Acute vertigo and dizziness are frequent presenting symptoms in patients on the emergency department. With a broad differential diagnosis and symptoms/signs often subtle and transient, the diagnostic approach to the dizzy patient remains challenging. Previous work emphasized the value of combining structured history-taking and a targeted examination focusing on subtle oculomotor signs. Here I review different bedside algorithms proposed for the acutely dizzy patient. Comparing area-under-the-curve ROC-characteristics and sensitivity/specificity, highest diagnostic accuracy was observed for algorithms focusing on subtle oculomotor signs. Both the HINTS+ bedside-exam and the STANDING algorithm have demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy for identifying strokes than early (<24-48h after symptom-onset) MRI-DWI. Importantly, HINTS and STANDING require moderate training to allow reliable application. Thus, for physicians lacking dedicated training, other approaches are needed. Various scores that rely on vascular risk-factors, clinical symptoms and focal neurologic findings have been proposed (e.g., ABCD2-score, PCI-score, TriAGe+-score). While these scores are more readily applicable for frontline providers, they provide intermediate diagnostic accuracy at best and often lack external validation, thus are an insufficient substitute for algorithms assessing subtle oculomotor findings. Providing dedicated training in HINTS+ or STANDING techniques will be key to improve the diagnostic accuracy and to avoid unnecessary brain imaging.

Critically ill patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) can present many abdominal conditions that need a prompt diagnosis and timely treatment because of their general frailty. Clinical evaluation and diagnostic tools like ultrasound or CT scan are not reliable or feasible in these patients. Bedside laparoscopy (BSL) is a minimally invasive procedure that allows surgeons to assess the abdominal cavity directly in the ICU, thus avoiding unnecessary exploratory laparotomy or incidence related to intra-hospital transfer. We conducted a review of the literature to summarize the state-of-the-art of BSL. Medline, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Scopus databases were utilized to identify all relevant publications. Indications, contraindications, technical aspects, and outcomes are discussed. The procedure is safe, feasible, and effective. When other diagnostic tools fail to diagnose or exclude an intra-abdominal condition in ICU patients, BSL should be preferred over exploratory laparotomy.

Background: This study presents the experience gained in the Newborn Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at “M. S. Curie” Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children in Bucharest after performing a series of bedside surgery interventions on newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). We evaluate the advantages, complications, immediate and long-term outcome as well as the morbidity. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the data for all patients operated on-site be-tween 2011 and 2020, in terms of pre- and post-operative stability, procedures performed, com-plications and outcomes. Results: Our study is based on data from ten cases of newborns, term or small for gestation age with birthweights ranging from 2300 to 3300 grams, operated, on average, on the fifth day of life. The main reasons for operating on-site were the hemodynamical instability and the need to ad-minister inhaled Nitic Oxide (iNO) and HFOV ventilation. There were no unforeseen events dur-ing surgery, no immediate postoperative complications and no surgery related mortality. One noticed drawback was the unfamiliarity of the surgery team with the new operating environment. Conclusions: Our experience indicates that bedside surgery improves the likelihood of survival for critically ill neonates suffering from CDH. No immediate complications could be associated with this practice. Keywords: congenital diaphragmatic hernia, severe pulmonary hypertension, bedside surgery, NICU infrastructure