Preprint Article Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Shale Compaction Kinetics

Version 1 : Received: 13 October 2020 / Approved: 14 October 2020 / Online: 14 October 2020 (10:47:42 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 29 November 2020 / Approved: 1 December 2020 / Online: 1 December 2020 (09:24:32 CET)

How to cite: Smith, J.; Smith-Rowland, E. Shale Compaction Kinetics. Preprints 2020, 2020100299. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202010.0299.v2 Smith, J.; Smith-Rowland, E. Shale Compaction Kinetics. Preprints 2020, 2020100299. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202010.0299.v2

Abstract

The grain-to-grain stress vertically in sediments is given by the overburden less the pore fluid pressure, σ, divided by the fraction of the horizontal area which is the supporting matrix , (1 − φ), where φ is the porosity. It is proposed that the fractional reduction of this ratio, Λ, with time is given by the product of φ 4m/3 , (1 − φ) 4n/3 , and one or more Arrhenius functions A exp(−E/RT ) with m and n close to 1. This proposal is tested for shale sections in six wells from around the world for which porosity-depth data are available. Good agreement is obtained above 30-40 C and porosities less than 0.5. Single activation energies for each well are obtained in the range 15-33 kJ/mole, close to pressure solution of quartz, 24 kJ/mol. Values of m and n are in the range 1 to 0.8, indicating nearly fractal pore-matrix spaces and water-wet interfaces. Results are independent of over- or under-pressure of pore water. This model explains shale compaction quantitatively. Given porosity-depth data and accurate activation energy, E, one can infer paleo-geothermal-gradient and from that organic maturity, thus avoiding unnecessary drilling.

Keywords

shale compaction; kinetics, activation energy; pore interfaces; grain interfaces; fractals

Subject

Environmental and Earth Sciences, Atmospheric Science and Meteorology

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 1 December 2020
Commenter: James Smith
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Six fewer figures. Many text revisions. Tables 1 and 3 revised. Abstract changed.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.