Short Note
Version 4
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Carbon Sequestration via Wood Burial: The Only Fast and Feasible Method
Version 1
: Received: 10 December 2021 / Approved: 13 December 2021 / Online: 13 December 2021 (12:40:47 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 16 February 2022 / Approved: 17 February 2022 / Online: 17 February 2022 (12:02:55 CET)
Version 3 : Received: 18 May 2022 / Approved: 18 May 2022 / Online: 18 May 2022 (15:49:05 CEST)
Version 4 : Received: 9 June 2022 / Approved: 10 June 2022 / Online: 10 June 2022 (15:59:04 CEST)
Version 5 : Received: 8 January 2023 / Approved: 9 January 2023 / Online: 9 January 2023 (01:14:28 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 16 February 2022 / Approved: 17 February 2022 / Online: 17 February 2022 (12:02:55 CET)
Version 3 : Received: 18 May 2022 / Approved: 18 May 2022 / Online: 18 May 2022 (15:49:05 CEST)
Version 4 : Received: 9 June 2022 / Approved: 10 June 2022 / Online: 10 June 2022 (15:59:04 CEST)
Version 5 : Received: 8 January 2023 / Approved: 9 January 2023 / Online: 9 January 2023 (01:14:28 CET)
How to cite: Xu, K. Carbon Sequestration via Wood Burial: The Only Fast and Feasible Method. Preprints 2021, 2021120201. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202112.0201.v4 Xu, K. Carbon Sequestration via Wood Burial: The Only Fast and Feasible Method. Preprints 2021, 2021120201. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202112.0201.v4
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated and compared several major carbon sequestration methods based on the first principles, namely, energy use efficiency and elemental stoichiometry. This study suggested that, at present, wood burial is the only feasible carbon sequestration method because it can be implemented immediately on a large scale, is cost-effective and efficient, has a long sequestration time, has low technical requirements, and has a relatively low impact on agriculture.
Keywords
Carbon sequestration; Elemental stoichiometry; Energy use efficiency; First principle
Subject
Environmental and Earth Sciences, Environmental Science
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (1)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Commenter: Kai Xu
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author