Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Force Prevalence Analysis
Version 1
: Received: 24 May 2019 / Approved: 29 May 2019 / Online: 29 May 2019 (11:14:33 CEST)
How to cite: Schaller, A. Force Prevalence Analysis. Preprints 2019, 2019050349. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201905.0349.v1 Schaller, A. Force Prevalence Analysis. Preprints 2019, 2019050349. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201905.0349.v1
Abstract
The electric field is enormously more powerful than the gravitational field. However, in our normal experience there is no electric field, the electric force is missing. How is it that when you get to larger and larger scales the gravitational field is extremely important whereas the electric field becomes less and less important [1]? This paper proposes a model to explain why gravitation dominates at a larger scale.
Supplementary and Associated Material
http://www.nptel.ac.in/courses/108106073/3: EEE class
http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_01.html: Physics class
Keywords
Field, gravitation, electricity, unification, force, theory.
Subject
Physical Sciences, Particle and Field Physics
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (20)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Kopycheva anastasia
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Gloria de la Flor
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Kim Sabina
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: RODRIGUEZ JOSE LUIS
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Ariel ROCH
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Sergio Raul SCHMIDT
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Dan Giova
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Tayná da Silva
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Guillermo Spinelli
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Spinelli Guillermo
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Josefina
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Alejandro Lucio José López
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Adrian Fernandez
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Nestor Omar Ricciuti
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Alejandro Manuel Gómez
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Matilde de Lara
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Leonardo Luongo
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter: Hyunjeong Son
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Commenter:
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Even though the idea stems from a classical perspective, it includes a consideration regarding quantum mechanics; namely the adoption of Bohr’s first orbital radius (a quantized magnitude).