bundled power system, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Volume 141, 2022, 108208, ISSN 0142-0615. [CrossRef]
- Kaliaperumal Rukmani, D.; Thangaraj, Y.; Subramaniam, U.; Ramachandran, S.; Madurai Elavarasan, R.; Das, N.; Baringo, L.; Imran Abdul Rasheed, M. A New Approach to Optimal Location and Sizing of DSTATCOM in Radial Distribution Networks Using Bio-Inspired Cuckoo Search Algorithm. Energies 2020, 13, 4615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, M.; Zaheer, H.; Mahmood, T. Modeling and Analysis of STATCOM for Renewable Energy Farm to Improve Power Quality and Reactive Power Compensation. Eng. Proc. 2021, 12, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anil Bharadwaj, Suman Maiti, Nirmalya Dhal, S. Chakraborty, Sreekesh K. Pillai, Chapter 10 - E-STATCOM (energy storage+STATCOM): a solution to integrate large-scale wind farms into the grid at medium and high power levels, Editor(s): P. Sanjeevikumar, C. Sharmeela, Jens Bo Holm-Nielsen, P. Sivaraman, Power Quality in Modern Power Systems, Academic Press, 2021, Pages 283-310, ISBN 9780128233467. [CrossRef]
- Sarath Perera, Sean Elphick, Chapter 2 - Steady-state voltage in low voltage networks, Editor(s): Sarath Perera, Sean Elphick, Applied Power Quality, Elsevier, 2023, Pages 19-48, ISBN 9780323854672. S: Perera, Sean Elphick, Chapter 2 - Steady-state voltage in low voltage networks, Editor(s). [CrossRef]
- Claudia Battistelli, Antonello Monti, Chapter 5 - Dynamics of modern power systems, Editor(s): Antonello Monti, Federico Milano, Ettore Bompard, Xavier Guillaud, Converter-Based Dynamics and Control of Modern Power Systems, Academic Press, 2021, Pages 91-124, ISBN 9780128184912. [CrossRef]
- R. Dash, P. Paikray and S. C. Swain, "Active power filter for harmonic mitigation in a distributed power generation system," 2017 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT), 2017, pp. 1-6. [CrossRef]
- Liangce He, Zhigang Lu, Lijun Geng, Jiangfeng Zhang, Xueping Li, Xiaoqiang Guo, Environmental economic dispatch of integrated regional energy system considering integrated demand response, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Volume 116, 2020, 105525, ISSN 0142-0615. [CrossRef]
- D. Ranamuka, K. M. Muttaqi and D. Sutanto, "Flexible AC Power Flow Control in Distribution Systems by Coordinated Control of Distributed Solar-PV and Battery Energy Storage Units," in IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 2054-2062, Oct. 2020. [CrossRef]
- B. Patnaik, S. Chandra Swain and R. Kumar Dash, "An Experimental Analysis of Solar PV on Higher Concentration of Methane," 2022 IEEE India Council International Subsections Conference (INDISCON), 2022, pp. 1-5. [CrossRef]
- Kerekes T, Sera D, Teodorescu R, et al. Improved MPPT algorithms for rapidly changing environmental conditions. in Proc. of Power Electron Motion Control Conf. 2006; p. 1614–1619.
- Narsingoju K, Busa V, Kumar GV. Simulation analysis of maximum power control of photovoltaic power system. Int J Adv Electr Electron Eng. 2012;1(1): 9–14.
- B. Patnaik, S. C. Swain and R. Dash, "A Study on Effect of GHG on the Performance of Grid Connected Solar PV System," 2022 IEEE India Council International Subsections Conference (INDISCON), 2022, pp. 1-4. [CrossRef]
- Sakib N, Kabir M, Rahman MS, et al. A comparative study of flower pollination algorithm and bat algorithm on continuous optimization problems. Int J Appl Inf Syst. 2014;7(9):20–19.
- Yang B, Zhong L, Zhang X, et al. Novel bio-inspired memetic salp swarm algorithm and application to MPPT for PV systems considering partial shading condition. J Clean Prod. 2019;215:1203–1222.
- Kumar C, Rao R. A novel global MPP tracking of a photovoltaic system based on whale optimization algorithm. Int J Renew Energy Dev. 2016;5(03):225– 232.
- Mohanty S, Subudhi B, Ray PK. A new MPPT design using grey wolf optimization technique for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions. IEEE Trans Sustainable Energy. 2016;7(1):181–188.
- Mansoor M, Feroz Mirza A, Ling Q. Harris hawk optimization-based MPPT control for PV systems under partial shading conditions. J Clean Prod. 2020; 274:122857.
- El-Helw HM, Magdy A, Marei MI. A hybrid maximum power point tracking technique for partially shaded photovoltaic arrays. IEEEAccess. 2017;5:11900– 11908.
- R. Paul, R. Dash and S. C. Swain, "Design & Analysis of Current Controller for SPV Grid Connected System through Hysteresis CCT," 2018 International Conference on Applied Electromagnetics, Signal Processing and Communication (AESPC), 2018, pp. 1-6. [CrossRef]
- H. Shen, L. Xu, Y. Xu, and J. Cao, "A novel hybrid PSO-LSTM approach for improving MPPT performance of PV system under partially shaded conditions", Solar Energy, 2019.
- Kong, W.C.; Dong, Z.Y.; Jia, Y.W.; Hill, D.J.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y. Short-Term Residential Load Forecasting Based on LSTM Recurrent Neural Network. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2019, 10, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saied M, Ali A, Mostafa M, et al. A survey of maximum PPT techniques of PV systems. in Proc of IEEE Energytech. 2012. p. 1–10.
- Premkumar M, Sowmya R. Certain study on MPPT algorithms to track the global MPP under partial shading on solar PVmod- 431 ule/array. Int JComput Digital Syst. 2019;8(4):405–416.
- Ali, S.; Bhargava, A.; Saxena, A.; Kumar, P. A Hybrid Marine Predator Sine Cosine Algorithm for Parameter Selection of Hybrid Active Power Filter. Mathematics 2023, 11, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aziz, R.M.; Mahto, R.; Goel, K.; Das, A.; Kumar, P.; Saxena, A. Modified Genetic Algorithm with Deep Learning for Fraud Transactions of Ethereum Smart Contract. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahoo, S. Chandra Swain and R. Dash, "A Novel Flower Pollination Method for Unit Price Estimation in a Microgrid," 2022 3rd International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET), 2022, pp. 1-5. [CrossRef]
- S.M. Abd-Elazim, E.S. Ali, Imperialist competitive algorithm for optimal STATCOM design in a multimachine power system, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Volume 76, 2016, Pages 136-146, ISSN 0142-0615. [CrossRef]
- B. Patnaik, S. C. Swain, U. Kumar Rout and R. Dash, "Performance of Solar PV under higher Concentration of Carbon dioxide and Methane," 2022 Trends in Electrical, Electronics, Computer Engineering Conference (TEECCON), 2022, pp. 113-118. [CrossRef]
- A. Ballaji, R. Dash, V. Subburaj, J. R. Kalvakurthi, D. Swain and S. C. Swain, "Design & Development of MPPT Using PSO With Predefined Search Space Based on Fuzzy Fokker Planck Solution," in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 80764-80783, 2022. [CrossRef]
- B. Patnaik, S. C. Swain, U. K. Rout and R. Dash, "An Experimental Investigation of Co2 Concentration on Solar PV Performance using SVM," 2021 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT), 2021, pp. 1-6. [CrossRef]
- A. Ramadan, S. Kamel, M.H. Hassan, T.M. V´eliz, A.M. Eltamaly, Parameter Estimation of Static/Dynamic Photovoltaic Models Using a Developed Version of Eagle Strategy Gradient-Based Optimizer, Sustainability 13 (2021) 13053.
- R. Dash, P. R. Behera and S. M. Ali, "Hybrid system for meeting global energy demand with solar PV and wind system," 2014 International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Communication and Computational Technologies (ICCICCT), 2014, pp. 388-392. [CrossRef]
- Ritesh Dash, Sarat Chandra Swain, Effective Power quality improvement using Dynamic Activate compensation system with Renewable grid interfaced sources, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, Volume 9, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 2897-2905, ISSN 2090-4479. [CrossRef]
- Abdul-Kalaam R, Muyeen S, Al-Durra A. Review of maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic system. Global J 420 Control Eng Technol.2016;2:8–18.
- S. C. Swain, R. Dash, S. M. Ali and A. K. Mohanta, "Performance evaluation of photovoltaic system based on solar cell modelling," 2015 International Conference on Circuits, Power and Computing Technologies [ICCPCT-2015], 2015, pp. 1-6. [CrossRef]
- Premkumar M, Sumithira TR. Humpback whale assisted hybrid maximum power point tracking algorithm for partially shaded 445 solar photovoltaic systems. Journal of Power Electronics. 2018;18(6):1498–1511.











| Sr. No. | Name of Parameter | Rating | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coupling Capacitor | 420 micro F | Storage |
| 2 | PWM Frequency | 2.33 kHz | Under Modulation |
| 3 | Coupling TFR | 210:800 | Centre Tap |
| 4 | AC voltage Reference | 1 pu | 707V |
| 5 | DC ref. Voltage STATCOM | 750 V | - |
| 6 | AC voltage Regulator Gain | [0.52 0.39] | ZNM |
| 7 | DC voltage Regulator Gain | [0.03 0.27] | ZNM-GA |
| 8 | Current Regulator Gain | [0.11 0.17] | GA-LSTM |
| Sr. No. | Technique | Power Quality Attribute | Magnitude |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Fuzzy-PI STATCOM |
DC-Offset | 0.21% |
| Harmonic Current | 15.34% | ||
| Inter Harmonics | 1.87% | ||
| Notching | Broad Band | ||
| Noise | 0.82% | ||
| 02 | PSO-PI STATCOM |
DC-Offset | 0.14% |
| Harmonic Current | 12.72% | ||
| Inter Harmonics | 1.25% | ||
| Notching | Broad Band | ||
| Noise | 0.57% | ||
| 03 | LSTM-GA-PI STATCOM |
DC-Offset | 0.07% |
| Harmonic Current | 11.22% | ||
| Inter Harmonics | 0.87% | ||
| Notching | Broad Band | ||
| Noise | 0.44% |
| Sr. No. | Technique | Parameters | Magnitude | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Fuzzy-PI STATCOM |
Delay Time | 0.58 | Marginally Stable Critically Damped |
| Rise Time | 0.62 | |||
| Peak Time | 0.77 | |||
| Settling Time | 2.23 | |||
| Max. Overshoot | 14.44% | |||
| 02 | PSO-PI STATCOM |
Delay Time | 0.49 | Asymptotically Stable Critically Damped |
| Rise Time | 0.53 | |||
| Peak Time | 0.65 | |||
| Settling Time | 1.90 | |||
| Max. Overshoot | 12.27% | |||
| 03 | LSTM-GA-PI STATCOM |
Delay Time | 0.35 | Stable |
| Rise Time | 0.38 | |||
| Peak Time | 0.47 | |||
| Settling Time | 1.36 | |||
| Max. Overshoot | 8.84% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).