Submitted:
30 March 2023
Posted:
03 April 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study area
2.2. Data collection and analysis
3. Results
3.1. Cone production
3.2. Fertility variation, effective number of parents and gene diversity
3.3. Cumulative contribution curve
4. Discussion
4.1. Cone production
4.2. Fertility variation, effective number of parents and gene diversity
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
References
- Boydak, M. Regeneration of Lebanon cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) on karstic lands in Turkey. For Ecol Manag. 2003, 178, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anonymous. Forest inventory of Turkey, Ankara, 2022. https://www.ogm.gov.tr.
- Koski, V.; Antola, J. National tree breeding and seed production programme for Turkey 1994-2003. The Research Directorate of Forest Tree Seeds and Tree Breeding, Ankara, 1993. https://ortohum.ogm.gov.tr.
- Odabasi, T. Research on cone and seed characters of Cedrus libani. General Directorate of Forestry. Ankara, Turkey, 1990. https://www.ogm.gov.tr.
- Griffin, A.R. (1982). Clonal variation in radiata pine seed orchards. I. Some flowering, cone and seed production traits. Aust. For. Res. 1982, 12, 295–302. http://jkv.50megs.com/afr.html.
- Savolainen, O.; Karkkainen, K.; Harju, A.; Nikkanen, T.; Rusanen, M. Fertility variation in Pinus sylvestris: a test of sexual allocation theory. American Journal of Botany 1993, 80, 1016–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilir, N. Fertility variation in wild rose (Rosa canina) over habitat classes. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2011, 13, 110–114. [Google Scholar]
- Bilir, N.; Catal, Y.; Tekocak, S.; Cercioglu, M. Fertility variation in endemic populations of Ehrami black pine (Pinus nigra Arnold. subsp. Pallasiana var. pyramidata). J. For. Res. 2017, 28, 683–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilir, N.; Kang, K.S. Estimation of fertility variation by strobili and cone productions in Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) populations. IUFRO Forest Tree Breeding Conference August 25-29, 2014, Prague, Czech Republic, p.42. http://www.iufrobreeding2014.org/.
- Bilir, N.; Kang, K.S. Fertility variation, seed collection and gene diversity in natural stands of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani). European Journal of Forest Research 2021, 40, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilir, N.; Ozel, H.B. Fertility variation in a natural stand of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.). International Forestry and Environment Symposium (IFES), 7-10 November, 2017, Trabzon. http://www.ktu.edu.tr/ifes2017.
- Yazici, N.; Bilir, N. Aspectual fertility variation and its effect on gene diversity of seeds in natural stands of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.). IJ. Genomics 2017, 2960624. [CrossRef]
- Eler, U. Seed yield in Calabrian cluster pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) by age. Forest Research Institute, Technical Bulletin No. 225, Antalya, 1990, 78 pp. https://centralanatolia.ogm.gov.tr.
- Kang, K.S.; Bila, A.D.; Harju, A.M.; Lindgren, D. Fertility variation in forest tree populations. Forestry 2003, 76, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bila, A.D.; Lindgren, D. Fertility variation in Milletias thuhlmannii, Brachystegia spiciformis, Brachystegia bohemii and Leucaena leucocephala and its effects on relatedness in seeds. Forest Genetics 1998, 5, 119–129. [Google Scholar]
- Bilir, N.; Kang, K.S.; Lindgren, D. Fertility variation in six populations of Brutian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) over altitudinal ranges. Euphytica, 2005, 141, 163–168. [CrossRef]
- Saatcioglu, F. Silviculture-I. Forestry Faculty of Istanbul University press, Istanbul, 1976. https://cerrahpasa.iuc.edu.tr/.
- SAS. Statistical Analysis System, SAS Institute, Inc. Cary., N.C., USA, 2004. https://www.sas.com.
- Rohlf, F.J.; Sokal, R.R. Statistical Tables. Macmillan. 1995. https://www.scirp.org.
- Kang, K.S.; Lindgren, D. Fertility variation among clones of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis S. et Z.) and its implications on seed orchard management. Forest Genetics 1999, 6, 191–200. [Google Scholar]
- Kang, K.S. Genetic gain and gene diversity of seed orchard crops. Ph.D Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, Silvestria 187, Umeå, Sweden, 2001, pp.75. https://www.upsc.se.
- Shea, K. L. Effects of population structure and cone production on out crossing rates in Engelmann spruce and Subalpine fir. Evolution 41, 1987,124-136. [CrossRef]
- Kamalakannan, R.; Varghese, M.; Park, J.M.; Kwon, S.H.; Song, J.H.; Kang, K.S. Fertility variation and its impact on effective population size in seed stands of Tamarindus indica and Azadirachta indica. Silvae Genetica 2015, 64, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teodosiu, M.; Botezatu, A.; Ciocîrlan, E.; Mihai, G. Variation of cones production in a Silver fir (Abies alba Mill. ) clonal seed orchard. Forests 2023, 14, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, K.S.; Bilir, N. Seed orchards (Establishment, Management and Genetics). OGEM-VAK Press, Ankara, 2021. https://www.ogemvak.org.tr/.
- Kang, K.S.; Lindgren, D. Fertility variation and its effect on the relatedness of seeds in Pinus densiflora, Pinus thunbergii and Pinus koraiensis clonal seed orchards. Silvae Genetica 1998, 47, 196–201. [Google Scholar]








| CCCs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | DF | LC | MC | FC |
| H (m) | 20.3 | 21.2 | 20.0 | 21.6 |
| D0 (cm) | 64.1 | 74.9 | 72.1 | 89.4 |
| d1.30 (cm) | 53.9 | 63.4 | 62.4 | 78.2 |
| CD (m) | 7.3 | 8.9 | 8.4 | 10.0 |
| Age (year) | 121 | 131 | 127 | 139 |
| Altitude (m) | 1632 | 1630 | 1628 | 1628 |
| CCCs | DF | LC | MC | FC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years | Year 1* | Year 2 | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 1 | Year 2 |
| x̄ | 25.2a | 28.3a | 25.5a | 27.1a | 24.6a | 29.8a | 29.5b | 40.3b |
| Range | 11-50 | 9-66 | 10-50 | 10-65 | 10-45 | 10-88 | 10-67 | 8-108 |
| CV | 32.8 | 51.4 | 33.5 | 56.0 | 37.5 | 61.1 | 41.0 | 74.6 |
| CCCs | DF | LC | MC | FC | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years | Year 1 | Year 2 | 1&2 | Year 1 | Year 2 | 1&2 | Year 1 | Year 2 | 1&2 | Year 1 | Year 2 | 1&2 |
| Ψ | 1.11 | 1.26 | 1.12 | 1.11 | 1.31 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.37 | 1.09 | 1.16 | 1.55 | 1.26 |
| Np | 45.23 | 39.71 | 44.60 | 45.04 | 38.25 | 43.73 | 43.95 | 36.62 | 45.79 | 42.92 | 32.35 | 39.60 |
| Nr* | 0.91 | 0.79 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.73 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.65 | 0.79 |
| GD | 0.989 | 0.987 | 0.989 | 0.989 | 0.987 | 0.989 | 0.989 | 0.986 | 0.989 | 0.988 | 0.984 | 0.988 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).