Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Perceived Health Inequalities: Do the UK and US Public Accurately Estimate Socioeconomic Health Inequality, and Do they Wish to See It Reduced?

Version 1 : Received: 14 June 2022 / Approved: 15 June 2022 / Online: 15 June 2022 (08:17:27 CEST)

How to cite: Bridger, E.; Hewett, A.; Comerford, D. Perceived Health Inequalities: Do the UK and US Public Accurately Estimate Socioeconomic Health Inequality, and Do they Wish to See It Reduced?. Preprints 2022, 2022060215. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202206.0215.v1 Bridger, E.; Hewett, A.; Comerford, D. Perceived Health Inequalities: Do the UK and US Public Accurately Estimate Socioeconomic Health Inequality, and Do they Wish to See It Reduced?. Preprints 2022, 2022060215. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202206.0215.v1

Abstract

Objective. It is unknown whether the public accurately estimate socioeconomic health inequality and whether they wish to see it reduced or eliminated. Methods. Representative samples of the UK and US indicated the perceived and ideal lifespan of people working in “higher managerial/professional” and “routine” occupations. We present perceived and desired lifespan ratios for each sample and for key socio-demographic variables. Results. The UK public estimated the lifespan of professionals to be 5.9% longer than routine workers (true value of 5.8%), and 67.8% (UK) and 53.7% (US) participants correctly identified that professionals live longer than routine workers. In both populations, the median respondent expressed equal ideal lifespans for routine workers and professional workers. Conclusion. The UK public appear well-appraised on the average lifespan for professionals and routine workers. Across nationalities and most socio-demographic groups, the median respondent was aware of social class inequalities in lifespan and preferred that they be eliminated.

Keywords

socioeconomic health inequality; public awareness; social class; life expectancy

Subject

Social Sciences, Psychology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.