Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Hexavalent Chromium Induces Infertility in Rats by Elevating Oxidative Stress, DNA Double-Strand Breaks, Microtubule Disruption, and Aberrant Segregation of Chromosomes in the Metaphase-II Oocytes

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

21 April 2023

Posted:

21 April 2023

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Environmental and occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), causes female reproductive failures and infertility. Cr(VI) is used in more than 50 industries and is a group-A carcinogen, mutagenic and teratogenic, and a male and female reproductive toxicant. Our previous findings indicate that Cr(VI) causes follicular atresia, trophoblast cell apoptosis, and mitochondrial dysfunction in metaphase II (MII) oocytes. However, the integrated molecular mechanism of Cr(VI)-induced oocyte defects are not understood. The current study investigates the mechanism of Cr(VI) in causing meiotic disruption of MII oocytes, leading to infertility in superovulated rats. Postnatal day (PND)-22 rats were treated with potassium dichromate (1 and 5 ppm) in drinking water from PND 22-29 and superovulated. MII oocytes were analyzed by immunofluorescence, and images were captured by confocal microscopy and quantified by Image Pro Plus software. Our data showed that Cr(VI) increased microtubule misalignment, missegregation of chromosomes, a bulged and folded actin cap, oxidative DNA and protein damage, increased DNA double-strand break, and DNA repair protein RAD51. Cr(VI) also induced incomplete cytokinesis and delayed polar body extrusion. Our study indicates that exposure to environmentally relevant doses of Cr(VI) caused severe DNA damage, distorted oocyte cytoskeletal proteins, and caused oxidative DNA and protein damage leading to infertility.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Females are born with a finite supply of oocytes, and it is critical that healthy oocytes are maintained throughout reproductive life to ensure successful ovulation, fertilization, and embryonic development [2]. Various external factors, including exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) such as heavy metals, plasticizers, pesticides, ionizing radiation, and chemotherapeutic agents, have adverse effects on genomic integrity and health of the oocytes [3,4]. Studies in mouse models, mammalian cells, and other model organisms have provided important insights into the pathogenesis of human diseases related to defects in genome maintenance [5]. Many factors involved in genome maintenance play crucial roles during embryonic development as well as later in life. Mutations in genes involved in DNA replication, repair, and checkpoint pathways underlie several genetically inherited disorders [5]. Therefore, rapid detection and repair of damaged DNA determine good oocyte quality. Failure of proper and timely DNA damage repair leads to defective oocytes with aneuploidy, embryo lethality, or birth defects [5]. Several studies have used microarrays to profile RNA expression in germinal vesical (GV) oocytes, metaphase II (MII) stage oocytes, and embryos in mice and humans [2]. DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are considered to be the most toxic of the DNA damage types, as they can cause genomic rearrangements and structural changes, such as deletions, translocations, and fusions in the DNA, which typically result in loss of cellular function or viability of the oocytes [3].
Interestingly, components from all DNA repair pathways, including direct lesion reversal, base excision repair (BER), mismatch repair (MMR), nucleotide excision repair (NER), homologous recombination (HR), and non-homologous end-joining repair (NHEJ) are represented in mouse, monkey and human MII oocytes, and embryos [2]. Base excision repair (BER) is the primary DNA repair pathway that corrects base lesions arising from oxidative, alkylation, deamination, and depurination /depyrimidination damage [6]. Phosphorylation of histone H2AX on serine 139 (γ-H2AX) is the most recognized assay to measure the DNA damage, offering an initial indication for cell death, and each γ-H2AX focus represents an individual DNA DSB [7]. Oocytes exposed to EDCs such as glyphosate and methoxychlor increased γ-H2AX foci, compromising DNA integrity and inducing cytotoxicity [8,9].
Reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as free radicals and oxidants, react with different components of DNA and modify the base [2]. The imbalance between ROS formation and enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants (AOXs) leads to various diseases, cancer, and male and female infertility [10]. Exposure to EDCs, ionizing radiation, and smoking leads to oxidative stress [11]. Excessive oxidative stress results in oxidative DNA damage, and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) is a well-known biomarker of oxidative DNA damage [12]. An increase in 8-OHdG may reflect oxidative DNA damage and can indicate a decline in the DNA repair rate [13]. Aging increases 8-OHdG production in the ovary of mice and is associated with infertility [14]. Even though ROS is involved in female infertility [15], the mechanism of ROS in damaging oocyte DNA and microtubule disruption is an understudied area of research. A recent study in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) demonstrated that elevated levels of the AOX catalase in the follicular fluid favored successful fertilization and live birth and had a positive IVF outcome [16]. Our previous study in rats reported that Cr(VI) induced follicular atresia by downregulating AOXs GPx1, SOD-1 and -2, catalase, PRDX3, and TXN-2 in the antral follicles, which was mitigated by supplementing resveratrol to Cr(VI)-exposed rats [17].
Superoxide radical in the presence of cellular nitric oxide (NO) forms peroxynitrite (ONOO), which in turn nitrates tyrosine residues forming nitrotyrosine (NTY), leading to changes in protein structure and function [18]. Oxidative damage to protein is characterized by structural modification of side chains by ROS, including oxidation of sulfhydryl groups, oxidative adducts on amino acid residues near metal-binding sites, cross-linking, unfolding, and protein fragmentation. Direct ROS attack on the amino acid side chains of proline, arginine, lysine, and threonine results in protein carbonyl formation, which eventually changes the tertiary structure of a protein and results in alterations of protein function [19]. Our previous study showed that Cr accumulation in the human placenta is associated with increased levels of NTY [20]. However, the role of NTY in altering the protein structure of the oocytes is largely unknown.
Hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), is one of eight metals in the top 50 priority list for toxic substances by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry [21]. Increased usage and improper disposal of chromium waste into the environment increases Cr contamination in the water, air, and soil [22]. A recent report by Environment Texas reported the discharge of Cr waste into Calaveras Lake, San Antonio, Texas, posing a potential risk to public health [23]. Leather tanning industries contribute to the extreme Cr contamination in South East Asia, risking the workers to various health hazards [24]. Environmental and health advocates indicated that the Cr contamination in Calaveras Lake threatens the health of anglers, boaters, and people who eat fish from the lake [23]. Chromate workers from Painesville, Ohio, reported having a reduction in lung cancer incidence from 1940-1965 when Cr content in the air was reduced from 270 mg/m3 to 39 mg/m3 [25]. In addition, environmental exposure of women living in Willits, California to Cr(VI) caused adverse health effects, abortions, pregnancy complications, and infertility in the mothers (direct exposure) and their daughters (in utero exposure) [26]. Even though the genotoxic effects of Cr(VI) in lung cancer have been well established, Cr(VI)-induced genotoxicity in the oocytes is unknown. Our recent study indicated that exposure to Cr(VI) in young rats caused infertility by disrupting cytoskeletal machinery and mitochondrial function, resulting in dysmorphic oocytes [1].
Oocytes undergo meiotic maturation before fertilization. In mammals, the process is initiated with the breakdown of the nuclear envelope and the formation of a bipolar microtubule spindle in the center of the egg that undergoes a series of dynamic reconfigurations to capture, sort, and align the chromosomes to the equatorial plate [27]. Under the active guidance and control of cytoplasmic actin, the spindle is positioned to the cortex, resulting in the first polar body (PB1) extrusion. Failures in the dynamics of cytoskeletal proteins, mainly F-actin, frequently lead to chromosome misdistributions and abnormal embryo development, causing infertility, miscarriages, and congenital diseases in humans. The increased risk for aneuploidy is associated with the unstable nature of the meiotic spindle and aberrant chromosome attachments occurring during spindle assembly [28]. These critical features of meiosis in mammalian oocytes and how they are modified by EDCs are unclear. The role of actin within the spindle during oocyte maturation remains poorly understood. The close association of F-actin and microtubules at the spindle implies a functional interdependence between the two systems for proper spindle function [27]. Disturbance in the orchestration of cytoskeletal machinery will result in aneuploidy.
Aneuploidy is a significant factor contributing to implantation failure and early miscarriage in human embryos. More than half of human embryos are affected by aneuploidy, resulting in miscarriage or birth defects [29]. X chromosome aneuploidy predisposes humans to autoimmune diseases, cancer, primary biliary cirrhosis, congenital defects, and genetic disorders such as X-chromosome monosomy, Turner's syndrome, Down syndrome, and progeroid pathologies [30]. Exposure to EDCs is associated with oocyte aneuploidy due to chromosome missegregation and microtubule defects [9,31,32,33]. EDCs such as phthalates and BPA induce aneuploidy during oocyte meiosis [34,35]. However, the molecular mechanism of Cr(VI) in causing chromosome missegregation during meiosis is not clearly understood. Therefore, the current study hypothesizes that exposure to environmentally relevant doses of Cr(VI) accelerates oxidative stress leading to DNA double strand breaks, and abnormal F-actin dynamics causing defective microtubule alignment, rendering poor quality oocytes in superovulated rats.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Chemicals

The chemicals used in these studies were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO), ABCAM Inc. (Boston, MA), Fisher Scientific Company LLC (Houston, Texas), or Life Technologies Cooperation (Carlsbad, CA) unless stated otherwise.

2.2. Animals and treatments

Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Houston, Texas), maintained in AAALAC-approved animal facilities with a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle at 23 - 25 °C, and fed with Teklad 4% mouse/rat diet and water ad libitum. Animal Use Protocols were performed following the National Institute of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and with standards established by Guiding Principles in the Use of Animals in Toxicology and specific guidelines and standards of the Society for the Study of Reproduction and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Texas A&M University. Postnatal day (PND) 22 female rats were divided into three groups: Control (n = 20), Cr(VI)- 1 ppm (n = 20), and Cr(VI)- 5 ppm (n = 20) for the metaphase II (MII) oocytes collection. Control rats received regular drinking water, and Cr(VI) treated groups received 1.0 ppm or 5.0 ppm potassium dichromate in drinking water from PND 22-28.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has established a non-enforceable Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) and an enforceable Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for total chromium in drinking water systems. The USEPA MCLG and MCL are identical, set at 100 μg/L (100 ppb) for total chromium [36]. As of July 2011, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) of the California Environmental Protection Agency established a Public Health Goal (PHG) specific to hexavalent chromium at 0.02 μg/L [36]. According to the FDA, the bottled drinking water's total chromium concentration should not exceed 100µg/L [37]. However, groundwater from Midland, Texas, contains 5.28 ppm Cr (5280 µg/L) [38]. A large population in the US is potentially consuming drinking water with high Cr(VI) levels; therefore, Cr(VI)-induced infertility in females needs to be thoroughly studied in the light of human exposure level of Cr(VI).

2.3. Superovulation and oocyte collection

Superovulation and oocytes collection was performed as we recently described [1]. Briefly, Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to Cr(VI) for seven days prior to intraperitoneal (i.p) injection with 10 IU of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin. After 48 h, rats were injected with 10 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and 14-15 h later, the rats were euthanized and oocytes collected for various analyses.

2.4. Immunocytochemistry of γ-H2AX, RAD 51, 8-OHdG, nitrotyrosine, and microtubules

For immunofluorescence staining, cumulus-oocyte complexes were pulled out from the ampulla region of the superovulated rat oviduct into 1mg/ml hyaluronidase to remove the surrounding cumulus cells from the oocytes. Cumulus cell-free oocytes were fixed in the 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and transferred to the permeabilization solution (containing 0.3% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) + 0.1% Tween-20 + 0.01% Triton X-100) for 20 min [1]. After fixation, oocytes were incubated with a blocking buffer (Invitrogen™) for 1 hour. For γ-H2AX staining, oocytes from each group were incubated in the recombinant Alexa Fluor® 647 anti-gamma H2AX (phospho S139) antibody [EP854(2)Y] (ab195189; 1:200 dilution) for 1 hour at room temperature (RT). Oocytes were next stained for the microtubules by incubating with mouse monoclonal anti-α-tubulin–FITC antibody (clone DM1A, purified from hybridoma cell culture, diluted 1:200 with blocking buffer, Sigma, St. Louise, MO; Catalog No. F2168) at RT for 1 hour. After three washes with 0.3% PVP washing media, the oocytes from each group were stained for F-actin by incubating with 1 μg/ml of phalloidin-tetramethylrhodamine (rhodamine phalloidin; Catalog No. R415; Invitrogen, Waltham, MA) at RT for 30 min. After 3 washes in the 0.3% PVP, oocytes were transferred into a small drop of prolong antifade mounting medium containing 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) on a microscope slide and covered with a coverslip. For RAD 51, 8-OHdG, and nitrotyrosine (NTY) staining, oocytes were incubated with primary antibodies in the blocking buffer overnight, washed three times in the washing buffer, and transferred to the corresponding secondary antibodies at RT for 1 hour and stained for microtubules and F-actin. After three washes in the 0.3% PVP washing media, the oocytes were transferred into a small drop of prolong antifade mounting medium containing DAPI on a glass slide and covered with a coverslip. The confocal images were captured with a Zeiss LSM 780 microscope. The intensity of staining for 8-OHdG, NTY, γ-H2AX, and RAD51 was quantified using Image-ProPlus 6.3 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc.; Bethesda, MD) and expressed as Integrated Optical Density (IOD), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

2.5. Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey posttest pair-wise comparison was used to detect the statistical significances from the mean of all the quantitative data analyzed for control, Cr 1 ppm, and Cr 5 ppm using statistical software Sigmaplot 14.5 (Systat Software Inc., Chicago, IL). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Exposure to Cr(VI) distorted the microtubule structure and chromosome arrangement in metaphase II oocytes.

Healthy oocytes from the MII phase carry symmetrical and barrel shaped microtubules with proper chromosome alignment in the metaphase plate. Compromised chromosome alignment and disrupted microtubule architecture are detrimental to the oocytes, increasing the risk of abortion or birth defects in children. Our recent findings showed that Cr(VI) caused infertility by adversely targeting the mitochondrial function and the F-actin network of the MII oocytes [1]. Strikingly, current data showed that exposure to 1 ppm or 5 ppm Cr(VI) resulted in severely misaligned chromosomes with highly disrupted microtubules in various shapes and patterns (Figures 1 & 2). While oocytes from the control group exhibited healthy bipolar oocytes, the Cr(VI)-exposed oocytes exhibited various abnormal phenotypes in terms of microtubule shapes and chromosome distribution. Exposure to Cr(VI) distorted the microtubule orientation and chromosome distribution, presenting the microtubules in various abnormal patterns such as non-polar, uneven polar, distorted, bulged bipolar (Figure 1), unfocused, tripolar, bulged bipolar, and asymmetric multipolar with misaligned chromosomes (Figure 2). Cr(VI) significantly (p<0.05) increased the percentage of abnormal microtubules (Figure 3A), and the abnormal microtubule structure was accompanied by thickened and highly folded peripheral oocyte F-actin with abundant expression (Figure 3B).

3.2. Exposure to Cr(VI) delayed polar body extrusion resulted in incomplete cytokinesis in the MII oocytes

The actin cap serves as the gateway for PB1 extrusion and strictly eliminates haploid chromosomes with minimum extrusion of the oocyte cytoplasm [39]. Our data showed that Cr(VI) increased F-actin accumulation in the MII oocytes, resulting in folded and thickened actin cap (Figure 4F & N), accompanied by incomplete cytokinesis and a delay in PB extrusion (Figure 4H & P).

3.3. Exposure to Cr(VI) increased oxidative DNA damage in the MII oocytes

8-OHdG is a biomarker for oxidative DNA damage [40]. As shown in Figure 5, exposure to Cr(VI) at a dose of 1 or 5 ppm increased 8-OHdG levels in the MII oocytes compared to the control. An accelerated rate of 8-OHdG excision and migration towards the periphery of the oocytes (extracellular release) under Cr(VI) exposure suggests an upregulation of the base excision repair pathway (Figure 5A-J), as suggested by a previous study in MII oocytes exposed to H2O2 [41].

3.4. Exposure to Cr(VI) increased oxidative protein damage in the MII oocytes

Nitrotyrosine is a biomarker for oxidative protein damage [14]. Our previous study showed increased NTY levels in the human placenta with elevated Cr burden [20]. To examine whether Cr(VI) causes oxidative damage to protein in the MII oocytes, we determined NTY levels. As depicted in Figure 6, exposure to Cr(VI) at 1 and 5 ppm doses increased NTY levels in the MII oocytes compared to the control. However, 1 ppm Cr(VI) caused maximum expression of NTY compared to 5 ppm (Figure 6M).

3.5. Exposure to Cr(VI) increased DNA double strand breaks in the MII oocytes

Cr(VI) is reduced to Cr(III) intracellularly by cellular reductants [42], and Cr(III) forms Cr(III)-DNA adducts [42]. Cr(III) forms bulky Cr-DNA and Cr-protein adducts and crosslinks, leading to replication fork stalling and DNA double strand breaks [37]. Therefore, we determined DNA double strand break marker γH2AX in MII oocytes. Cr(VI) significantly (p<0.05) increased γH2AX expression in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 7).

3.6. Exposure to Cr(VI) increased RAD51 expression in the MII oocytes

RAD51, a multifunctional protein, plays a central role in DSB repair and replication fork processing [43]. Since Cr(VI) increased DNA DSB, we examined RAD51 expression in the MII oocytes. Our data show that exposure to 1 ppm and 5 ppm Cr(VI) increased the expression of RAD51 in the MII oocytes dose-dependently (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

Female fertility has declined over the past half-century [44]. Several factors contribute to the decline, including genetic, lifestyle, and exposure to EDCs, i.e., natural or synthetic exogenous compounds that interfere with the physiology of normal endocrine-regulated events such as reproduction and growth [45]. A recent study reported thirteen EDCs in human follicular fluid samples with the highest concentrations of nonylphenol and insecticide mirex [46]. Previous findings showed a clear linear correlation between EDC concentration and a reduced maturation and fertilization rate for polychlorinated biphenyls, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, nonylphenol, and mirex. Studies from animal models revealed adverse effects of chronic EDC exposure during the resumption of meiosis I or II, thus limiting the process of oocyte maturation and fertilization [47,48]. Most EDCs cause DNA damage and alter gene transcription [3] leading to various gynecological diseases and infertility.
With growing industrialization and exposure to EDCs, women experience challenges with infertility, resulting in dependence on Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) [4]. According to the Center for Disease Control, there were 326,468 ART cycles performed at 449 reporting clinics in the United States during 2020, resulting in 75,023 live births [49]. Overcoming poor oocyte quality is the major limiting factor determining the IVF success rate [50]. Oocytes play a critical role in correcting DNA damage, to prevent apoptosis, and inhibit the transmission of genetic mutations to offspring, and to preserve fertility [3,4].
Cr(VI) rapidly enters cells by mimicking anions through transporters such as sulfate ion transporters [51]. Cellular reductants such as enzymatic and non-enzymatic AOXs convert Cr(VI) into Cr(III), where Cr(III) forms Cr(III)-DNA adducts, causing mutations and DNA strand breaks [51]. Our recent study demonstrated that Cr(VI) caused infertility in rats by increasing F-actin and disrupting mitochondrial function in the MII oocytes [1]. Our previous study reported that gestational exposure to Cr(VI) caused premature ovarian failure (POF) in rats by altering xpnpep-2, a POF marker gene [52]. Environmental and occupational exposures to Cr(VI) increased infertility in women [21]. However, how Cr(VI) affects the integrity of DNA or disrupts spindle assembly by altering microtubules is unknown. A recent study reported that a high dose of Cr(VI) (50 ppm) given to mice for 21 days induced microtubule disruption, which was inhibited by quercetin [33]. Our study, for the first time, reveals that environmentally relevant doses of Cr(VI) (1 and 5 ppm) caused severe oocyte deficiencies, including abnormal and distorted microtubules, incomplete polar body extrusion, increased numbers of misaligned and disintegrated chromosomes with severe spindle abnormality due to increased actin deposition. A study from mouse oocytes revealed that actin depletion drastically affected chromosome alignment during metaphase II [53]. In the current study, the abnormal chromosome attachments to the spindle lead to the disarrangement of chromosomes, and loss of bipolarity due to abnormal deposition and folding of F-actin. There is increasing evidence that actin in the spindle assembly participates in spindle migration and positioning and protects oocytes from chromosome segregation errors leading to aneuploidy [27]. Actin is an integral component of the meiotic machinery that closely interacts with microtubules during all major events of oocyte maturation from the time point of spindle assembly until PB extrusion and metaphase arrest [27]. In healthy oocytes, PB extrusion via polar relaxation occurs via specific weakening of the cortical patch by local depletion of actomyosin contractility [39]. Interestingly, Cr(VI) increased F-actin abundance and thickness of the cortical patch resulting in delayed or incomplete cytokinesis and PB extrusion.
We further explored DNA strand break and oxidative stress to understand the mechanism of chromosome missegregation and disintegration. We established ROS as one of the primary pathways for Cr(VI) to cause apoptosis of the oocytes [54], and placental trophoblasts [55], whereas, antioxidants such as resveratrol [17], edaravone [54] and ascorbic acid [56] mitigated Cr(VI)-induced follicular atresia in rats. Indeed, increased ROS levels in follicular fluid have been associated with poor oocyte and embryo qualities and low pregnancy rates in women [57]. The most important oxygen-free radicals causing damage to basic biomolecules (proteins, membrane lipids, and DNA) is the hydroxyl radical (HO•). Cr(VI) produces HO• by the Fenton reaction, and the HO• attacks DNA strands when it is produced adjacent to cellular and mitochondrial DNA, leading to the generation of various oxidation products [42]. The interaction of HO• with the nucleobases of the DNA strand, such as guanine, leads to the formation of C8-hydroxyguanine (8-OHGua) or its nucleoside form 8-OHdG. The 8-OHdG undergoes keto-enol tautomerism, which favors the oxidized product 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2 -deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG). In the scientific literature, 8-OHdG and 8-oxodG are used for the same compound [40]. Occupational exposure to EDCs such as PAH, benzene, styrene, and inorganic arsenic increase urinary 8-oxodG in workers [58].
Cases of miscarriage and stillbirths due to heavy metal exposure continue to rise in developing nations. Occupational exposure is often cited as a risk factor for female fertility, as well as for early pregnancy loss and pre-term delivery [59]. Whether heavy metals alter DNA in the oocytes or embryos in women due to occupational exposure is unknown. The current data shows that Cr(VI) increases 8-OHdG in the MII oocytes in superovulated rats. An accelerated rate of 8-OHdG excision and migration towards the periphery of the oocytes (extracellular release) under Cr(VI) exposure suggests an upregulation of the BER pathway. Our study supports a recent study where exposure to H2O2 increased excision and migration of the 8-OHdG towards the periphery of the MII oocytes [41]. The oocyte derived BER removes and replaces a single damaged nucleotide by targeting the damaged base. Our study suggests BER as one of the DNA repair mechanisms that oocytes use to defend against Cr(VI)-induced genotoxicity with environmentally relevant Cr(VI) doses.
Consistent with the increase in 8-OHdG, Cr(VI) increased NTY in the MII oocytes, a hallmark of ONOO-, and indicates the interaction between NO and O2.-. ONOO- promotes the nitration of tyrosine residues of cellular proteins, depletes lipid-soluble antioxidants, and initiates lipid peroxidation [60]. Enhanced O2.- and increased production of ONOO- lead to poor oocyte quality in women with endometriosis [60]. ONOO- can cross biological membranes and oxidize iron-sulfur centers of proteins, eventually affecting the oocyte quality [61]. Direct ROS attack on the amino acid side chains changes a protein's tertiary structure and results in protein function alterations. ROS deteriorates the postovulatory MII oocyte quality and integrity [62]. Our previous study showed a positive association between increased NTY accumulation and elevated Cr burden in the human term placenta [20]. Collectively, our data show that Cr(VI) increased oxidative stress of DNA and protein, which adversely affects the genome and proteins (such as microtubules and F-actin) of the MII oocytes, respectively, resulting in severe oocyte deterioration.
DNA damage accumulation increases chromosomal fragmentation and affects meiosis, spindle assembly, and mitochondrial distribution in the oocyte, ultimately affecting embryo development [3]. DSBs are the most toxic of the DNA damage types, which increases deletions, translocations, and fusions in the DNA, resulting in loss of oocyte viability [3]. Pb chromate induced DNA DSB in human lung cells [63]. DNA DSBs represent a major concern for the maintenance of oocyte genomic integrity. If left unrepaired, they can result in meiotic arrest and apoptosis, and if repaired incorrectly, they can potentially lead to delayed or abnormal chromosomal segregation. Aneuploidy, caused by aberrant segregation of chromosomes, can lead to miscarriage or birth defects, such as trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome), and trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome) [64]. Exposure to EDC, aging, and lifestyle factors can contribute to aneuploidy of the oocytes [65,66]. Aging has also been associated with decreased expression of key genes involved in the DNA repair of DSBs in human and mouse oocytes [67]. Therefore, we determined DNA DSB in the MII oocytes in response to Cr(VI). Our data show that Cr(VI) increased DNA DSB, evidenced by increased DNA DSB marker, γ-H2AX.
The homologous recombination DNA DSB repair pathway is the predominant pathway in the oocytes from GV to MII stage, while NHEJ becomes the predominant DNA repair mechanism post-fertilization. DNA repair protein RAD51 homolog 1 (RAD51), a highly conserved protein among species, plays a central role in HR repair of DNA breaks. HR depends on the formation of a RAD51 recombinase filament that facilitates strand invasion [3]. Microinjection of recombinant RAD51 before irradiation prevented irradiation-induced DNA damage in both bovine and mouse oocytes [43]. To determine if Cr(VI) alters the DNA repair mechanism, we investigated RAD51. Cr(VI) activated the expression of RAD51 compared to control oocytes. Thus the current study suggests that Cr(VI) increased DNA DSB, in turn, DNA DSBs induced the activation of DNA damage repair machinery, namely the expression of RAD51. Previous studies show that exposure to EDCs such as BPA [68] and zearalenone [69] caused DNA strand breaks, and elevated RAD51, supporting the current finding.
Taken together, as depicted in the schematic diagram, Figure-9, our data show that Cr(VI) (i) increased oxidative stress to DNA causing base modification and DNA double strand breaks (DSB); (ii) increased oxidative protein damage and disrupted oocyte cytoskeletal proteins F-actin and microtubules; (iii) activated abnormal accumulation and folding of the F-actin filament, resulting in thickened actin cap, incomplete cytokinesis, and delayed PB1 extrusion. (iv) All these cytoskeletal disruptions led to distorted microtubules and misaligned chromosomes, which might lead to aneuploidy, embryo lethality, infertility, or birth defects.
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of the mechanism of Cr(VI)-induced meiotic disruption of MII oocytes. (a) Cr(VI) increased oxidative stress to DNA, (b) causing base modification and DNA double strand breaks (DSB). Cr(VI), after being reduced to Cr(III), forms (c) Cr(III)-DNA adducts. Cr(VI) increased (d) oxidative protein damage and (e) F-actin thickening leading to (f) delayed polar body extrusion. (g) Cr(VI)-induced cytoskeletal disruptions led to distorted microtubules and misaligned chromosomes, accompanied by (h) aberrant DNA repair, which might lead to aneuploidy, embryo lethality, infertility,.
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of the mechanism of Cr(VI)-induced meiotic disruption of MII oocytes. (a) Cr(VI) increased oxidative stress to DNA, (b) causing base modification and DNA double strand breaks (DSB). Cr(VI), after being reduced to Cr(III), forms (c) Cr(III)-DNA adducts. Cr(VI) increased (d) oxidative protein damage and (e) F-actin thickening leading to (f) delayed polar body extrusion. (g) Cr(VI)-induced cytoskeletal disruptions led to distorted microtubules and misaligned chromosomes, accompanied by (h) aberrant DNA repair, which might lead to aneuploidy, embryo lethality, infertility,.
Preprints 71504 g009

Author Contributions

S.K.B designed research and wrote the manuscript; R.C.B., J.A.A., and C.R.L. critically evaluated the paper; L.W carried out experiments and analyzed data, and R.C.B partly contributed to confocal imaging; Funding acquisition from the NIEHS (S.K.B), and Texas A&M Institute of Environmental Health Research (TiCER) (S.K.B, R.C.B, and C.R.L). All authors have read and agreed to the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01-ES025234 to S.K.B), and in part, by the Texas A&M Center for Environmental Health Research (TiCER) pilot project award to S.K.B, R.C.B and C.R.L (P30-ES029067).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This Study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), Texas A&M University.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the use of the Zeiss 780 confocal microscope at the Image Analysis Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, (RRID: SCR_022479). This work was funded, in part, by the grant from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30 ES029067).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wuri, L.; Arosh, J. A.; Wu, J. Z.; Banu, S. K. Exposure to hexavalent chromium causes infertility by disrupting cytoskeletal machinery and mitochondrial function of the metaphase II oocytes in superovulated rats. Toxicology Reports 2022, 9, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Stringer, J. M.; Winship, A.; Liew, S. H.; Hutt, K. The capacity of oocytes for DNA repair. Cell Mol Life Sci 2018, 75, 2777–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Winship, A. L.; Stringer, J. M.; Liew, S. H.; Hutt, K. J. The importance of DNA repair for maintaining oocyte quality in response to anti-cancer treatments, environmental toxins and maternal ageing. Hum Reprod Update 2018, 24, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vessa, B.; Perlman, B.; McGovern, P. G.; Morelli, S. S. Endocrine disruptors and female fertility: a review of pesticide and plasticizer effects. F S Rep 2022, 3, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Munisha, M.; Schimenti, J. C. Genome maintenance during embryogenesis. DNA Repair (Amst) 2021, 106, 103195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Robertson, A. B.; Klungland, A.; Rognes, T.; Leiros, I. DNA repair in mammalian cells: Base excision repair: the long and short of it. Cell Mol Life Sci 2009, 66, 981–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rothkamm, K.; Lobrich, M. Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100, 5057–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, J. W.; Xu, D. Q.; Feng, X. Z. The toxic effects and possible mechanisms of glyphosate on mouse oocytes. Chemosphere 2019, 237, 124435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Y.; Wang, Y. L.; Chen, M. H.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, B. H.; Liu, R.; Xu, L.; He, S. W.; Li, F. P.; Qi, Z. Q.; Wang, H. L. Methoxychlor exposure induces oxidative stress and affects mouse oocyte meiotic maturation. Mol Reprod Dev 2016, 83, 768–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Raghunath, A.; Sundarraj, K.; Nagarajan, R.; Arfuso, F.; Bian, J.; Kumar, A. P.; Sethi, G.; Perumal, E. Antioxidant response elements: Discovery, classes, regulation and potential applications. Redox biology 2018, 17, 297–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Song, Y.; Li, R. Effects of environment and lifestyle factors on anovulatory disorder. Environment and Female Reproductive Health 2021, 113–136. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dabrowska, N.; Wiczkowski, A. Analytics of oxidative stress markers in the early diagnosis of oxygen DNA damage. Adv Clin Exp Med 2017, 26, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Halliwell, B. Can oxidative DNA damage be used as a biomarker of cancer risk in humans? Problems, resolutions and preliminary results from nutritional supplementation studies. Free radical research 1998, 29, 469–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lim, J.; Luderer, U. Oxidative damage increases and antioxidant gene expression decreases with aging in the mouse ovary. Biology of reproduction 2011, 84, 775–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wojsiat, J.; Korczyński, J.; Borowiecka, M.; Żbikowska, H. M. The role of oxidative stress in female infertility and in vitro fertilization. Postepy higieny i medycyny doswiadczalnej (Online) 2017, 71, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Al-Saleh, I.; Coskun, S.; Al-Rouqi, R.; Al-Rajudi, T.; Eltabache, C.; Abduljabbar, M.; Al-Hassan, S. Oxidative stress and DNA damage status in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. Reprod Fertil 2021, 2, 117–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Banu, S. K.; Stanley, J. A.; Sivakumar, K. K.; Arosh, J. A.; Burghardt, R. C. Resveratrol protects the ovary against chromium-toxicity by enhancing endogenous antioxidant enzymes and inhibiting metabolic clearance of estradiol. Toxicology and applied pharmacology 2016, 303, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hall, E. D.; Detloff, M. R.; Johnson, K.; Kupina, N. C. Peroxynitrite-mediated protein nitration and lipid peroxidation in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. Journal of neurotrauma 2004, 21, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Headlam, H. A.; Davies, M. J. Markers of protein oxidation: different oxidants give rise to variable yields of bound and released carbonyl products. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 2004, 36, 1175–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Banu, S. K.; Stanley, J. A.; Taylor, R. J.; Sivakumar, K. K.; Arosh, J. A.; Zeng, L.; Pennathur, S.; Padmanabhan, V. Sexually dimorphic impact of chromium accumulation on human placental oxidative stress and apoptosis. Toxicological Sciences 2018, 161, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, X.-H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.-C.; Jin, L.-F.; Yang, Z.-P.; Jiang, C.-X.; Chen, Q.; Ren, X.-B.; Cao, J.-Z.; Wang, Q. Chronic occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium causes DNA damage in electroplating workers. BMC Public Health 2011, 11, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Singh, P.; Itankar, N.; Patil, Y. Biomanagement of hexavalent chromium: Current trends and promising perspectives. Journal of Environmental Management 2021, 279, 111547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Metzger, L. New Report: CPS Energy’s Calaveras Power Station among nation’s top water polluters; Environment Texas Research & Policy Center: 2022.
  24. Dubey, R.; Verma, P.; Kumar, S. Cr (III) genotoxicity and oxidative stress: An occupational health risk for leather tannery workers of South Asian developing countries. Toxicol Ind Health 2022, 38, 112–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yatera, K.; Morimoto, Y.; Ueno, S.; Noguchi, S.; Kawaguchi, T.; Tanaka, F.; Suzuki, H.; Higashi, T. Cancer risks of hexavalent chromium in the respiratory tract. Journal of UOEH 2018, 40, 157–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Remy, L. L.; Byers, V.; Clay, T. Reproductive outcomes after non-occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium, Willits California, 1983-2014. Environmental Health 2017, 16, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Roeles, J.; Tsiavaliaris, G. Actin-microtubule interplay coordinates spindle assembly in human oocytes. Nature communications 2019, 10, 4651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. MacLennan, M.; Crichton, J. H.; Playfoot, C. J.; Adams, I. R. Oocyte development, meiosis and aneuploidy. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2015, 45, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Campbell, A.; Fishel, S.; Bowman, N.; Duffy, S.; Sedler, M.; Thornton, S. Retrospective analysis of outcomes after IVF using an aneuploidy risk model derived from time-lapse imaging without PGS. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2013, 27, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cimini, D.; Degrassi, F. Aneuploidy: a matter of bad connections. Trends in cell biology 2005, 15, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chang, H.; Li, J.; Zhang, C.; Qian, W. Octocrylene exposure impairs mouse oocyte quality by inducing spindle defects and mitochondria dysfunction. Toxicology 2022, 479, 153306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, S.-X.; Ding, Z.-M.; Ahmad, M. J.; Wang, Y.-S.; Duan, Z.-Q.; Miao, Y.-L.; Xiong, J.-J.; Huo, L.-J. Bisphenol B exposure disrupts mouse oocyte meiotic maturation in vitro through affecting spindle assembly and chromosome alignment. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 2020, 8, 616771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gumus, E.; Sisko, A.; Abas, B. I.; Demirkan, B.; Cevik, O. Quercetin protects mouse oocytes against chromium-induced damage in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 2023, 75, 127087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Henderson, A. L.; Colaiácovo, M. P. Exposure to phthalates: germline dysfunction and aneuploidy. Prenatal Diagnosis 2021, 41, 610–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hunt, P. A.; Koehler, K. E.; Susiarjo, M.; Hodges, C. A.; Ilagan, A.; Voigt, R. C.; Thomas, S.; Thomas, B. F.; Hassold, T. J. Bisphenol A exposure causes meiotic aneuploidy in the female mouse. Current biology 2003, 13, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wellbrock, R.; Rattonetti, A. IS IT CHROMIUM III OR CHROMIUM VI? ARE YOU SURE? ENERGY & AIR, 2013; 113. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhitkovich, A. Chromium in drinking water: sources, metabolism, and cancer risks. Chemical research in toxicology 2011, 24, 1617–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Honeycutt, M. E. Hexavalent chromium in Texas drinking water. Toxicol Sci 2011, 119, 423–4, author reply 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Maddox, A. S.; Azoury, J.; Dumont, J. Polar body cytokinesis. Cytoskeleton 2012, 69, 855–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Valavanidis, A.; Vlachogianni, T.; Fiotakis, C. 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG): a critical biomarker of oxidative stress and carcinogenesis. Journal of environmental science and health Part C 2009, 27, 120–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lord, T.; Aitken, R. J. Fertilization stimulates 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine repair and antioxidant activity to prevent mutagenesis in the embryo. Developmental biology 2015, 406, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Valko, M.; Morris, H.; Cronin, M. Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress. Current medicinal chemistry 2005, 12, 1161–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kujjo, L. L.; Ronningen, R.; Ross, P.; Pereira, R. J.; Rodriguez, R.; Beyhan, Z.; Goissis, M. D.; Baumann, T.; Kagawa, W.; Camsari, C.; Smith, G. W.; Kurumizaka, H.; Yokoyama, S.; Cibelli, J. B.; Perez, G. I. RAD51 plays a crucial role in halting cell death program induced by ionizing radiation in bovine oocytes. Biol Reprod 2012, 86, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Crain, D. A.; Janssen, S. J.; Edwards, T. M.; Heindel, J.; Ho, S.-m.; Hunt, P.; Iguchi, T.; Juul, A.; McLachlan, J. A.; Schwartz, J. Female reproductive disorders: the roles of endocrine-disrupting compounds and developmental timing. Fertility and sterility 2008, 90, 911–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Guillette Jr, L.; Crain, D. Endocrine disrupting contaminants: an evolutionary perspective. Francis and Taylor Inc., Philadelphia 2000, 355.
  46. Bullach, A.; Trapphoff, T.; Zühlke, S.; Spiteller, M.; Dieterle, S. Impact of Nonylphenols and Polyhalogenated Compounds in Follicular Fluid on the Outcome of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection. Reproductive Sciences 2021, 28, 2118–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Eichenlaub-Ritter, U.; Vogt, E.; Cukurcam, S.; Sun, F.; Pacchierotti, F.; Parry, J. Exposure of mouse oocytes to bisphenol A causes meiotic arrest but not aneuploidy. Mutat Res 2008, 651, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Grossman, D.; Kalo, D.; Gendelman, M.; Roth, Z. Effect of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate on in vitro developmental competence of bovine oocytes. Cell Biol Toxicol 2012, 28, 383–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sunderam, S.; Kissin, D. M.; Crawford, S. B.; Folger, S. G.; Jamieson, D. J.; Warner, L.; Barfield, W. D. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance—United States, 2012. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Surveillance Summaries 2015, 64, 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  50. Gilchrist, R. B.; Lane, M.; Thompson, J. G. Oocyte-secreted factors: regulators of cumulus cell function and oocyte quality. Hum Reprod Update 2008, 14, 159–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nickens, K. P.; Patierno, S. R.; Ceryak, S. Chromium genotoxicity: A double-edged sword. Chem Biol Interact 2010, 188, 276–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Banu, S. K.; Stanley, J. A.; Sivakumar, K. K.; Arosh, J. A.; Barhoumi, R.; Burghardt, R. C. Identifying a novel role for X-prolyl aminopeptidase (Xpnpep) 2 in CrVI-induced adverse effects on germ cell nest breakdown and follicle development in rats. Biol Reprod 2015, 92, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mogessie, B.; Schuh, M. Actin protects mammalian eggs against chromosome segregation errors. Science 2017, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Stanley, J. A.; Sivakumar, K. K.; Arosh, J. A.; Burghardt, R. C.; Banu, S. K. Edaravone mitigates hexavalent chromium-induced oxidative stress and depletion of antioxidant enzymes while estrogen restores antioxidant enzymes in the rat ovary in F1 offspring. Biology of reproduction 2014, 91, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Banu, S. K.; Stanley, J. A.; Sivakumar, K. K.; Arosh, J. A.; Taylor, R. J.; Burghardt, R. C. Chromium VI− Induced developmental toxicity of placenta is mediated through spatiotemporal dysregulation of cell survival and apoptotic proteins. Reproductive Toxicology 2017, 68, 171–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Banu, S. K.; Samuel, J. B.; Arosh, J. A.; Burghardt, R. C.; Aruldhas, M. M. Lactational exposure to hexavalent chromium delays puberty by impairing ovarian development, steroidogenesis and pituitary hormone synthesis in developing Wistar rats. Toxicology and applied pharmacology 2008, 232, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Elizur, S. E.; Lebovitz, O.; Orvieto, R.; Dor, J.; Zan-Bar, T. Reactive oxygen species in follicular fluid may serve as biochemical markers to determine ovarian aging and follicular metabolic age. Gynecol Endocrinol 2014, 30, 705–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Carpenter, D. O. Effects of persistent and bioactive organic pollutants on human health; John Wiley & Sons: 2013.
  59. Amadi, C. N.; Igweze, Z. N.; Orisakwe, O. E. Heavy metals in miscarriages and stillbirths in developing nations. Middle East Fertility Society Journal 2017, 22, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Goud, P. T.; Goud, A. P.; Joshi, N.; Puscheck, E.; Diamond, M. P.; Abu-Soud, H. M. Dynamics of nitric oxide, altered follicular microenvironment, and oocyte quality in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2014, 102, 151–159 e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Banerjee, J.; Shaeib, F.; Maitra, D.; Saed, G. M.; Dai, J.; Diamond, M. P.; Abu-Soud, H. M. Peroxynitrite affects the cumulus cell defense of metaphase II mouse oocytes leading to disruption of the spindle structure in vitro. Fertil Steril 2013, 100, 578–84 e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Goud, A. P.; Goud, P. T.; Diamond, M. P.; Gonik, B.; Abu-Soud, H. M. Reactive oxygen species and oocyte aging: role of superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hypochlorous acid. Free Radic Biol Med 2008, 44, 1295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Xie, H.; Wise, S. S.; Wise, J. P., Sr. Deficient repair of particulate hexavalent chromium-induced DNA double strand breaks leads to neoplastic transformation. Mutat Res 2008, 649, 230–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Namgoong, S.; Kim, N. H. Meiotic spindle formation in mammalian oocytes: implications for human infertility. Biol Reprod 2018, 98, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ghosh, A.; Tripathy, A.; Ghosh, D. In Impact of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) on reproductive health of human, Proceedings of the Zoological Society, 2022; Springer: 2022; pp 16-30. [CrossRef]
  66. La Marca, A.; Mastellari, E. Infertility: Epidemiology and etiology. Female Reproductive Dysfunction 2020, 211–233. [Google Scholar]
  67. Winship, A. L.; Stringer, J. M.; Liew, S. H.; Hutt, K. J. The importance of DNA repair for maintaining oocyte quality in response to anti-cancer treatments, environmental toxins and maternal ageing. Human Reproduction Update 2018, 24, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ganesan, S.; Keating, A. F. Bisphenol A-Induced Ovotoxicity Involves DNA Damage Induction to Which the Ovary Mounts a Protective Response Indicated by Increased Expression of Proteins Involved in DNA Repair and Xenobiotic Biotransformation. Toxicol Sci 2016, 152, 169–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Liu, K. H.; Sun, X. F.; Feng, Y. Z.; Cheng, S. F.; Li, B.; Li, Y. P.; Shen, W.; Li, L. The impact of Zearalenone on the meiotic progression and primordial follicle assembly during early oogenesis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2017, 329, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effects of 1 ppm Cr(VI) on microtubule structure and chromosome alignment in rat metaphase II oocytes. Prepubertal rats were exposed to potassium dichromate (1 and 5 ppm) through drinking water from PND 22-29 and superovulated as described [1]. ICC was performed in the MII oocytes, and representative images are shown. Chromosomes are shown in blue (A, E, I, M, Q), F-actin is shown in red (B, F, J, N, R), microtubules are shown in green (C, G, K, O, S), and merged images are shown (D, H, L, P, T). (A-D) Control: Bipolar spindle with normal chromosome alignment. Cr(VI) 1 ppm: (E-H) unfocused chromosome and abnormal spindle with misaligned chromosomes. (I-L) Uneven polar spindle with unfocused poles and chromosomes aligned in three directions. (M-P) Asymmetric multipolar maple leaf-shaped spindle with extremely broad poles and dispersed chromosomes. (Q-T) The bipolar spindle bulged in the middle. (F, J, N, R) shows extreme folding of the F-actin, which tightly surrounds the chromosomes holding together the microtubules (H, L, P, T).
Figure 1. Effects of 1 ppm Cr(VI) on microtubule structure and chromosome alignment in rat metaphase II oocytes. Prepubertal rats were exposed to potassium dichromate (1 and 5 ppm) through drinking water from PND 22-29 and superovulated as described [1]. ICC was performed in the MII oocytes, and representative images are shown. Chromosomes are shown in blue (A, E, I, M, Q), F-actin is shown in red (B, F, J, N, R), microtubules are shown in green (C, G, K, O, S), and merged images are shown (D, H, L, P, T). (A-D) Control: Bipolar spindle with normal chromosome alignment. Cr(VI) 1 ppm: (E-H) unfocused chromosome and abnormal spindle with misaligned chromosomes. (I-L) Uneven polar spindle with unfocused poles and chromosomes aligned in three directions. (M-P) Asymmetric multipolar maple leaf-shaped spindle with extremely broad poles and dispersed chromosomes. (Q-T) The bipolar spindle bulged in the middle. (F, J, N, R) shows extreme folding of the F-actin, which tightly surrounds the chromosomes holding together the microtubules (H, L, P, T).
Preprints 71504 g001
Figure 2. Effects of 5 ppm Cr(VI) on microtubule structure and chromosome alignment in rat metaphase II oocytes. In vivo experiments were performed as shown in the materials and methods and figure-1 legend. Chromosomes are shown in blue (A, E, I, M, Q), F-actin is shown in red (B, F, J, N, R), microtubules are shown in green (C, G, K, O, S), and merged images are shown (D, H, L, P, T). (A-D) Control: Bipolar spindle with normal chromosome alignment. Cr(VI) 5 ppm: (E-H) unfocused chromosome and abnormal spindle with several misaligned chromosomes. (I-L) Tripolar spindle with unfocused poles and chromosomes aligned in three directions. (M-P) Asymmetric multipolar maple leaf-shaped spindle with extremely broad poles and dispersed.
Figure 2. Effects of 5 ppm Cr(VI) on microtubule structure and chromosome alignment in rat metaphase II oocytes. In vivo experiments were performed as shown in the materials and methods and figure-1 legend. Chromosomes are shown in blue (A, E, I, M, Q), F-actin is shown in red (B, F, J, N, R), microtubules are shown in green (C, G, K, O, S), and merged images are shown (D, H, L, P, T). (A-D) Control: Bipolar spindle with normal chromosome alignment. Cr(VI) 5 ppm: (E-H) unfocused chromosome and abnormal spindle with several misaligned chromosomes. (I-L) Tripolar spindle with unfocused poles and chromosomes aligned in three directions. (M-P) Asymmetric multipolar maple leaf-shaped spindle with extremely broad poles and dispersed.
Preprints 71504 g002
Figure 3. Effects of Cr(VI) exposure on microtubule structure and F-actin expression. A: The number of oocytes with dispersed chromosomes and abnormal microtubules was counted and expressed in percentage. Each value is mean + SEM of 100 oocytes from 10 rats. B: Expression of F-actin was determined by immunofluorescence, images were captured by confocal microscopy, and quantified using Image ProPlus software (Media Cybernetics Inc.). a: Control vs. Cr(VI) 1 ppm or 5 ppm; b: Cr(VI) 1 ppm vs. 5 ppm; p<0.05.
Figure 3. Effects of Cr(VI) exposure on microtubule structure and F-actin expression. A: The number of oocytes with dispersed chromosomes and abnormal microtubules was counted and expressed in percentage. Each value is mean + SEM of 100 oocytes from 10 rats. B: Expression of F-actin was determined by immunofluorescence, images were captured by confocal microscopy, and quantified using Image ProPlus software (Media Cybernetics Inc.). a: Control vs. Cr(VI) 1 ppm or 5 ppm; b: Cr(VI) 1 ppm vs. 5 ppm; p<0.05.
Preprints 71504 g003
Figure 4. Effects of Cr(VI) exposure on polar body extrusion. In vivo experiments were performed as shown in the materials and methods and figure-1 legend. Expression of F-actin and microtubules were determined by immunofluorescence, and images were captured by confocal microscopy. Cr(VI) caused thickening of actin cap resulting in incomplete cytokinesis and delayed PB1 extrusion. Representative images of control (A-D), and Cr(VI) 1 ppm (E-L), and 5 ppm (M-T) are shown.
Figure 4. Effects of Cr(VI) exposure on polar body extrusion. In vivo experiments were performed as shown in the materials and methods and figure-1 legend. Expression of F-actin and microtubules were determined by immunofluorescence, and images were captured by confocal microscopy. Cr(VI) caused thickening of actin cap resulting in incomplete cytokinesis and delayed PB1 extrusion. Representative images of control (A-D), and Cr(VI) 1 ppm (E-L), and 5 ppm (M-T) are shown.
Preprints 71504 g004
Figure 5. Effects of Cr(VI) exposure on oxidative DNA damage of the MII oocytes. In vivo experiments were performed as shown in the materials and methods and figure-1 legend. Oxidative DNA damage marker 8-OHdG was determined by immunofluorescence, and images were captured by confocal microscopy and quantified using Image ProPlus software (Media Cybernetics Inc.). Cr(VI) increased 8-OHdG expression. Representative images of control (A-C), 1 ppm Cr(VI) (D-F), and 5 ppm (G-I) are shown. Histogram (J) represents the intensity of staining expressed as IOD. Each value is mean + SEM of ~24 oocytes from 6 rats, p<0.05. a: Control vs. Cr(VI) 1 ppm or 5 ppm.
Figure 5. Effects of Cr(VI) exposure on oxidative DNA damage of the MII oocytes. In vivo experiments were performed as shown in the materials and methods and figure-1 legend. Oxidative DNA damage marker 8-OHdG was determined by immunofluorescence, and images were captured by confocal microscopy and quantified using Image ProPlus software (Media Cybernetics Inc.). Cr(VI) increased 8-OHdG expression. Representative images of control (A-C), 1 ppm Cr(VI) (D-F), and 5 ppm (G-I) are shown. Histogram (J) represents the intensity of staining expressed as IOD. Each value is mean + SEM of ~24 oocytes from 6 rats, p<0.05. a: Control vs. Cr(VI) 1 ppm or 5 ppm.
Preprints 71504 g005
Figure 6. Effects of Cr(VI) exposure on oxidative protein damage of the MII oocytes: In vivo experiments were performed as shown in the materials and methods and figure-1 legend. Oxidative protein damage marker nitrotyrosine (NTY) was determined by immunofluorescence, images were captured by confocal microscopy, and quantified using Image ProPlus software (Media Cybernetics Inc.). Cr(VI) increased NTY expression. Representative images of control (A-D), 1 ppm Cr(VI) (E-H), and 5 ppm (I-L) are shown. Histogram (M) represents the intensity of staining expressed as IOD. Each value is mean + SEM of ~24 oocytes from 6 rats, p<0.05. a: Control vs. Cr(VI) 1 ppm or 5 ppm.
Figure 6. Effects of Cr(VI) exposure on oxidative protein damage of the MII oocytes: In vivo experiments were performed as shown in the materials and methods and figure-1 legend. Oxidative protein damage marker nitrotyrosine (NTY) was determined by immunofluorescence, images were captured by confocal microscopy, and quantified using Image ProPlus software (Media Cybernetics Inc.). Cr(VI) increased NTY expression. Representative images of control (A-D), 1 ppm Cr(VI) (E-H), and 5 ppm (I-L) are shown. Histogram (M) represents the intensity of staining expressed as IOD. Each value is mean + SEM of ~24 oocytes from 6 rats, p<0.05. a: Control vs. Cr(VI) 1 ppm or 5 ppm.
Preprints 71504 g006
Figure 7. Effects of Cr(VI) exposure on DNA double strand break. In vivo experiments were performed as shown in the materials and methods and figure-1 legend. γ-H2AX, the DNA DSB marker, was determined by immunofluorescence, images were captured by confocal microscopy, and quantified using Image ProPlus software (Media Cybernetics Inc.). Cr(VI) activated γ-H2AX expression in a dose-dependent manner. Representative images of control (A-E), 1 ppm Cr(VI) (F-J), and 5 ppm (K-O) are shown. Histogram (P) represents the intensity of staining expressed as IOD. Each value is mean + SEM of ~24 oocytes from 6 rats, p<0.05. a: Control vs. Cr(VI) 1 ppm or 5 ppm; b: Cr(VI) 1 ppm vs. 5 ppm.
Figure 7. Effects of Cr(VI) exposure on DNA double strand break. In vivo experiments were performed as shown in the materials and methods and figure-1 legend. γ-H2AX, the DNA DSB marker, was determined by immunofluorescence, images were captured by confocal microscopy, and quantified using Image ProPlus software (Media Cybernetics Inc.). Cr(VI) activated γ-H2AX expression in a dose-dependent manner. Representative images of control (A-E), 1 ppm Cr(VI) (F-J), and 5 ppm (K-O) are shown. Histogram (P) represents the intensity of staining expressed as IOD. Each value is mean + SEM of ~24 oocytes from 6 rats, p<0.05. a: Control vs. Cr(VI) 1 ppm or 5 ppm; b: Cr(VI) 1 ppm vs. 5 ppm.
Preprints 71504 g007
Figure 8. Effects of Cr(VI) exposure on DNA damage repair protein RAD51. In vivo experiments were performed as shown in the materials and methods and figure-1 legend. RAD51, a DNA damage repair protein, was determined by immunofluorescence, images were captured by confocal microscopy, and quantified using Image ProPlus software (Media Cybernetics Inc.). Cr(VI) increased RAD51 expression in a dose-dependent manner. Representative images of control (A-E), 1 ppm Cr(VI) (F-J), 5 ppm Cr(VI) (K-O), and histogram of staining intensity (IOD) (P) are shown. Each value is mean + SEM of ~24 oocytes from 6 rats, p<0.05. a: Control vs. Cr(VI) 1 ppm or 5 ppm; b: Cr(VI) 1 ppm vs. 5 ppm.
Figure 8. Effects of Cr(VI) exposure on DNA damage repair protein RAD51. In vivo experiments were performed as shown in the materials and methods and figure-1 legend. RAD51, a DNA damage repair protein, was determined by immunofluorescence, images were captured by confocal microscopy, and quantified using Image ProPlus software (Media Cybernetics Inc.). Cr(VI) increased RAD51 expression in a dose-dependent manner. Representative images of control (A-E), 1 ppm Cr(VI) (F-J), 5 ppm Cr(VI) (K-O), and histogram of staining intensity (IOD) (P) are shown. Each value is mean + SEM of ~24 oocytes from 6 rats, p<0.05. a: Control vs. Cr(VI) 1 ppm or 5 ppm; b: Cr(VI) 1 ppm vs. 5 ppm.
Preprints 71504 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated