Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Is Free Early Childhood Education A Sustainable Solution? Evidence from the Case Study of Nanjing

Version 1 : Received: 19 May 2022 / Approved: 20 May 2022 / Online: 20 May 2022 (03:39:51 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 20 May 2022 / Approved: 23 May 2022 / Online: 23 May 2022 (03:42:52 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Qian, Y.; Gu, X.; Li, H. Is Free Early Childhood Education a Sustainable Solution? Evidence from the Case Study of Nanjing. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6586. Qian, Y.; Gu, X.; Li, H. Is Free Early Childhood Education a Sustainable Solution? Evidence from the Case Study of Nanjing. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6586.

Abstract

Many countries have implemented free early childhood education to solve the affordability and accessibility problems without considering the sustainability of policy; thus, they have to discontinue the policy. The city of Nanjing, China, is no exception. This case study adopted a mixed-methods approach to understanding how and why the policy was formulated, implemented, and failed in the city, using the “policy cycle” framework. Altogether 232 kindergarten principals and teaching/research staff were randomly sampled and surveyed, and 5 kindergarten principals and 5 teaching/researcher staff were interviewed. The results indicated that there were many obstacles to the policy’s sustainability, including the conflict of interest, the inefficient policy implementation, the insufficient funding, and more social inequality issues. And the policymakers made mistakes in the five domains of the policy cycle: the context of influence, the context of policy text production, the context of practice, the context of outcomes, and the context of political strategy. Finally, the lessons for a more sustainable policy decision process are discussed.

Keywords

early childhood education (ECE); free early childhood education; policy cycle; sustainability

Subject

Social Sciences, Education

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.