Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Bolton's Ratios: Normal Occlusion and Malocclusion

Version 1 : Received: 12 February 2019 / Approved: 18 February 2019 / Online: 18 February 2019 (17:17:20 CET)

How to cite: Machado, V..; Botelho, J.; Mascarenhas, P..; João Mendes, J..; Delgado, A.. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Bolton's Ratios: Normal Occlusion and Malocclusion. Preprints 2019, 2019020169 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201902.0169.v1). Machado, V..; Botelho, J.; Mascarenhas, P..; João Mendes, J..; Delgado, A.. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Bolton's Ratios: Normal Occlusion and Malocclusion. Preprints 2019, 2019020169 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201902.0169.v1).

Abstract

Introduction: The purposes of this study were to seek for overall ratio (OR) and anterior ratio (AR) patients data in normal occlusion and Angle’s malocclusion studies, and to assess if such results support Bolton’s standards as general references. Methods: Pubmed, Medline, CENTRAL and Scholar databases were searched up to February 2018 (CRD42018088438). Gray literature was explored through OpenGray. Non-randomized clinical studies, published in English and assessing Bolton’s OR and AR in normal occlusion and Angle’s malocclusion groups (Class I, Class II, Class II division 1, Class 2 division 2, Class III) patients were included. OR and AR means and standard deviations (SD) were collected. Potential covariates (study design, publication year, country where the study was conducted, number of cases, gender, mesiodistal measurement method, and calibration method) were also extracted. The National Health Heart Lung, and Blood Institute’s Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies was used to assess each included studies quality. Pairwise Random-Effects and Multilevel Bayesian Network Meta-Analyses were used to synthesize available data. Results: Fifty-two observational studies were included (8872 participants; male/females 2674/3272; 16 studies lacked gender information). For normal occlusion, global pooled estimates for OR and AR means were 91.74% (95% CI: 91.37-92.10) and 78.24% (95% CI: 77.85-78.63), respectively. We could identify on Angle’s Class III patients meaningful OR and AR mean deviations from normal occlusion (0.89, 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.66-1.12, and 0.66, 95% CrI, 0.38-0.94, respectively), while on Class I patients we found a meaningful mean deviation from normal occlusion only for OR (0.25, 95% CrI, 0.03-0.47). Concerning gender impact, male patients presented higher OR (0.30, 95% CI 0.00-0.59) and AR (0.41, 95% CI 0.00-0.83) mean values than females in Class I. Conclusions: The results show that global pooled OR and AR mean values for normal occlusion patients are slightly above Bolton’s original values. Class I, for OR mean values, and Class III, for both OR and AR, are proportionally larger than normal occlusion patients. Gender had almost no impact on teeth mesiodistal proportion.

Subject Areas

Tooth size; Tooth size discrepancy; Bolton ratios; Meta-analysis; Systematic review

Readers' Comments and Ratings (0)

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.