Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Genetic Polymorphisms of ACE1 rs4646994 Associated with Lung Cancer in Patients with Pulmonary Nodules: A Case Control Study

Rong Qiao  †,Siyao Sang  †,Jiajun Teng  †,Hua Zhong  *,Hui Li  *
,
Baohui Han  *

  † These authors contributed to the work equally and should be regarded as co-first authors.

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

26 April 2023

Posted:

27 April 2023

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background: Currently, many detection methods have high sensitivity to the diagnosis of lung cancer. However, some postoperative patients with pulmonary nodule were eventually diagnosed as benign nodules. The ideal evaluation of an individual with a pulmonary nodule would expedite therapy for a malignant nodule and minimize testing for those with a benign nodule.Methods: This case-control study is designed to explore the relationship between ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphism and the risk of lung cancer in patients with pulmonary nodules, 400 individuals with lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules were included. A DNA extraction kit was used to extract plasm DNA from peripheral blood. The relationship between ACE1 rs4646994 and the risk of lung cancer in patients with pulmonary nodules was determined by chi-square test, logistic regression analysis and cross analysis. Results: The results showed that the DD genotype of ACE1 rs4646994 may increase the risk of lung cancer in patients with pulmonary nodules, and this correlation was more significant in the female subgroup. In the age stratification analysis, it was found that the risk of lung cancer was significantly increased in the DD genotype of ACE1 rs4646994 in the older subgroup (> 45 years). In addition, the possibility of EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma patients with ACE1 rs4646994 DD genotype was lower than that of II or ID genotype carriers. Conclusions: Our study indicated that ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphism increases the risk of lung cancer in patients with pulmonary nodules from China.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Lung cancer is a primary cancer type with high incidence and mortality, and the number of new cases of lung cancer in China has continued to rise [1]. The overall 5-year survival rate of lung cancer patients is less than 15%, but the 5-year survival rate of early lung cancer can be increased to more than 80% after reasonable treatment [2]. Lung cancer is classified as small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (15% of total diagnoses) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (85% of total diagnoses) [3]. In the classification of NSCLC, adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common subtype of lung cancer, followed by squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) [4].
A pulmonary nodule is an abnormal area in the lung that is less than 3cm in size, and most pulmonary nodules are benign (not caused by cancer) [5]. The risk of cancer increases with pulmonary nodules that are larger in size. Risk factors for increasing the likelihood of lung nodule carcinogenesis: current or previous smoking, older, personal cancer history, family history of lung cancer, emphysema, exposure to asbestos or radon and EGFR mutation [5,6,7,8]. This suggests that the development of pulmonary nodules into lung cancer is a complex and gradual process [9]. In recent years, several studies have reported the correlation between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of genes related to metabolism, DNA damage repair, cell cycle regulation and lung diseases [9,10,11,12]. The treatment of patients with pulmonary nodules should be guided by the probability of malignant nodules, the safety of detection, and other additional tests [13].
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) encodes an enzyme involved in blood pressure regulation and electrolyte balance that converts of angiotensin I into a physiologically active peptide angiotensin II, and degrades bradykinin [14]. ACE plasma levels depend on the 287 bp insertion / deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the ACE gene on chromosome 17q23 [15]. According to its variation, there are three different genotypes: II, ID and DD [15]. It has been reported that the D allele is associated with increased ACE expression, and it has been observed that D allele heterozygous carriers have higher levels of systemic ACE protein than I allele carriers [16,17,18]. A large number of studies have reported that ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphism is associated with a variety of diseases, including cardiovascular disease, psoriasis, kidney disease, stroke and Alzheimer ’s disease [14,19,20]. A few studies have reported that ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphism may be a possible risk factor for lung cancer [12]. On basis of previous relevant studies, the aim of this study was to investigate the possible correlation between ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphism and lung cancer in patients with pulmonary nodules, providing evidence for molecular markers and etiological study of lung cancer.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Conformity

This pilot study was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of the Shanghai Jiao Tong University, under protocol KS1407, in the city of Shanghai, China. All participants signed informed consent.

2.2. Case and Control

Data were prospectively collected from October 2020 to September 2022 for a cohort of 460 subjects enrolled in Shanghai Chest Hospital under an active institutional review board, and written informed consents were acquired. All the cases were reviewed by a multidisciplinary lung nodule board, and CT images were collected at 3-12 months intervals until they were determined to be malignant or benign. For our study, IRB approval and a waiver of written informed consent were obtained. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Only the patients with at least one pulmonary nodule that was at least 1 mm in diameter, when using lung parenchymal CT display thresholds, on the baseline CT image were included [21], (2) For patients with malignant pulmonary nodules, only subjects with nodules that were determined to be primary lung cancer (LC) by histopathology before the consent date of May 2022 were included, (3) For benign nodules, only those confirmed by histopathologic examination of tissue obtained via surgical resection, or the lesion was found to be stable radiographically for at least 2 years of follow-up, or resolved under CT surveillance, were included. Finally, subjects with lung cancer (n= 300) were included as the case group and matched with subjects with benign nodules (n= 100) as the control group. Both groups were investigated for clinical demographic data, including age, gender, and histological type.

2.3. Genotyping

TaqMan®-MGB probe assays were used to genotype the polymorphisms in 384-well plates on LightCycler® 480 system (Roche Ltd., Basel, CH). The primers and probes of TaqMan® assays were designed using Primer Express Oligo Design soft-ware v3.0 (Applied Biosystems, Foster city, CA, USA). PCR reactions were performed in a 6 μ L reaction mixture containing 1 μ L DNA, 3 μ L TaqMan Genotyping Master Mix (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), 0.015 μ L each primer, 0.012 μ L FAM- and HEX-labelled TaqMan-MGB probes and 1 μ L DNA. The program of amplification contained 10 min heat preservation at 95°C followed by 50 cycles of 15s at 95°C and annealing at 60°C for 1 min. The normalized intensities of the 2 reporter dyes in each sample were plotted on an allelic discrimination plot and were algorithmically clustered. Genotype calls were assigned according to the sample position on the allelic discrimination plot.

2.4. Statistical analysis

All data were analysed using SPSS 20.0 statistical software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The χ 2 -test was used to verify whether the allele frequency of polymorphism met the Hardy–Weinberg (H-W) equilibrium. Pearson ’s Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the demographic and clinical variables between the study groups. Pearson’s Chi-square was used to compare the frequency distribution of genotypes and alleles among groups. The odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) of lung cancer incidence in patients with pulmonary nodule and genotype distribution was dealt with statistically by unconditional logistic regression model. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered for all statistical analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline characteristic of study subjects

In the results of demographic and clinical analyses, it can be observed that the groups differed in terms of age. No significant variation in gender was found between lung cancer patients and lung benign (p > 0.05). Most cases of lung cancer were LUAD, followed by SCLC and SCC. Among the 400 patients with pulmonary nodules included in the study, a total of 146 patients were tested for EGFR gene mutation. There was no significant difference in EGFR gene mutation between lung cancer patients and benign lung disease patients (p = 1.000). It is noteworthy that EGFR mutations exist in patients with benign nodules (Table 1).

3.2. Correlations of allele and genotype frequencies of ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphism with risk of lung cancer in pulmonary nodules

Table 2. Genotypes and allele frequencies of ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphisms in patients with lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules.
Table 2. Genotypes and allele frequencies of ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphisms in patients with lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules.
Genotype/allele Case(n=300) Control(n=100) p-Value OR 95% CI
II 121 41 Reference
ID 132 53 0.485 0.844 0.524-1.359
DD 47 6 0.038 2.654 1.057-6.664
DD vs. ID+II 0.018 2.91 1.205-7.031
I allele 374 135 Reference
D allele 226 65 0.189 1.255 0.894-1.761
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. Case group versus control group.

3.3. Correlations of allele and genotype frequencies of ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphism with histological types of SCC and LUAD

The distribution of genotypic frequencies of ACE1 rs4646994 in the SCC, LUAD, and control group are listed in Table 3. Patients with pulmonary nodules carrying the DD genotype are about 2.7 times as likely to develop lung adenocarcinoma (OR = 2.685, 95% CI, 1.065–6.770, p = 0.036). Compared with the I genotype (II+ID) carriers, patients with DD genotype were about 3 times more likely to develop LUAD than patients with benign nodules (OR = 2.896, 95% CI, 1.194–7.023, p = 0.019). The comparison on ACE1 rs4646994 between SCC group and control group manifested no statistical significance (p> 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference between lung squamous cell carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma in the polymorphism of ACE1 rs4646994 (p> 0.05).
As shown in Table 4, genotype with DD was more frequent in lung adenocarcinoma patients without EGFR mutation (22.6%). The risk of lung adenocarcinoma in patients with EGFR mutation-positive pulmonary nodules carrying genotype DD (OR = 0.295, 95% CI, 0.098–0.885, p = 0.029) was lower than that in patients carrying genotype II. The DD genotype decreased the onset risk EGFR mutation when compared with the I carrier (II+ID) genotype (OR = 0.298, 95% CI, 0.107–0.831, p = 0.021), and D allele was a protect factor contributing to the incidence of EGFR mutation (OR = 0.606, 95% CI, 0.372–0.990, p = 0.045).

3.4. ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphism and lung cancer risk in patients with pulmonary nodules by gender

The gender stratification analysis of the correlation between lung cancer risk and ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphism in patients with pulmonary nodules is shown in Table 5. No statistical association was found between ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphism and the risk of lung cancer in male patients with pulmonary nodules (p> 0.05). In the female subgroup, patients with pulmonary nodules carrying DD genotype have an increased risk of lung cancer (OR = 3.652, 95% CI, 1.025–13.019, p = 0.046). Compared with the I carrier (II+ID) genotype, DD genotype (OR = 3.457, 95% CI, 1.006–11.875, p = 0.049) increased the onset risk of lung cancer with pulmonary nodules. As shown in Table 6, there was no significant difference between SCC group and LUAD group in the polymorphism of ACE1 rs4646994 by gender stratification analysis (p> 0.05). No evidence shown there was relationship between ACE1 rs4646994 gene polymorphism and EGFR mutation in male (p> 0.05) and female (p> 0.05) lung adenocarcinoma patients (Table 7).

3.5. ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphism and lung cancer risk in patients with pulmonary nodules by age

Stratification analysis was carried out on the rs4646994 polymorphism in ACE1 by taking age in case group into consideration. The results shown in Table 8 illustrated that DD genotype could increase the risk of lung cancer in older (> 45 years) patients with pulmonary nodules (OR = 2.693, 95% CI, 0.983–7.377, p = 0.054). Moreover, the probability of lung cancer in patients with pulmonary nodules carrying the DD genotype is about 3 times that of patients carrying the I genotype (II+ID) (OR = 2.943, 95% CI, 1.121–7.728, p = 0.028). Table 9 showed that there was no correlation between ACE1 rs4646994 gene polymorphism and different histological types of lung cancer at different ages (both p> 0.05). As shown in Table 10, ACE1 rs4646994 gene polymorphism was not found to be associated with EGFR mutation in patients with LUAD by age stratification analysis (p> 0.05).

4. Discussion

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene polymorphism is one of the most studied genetic systems in recent years, including cardiovascular, metabolic, immune, cancer, aging, neurodegenerative diseases and mental illness [22,23,24,25,26]. This case-control study aimed to investigate the potential association between ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphism and lung cancer risk in Chinese patients with pulmonary nodules, and whether this association is related to lung cancer histology and EGFR mutation. We found that the DD genotype of ACE1 rs4646994 may be associated with lung cancer in patients with pulmonary nodules (OR = 2.654, 95% CI, 1.057–6.664, p = 0.038). The results of a previous meta-analysis did not show any significant association between ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphism and lung cancer risk [12]. The inconsistency between the results of this study and our results may be affected by race and the number of samples. We did not observe strong evidence that increased risk was associated with specific histological types of lung cancer (OR = 2.750, 95% CI, 0.329–23.005, p = 0.351). More interestingly, we found that patients with pulmonary nodules carrying the DD genotype had an increased risk of adenocarcinoma and a lower probability of EGFR gene mutation (OR = 0.606, 95% CI, 0.372–0.990, p = 0.045).
In the gender stratification analysis, we found that DD genotype carriers of ACE1 rs4646994 had a significantly increased risk of lung cancer in female patients with pulmonary nodules (OR = 3.652, 95% CI, 1.025–13.019, p = 0.046). No statistically significant association between ACE1 gene polymorphism and lung cancer risk was found in male patients with pulmonary nodules (OR = 1.667, 95% CI, 0.429–6.475, p = 0.461). However, it is certain that in both male and female subgroups, we observed that the DD genotype of ACE1 was positively correlated with lung cancer susceptibility in patients with pulmonary nodules. Male patients with pulmonary nodules carrying DD genotype of ACE1 rs4646994 is more strongly associated with lung adenocarcinoma than lung squamous cell carcinoma (OR = 2.930, 95% CI, 0.336–25.570, p=0.331). Due to the limited number of samples, there was no lung squamous cell carcinoma in female patients diagnosed with lung cancer. There was no significant correlation between ACE1 polymorphism and EGFR mutation after gender stratification. However, we observed that patients with DD genotype of ACE1 rs4646994 were less likely to have EGFR mutations in male and female subgroups of lung adenocarcinoma patients, which was consistent with the results of no gender stratification analysis. It is noteworthy that in this study, we observed that patients with benign nodules also had EGFR mutations, suggesting that patients with benign nodules should also be screened for EGFR mutations.
In patients with pulmonary nodules under 45 years old, no statistical association was found between ACE1 rs4646994 and lung cancer risk, while in older patients (> 45), the risk of lung cancer was significantly increased in patients with DD genotype (DD vs. ID+II: OR = 2.943, 95% CI, 1.121–7.728, p=0.028). It was reported that advanced age is risk factor for lung cancer and pulmonary nodule [27,28,29]. In the age stratification analysis, no significant correlation was found between ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphism and different pathological types of lung cancer and EGFR mutation in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
As far as we know, this is first study exploring the association between ACE1 rs4646994 polymorphism and lung cancer risk in patients with pulmonary nodules. And this study is one of the few that has investigated the association between gene polymorphism and the risk of SCC and LUAD. However, there are some limitations in our research. It is difficult to avoid selection bias and information bias in the whole research process. Although the number of samples included in this study can meet the experimental requirements, the number of respondents in the stratified analysis is not sufficient. In order to further understand the role of ACE1 gene in the development of lung cancer and find out the complex relationship between ACE1 polymorphism and gene-environment interaction, larger sample size and various expression studies will be needed. In addition, as with all association studies, it is certainly necessary to reproduce our findings in independent studies and in different ethnic populations.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study indicates that the DD genotype of ACE1 rs4646994 may contribute to an increased risk of lung cancer in patients with pulmonary nodules. Furthermore, the possibility of EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma patients with ACE1 rs4646994 DD genotype was lower than that of II or ID genotype carriers.

Author Contributions

Rong Qiao: Ideas, Conduction a research and investigation process, Data collection, Data analysis, Writing original draft. Siyao Sang: Writing original draft, Methodology, Visualization. Jiajun Teng: Writing review and editing, Visualization. Hua Zhong: Supervision, Writing review and editing. Hui Li: Funding acquisition, Writing review and editing. Baohui Han: Supervision, Writing review and editing, Data collection.

Funding

The work was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2020YFE0201600).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Shanghai Jiao Tong University, under protocol number KS1407. All participants signed an informed consent form.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets employed to support this study are available from corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The work was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2020YFE0201600). We thank the Dr. Minhua Shao of Guang Han Technology (Shanghai) Co. for her help with the experiments and writing in this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

ACE Angiotensin-converting enzyme
CI confidence intervals
LUAD adenocarcinoma
NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer
OR odds ratios
SCC squamous cell carcinoma
SCLC small cell lung cancer
SNPs single nucleotide polymorphisms

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fuchs, H.E.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022, 72, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Varoli, F.; Vergani, C.; Caminiti, R.; Francese, M.; Gerosa, C.; Bongini, M.; Roviaro, G. Management of solitary pulmonary nodule. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008, 33, 461–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Travis, W.D.; Brambilla, E.; Nicholson, A.G.; Yatabe, Y.; Austin, J.H.M.; Beasley, M.B.; Chirieac, L.R.; Dacic, S.; Duhig, E.; Flieder, D.B.; Geisinger, K.; Hirsch, F.R.; Ishikawa, Y.; Kerr, K.M.; Noguchi, M.; Pelosi, G.; Powell, C.A.; Tsao, M.S.; Wistuba, I.; Panel, W.H.O. The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Genetic, Clinical and Radiologic Advances Since the 2004 Classification. J Thorac Oncol 2015, 10, 1243–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Thai, A.A.; Solomon, B.J.; Sequist, L.V.; Gainor, J.F.; Heist, R.S. Lung cancer. Lancet 2021, 398, 535–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Walter, K. Pulmonary Nodules. JAMA 2021, 326, 1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kang, N.; Kim, K.H.; Jeong, B.H.; Lee, K.; Kim, H.; Kwon, O.J.; Ahn, M.J.; Cho, J.; Lee, H.Y.; Um, S.W. The Impact of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor on the Natural Course of Concurrent Subsolid Nodules in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Res Treat 2022, 54, 817–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Loeb, L.A.; Ernster, V.L.; Warner, K.E.; Abbotts, J.; Laszlo, J. Smoking and lung cancer: an overview. Cancer Res 1984, 44, 5940–58. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Hurria, A.; Kris, M.G. Management of lung cancer in older adults. CA Cancer J Clin 2003, 53, 325–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pereira, E.E.B.; Leitao, L.P.C.; Andrade, R.B.; Modesto, A.A.C.; Fernandes, B.M.; Burbano, R.M.R.; Assumpcao, P.P.; Fernandes, M.R.; Guerreiro, J.F.; Santos, S.; Santos, N. UGT1A1 Gene Polymorphism Contributes as a Risk Factor for Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study with Patients from the Amazon. Genes (Basel) 2022, 13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, S.; Cui, Z.; Li, H.; Li, J.; Lv, X.; Yang, Z.; Gao, M.; Bi, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, B.; Yin, Z. LncRNA NEAT1 polymorphisms and lung cancer susceptibility in a Chinese Northeast Han Population: A case-control study. Pathol Res Pract 2019, 215, 152723, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31704150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schneider, J.; Classen, V.; Helmig, S. XRCC1 polymorphism and lung cancer risk. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2008, 8, 761–80, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18999926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, N.; Yang, D.; Ji, B.; Li, J. Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion gene polymorphism and lung cancer risk: A meta-analysis. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2015, 16, 189–94, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25354524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mazzone, P.J.; Lam, L. Evaluating the Patient With a Pulmonary Nodule: A Review. JAMA 2022, 327, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Saengsiwaritt, W.; Jittikoon, J.; Chaikledkaew, U.; Udomsinprasert, W. Genetic polymorphisms of ACE1, ACE2, and TMPRSS2 associated with COVID-19 severity: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Rev Med Virol 2022, 32, e2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rieder, M.J.; Taylor, S.L.; Clark, A.G.; Nickerson, D.A. Sequence variation in the human angiotensin converting enzyme. Nat Genet 22, 59–62. [CrossRef]
  16. Gomez, J.; Albaiceta, G.M.; Garcia-Clemente, M.; Lopez-Larrea, C.; Amado-Rodriguez, L.; Lopez-Alonso, I.; Hermida, T.; Enriquez, A.I.; Herrero, P.; Melon, S.; Alvarez-Arguelles, M.E.; Boga, J.A.; Rojo-Alba, S.; Cuesta-Llavona, E.; Alvarez, V.; Lorca, R.; Coto, E. Angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACE, ACE2) gene variants and COVID-19 outcome. Gene 2020, 762, 145102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Verma, S.; Abbas, M.; Verma, S.; Khan, F.H.; Raza, S.T.; Siddiqi, Z.; Ahmad, I.; Mahdi, F. Impact of I/D polymorphism of angiotensin-converting enzyme 1 (ACE1) gene on the severity of COVID-19 patients. Infect Genet Evol 2021, 91, 104801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Delanghe, J.R.; Speeckaert, M.M.; De Buyzere, M.L. COVID-19 infections are also affected by human ACE1 D/I polymorphism. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020, 58, 1125–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kehoe, P.G. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and Alzheimer s disease? J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2003, 4, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Castellon, R.; Hamdi, H.K. Demystifying the ACE polymorphism: from genetics to biology. Curr Pharm Des 2007, 13, 1191–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. McWilliams, A.; Tammemagi, M.C.; Mayo, J.R.; Roberts, H.; Liu, G.; Soghrati, K.; Yasufuku, K.; Martel, S.; Laberge, F.; Gingras, M.; Atkar-Khattra, S.; Berg, C.D.; Evans, K.; Finley, R.; Yee, J.; English, J.; Nasute, P.; Goffin, J.; Puksa, S.; Stewart, L.; Tsai, S.; Johnston, M.R.; Manos, D.; Nicholas, G.; Goss, G.D.; Seely, J.M.; Amjadi, K.; Tremblay, A.; Burrowes, P.; MacEachern, P.; Bhatia, R.; Tsao, M.S.; Lam, S. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med 2013, 369, 910–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sayed-Tabatabaei, F.A.; Oostra, B.A.; Isaacs, A.; van Duijn, C.M.; Witteman, J.C. ACE polymorphisms. Circ Res 2006, 98, 1123–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Khurana, V.; Goswami, B. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE). Clin Chim Acta 2022, 524, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zmorzynski, S.; Szudy-Szczyrek, A.; Popek-Marciniec, S.; Korszen-Pilecka, I.; Wojcierowska-Litwin, M.; Luterek, M.; Chocholska, S.; Styk, W.; Swiderska-Kolacz, G.; Januszewska, J.; Mielnik, M.; Hus, M.; Filip, A.A. ACE Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism (rs4646994) Is Associated With the Increased Risk of Multiple Myeloma. Front Oncol 9, 44. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gupta, K.; Kaur, G.; Pathak, T.; Banerjee, I. Systematic review and meta-analysis of human genetic variants contributing to COVID-19 susceptibility and severity. Gene 2022, 844, 146790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Moradzadegan, A.; Vaisi-Raygani, A.; Nikzamir, A.; Rahimi, Z. Angiotensin converting enzyme insertion/deletion (I/D) (rs4646994) and Vegf polymorphism (+405G/C; rs2010963) in type II diabetic patients: Association with the risk of coronary artery disease. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2015, 16, 672–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Toumazis, I.; Bastani, M.; Han, S.S.; Plevritis, S.K. Risk-Based lung cancer screening: A systematic review. Lung Cancer 2020, 147, 154–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sears, C.R.; Rivera, M.P. Age, Sex, Smoking, and Race: Is Progress Being Made in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility? Chest 2021, 160, 31–33, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34246372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wong, M.L.; Shi, Y.; Fung, K.Z.; Ngo, S.; Elicker, B.M.; Brown, J.K.; Hiatt, R.A.; Tang, V.L.; Walter, L.C. Age, comorbidity, life expectancy, and pulmonary nodule follow-up in older veterans. PLoS One 2018, 13, e0200496, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30044854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the investigated groups.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the investigated groups.
Characteristics Case (n=300) Control (n=100) p-Value
Gender, n (%) 0.862 a
   Male 135 (45%) 44 (44%)
   Female 165 (55%) 56 (56%)
Age (years)
Median (p25-p75%) 57.00 (49.00-64.00) 55.00 (48.25-61.00) 0.038 b*
Histology
   Squamous Cell Carcinoma 14 (5.3%) -
   Adencarcinoma 282 (93.4%) - NA
   Small Cell Carcinoma 2 (0.6%) -
   Malt 2 (0.6%) -
EGFR Mutation-positive 1.000 c
   Yes 75 (52.1%) 1 (50%)
   No 69 (47.9%) 1 (50%)
NA, not applicable; -, no data. a Chi-square Test; b Mann-Whitney; c Chi-square Test with Yates’ continuity correction. * p-Value < 0.05
Table 3. Correlations of genotype polymorphism in ACE1 rs4646994 with histological types of lung squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.
Table 3. Correlations of genotype polymorphism in ACE1 rs4646994 with histological types of lung squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.
Genotype/ SCC LUAD Control p-Value OR 95%CI p-Value OR 95%CI p-Value § OR § 95%CI §
allele (n=14) (n=282) (n=100)
      II 7 (50%) 112 (39.7%) 41 (41%) Reference Reference Reference
      ID 6 (42.9%) 126 (44.7%) 53 (53%) 0.489 0.663 0.207-2.124 0.571 0.87 0.538-1.407 0.634 1.312 0.428-4.022
      DD 1 (7.1%) 44 (14.6%) 6 (6%) 0.983 0.976 0.101-9.389 0.036 2.685 1.065-6.770 0.351 2.75 0.329-23.005
DD vs. ID+II 0.868 1.205 0.134-10.822 0.019 2.896 1.194-7.023 0.404 2.403 0.307-18.842
   I allele 20 (71.4%) 350 (62.1%) 135 Reference Reference Reference
   D allele 8 (28.6%) 214 (37.9%) 65 0.922 1.038 0.489-2.206 0.157 1.279 0.910-1.798 0.31 1.543 0.668-3.564
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. SCC group versus control group; LUAD group versus control group; § LUAD group versus SCC group.
Table 4. Correlations of ACE1 rs4646994 genotype polymorphism with EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma.
Table 4. Correlations of ACE1 rs4646994 genotype polymorphism with EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma.
Genotype/allele EGFR+ (n=75) EGFR- (n=62) p-Value OR 95% CI
II 32 (42.7%) 22 (35.5%) Reference
ID 37 (49.3%) 26 (41.9%) 0.954 0.978 0.467-2.049
DD 6 (8.0%) 14 (22.6%) 0.029 0.295 0.098-0.885
DD vs. ID+II 69 (57.3%) 48 (64.5%) 0.021 0.298 0.107-0.831
I allele 101 (67.3%) 70 (56.5%) Reference
D allele 49 (32.7%) 54 (43.5%) 0.045 0.606 0.372-0.990
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. Case group versus control group.
Table 5. Correlations of genotype polymorphism in ACE1 rs4646994 and lung cancer risk in patients with pulmonary nodules according to gender.
Table 5. Correlations of genotype polymorphism in ACE1 rs4646994 and lung cancer risk in patients with pulmonary nodules according to gender.
Gender Genotype Case Control p-Value OR 95% CI
/allele (n=300) (n=100)
Male 135 44
      II 52 (38.5%) 13 (29.5%) Reference
      ID 63 (46.7%) 28 (63.6%) 0.134 0.562 0.265-1.195
      DD 20 (14.8%) 3 (6.8%) 0.461 1.667 0.429-6.475
DD vs.ID+II 0.18 2.377 0.671-8.419
   I allele 167 (61.9%) 54 (61.4%) Reference
   D allele 103 (38.1%) 34 (38.6%) 0.935 0.98 0.597-1.606
Female 165 56
      II 69 (41.8%) 28 (50%) Reference
      ID 69 (41.8%) 25 (44.6%) 0.726 1.12 0.594-2.112
      DD 27 (16.4%) 3 (5.4%) 0.046 3.652 1.025-13.019
DD vs.ID+II 0.049 3.457 1.006-11.875
   I allele 207 (62.7%) 81 (72.3%) Reference
   D allele 123 (37.3%) 31 (27.7%) 0.067 1.553 0.970-2.485
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. Case group versus control group.
Table 6. Correlations of genotype polymorphism in ACE1 rs4646994 with histological types of SCC and LUAD according to gender.
Table 6. Correlations of genotype polymorphism in ACE1 rs4646994 with histological types of SCC and LUAD according to gender.
Gender Genotype LUAD SCC p-Value OR 95% CI
/allele (n=282) (n=14)
Male 118 14
      II 43 (36.4%) 7 (50%) Reference
      ID 57 (48.3%) 6 (42.9%) 0.461 1.547 0.485-4.934
      DD 18 (15.3%) 1 (7.1%) 0.331 2.93 0.336-25.570
DDvs.ID+II 0.426 2.34 0.288-19.012
   I allele 143 (60.6%) 20 (71.4%) reference
   D allele 93 (39.4%) 8 (28.6%) 0.268 1.626 0.688-3.844
Female 164 0
      II 69 (42.1%) 0 Reference
      ID 69 (42.1%) 0 - - -
      DD 26 (15.9) 0 - - -
DDvs.ID+II - - -
   I allele 207 (63.1%) 0 Reference
   D allele 121 (36.9%) 0 - - -
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. LUAD group versus SCC group.
Table 7. Correlations of ACE1 rs4646994 genotype polymorphism with EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma according to gender.
Table 7. Correlations of ACE1 rs4646994 genotype polymorphism with EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma according to gender.
Gender Genotype EGFR+ EGFR- p-Value OR 95% CI
/allele (n=75) (n=62)
Male 29 32
      II 10 (34.5%) 11 (34.4%) Reference
      ID 18 (62.1%) 14 (43.8%) 0.539 1.414 0.468-4.270
      DD 1 (3.4%) 7 (21.9%) 0.109 0.157 0.016-1.511
DDvs.ID+II 0.062 0.128 0.015-1.110
   I allele 38 (65.5%) 36 (56.2%) Reference
   D allele 20 (34.5%) 28 (43.8%) 0.232 0.65 0.321-1.316
Female 46 30
      II 22 (47.8%) 11 (36.7%) Reference
      ID 19 (41.3%) 12 (40%) 0.654 0.792 0.285-2.202
      DD 5 (10.9%) 7 (23.3z%) 0.137 0.357 0.092-1.387
DDvs.ID+II 0.154 0.401 0.114-1.407
   I allele 63 (68.5%) 34 (56.7%) Reference
   D allele 29 (31.5%) 26 (43.3%) 0.14 0.602 0.307-1.181
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. EGFR+ group versus EGFR- group.
Table 8. Correlations of genotype polymorphism in ACE1 rs4646994 and lung cancer risk in patients with pulmonary nodules according to age.
Table 8. Correlations of genotype polymorphism in ACE1 rs4646994 and lung cancer risk in patients with pulmonary nodules according to age.
Age Genotype Case Control p-Value OR    95% CI
   /allele (n=300) (n=100)
45    48    17
      II 20 (41.7%) 7 (41.2%) Reference
      ID 21 (43.8) 9 (52.9%) 0.733 0.817 0.255-2.611
      DD 7 (14.6) 1 (5.9%) 0.438 2.45 0.254-23.601
DD vs.ID+II 0.365 2.732 0.311-24.009
   I allele 201 (63.8%) 50 (61.0%) Reference
   D allele 114 (36.2%) 32 (39.0%) 0.636 0.886 0.538-1.461
>45    252    83
      II 101 (40.1%) 34 (41.0%) Reference
      ID 111 (44.0%) 44 (53.0%) 0.54 0.849 0.504-1.432
      DD 40 (15.9%) 5 (6%) 0.054 2.693 0.983-7.377
DD vs.ID+II 0.028 2.943 1.121-7.728
   I allele 313 (62.1%) 112 (67.5%) Reference
   D allele 191 (37.9%) 54 (32.5%) 0.214 1.266 0.873-1.835
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. Case group versus control group.
Table 9. Correlations of genotype polymorphism in ACE1 rs4646994 with histological types of SCC and LUAU according to age.
Table 9. Correlations of genotype polymorphism in ACE1 rs4646994 with histological types of SCC and LUAU according to age.
Age Genotype LUAD SCC p-Value OR    95% CI
/allele (n=282) (n=14)
45    48    0
      II 20 (41.7%)    0 Reference
      ID 21 (43.8%)    0 - -       -
      DD 7 (14.6%)    0 - -       -
DD vs.ID+II    -    - - -       -
   I allele 61 (63.5%)    0 Reference
   D allele 35 (36.5%)    0 - -       -
>45    234    14
      II 92 (39.3%) 7 (50%) Reference
      ID 105 (44.9%) 6 (42.9%) 0.618 1.332 0.432-4.105
      DD 37 (15.8%) 1 (7.1%) 0.341 2.815 0.335-23.684
DD vs.ID+II 0.397 2.442 0.310-19.235
   I allele 289 (61.8%) 20 (71.4%) Reference
   D allele 179 (38.2%) 8 (28.6%) 0.308 1.548 0.668-3.590
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.LUAD group versus SCC group.
Table 10. Correlations of ACE1 rs4646994 genotype polymorphism with EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma according to age.
Table 10. Correlations of ACE1 rs4646994 genotype polymorphism with EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma according to age.
Age Genotype EGFR+ EGFR- p-Value OR 95% CI
   /allele (n=75) (n=62)
45 9 10
      II 4 (44.4%) 3 (30%) Reference
      ID 5 (55.6%) 4 (40%) 0.949 0.938 0.128-6.875
      DD 0 3 (30%) 0.999 0 0
DD vs.ID+II 0.999 0 0
   I allele 13 (72.2%) 10 (50%) Reference
   D allele 5 (27.8%) 10 (50%) 0.166 0.385 0.099-1.489
>45 66 52
      II 28 (42.4%) 19 (36.5%) Reference
      ID 32 (48.5%) 22 (42.3%) 0.974 0.987 0.445-2.188
      DD 6 (9.1%) 11 (21.2%) 0.091 0.37 0.117-1.172
DD vs.ID+II 0.071 0.373 0.128-1.088
   I allele 88 (66.7%) 60 (57.7%) Reference
   D allele 44 (33.3%) 44 (42.3%) 0.158 0.682 0.401-1.160
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. EGFR+ group versus EGFR- group.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated