Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Assessment of the Prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis in Dual Purpose Livestock System of Colombian Orinoquia: On-Farm Diagnostic Tests Comparison

Version 1 : Received: 23 April 2023 / Approved: 25 April 2023 / Online: 25 April 2023 (08:35:22 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Arcesio Salamanca-Carreño, Mauricio Vélez-Terranova, Rita Tamasaukas, Raúl Jáuregui-Jiménez, Pere M. Parés-Casanova & José N. Arias-Landazábal (2023) Assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia, Journal of Applied Animal Research, 51:1, 599-607, DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2023.2256829 Arcesio Salamanca-Carreño, Mauricio Vélez-Terranova, Rita Tamasaukas, Raúl Jáuregui-Jiménez, Pere M. Parés-Casanova & José N. Arias-Landazábal (2023) Assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis through two on-farm tests in dual-purpose livestock system of Colombian Orinoquia, Journal of Applied Animal Research, 51:1, 599-607, DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2023.2256829

Abstract

The assessment of the prevalence of Subclinical Mastitis (SCM) in dairy farms is essential to validate the health status of the mammary gland. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of SCM in dual purpose livestock systems in Arauca, Colombian Orinoquia, through the analysis of the values found by the field diagnostic tests California Mastitis Test (CMT) and Electric Conductivity (EC). Milk samples were taken from the individual mammary quarters of 481 cows. The general prevalence, per affected room and the total number of rooms was determined according to the values obtained for each test using two methods of analysis. An ANOVA was performed to determine the difference between prevalence’s, a correlation analysis, and an analysis of sensitivity and specificity. The general prevalence was similar between the tests (CMT = 31.4%; EC = 29.7%) (p > 0.05). The prevalence of the total quarters was lower with EC (11.3% vs 14.2%) (p < 0.05). The correlations between tests were significant, but with low values (rs = 0.20-0.25). CMT and EC test concordance showed a sensitivity between 0.35-0.45 and a specificity of 0.75-0.90. The two tests showed positive results in detecting the same animals with or without the presence of the infection, although some animals that were positive for one test were not positive for the other test. The test EC classified animals and their quarters as SCM positive or negative in a more similar way to that obtained with CMT. The two diagnostic tests showed a general low prevalence of SCM in the livestock systems evaluated.

Keywords

hand milking; inflammation; public health; udder health

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Zoology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.