Han, Q.; Ke, G.Y.; Zhu, Y.; Lin, H. A Two-Stage Decision Framework for Resolving Brownfield Conflicts. Preprints2019, 2019020206. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201902.0206.v1
APA Style
Han, Q., Ke, G.Y., Zhu, Y., & Lin, H. (2019). A Two-Stage Decision Framework for Resolving Brownfield Conflicts. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201902.0206.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Han, Q., Yuming Zhu and Hongli Lin. 2019 "A Two-Stage Decision Framework for Resolving Brownfield Conflicts" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201902.0206.v1
Abstract
Based on the Graph Model of Conflict Resolution (GMCR), a two-stage decision framework is developed to reveal the essence of brownfield incidents and facilitate the resolution of brownfield conflicts caused by the incidents. More particularly, the forward GMCR is utilized in Stage I, the negotiation stage, to simulate the evolution of a brownfield conflict (BC) and predict its potential resolution via stability analysis. If no acceptable equilibrium can be obtained, the BC progresses into Stage II, the third-party-intervention stage, where the inverse GMCR is used to assist a third party in intervening the conflict to achieve a desirable outcome. To illustrate the practicality of this framework, a recent BC occurred in Changzhou, China, is taken as a case study. Invaluable insights are provided through the computation and investigation of the corresponding preference relationships.
Keywords
Graph Model of Conflict Resolution; Brownfields; Inverse problem; Negotiation; Third party intervention
Subject
Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
