Preprint Article Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Some Comments on a Time Interval Only Description

Version 1 : Received: 11 September 2022 / Approved: 12 September 2022 / Online: 12 September 2022 (13:03:22 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 20 September 2022 / Approved: 20 September 2022 / Online: 20 September 2022 (11:21:14 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 20 March 2023 / Approved: 21 March 2023 / Online: 21 March 2023 (15:15:29 CET)
Version 4 : Received: 27 September 2023 / Approved: 27 September 2023 / Online: 28 September 2023 (10:27:02 CEST)
Version 5 : Received: 18 March 2024 / Approved: 19 March 2024 / Online: 19 March 2024 (12:54:20 CET)

How to cite: Hollestelle, H.H. Some Comments on a Time Interval Only Description. Preprints 2022, 2022090151. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202209.0151.v2 Hollestelle, H.H. Some Comments on a Time Interval Only Description. Preprints 2022, 2022090151. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202209.0151.v2

Abstract

The time interval description is a natural way to introduce finite intervals, like finite time intervals. This approach depends on results for radiation propagation from star sources, where properties relate to a propagation surface, which is finite for every realistic event and measurement. In contrast the usual vector approach like for Newton’s laws depends on introducing an infinite coordinate system. A time interval only approach necessarily has to start from scratch. Properties for time intervals have to be defined with time intervals. Where the first parts of this paper are devoted to time interval set properties, in the discussion part these are applied to quantities and measurements within astronomy. The introduction provides a survey of results.

Keywords

time interval; measurement event; Noether charge; structure constants; differentiation properties; star source radiation propagation; gravitation

Subject

Physical Sciences, Theoretical Physics

Comments (2)

Comment 1
Received: 20 September 2022
Commenter: Harmen Henricus Hollestelle
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: changes: references and comment 9.
+ Respond to this comment
Comment 2
Received: 24 February 2023
Commenter:
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Comment: New version in preparation, to resolve inaccuracies mostly in the last two paragraphs.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 2
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.