Submitted:
21 April 2023
Posted:
23 April 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethical Approval
2.2. Animals farm and feeding
2.3. Research design
2.4. Measurements.
2.4.1. Measurement Equipment
2.4.2. Duration of measurements
2.4.3. Statistical analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hogeveen, H.; Klaas, I.C.; Dalen, G.; Honig, H.; Zecconi, A.; Kelton, D.F.; Sánchez Mainar, M. Novel Ways to Use Sensor Data to Improve Mastitis Management. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 11317–11332. [CrossRef]
- Rollin, E.; Dhuyvetter, K.C.; Overton, M.W. The Cost of Clinical Mastitis in the First 30 Days of Lactation: An Economic Modeling Tool. Prev. Vet. Med. 2015, 122, 257–264. [CrossRef]
- van Loo, I.; Huijsdens, X.; Tiemersma, E.; de Neeling, A.; van de Sande-Bruinsma, N.; Beaujean, D.; Voss, A.; Kluytmans, J. Emergence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus of Animal Origin in Humans. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2007, 13, 1834–1839. [CrossRef]
- Blowey, R.W.; Edmondson, P. Mastitis Control in Dairy Herds; CABI, 2010; ISBN 978-1-84593-751-5.
- Bradley, A.J. Bovine Mastitis: An Evolving Disease. Vet. J. 2002, 164, 116–128. [CrossRef]
- Levison, L.J.; Miller-Cushon, E.K.; Tucker, A.L.; Bergeron, R.; Leslie, K.E.; Barkema, H.W.; DeVries, T.J. Incidence Rate of Pathogen-Specific Clinical Mastitis on Conventional and Organic Canadian Dairy Farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 1341–1350. [CrossRef]
- Dore, S.; Liciardi, M.; Amatiste, S.; Bergagna, S.; Bolzoni, G.; Caligiuri, V.; Cerrone, A.; Farina, G.; Montagna, C.O.; Saletti, M.A.; et al. Survey on Small Ruminant Bacterial Mastitis in Italy, 2013–2014. Small Rumin. Res. 2016, 141, 91–93. [CrossRef]
- Guimarães, J.L.B.; Brito, M.A.V.P.; Lange, C.C.; Silva, M.R.; Ribeiro, J.B.; Mendonça, L.C.; Mendonça, J.F.M.; Souza, G.N. Estimate of the Economic Impact of Mastitis: A Case Study in a Holstein Dairy Herd under Tropical Conditions. Prev. Vet. Med. 2017, 142, 46–50. [CrossRef]
- Hennekinne, J.-A.; Ostyn, A.; Guillier, F.; Herbin, S.; Prufer, A.-L.; Dragacci, S. How Should Staphylococcal Food Poisoning Outbreaks Be Characterized? Toxins 2010, 2, 2106–2116. [CrossRef]
- Krömker, V.; Leimbach, S. Mastitis Treatment—Reduction in Antibiotic Usage in Dairy Cows. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2017, 52, 21–29. [CrossRef]
- Bell, M.J.; Tzimiropoulos, G. Novel Monitoring Systems to Obtain Dairy Cattle Phenotypes Associated With Sustainable Production. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2018, 2.
- Barkema, H.W.; von Keyserlingk, M.A.G.; Kastelic, J.P.; Lam, T.J.G.M.; Luby, C.; Roy, J.-P.; LeBlanc, S.J.; Keefe, G.P.; Kelton, D.F. Invited Review: Changes in the Dairy Industry Affecting Dairy Cattle Health and Welfare. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 7426–7445. [CrossRef]
- González, L.A.; Tolkamp, B.J.; Coffey, M.P.; Ferret, A.; Kyriazakis, I. Changes in Feeding Behavior as Possible Indicators for the Automatic Monitoring of Health Disorders in Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91, 1017–1028. [CrossRef]
- Luby, C.D.; Waldner, C.; Jelinski, M.D. Update on Demographics of the Canadian Dairy Industry for the Period 2011 to 2016. Can. Vet. J. 2020, 61, 75–78.
- Delgado, H.A.; Cue, R.I.; Haine, D.; Sewalem, A.; Lacroix, R.; Lefebvre, D.; Dubuc, J.; Bouchard, E.; Wade, K.M. Profitability Measures as Decision-Making Tools for Québec Dairy Herds. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 98, 18–31. [CrossRef]
- Liang, D.; Arnold, L.M.; Stowe, C.J.; Harmon, R.J.; Bewley, J.M. Estimating US Dairy Clinical Disease Costs with a Stochastic Simulation Model. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 1472–1486. [CrossRef]
- Fadul-Pacheco, L.; Delgado, H.; Cabrera, V.E. Exploring Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Prediction of Clinical Mastitis. Int. Dairy J. 2021, 119, 105051. [CrossRef]
- Stangaferro, M.L.; Wijma, R.; Caixeta, L.S.; Al-Abri, M.A.; Giordano, J.O. Use of Rumination and Activity Monitoring for the Identification of Dairy Cows with Health Disorders: Part III. Metritis. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 7422–7433. [CrossRef]
- Khatun, M.; Clark, C.E.F.; Lyons, N.A.; Thomson, P.C.; Kerrisk, K.L.; García, S.C. Early Detection of Clinical Mastitis from Electrical Conductivity Data in an Automatic Milking System. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2017, 57, 1226–1232. [CrossRef]
- Denwood, M.J.; Kleen, J.L.; Jensen, D.B.; Jonsson, N.N. Describing Temporal Variation in Reticuloruminal PH Using Continuous Monitoring Data. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 233–245. [CrossRef]
- Rambeaud, M.; Almeida, R.A.; Pighetti, G.M.; Oliver, S.P. Dynamics of Leukocytes and Cytokines during Experimentally Induced Streptococcus Uberis Mastitis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2003, 96, 193–205. [CrossRef]
- Tassi, R.; McNeilly, T.N.; Fitzpatrick, J.L.; Fontaine, M.C.; Reddick, D.; Ramage, C.; Lutton, M.; Schukken, Y.H.; Zadoks, R.N. Strain-Specific Pathogenicity of Putative Host-Adapted and Nonadapted Strains of Streptococcus Uberis in Dairy Cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 5129–5145. [CrossRef]
- Machado, N.A.F.; Da Costa, L.B.S.; Barbosa-Filho, J.A.D.; De Oliveira, K.P.L.; De Sampaio, L.C.; Peixoto, M.S.M.; Damasceno, F.A. Using Infrared Thermography to Detect Subclinical Mastitis in Dairy Cows in Compost Barn Systems. J. Therm. Biol. 2021, 97, 102881. [CrossRef]
- Adams, A.E.; Olea-Popelka, F.J.; Roman-Muniz, I.N. Using Temperature-Sensing Reticular Boluses to Aid in the Detection of Production Diseases in Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 1549–1555. [CrossRef]
- Abdela, N. Sub-Acute Ruminal Acidosis (SARA) and Its Consequence in Dairy Cattle: A Review of Past and Recent Research at Global Prospective. Achiev. Life Sci. 2016, 10, 187–196. [CrossRef]
- Kleen, J.L.; Cannizzo, C. Incidence, Prevalence and Impact of SARA in Dairy Herds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 172, 4–8. [CrossRef]
- Levit, H.; Pinto, S.; Amon, T.; Gershon, E.; Kleinjan-Elazary, A.; Bloch, V.; Ben Meir, Y.A.; Portnik, Y.; Jacoby, S.; Arnin, A.; et al. Dynamic Cooling Strategy Based on Individual Animal Response Mitigated Heat Stress in Dairy Cows. Animal 2021, 15, 100093. [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez, Z.; Kolar, Q.K.; Krogstad, K.C.; Swartz, T.H.; Yoon, I.; Bradford, B.J.; Ruegg, P.L. Evaluation of Reticuloruminal Temperature for the Prediction of Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Cows Challenged with Streptococcus Uberis. J. Dairy Sci. 2022. [CrossRef]
- Antanaitis, R.; Juozaitienė, V.; Jonike, V.; Baumgartner, W.; Paulauskas, A. Subclinical Mastitis Detected during the Last Gestation Period Can Increase the Risk of Stillbirth in Dairy Calves. Animals 2022, 12, 1394. [CrossRef]
- Antanaitis, R.; Juozaitienė, V.; Malašauskienė, D.; Televičius, M.; Urbutis, M.; Rutkaukas, A.; Šertvytytė, G.; Baumgartner, W. Identification of Changes in Rumination Behavior Registered with an Online Sensor System in Cows with Subclinical Mastitis. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 454. [CrossRef]
- Castro-Costa, A.; Salama, A.A.K.; Moll, X.; Aguiló, J.; Caja, G. Using Wireless Rumen Sensors for Evaluating the Effects of Diet and Ambient Temperature in Nonlactating Dairy Goats. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 4646–4658. [CrossRef]
- Nielen, M.; Schukken, Y.H.; Brand, A.; Deluyker, H.A.; Maatje, K. Detection of Subclinical Mastitis from On-Line Milking Parlor Data. J. Dairy Sci. 1995, 78, 1039–1049. [CrossRef]
- Antanaitis, R.; Juozaitienė, V.; Jonike, V.; Baumgartner, W.; Paulauskas, A. Milk Lactose as a Biomarker of Subclinical Mastitis in Dairy Cows. Animals 2021, 11, 1736. [CrossRef]
- Yang, F.L.; Li, X.S.; He, B.X.; Yang, Z.L.; Li, G.H.; Liu, P.; Huang, Q.H.; Pan, X.M.; Li, J. Malondialdehyde Level and Some Enzymatic Activities in Subclinical Mastitis Milk. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 5534–5538. [CrossRef]
- Antanaitis, R.; Juozaitienė, V.; Malašauskienė, D.; Televičius, M. Inline Reticulorumen PH as an Indicator of Cows Reproduction and Health Status. Sensors 2020, 20, 1022. [CrossRef]
- Kamphuis, C.; Mollenhorst, H.; Heesterbeek, J. a. P.; Hogeveen, H. Data Mining to Detect Clinical Mastitis with Automatic Milking.; Wellington, New Zealand, 2010; pp. 568–572.
- Ashraf, A.; Imran, M. Causes, Types, Etiological Agents, Prevalence, Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention, Effects on Human Health and Future Aspects of Bovine Mastitis. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2020, 21, 36–49. [CrossRef]
- Kuipers, A.; Koops, W.J.; Wemmenhove, H. Antibiotic Use in Dairy Herds in the Netherlands from 2005 to 2012. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 1632–1648. [CrossRef]
- AlZahal, O.; Kebreab, E.; France, J.; McBride, B.W. A Mathematical Approach to Predicting Biological Values from Ruminal PH Measurements. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, 3777–3785. [CrossRef]
- Plaizier, J.C.; Krause, D.O.; Gozho, G.N.; McBride, B.W. Subacute Ruminal Acidosis in Dairy Cows: The Physiological Causes, Incidence and Consequences. Vet. J. 2008, 176, 21–31. [CrossRef]
- Schmitz, R.; Schnabel, K.; von Soosten, D.; Meyer, U.; Hüther, L.; Spiekers, H.; Rehage, J.; Dänicke, S. Changes of Ruminal PH, Rumination Activity and Feeding Behaviour during Early Lactation as Affected by Different Energy and Fibre Concentrations of Roughage in Pluriparous Dairy Cows. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 72, 458–477. [CrossRef]
- Heirbaut, S.; Børge Jensen, D.; Jing, X.P.; Stefańska, B.; Lutakome, P.; Vandaele, L.; Fievez, V. Different Reticuloruminal PH Metrics of High-Yielding Dairy Cattle during the Transition Period in Relation to Metabolic Health, Activity, and Feed Intake. J. Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 6880–6894. [CrossRef]
- Van Winden, S.C.L.; Jorritsma, R.; Müller, K.E.; Noordhuizen, J.P.T.M. Feed Intake, Milk Yield, and Metabolic Parameters Prior to Left Displaced Abomasum in Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86, 1465–1471. [CrossRef]
- Huzzey, J.M.; Veira, D.M.; Weary, D.M.; von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. Prepartum Behavior and Dry Matter Intake Identify Dairy Cows at Risk for Metritis. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, 3220–3233. [CrossRef]
- Lukas, J.M.; Reneau, J.K.; Wallace, R.L.; De Vries, A. A Study of Methods for Evaluating the Success of the Transition Period in Early-Lactation Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 250–262. [CrossRef]
- Antanaitis, R.; Juozaitienė, V.; Televičius, M.; Malašauskienė, D.; Urbutis, M.; Baumgartner, W. Relation of Subclinical Ketosis of Dairy Cows with Locomotion Behaviour and Ambient Temperature. Animals 2020, 10, 2311. [CrossRef]
- Bewley, J.M.; Grott, M.W.; Einstein, M.E.; Schutz, M.M. Impact of Intake Water Temperatures on Reticular Temperatures of Lactating Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91, 3880–3887. [CrossRef]
- Puerto, M.A.; Shepley, E.; Cue, R.I.; Warner, D.; Dubuc, J.; Vasseur, E. The Hidden Cost of Disease: I. Impact of the First Incidence of Mastitis on Production and Economic Indicators of Primiparous Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 7932–7943. [CrossRef]
- Antanaitis, R.; Žilaitis, V.; Kucinskas, A.; Juozaitienė, V.; Leonauskaite, K. Changes in Cow Activity, Milk Yield, and Milk Conductivity before Clinical Diagnosis of Ketosis, and Acidosis. Vet. Ir Zootech. 2015, 70, 3–9.
- Siivonen, J.; Taponen, S.; Hovinen, M.; Pastell, M.; Lensink, B.J.; Pyörälä, S.; Hänninen, L. Impact of Acute Clinical Mastitis on Cow Behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011, 132, 101–106. [CrossRef]
- Antanaitis, R.; Zilaitis, V.; Juozaitiene, V.; Stoskus, R.; Televicius, M. Changes in Reticulorumen Content Temperature and PH According to Time of Day and Yearly Seasons. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2016, 19. [CrossRef]
- Fogsgaard, K.K.; Bennedsgaard, T.W.; Herskin, M.S. Behavioral Changes in Freestall-Housed Dairy Cows with Naturally Occurring Clinical Mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 1730–1738. [CrossRef]
- Johnson, R.W. The Concept of Sickness Behavior: A Brief Chronological Account of Four Key Discoveries. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2002, 87, 443–450. [CrossRef]







| Group | pH | Temperature | Walking activity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investigated a (n=25) |
5.70±0.009*** b | 39.36±0.011* b | 5.47±0.027*** b |
| Controlled b (n=75) |
6.15±0,038*** a | 38.87±0,020 * a | 6.62±0.112*** a |
| Indicators | Groups of investigation | B | S.E. | Wald | df | p-value | OR: odds ratio (95% CI for OR) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | pH value: first group <6.22 second group >6.22 |
0.191 | 0.093 | 4.281 | 1 | 0.039 | 1.211 (1.010-1.452) |
| Activity | pH value: first group <6.22 second group >6.22 |
0.670 | 0.073 | 84.609 | 1 | p<0.001 | 1.954 (1.694-2.253 |
| Constant | -13.391 | 3.465 | 14.935 | 1 | p<0.001 | 0.000 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).