Submitted:
11 March 2023
Posted:
13 March 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials and reagents
2.2. Chili peppers fermentation and extraction
2.3. UHPLC-Q-TOF method
2.4. Data processing and statistical analysis
2.5. FBMN analysis
3. Results
3.1. Global FBMN analysis
3.2. Multivariate statistical analysis
3.3. Identification of taste-active metabolites using VirtualTaste
3.4. KEGG annotation and interpretation of pathway
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Li, X.; Cheng, X.; Yang, J.; Wang, X.; Lü, X. Unraveling the difference in physicochemical properties, sensory, and volatile profiles of dry chili sauce and traditional fresh dry chili sauce fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum PC8 using electronic nose and HS-SPME-GC-MS. Food Bioscience 2022, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y.; Chen, J.; Chen, L.; Hu, T.; Shi, L.; Wan, S.P.; Wang, M. Analysis and control of microbial gas production in fermented chili paste. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.Y.; Zhang, L.; Wen, R.X.; Chen, Q.; Kong, B.H. Role of lactic acid bacteria in flavor development in traditional Chinese fermented foods: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 2741–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Echegaray, N.; Yilmaz, B.; Sharma, H.; Kumar, M.; Pateiro, M.; Ozogul, F.; Lorenzo, J.M. A novel approach to Lactiplantibacillus plantarum: From probiotic properties to the omics insights. Microbiological Research 2023, 268, 127289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Besnard, P.; Passilly-Degrace, P.; Khan, N.A. Taste of Fat: A Sixth Taste Modality? Physiological Reviews 2016, 96, 151–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Cheng, X.; Yang, J.; Wang, X.; Lü, X. Unraveling the difference in physicochemical properties, sensory, and volatile profiles of dry chili sauce and traditional fresh dry chili sauce fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum PC8 using electronic nose and HS-SPME-GC-MS. Food Bioscience 2022, 50, 102057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avula, B.; Katragunta, K.; Wang, Y.-H.; Ali, Z.; Srivedavyasasri, R.; Gafner, S.; Slimestad, R.; Khan, I.A. Chemical profiling and UHPLC-QToF analysis for the simultaneous determination of anthocyanins and flavonoids in Sambucus berries and authentication and detection of adulteration in elderberry dietary supplements using UHPLC-PDA-MS. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 2022, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barathikannan, K.; Chelliah, R.; Yeon, S.J.; Tyagi, A.; Elahi, F.; Vijayalakshmi, S.; Agastian, P.; Arockiasami, V.; Hawn Oh, D. Untargeted metabolomics of fermented onion (Allium cepa L) using UHPLC Q-TOF MS/MS reveals anti-obesity metabolites and in vivo efficacy in Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Chem. 2022, 404, 134710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dadwal, V.; Joshi, R.; Gupta, M. A comparative metabolomic investigation in fruit sections of Citrus medica L. and Citrus maxima L. detecting potential bioactive metabolites using UHPLC-QTOF-IMS. Food Res. Int. 2022, 157, 111486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dadwal, V.; Joshi, R.; Gupta, M. Comparative metabolomics of Himalayan crab apple (Malus baccata) with commercially utilized apple (Malus domestica) using UHPLC-QTOF-IMS coupled with multivariate analysis. Food Chem. 2023, 402, 134529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vinaixa, M.; Schymanski, E.L.; Neumann, S.; Navarro, M.; Salek, R.M.; Yanes, O. Mass spectral databases for LC/MS- and GC/MS-based metabolomics: State of the field and future prospects. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2016, 78, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olivon, F.; Grelier, G.; Roussi, F.; Litaudon, M.; Touboul, D. MZmine 2 Data-Preprocessing To Enhance Molecular Networking Reliability. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 2017, 89, 7836–7840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nothias, L.F.; Petras, D.; Schmid, R.; Duhrkop, K.; Rainer, J.; Sarvepalli, A.; Protsyuk, I.; Ernst, M.; Tsugawa, H.; Fleischauer, M.; et al. Feature-based molecular networking in the GNPS analysis environment. Nat. Methods 2020, 17, 905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Hengchao, E.; Dong, H.; Zhang, Y.; Qiu, J.; Qian, Y.; Zhou, C. Combination of untargeted metabolomics approach and molecular networking analysis to identify unique natural components in wild Morchella sp. by UPLC-Q-TOF-MS. Food Chem. 2022, 366, 130642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.; Bian, X.; Yan, G.; Sun, B.; Miao, W.; Huang, M.; Li, N.; Wu, J.-L. Discovery of novel ascorbic acid derivatives and other metabolites in fruit of Rosa Roxburghii Tratt through untargeted metabolomics and feature-based molecular networking. Food Chem. 2022, 405, 134807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fritz, F.; Preissner, R.; Banerjee, P. VirtualTaste: a web server for the prediction of organoleptic properties of chemical compounds. Nucleic Acids Research 2021, 49, W679–W684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tobolka, A.; Škorpilová, T.; Dvořáková, Z.; Cusimamani, E.F.; Rajchl, A. Determination of capsaicin in hot peppers (Capsicum spp.) by direct analysis in real time (DART) method. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 2021, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsugawa, H.; Ikeda, K.; Takahashi, M.; Satoh, A.; Mori, Y.; Uchino, H.; Okahashi, N.; Yamada, Y.; Tada, I.; Bonini, P.; et al. A lipidome atlas in MS-DIAL 4. Nat Biotechnol 2020, 38, 1159–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Otasek, D.; Morris, J.H.; Bouças, J.; Pico, A.R.; Demchak, B. Cytoscape Automation: empowering workflow-based network analysis. Genome Biology 2019, 20, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blaško, J.; Nižnanská, Ž.; Kubinec, R.; Mikuláš, Ľ.; Nižnanský, Ľ.; Kubincová, J.; Kunštek, M.; Duháčková, Ľ.; Hrčka, R.; Kabát, J.; et al. Simple, fast method for the sample preparation of major capsaicinoids in ground peppers, in potato chips and chilli sauces and their analysis by GC-MS. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 2022, 114, 104733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, P.; Preissner, R. BitterSweetForest: A Random Forest Based Binary Classifier to Predict Bitterness and Sweetness of Chemical Compounds. Frontiers in Chemistry 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferreira, C.R.; Goorden, S.M.I.; Soldatos, A.; Byers, H.M.; Ghauharali-van der Vlugt, J.M.M.; Beers-Stet, F.S.; Groden, C.; van Karnebeek, C.D.; Gahl, W.A.; Vaz, F.M.; et al. Deoxysphingolipid precursors indicate abnormal sphingolipid metabolism in individuals with primary and secondary disturbances of serine availability. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2018, 124, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cao, M.; Gao, M.; Suastegui, M.; Mei, Y.; Shao, Z. Building microbial factories for the production of aromatic amino acid pathway derivatives: From commodity chemicals to plant-sourced natural products. Metab. Eng. 2020, 58, 94–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]





| RT (min) | m/z | Formula | Compounds | Taste trait* | 0 day (mg g−1) | 3 days (mg g−1) | 5 days (mg g−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.037 | 131.0672 | C6H12O3 | 2-Hydroxy-4-methylpentanoic acid | Sour (0.918) | ND | 40.85 | 43.79 |
| 5.486 | 165.0507 | C9H10O3 | 3-Phenyllactic acid | Sour (0.969) | ND | 32.85 | 32.59 |
| 1.46 | 193.0310 | C6H10O7 | D-sorbosonic acid | Sour (0.999) | ND | 6.29 | ND |
| 17.193 | 338.3403 | C22H43NO | Erucamide | Bitter (0.816) | 44.32 | 19.61 | 16.89 |
| 1.44 | 195.0464 | C6H12O7 | Gluconic acid | Sour (0.968) | ND | 47.36 | 30.43 |
| 1.709 | 89.0216 | C3H6O3 | Lactic acid | Sour (0.980) | ND | 185.24 | 117.54 |
| 2.911 | 181.0461 | C9H10O4 | 3-(4-Hydroxyphenyl) lactic acid | Sour (0.941) | ND | 14.92 | 13.66 |
| 1.594 | 203.0520 | C7H8N4O2 | Theophylline | Bitter (0.999) | 106.70 | 51.18 | 38.17 |
| 1.619 | 175.1188 | C6H14N4O2 | Arginine | Sweet (0.893) | ND | 9.73 | ND |
| 7.272 | 211.1428 | C11H18N2O2 | Cyclo(proline-leucine) | Bitter (0.940) | ND | 4.00 | ND |
| 2.757 | 132.1007 | C6H13NO2 | D-Alloisoleucine | Sweet (0.813) | 15.15 | 35.33 | 20.43 |
| 1.763 | 145.0588 | C5H10N2O3 | Glutamine | Sweet (0.964) | 44.31 | ND | 5.66 |
| 2.436 | 132.1008 | C6H13NO2 | Isoleucine | Sweet (0.813) | 47.36 | ND | 24.15 |
| 1.622 | 128.0313 | C5H7NO3 | L-5-Oxoproline | Sweet (0.648) | 23.77 | 55.06 | 67.82 |
| 2.487 | 180.0619 | C9H11NO3 | M-Tyrosine | ND | 0.27 | 8.50 | 2.25 |
| 4.686 | 164.0662 | C9H11NO2 | Phenylalanine | Sweet (0.931) | ND | 53.46 | 60.57 |
| 5.822 | 203.0766 | C11H12N2O2 | Tryptophan | Sweet (0.971) | 29.16 | 26.52 | 18.72 |
| 2.367 | 182.0801 | C9H11NO3 | Tyrosine | Bitter (0.507) | ND | 3.61 | ND |
| 8.223 | 565.1525 | C26H28O14 | Ambocin | Sweet (0.641) | ND | ND | 14.81 |
| 8.269 | 431.0876 | C21H20O10 | Kaempferol-7-O-deoxyhexoside | Sweet (0.505) | ND | 16.90 | 14.63 |
| 8.476 | 287.0539 | C15H10O6 | Luteolin | Bitter (1.000) | ND | 5.03 | ND |
| 13.859 | 302.3032 | C18H39NO2 | Dihydrosphingosine | Sweet (0.575) | ND | 107.95 | 233.32 |
| 8.59 | 329.2247 | C18H34O5 | Fatty acids (18:1;3O) | Sour (0.776) | 20.50 | ND | ND |
| 15.542 | 269.2432 | C17H34O2 | Heptadecanoic acid | Sour (1.000) | 3.63 | 20.05 | 21.59 |
| 12.94 | 318.2981 | C18H39NO3 | Phytosphingosine | Sweet (0.547) | ND | 66.03 | 52.86 |
| 5.278 | 268.1034 | C10H13N5O4 | Adenosine | Bitter (0.814) | 26.33 | ND | 1.51 |
| 9.155 | 353.2274 | C22H28N2O2 | Anileridine | Bitter (0.930) | 8.13 | 20.73 | ND |
| 1.573 | 104.1069 | C5H14NO | Choline | Bitter (0.751) | 29.50 | 23.61 | 17.00 |
| 11.983 | 330.2037 | C20H27NO3 | Hetisine | Bitter (0.865) | ND | 3.43 | ND |
| 6.916 | 177.0148 | C9H6O4 | 6,7-Dihydroxycoumarin | Bitter (0.656) | ND | 42.66 | 41.77 |
| 6.647 | 109.0265 | C6H6O2 | Catechol | Sweet (0.685) | ND | 14.98 | 15.34 |
| 11.422 | 294.2067 | C17H27NO3 | N-Vanillylnonanamide | ND | ND | ND | 3.68 |
| 3.678 | 163.0353 | C9H8O3 | Trans-4-Coumaric acid | Sour (0.654) | ND | ND | 9.63 |
| 1.985 | 360.1497 | C12H22O11 | Isomaltulose | Sweet (0.996) | 1.73 | 4.93 | ND |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).