Version 1
: Received: 14 January 2021 / Approved: 19 January 2021 / Online: 19 January 2021 (08:41:42 CET)
How to cite:
Bulbuk, O.; Bulbuk, O.; ROZHKO, M. The Localization Subgingival Margins of Cavity: A New Classification. Preprints2021, 2021010364. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202101.0364.v1
Bulbuk, O.; Bulbuk, O.; ROZHKO, M. The Localization Subgingival Margins of Cavity: A New Classification. Preprints 2021, 2021010364. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202101.0364.v1
Bulbuk, O.; Bulbuk, O.; ROZHKO, M. The Localization Subgingival Margins of Cavity: A New Classification. Preprints2021, 2021010364. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202101.0364.v1
APA Style
Bulbuk, O., Bulbuk, O., & ROZHKO, M. (2021). The Localization Subgingival Margins of Cavity: A New Classification. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202101.0364.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Bulbuk, O., Olena Bulbuk and Mykola ROZHKO. 2021 "The Localization Subgingival Margins of Cavity: A New Classification" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202101.0364.v1
Abstract
Background. Restoring large defects with proximal caries extending below the cemento-enamel junction and cavity margins located beneath the gingival tissues represents a very common clinical situation. The aim of this article is to propose a clinical classification of the localization subgingival margins of cavity.Material and methods. Diagnosis is carried out by periodontal probe perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth in the deepest point of the cavity’s margin. To describe the localization subgingival margins of cavity we use exponent which value is equal to the distance (integer number expressed in millimeters) of the level of epithelial attachment to the margin of the cavity. Three periodontal examiners, with >10 years of periodontal practice, were required to attend a calibration session aimed at the validation of the proposed classification. Results. The intrarater and interrater agreement among the localization subgingival margins of cavity: for intrarater agreement ranged from 0.74 to 0.95 (almost perfect agreement), whereas interrater agreement ranged from 0.26 to 0.59 (moderate agreement).Conclusions. The classification the localization subgingival margins of cavity is useful for reaching a more precise diagnosis.
Keywords
subgingival margin; cavity; gum; choice of treatment plan
Subject
Medicine and Pharmacology, Immunology and Allergy
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
