Version 1
: Received: 5 December 2022 / Approved: 7 December 2022 / Online: 7 December 2022 (09:24:19 CET)
Version 2
: Received: 8 December 2022 / Approved: 9 December 2022 / Online: 9 December 2022 (10:10:08 CET)
How to cite:
Pizà-Mir, B. Validation of the Use of Bloom's Revised Taxonomy as a Tool for the Design of Assessment Tests. Preprints2022, 2022120123. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202212.0123.v2
Pizà-Mir, B. Validation of the Use of Bloom's Revised Taxonomy as a Tool for the Design of Assessment Tests. Preprints 2022, 2022120123. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202212.0123.v2
Pizà-Mir, B. Validation of the Use of Bloom's Revised Taxonomy as a Tool for the Design of Assessment Tests. Preprints2022, 2022120123. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202212.0123.v2
APA Style
Pizà-Mir, B. (2022). Validation of the Use of Bloom's Revised Taxonomy as a Tool for the Design of Assessment Tests. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202212.0123.v2
Chicago/Turabian Style
Pizà-Mir, B. 2022 "Validation of the Use of Bloom's Revised Taxonomy as a Tool for the Design of Assessment Tests" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202212.0123.v2
Abstract
(1) Background: This study aims to validate the use of Bloom's revised taxonomy as an instrument for the design of assessment tests; (2) Methods: A validation has been carried out by external judges, as well as by teachers and students, validating the instrument by means of Aiken's V; (3) Results: Judges, teachers and students consider Bloom's revised taxonomy as an effective tool for the design of assessment tests; (4) Conclusions: Using Bloom's revised taxonomy as a model for designing assessment tests promotes learning.
Keywords
Bloom; Assessment; Validation
Subject
Social Sciences, Education
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received:
9 December 2022
Commenter:
Bartolomé Piza Mir
Commenter's Conflict of Interests:
Author
Comment:
In this new version, changes have been added both in the description of the theoretical framework and the expansion of the results and discussion section.
Commenter: Bartolomé Piza Mir
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author