Submitted:
23 April 2023
Posted:
24 April 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Data Acquisition and Processing
2.1. Types of surface defects on shield tunnel
2.2. Testing technology and equipment
2.3. Data Processing
2.4. Test results
2.4.1. Cross-section deformation
2.4.2. Segment dislocation
2.4.3. Water leakage
2.4.4. Spalling defects
3. Defect Association Analysis
3.1. Introduction to Apriori algorithm
3.1.1. Support count
3.1.2. Association rules and calculation process
3.2. Defect Association Calculation
3.2.1. Calculation of support degree of defects
3.2.2. Frequent itemset Determination
3.2.3. Confidence Calculation
3.3. Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhao, S.; Shadabfar, M.; Zhang, D.; Chen, J.; Huang, H. Deep learning-based classification and instance segmentation of leakage-area and scaling images of shield tunnel linings. Struct. Control. Heal. Monit. 2021, 28, e2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attard, L.; Debono, C.J.; Valentino, G.; Di Castro, M. Tunnel inspection using photogrammetric techniques and image processing: A review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 2018, 144, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, Q.; Zhu, L.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Z. Automatic subway tunnel crack detection system based on line scan camera. Struct. Control. Heal. Monit. 2021, 28, e2776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D. Duan. W. Qiu, Y. D. Duan. W. Qiu, Y. Cheng, “Reconstruction of shield tunnel lining using point cloud,” Automation in Construction, vol. 130, Article ID 103860, 2021.
- Sánchez-Rodríguez, B. Riveiro, M. Soilán, “Automated detection and decomposition of railway tunnels from Mobile Laser Scanning Datasets,” Automation in Construction, vol. 96, pp. 171–179, 2018.
- Tan, K.; Cheng, X.; Ju, Q.; Wu, S. Correction of Mobile TLS Intensity Data for Water Leakage Spots Detection in Metro Tunnels. IEEE Geosci. Remote. Sens. Lett. 2016, 13, 1711–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- T. Asakura and Y. Kojima, “Tunnel maintenance in Japan,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 161–169, 2003.
- Afshani, A.; Kawakami, K.; Konishi, S.; Akagi, H. Study of infrared thermal application for detecting defects within tunnel lining. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2019, 86, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Fu, H.; Chen, W.; Zhang, J.; Huang, H. Damage detection and quantitative analysis of shield tunnel structure. Autom. Constr. 2018, 94, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.; Xie, Q.; Gong, X.; Yu, Z.; Xu, J.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J. Automatic defect detection of metro tunnel surfaces using a vision-based inspection system. Adv. Eng. Informatics 2020, 47, 101206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.; Sun, Y.; Xue, Y.; Wang, F. Inspection equipment study for subway tunnel defects by grey-scale image processing. Adv. Eng. Informatics 2017, 32, 188–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Y. Xue, P. Y. Xue, P. Shi, F. Jia, “3D reconstruction and automatic leakage defect quantification of metro tunnel based on SfM-Deep learning method,” Underground Space, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 311–323, 2022.
- Xue, Y.; Li, Y. A Fast Detection Method via Region-Based Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Shield Tunnel Lining Defects. Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2018, 33, 638–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.-W.; Li, Q.-T.; Zhang, D.-M. Deep learning based image recognition for crack and leakage defects of metro shield tunnel. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2018, 77, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.; Zhang, D.M.; Huang, H.W. Deep learning–based image instance segmentation for moisture marks of shield tunnel lining. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2019, 95, 103156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Yang, H. Vision Measurement of Tunnel Structures with Robust Modelling and Deep Learning Algorithms. Sensors 2020, 20, 4945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, M.; Cheng, W.; Huang, H.; Chen, J. A Novel Approach to Automated 3D Spalling Defects Inspection in Railway Tunnel Linings Using Laser Intensity and Depth Information. Sensors 2021, 21, 5725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, T.; Xu, L.; Li, X.; Yao, J. Detection of Water Leakage in Underground Tunnels Using Corrected Intensity Data and 3D Point Cloud of Terrestrial Laser Scanning. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 32471–32480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, C.; Lu, D.; Xie, Q.; Xu, J.; Wang, J. Tunnel Deformation Inspection via Global Spatial Axis Extraction from 3D Raw Point Cloud. Sensors 2020, 20, 6815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fahmy, M.; Moselhi, O. Automated Detection and Location of Leaks in Water Mains Using Infrared Photography. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 2010, 24, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, T.; Zhu, A.; Chen, Y. Efficient Crack Detection Method for Tunnel Lining Surface Cracks Based on Infrared Images. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 2017, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konishi, S.; Kawakami, K.; Taguchi, M. Inspection Method with Infrared Thermometry for Detect Void in Subway Tunnel Lining. Procedia Eng. 2016, 165, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, H.; Ren, X.; Mao, Q.; Hu, Q.; Wang, W. Shield subway tunnel deformation detection based on mobile laser scanning. Autom. Constr. 2019, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Wang, S.; Mei, X.; Yin, W.; Lin, C.; Hu, Q.; Mao, Q. Railway Tunnel Clearance Inspection Method Based on 3D Point Cloud from Mobile Laser Scanning. Sensors 2017, 17, 2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, S.; Zhong, J.; Hao, P.; Zhang, W.; Chen, J.; Lei, Y.; Schneider, A. Mining multiple association rules in LTPP database: An analysis of asphalt pavement thermal cracking distress. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 191, 837–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]













| Defect type | Support Degree S1 | Support Degree S2 | Support Degree S3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dislocation | 33.33% | 30.30% | 23.53% |
| Water leakage | 53.85% | 69.70% | 91.60% |
| Spalling | 46.15% | 33.33% | 6.72% |
| Dislocation, Water leakage | 20.51% | 10.61% | 15.13% |
| Dislocation, Spalling | 12.82% | 12.12% | 4.20% |
| Water leakage, Spalling | 7.69% | 13.64% | 6.72% |
| Dislocation, Water leakage, Spalling | 5.13% | 4.54% | 4.20% |
| Frequent one term set | Section 1 | Section 2 | Section 3 |
| Dislocation | 13 | 20 | 28 |
| Water leakage | 21 | 46 | 109 |
| Spalling | 18 | 22 | 8 |
| Frequent binomial set | Section 1 | Section 2 | Section 3 |
| Dislocation, Water leakage | 8 | 7 | 18 |
| Water leakage, Spalling | 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Dislocation, Spalling | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Frequent trinomial set | Section 1 | Section 2 | Section 3 |
| Dislocation, Water leakage, Spalling | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Defect type | Confidence S1 | Confidence S2 | Confidence S3 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water leakage → Dislocation | 38.10% | 15.22% | 16.51% | 23.28% |
| Water leakage → Spalling | 14.28% | 17.39% | 7.34% | 13.00% |
| Dislocation → Spalling | 38.46% | 45.00% | 17.86% | 33.77% |
| Dislocation → Water leakage | 61.54% | 35.00% | 64.29% | 53.61% |
| Spalling → Dislocation | 27.78% | 40.91% | 62.50% | 43.73% |
| Spalling → Water leakage | 16.67% | 36.36% | 100% | 51.01% |
| Dislocation, Spalling → Water leakage | 40.00% | 33.33% | 100% | 57.78% |
| Water leakage, Spalling → Dislocation | 66.67% | 37.50% | 62.50% | 55.56% |
| Dislocation, Water leakage → Spalling | 25.00% | 42.86% | 27.78% | 31.88% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).