Preprint Review Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Detection and Survival of SARS-coronavirus in Human Stool, Urine, Wastewater and Sludge

Version 1 : Received: 16 June 2020 / Approved: 17 June 2020 / Online: 17 June 2020 (13:09:06 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 17 June 2020 / Approved: 18 June 2020 / Online: 18 June 2020 (09:29:00 CEST)

How to cite: Singer, A.; Wray, R. Detection and Survival of SARS-coronavirus in Human Stool, Urine, Wastewater and Sludge. Preprints 2020, 2020060216. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202006.0216.v2 Singer, A.; Wray, R. Detection and Survival of SARS-coronavirus in Human Stool, Urine, Wastewater and Sludge. Preprints 2020, 2020060216. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202006.0216.v2

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed many knowledge gaps with implications toward the speed and nature of our response to contain, assess and mitigate risk. The routine discharge of treated and untreated wastewater into rivers and coastal waters has placed SARS-CoV-2 viability in wastewater at the centre of an emerging hazard and potential risk to water industry workers and the public who come into contact with sewage-impacted water. Here we provide a review of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus primary literature that presents the evidence base pertaining to the key questions of whether the SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 is shed in stool and urine, is recoverable, and infectious in wastewater. We discuss the challenges posed by the current literature base and the extent to which the current evidence is fit for the purpose of informing robust human and environmental risk assessments.

Keywords

SARS-coronavirus; Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome; COVID-19; Stool; Urine; Wastewater; Wastewater-based epidemiology

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Virology

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 18 June 2020
Commenter: Andrew Singer
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: 1) Title changed from SARS to SARC coronavirus. This edit was made throughout as SARS is the disease but we are talking about the virus.
2) Grammatical edits were made throughout.
+ Respond to this comment
Comment 2
Received: 19 June 2020
Commenter: Julian Jones
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Comment: Many thanks for this.

... and 16,000+ England & Wales CSOs, with 26,000+ weirs to disperse as faecal particulates ...

eg BMA Cheltenham & EU WFD Swift-Aquaterra, 2006 : http://www.water21.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Microbial_Standards.pdf

Engineered solutions : http://www.water21.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/EXEMPLAR-ALLEVIATION-OF-FLOODING-CONSEQUENCES-2004.pdf

More details if required.

Best wishes - Julian
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.