Preprint Review Version 2 This version is not peer-reviewed

Nerve, Muscle and Synaptogenesis

Version 1 : Received: 23 September 2019 / Approved: 25 September 2019 / Online: 25 September 2019 (03:22:34 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 27 September 2019 / Approved: 29 September 2019 / Online: 29 September 2019 (05:04:45 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Swenarchuk, L.E. Nerve, Muscle, and Synaptogenesis. Cells 2019, 8, 1448. Swenarchuk, L.E. Nerve, Muscle, and Synaptogenesis. Cells 2019, 8, 1448.

Journal reference: Cells 2019, 8, 1448
DOI: 10.3390/cells8111448

Abstract

The vertebrate skeletal neuromuscular junction (NMJ) has long served as a model system for studying synapse structure, function and development. Over the last several decades a neuron-specific isoform of agrin, a heparan sulfate proteoglycan, has been identified as playing a central role in synapse formation at all vertebrate skeletal neuromuscular synapses. While agrin was initially postulated to be the inductive molecule that initiates synaptogenesis, this model has been modified in response to work showing that postsynaptic differentiation can develop in the absence of innervation, and that synapses can form in transgenic mice in which the agrin gene is ablated. In place of a unitary mechanism for neuromuscular synapse formation, studies in both mice and zebrafish have led to the proposal that two mechanisms mediate synaptogenesis, with some synapses being induced by nerve contact while others involve the incorporation of prepatterned postsynaptic structures. Moreover, the current model also proposes that agrin can serve two functions, to induce synaptogenesis and to stabilize new synapses, once these are formed. This review examines the evidence for these propositions, and concludes that it remains possible that a single molecular mechanism mediates synaptogenesis at all NMJs, and that agrin acts as a stabilizer, while its role as inducer is open to question. Moreover, if agrin does not act to initiate synaptogenesis, it follows that as yet uncharacterized molecular interactions are required to play this essential inductive role. Several alternatives to agrin for this function are suggested, including focal pericellular proteolysis and integrin signaling, but all require experimental validation.

Subject Areas

synapse; agrin; MuSK; Lrp4; neuromuscular junction

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 29 September 2019
Commenter: Lauren Swenarchuk
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: 1. I included 2 new references:
(a) Chakraborty S, Hong W. (2018). Linking Extracellular Matrix Agrin to the Hippo Pathway in Liver Cancer and Beyond. Cancers 10:45. doi: 10.3390/cancers10020045;
(b) Njah K, Chakraborty S, Qiu B, Arumugam S, Raju A, Pobbati AV, Lakshmanan M, Tergaonkar V, Thibault G, Wang X, Hong W. (2019). A role of Agrin in Maintaining the Stability of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 during Tumor Angiogenesis. Cell Rep. 28:949-965. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.036
2.The penultimate paragraph, immediately preceding Concluding Remarks, was modified to include material from these new papers;
3. I have used Name-date mode of referencing
4. I used Arial type, and 2 cm wide margins.
5. I manipulated the Figures and legends, including the use of columns, to improve the overall presentation of the material.
6. I added in a list of abbreviations at the bottom of the Contents page.

Note that I am aware that most of these changes may not appear in any paper published by MDPI, but I am quite in accord with that fact.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.