Preprint Article Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The Optimal Tuning, within Carbon Limits, of Thermal Mass in Naturally Ventilated Buildings

Version 1 : Received: 12 July 2019 / Approved: 15 July 2019 / Online: 15 July 2019 (05:43:16 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 15 July 2019 / Approved: 16 July 2019 / Online: 16 July 2019 (08:50:05 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Abstract

What proportions should a thermally massive building have? How should the thermal mass be distributed? Should the "massing" change with the choice of material? This paper shows how to optimize the physical proportions of a building so that it synchronizes ambient heat exchanges in a natural feedback cycle. The internal mass is thermally coupled with buoyancy ventilation; the cycle is driven by the daily swing of outdoor temperature. Tripling up functions in this way—so that structural materials can reliably cool and power the ventilation for buildings—could help decarbonize the construction industry and provide an effective strategy for adapting to life-threatening heatwaves. Based on harmonic analysis, the method allows designers to thermally tune the form and mass of a building to meet chosen targets for temperature and ventilation in free-running mode. Once the optimal balance of exchange rates is known, design teams can proportionally vary the building height and ventilation openings against the surface area and thickness of an internal thermal mass. The possible permutations are infinite but parametrically constrained, allowing teams to fairly compare the functional and environmental credentials of different construction materials while they produce and evaluate preliminary options for organizing the exterior form and interior spaces of a building. An example study suggests that thin-shell structures of minimum weight, and even timber buildings, may be optimally tuned to produce ample ventilation and temperature attenuation.

Keywords

thermal mass; natural ventilation; thermal resilience; materials design; life cycle analysis; thermal optimization; low carbon

Subject

Engineering, Architecture, Building and Construction

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 16 July 2019
Commenter: Salmaan Craig
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: The article was edited down and resubmitted to meet the word count limit of the journal (10,500 words down to 8000 words). A graphical abstract has also been added
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.