Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Symbiont-Mediated Cytoplasmic Incompatibility: What have we Learned in 50 Years?

Version 1 : Received: 13 August 2020 / Approved: 17 August 2020 / Online: 17 August 2020 (04:35:31 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 9 September 2020 / Approved: 11 September 2020 / Online: 11 September 2020 (06:27:07 CEST)

How to cite: Shropshire, J.D.; Leigh, B.; Bordenstein, S.R. Symbiont-Mediated Cytoplasmic Incompatibility: What have we Learned in 50 Years?. Preprints 2020, 2020080350 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202008.0350.v1). Shropshire, J.D.; Leigh, B.; Bordenstein, S.R. Symbiont-Mediated Cytoplasmic Incompatibility: What have we Learned in 50 Years?. Preprints 2020, 2020080350 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202008.0350.v1).

Abstract

Cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is the most common symbiont-induced reproductive manipulation. Specifically, symbiont-induced sperm modifications cause catastrophic mitotic defects in the fertilized embryo and ensuing lethality in crosses between symbiotic males and either aposymbiotic females or females harboring a different symbiont strain. However, if the female carries the same symbiont strain, then embryos develop properly, which imparts a relative fitness benefit to symbiont-transmitting mothers. Thus, CI drives maternally transmitted bacteria to high frequencies in arthropod species worldwide. In the past two decades, CI has experienced a boom in interest due in part to its (i) deployment in successful, worldwide efforts to reduce the spread of mosquito-borne diseases, (ii) causation by bacteriophage genes, cifA and cifB, that modify animal reproductive processes, and (iii) important impacts on incipient speciation. This review serves as a gateway to experimental, conceptual, and quantitative themes of CI and outlines significant gaps in our understanding of CI’s mechanism that are ripe for investigation from a diversity of subdisciplines in the life sciences.

Subject Areas

cytoplasmic incompatibility; Wolbachia; prophage WO; CifA and CifB; symbiosis

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.