Background: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common disease in otolaryngology characterized by an inflammatory reaction of the mucosa of the upper aerodigestive tract caused by digestive refluxate enzymes. LPR has been identified as etiological or favoring factor of laryngeal, oral, sinonasal or otological diseases. In this case-series, we reported atypical clinical presentation of LPR in patients presenting in our clinic with reflux. Methods: A retrospective medical chart review of 351 patients with LPR treated in the European Reflux Clinic in Brussels, Poitiers and Paris was performed. In order to be included, patients had to report atypical clinical presentation of LPR, consisting of symptoms or findings that are not described in reflux symptom score and reflux sign assessment. The LPR diagnosis was confirmed with 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance pH-study and patients were treated with a combination of diet, proton pump inhibitors and alginates. The atypical symptoms or findings had to be resolved from pre- to posttreatment Results: From 2017 to 2021, 21 patients with atypical LPR were treated in our center. The clinical presentation consisted of recurrent aphthosis or burning mouth (N=9), recurrent burps and abdominal disorders (N=2), posterior nasal obstruction (N=2), recurrent acute suppurative otitis media (N=2), severe vocal fold dysplasia (N=2), and recurrent acute rhinopharyngitis (N=1), tearing (N=1), aspirations (N=1) or tracheobronchitis (N=1). Abnormal upper aerodigestive tract reflux events were identified in all of these patients. Atypical clinical findings resolved and did not recur after an adequate anti-reflux treatment. Conclusion: LPR may present with various clinical presentations including mouth, eye, tracheobronchial, nasal or laryngeal findings, which may all regress with an adequate treatment. Future studies are needed to better specify the relationship between LPR and these atypical findings through analyses identifying gastroduodenal enzyme in the enflamed tissue.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a prevalent disease in the general population and may have acute or chronic clinical presentation. LPR may be misdiagnosed in primary care medicine regarding the lack of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and the lack of findings at the gastrointestinal endoscopy. Depending on the physician field of expertise and experience, LPR may be clinically over- or under-diagnosed. The management of LPR is possible in primary care medicine but primary care physician has to consider some red flags that requires to address the patient to otolaryngologist or gastroenterologist. The use of patient-reported outcome questionnaire such as reflux symptom score-12 and the consideration of some oral and pharyngeal findings visualized through the mouth opening may help the primary care physician to evaluate the LPR findings at the diagnosis time and throughout treatment. In this review, we provide a practical algorithm of management of LPR for primary care physician or other specialists that cannot perform fiberoptic examination. In this algorithm, physician has to exclude some confounding conditions such as allergy or other causes of pharyngolaryngitis and red flags. Physician may prescribe an empirical treatment based on diet and behavioral changes with or without medication, depending on the complaint severity of the patient. In case of prescription of medication, proton pump inhibitors and alginate have to be considered in association to protect the upper aerodigestive tract mucosa from acid, weakly acid and alkaline pharyngeal reflux events.

Marangoni flow in foam fractionation in the lamellar film for the interior and exterior of a micro-foam was investigated. The three-dimensional node-film-Plateau Border system was modeled using computational fluid dynamics. The importance of the surfactant concentration of the foam fractionation column and air-liquid interface mobility on the Marangoni velocity in the film was emphasized. The study found that an increase in surfactant concentration in the reflux column significantly increases the Marangoni velocities. Additionally, a mobile interface results in a higher Marangoni flow, while a rigid interface leads to less intensive flow. The behavior of the Marangoni flow in both interior and exterior foam was explored, revealing that the flow in exterior foam has different behavior due to the presence of the wall, which reduces the Marangoni velocity compared to interior films.