Submitted:
01 September 2026
Posted:
02 September 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Chelerythrine has recently been proposed as a therapeutic candidate for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) based on its reported effects on proliferation, apoptosis, migration, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and miR-21/PTEN/PI3K/AKT signaling. However, the central experimental models used to support this conclusion, namely the 5-8F and 6-10B cell lines, have been reported to be HeLa-derived, HeLa-contaminated, or otherwise misidentified rather than authentic NPC cell lines. This raises major concerns regarding the disease-specific interpretation of the reported findings. Although the data may indicate pharmacological activity of chelerythrine in the tested cellular background, they do not establish anti-NPC efficacy. Similarly, xenograft experiments using 5-8F cells cannot be interpreted as valid NPC models if the implanted cells are misidentified. The proposed miR-21/PTEN/PI3K/AKT mechanism may be internally consistent but remains unvalidated in authentic NPC systems. To support translational claims, key experiments should be repeated in authenticated NPC models, ideally including Epstein-Barr virus-positive and Epstein-Barr virus-negative systems, patient-derived organoids or xenografts, and models that recapitulate orthotopic tumor growth or metastatic disease. This short communication highlights the need for rigorous cell line authentication before proposing disease-specific therapeutic conclusions.
Keywords:
nasopharyngeal carcinoma
; chelerythrine
; miR-21
; PTEN
; PI3K/AKT
; HeLa contamination
; cell line authentication
; misidentified cell lines
; 5-8F
; 6-10B
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.