Version 1
: Received: 10 December 2021 / Approved: 13 December 2021 / Online: 13 December 2021 (12:40:47 CET)
Version 2
: Received: 16 February 2022 / Approved: 17 February 2022 / Online: 17 February 2022 (12:02:55 CET)
Version 3
: Received: 18 May 2022 / Approved: 18 May 2022 / Online: 18 May 2022 (15:49:05 CEST)
Version 4
: Received: 9 June 2022 / Approved: 10 June 2022 / Online: 10 June 2022 (15:59:04 CEST)
Version 5
: Received: 8 January 2023 / Approved: 9 January 2023 / Online: 9 January 2023 (01:14:28 CET)
How to cite:
Xu, K. Wood Burial is Currently the Only Fast and Feasible Method of Carbon Sequestration. Preprints2021, 2021120201. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202112.0201.v3
Xu, K. Wood Burial is Currently the Only Fast and Feasible Method of Carbon Sequestration. Preprints 2021, 2021120201. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202112.0201.v3
Xu, K. Wood Burial is Currently the Only Fast and Feasible Method of Carbon Sequestration. Preprints2021, 2021120201. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202112.0201.v3
APA Style
Xu, K. (2022). Wood Burial is Currently the Only Fast and Feasible Method of Carbon Sequestration. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202112.0201.v3
Chicago/Turabian Style
Xu, K. 2022 "Wood Burial is Currently the Only Fast and Feasible Method of Carbon Sequestration" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202112.0201.v3
Abstract
This study analyzed and compared several major methods of carbon sequestration based on the first principles, namely energy use efficiency and elemental stoichiometry. This study suggested that wood burial is the only currently feasible carbon sequestration method because it can be implemented immediately on a large scale, is low cost, efficient, has a long sequestration time, has low technical requirements, and has relatively little impact on agriculture.
Keywords
Carbon sequestration; Elemental stoichiometry; Energy use efficiency; First principle
Subject
Environmental and Earth Sciences, Environmental Science
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Commenter: Kai Xu
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author