It is currently believed that the cause of superior mesenteric artery syndrome (SMAS) is compression of the duodenum in the angle between the aorta and superior mesenteric artery (SMA). It is recognized that a decrease in aortomesenteric angle (AMA) <25° and intervascular distance < 8 mm, caused by fat loss, is characteristic of SMAS. Based on these statements, surgeons operate on patients with symptoms of dyspepsia only based on a reduction of AMA. This study is devoted to the analysis of the literature, including four own studies on this issue. Results: Measurement of the length of the constriction in the third part of the duodenum on radiograms from available sources showed that its true length ranged from 2.5 to 4.2 (3.30±0.15) cm and began a few centimeters cranial to the AMA. Therefore, it could not have been caused by compression in the AMA. In terms of length (3.20±0.15 cm) and location, this constriction corresponded to Ochsner’s sphincter, which normally short-term contracts to prevent the penetration of an acid bolus into the jejunum. Conscientious studies have shown that AMA is proportional to BMI, i.e., a decrease in AMA is observed in all thin people. An analysis of 211 cases of SMAS made it possible to differentiate two types of diseases. In 101 patients, the disease occurred acutely 1–53 (8.2 ± 1.9) days after stressful situations, accompanied by a catabolic reaction and hypersecretion of hydrochloric acid. In 110 patients, SMAS developed 3-72 (17.2±3.2) months after the diagnosis of acid-dependent diseases. Conclusion: The analysis of the literature led to the conclusion that hypersecretion of hydrochloric acid causes damage to the upper level of the digestive system, including duodenal dyskinesia. One of the manifestations of duodenal dyskinesia is an increase in tone and hypertrophy of the Ochsner’s sphincter. The clinic of the disease depends on the varying degree of Ochsner’s sphincter dyskinesia. In severe cases, partial or complete intestinal obstruction. New ideas about the etiology and pathogenesis of the so-called SMAS have made it possible to propose a tactic for the diagnosis and treatment of Ochsner’s sphincter dyskinesia, where there is no place for surgical treatment.

Modern gastroenterology, which occupies the pages of scientific journals without alternative, began as an initiative of manufacturers of diagnostic equipment. For widespread advertising, they selected practical doctors who were not familiar with the methodology of science and superficial knowledge of physiology. This is how a group led by DeMeester arose, which in 1976 published the DeMeester score, i.e., the normal limit for esophageal pH monitoring. pH <4, less than 4% of the time per day was considered normal, i.e., it was unreasonably claimed that such reflux is physiological. This article proves that this study was carried out with numerous methodological errors, which led to an erroneous conclusion. For a long time, pH monitoring was considered the gold standard and with its help hypotheses were proposed that form the basis of modern gastroenterology. The article proves the fallacy of 13 hypotheses, which are presented as theories. Numerous articles using pH monitoring have publicized this method. Practitioners became "great scientists", equipment manufacturers became successful businessmen. Over time, they found other groups of practitioners to promote devices for impedance ph monitoring, high-resolution manometry, and many others. At the same time, a network of reviewers who believe in the infallibility of the luminaries do not allow studies that contradict their faith to be published. Thus, fundamental science was destroyed, which alone could assess the harm of false research both for science and for patients. Conclusion This study provides a list of hypotheses, that were previously considered theories, but since scientific evidence has proven these assumptions to be false, they should be excluded from subsequent use and citation.

There is a growing appreciation in the fields of Cell and Developmental Biology that cells collectively process information in time and space. While many powerful molecular tools exist to observe biophysical dynamics biologists must find ways to quantitatively understand these phenomena at the systems level. Here, we present a guide for application of well-established information theory metrics to biological datasets and explain these metrics using examples from cell, developmental and regenerative biology. We introduce a novel computational tool (CAIM) for simple, rigorous application of these metrics to timeseries datasets. Finally, we use CAIM to study calcium and cytoskeletal Actin information flow patterns between Xenopus laevis embryonic animal cap stem cells. The tools that we present here will enable biologists to apply information theory to develop systems level understanding of a diverse array of experimental systems.

All living cells maintain a charge distribution across their cell membrane (membrane potential) by carefully controlled ion fluxes. These bioelectric signals regulate cell behavior (such as migration, proliferation, differentiation) as well as higher-level tissue and organ patterning. Thus, voltage gradients represent an important parameter for diagnostics as well as a promising target for therapeutic interventions in birth defects, injury, and cancer. However, despite much progress in cell and molecular biology, little is known about bioelectric states in human stem cells. Here, we present simple methods to simultaneously track ion dynamics, membrane voltage, cell morphology, and cell activity (pH and ROS), using fluorescent reporter dyes in living human neurons derived from induced neural stem cells (hiNSC). We developed and tested functional protocols for manipulating ion fluxes, membrane potential, and cell activity, and tracking neural responses to wounding and re-innervation in vitro. Finally, using morphology sensor, we tested and quantified the ability of physiological actuators (neurotransmitters and pH) to manipulate nerve wound re-innervation. These methods are not specific to a particular cell type and should be broadly applicable to the study of bioelectrical controls across a wide range of combinations of models and endpoints.

Nervous systems and brains’ computational abilities are an evolutionary innovation, specializing and speed-optimizing ancient biophysical dynamics. Bioelectric signaling originated in cells’ communication with the outside world and with each other, in order to cooperate toward adaptive construction and repair of multicellular bodies. Here we review the emerging field of developmental bioelectricity, which links the field of basal cognition to state-of-the-art questions in regenerative medicine, synthetic bioengineering, cognitive science, and even machine learning and artificial intelligence. One of the predictions of this view is that regeneration and regulative development are able to restore correct large-scale anatomies from diverse starting states because, like the brain, they exploit bioelectric encoding of distributed goal states - in this case, pattern memories. Based on this idea, we propose a new interpretation of recent stochastic regenerative phenotypes in planaria, by appealing to computational models of memory representation and processing in the brain. Moreover, we discuss novel findings showing that bioelectric changes induced in planaria can be stored in tissue for over a week, thus revealing that somatic bioelectric circuits in vivo can implement a long-term, re-writable memory medium. A consideration of the mechanisms, evolution, and functionality of basal cognition makes novel predictions and provides an integrative perspective on the evolution, physiology, and biomedicine of information processing in vivo.

Breast cancer is a complex and heterogeneous disease that displays diverse molecular subtypes and clinical outcomes. Although it is known that the location of tumors can affect their biological behavior, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. In our previous study, we found a differential methylation profile and membrane potential between left (L) and right (R)-sided breast tumors. In this current study, we aimed to identify the ion channels responsible for this phenomenon and determine any associated phenotypic features. To achieve this, experiments were conducted in mammary tumors in mice, human patient samples, and with data from public datasets. The results revealed that L-sided tumors have a more depolarized state than R-ones. We identified a 6-ion channel-gene signature (CACNA1C, CACNA2D2, CACNB2, KCNJ11, SCN3A, and SCN3B) associated with side: L-tumors exhibit lower expression levels than R-ones. Additionally, in silico analyses show that the signature correlates inversely with DNA methylation writers and with key biological processes involved in cancer progression, such as proliferation and stemness. The signature also correlates inversely with patients’ survival rates. In an in vivo mouse model, we confirmed that KI67 and CD44 markers were increased in L-sided tumors and similar tendency for KI67 was found in patient L-tumors. Overall, this study provides new insights into the potential impact of anatomical location on breast cancer biology and highlights the need for further investigation into possible differential treatment options.