Submitted:
17 September 2026
Posted:
18 September 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Operational energy is increasingly shaped by coupled dependencies among physical energy systems, digital control, logistics, and mission functions, particularly under contested and communications-degraded conditions. This critical narrative review argues that operational energy should therefore be treated as a strategic technology architecture rather than primarily as a fuel, power, or logistics problem. The principal conceptual contribution is a three-layer Operational Energy Architecture (OEA) linking physical energy, digital intelligence and control, and mission capability through explicit interfaces, dependencies, and operational feedback. The framework uses mission-thread integration to trace operational effects through energy, information, control, logistics, and human dependencies and treats disruption, degraded operation, recovery, and capability transition as architecture-level concerns. The review further distinguishes technical performance from the strength of evidence supporting mission-level claims and proposes a mission-oriented basis for comparing alternative architectures. The central conclusion is that operational-energy value emerges from the integrated ability to sustain and recover required mission effects under stated disruption and support conditions, rather than from the maturity or performance of individual technologies in isolation.
Keywords:
operational energy
; contested logistics
; mission engineering
; cyber-physical resilience
; military energy resilience
; digital engineering
; digital twins
; capability transition
; mission assurance
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.