Preprint Article Version 4 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

State of Charge Estimation Using Deep Neural Networks for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Version 1 : Received: 11 April 2023 / Approved: 11 April 2023 / Online: 11 April 2023 (05:41:54 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 15 April 2023 / Approved: 17 April 2023 / Online: 17 April 2023 (04:30:34 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 18 April 2023 / Approved: 18 April 2023 / Online: 18 April 2023 (04:19:53 CEST)
Version 4 : Received: 18 April 2023 / Approved: 19 April 2023 / Online: 19 April 2023 (03:34:32 CEST)

How to cite: Aryal, A.; Hossain, J.; Khalilpour, K. State of Charge Estimation Using Deep Neural Networks for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Preprints 2023, 2023040203. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202304.0203.v4 Aryal, A.; Hossain, J.; Khalilpour, K. State of Charge Estimation Using Deep Neural Networks for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Preprints 2023, 2023040203. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202304.0203.v4

Abstract

This paper presents an improved SOC estimation method for lithium ion batteries in Electric Vehicles using Bayesian optimized feedforward network. This innovative bayesian optimized neural network method attempts to minimize a scalar objective function by extracting hyperpa-rameters (hidden neurons in both layers) using a surrogate model. Furthemore, the hyperparameters are built and data samples are trained and validated. The performance of the proposed deep learning neural network is evaluated. Two reasonable size data samples are ex-tracted from Panasonic 18650PF Li-ion Mendeley datasets that are used for training and valida-tion. RNN and LSTM neural network algorithms offer the common core property of retaining past information and/or hidden states for better SOC estimation. However, the feature of this pro-posed method is the inclusion of Bayesian optimization that chooses optimal double layer hidden neurons. Analysis of results shows that Bayesian optimized feedforward algorithm with average MAPE (0.20%) is the lowest and is the best selection compared with average MAPE for other five deep learning algorithms. In the last quarter of fuel gauge, where fuel anxiety is severe, feed-forward with Bayesian Optimization algorithm is still the best selection (with MAPE of 0.64%).

Keywords

Electric Vehicles; Battery Management System; Lithium-ion batteries; Deep Learning

Subject

Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 19 April 2023
Commenter: Amit Aryal
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Methodology first paragraph wording
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.